Citations

Abstract Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) poses significant clinical challenges due to its rising incidence and potential for metastasis. Histopathologic risk stratification is further limited by substantial inter-observer variability. Unsupervised AI approaches based on content-based image retrieval offer scalable and interpretable decision support for diagnostic pathology. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of image retrieval within histopathology atlases to stratify cSCC tumor differentiation from whole-slide images (WSIs), while comparing different patch selection and feature extraction strategies. This retrospective study included 552 archived WSIs comprising 385 well-differentiated, 102 moderately differentiated, and 66 poorly differentiated cases collected across Mayo Clinic sites in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. Image atlases were constructed using multiple patch aggregation strategies (Mosaic, Collage, and Montage) and deep learning encoders (KimiaNet, PathDino, and H-Optimus-0). A leave-one-WSI-out evaluation framework was used to assess differentiation classification performance using accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and F1 score. Mosaic combined with KimiaNet achieved the highest Top-1 accuracy (74.9%) and specificity (92.6%), while Mosaic with H-Optimus-0 yielded the best Top-5 accuracy (79.0%) and macro-F1 score (62.6%). Collage combined with KimiaNet produced the highest Top-5 specificity (99.5%). The generalizability of the evaluated AI models varied across hospitals, reflecting differences in imaging protocols, staining practices, and patient populations. Overall, unsupervised image search and retrieval provides effective, annotation-free support for cSCC differentiation and has the potential to enhance dermatopathology workflows when appropriate combinations of patch selection and feature ex-traction methods are employed.

Abstract Introduction Cannabidiol has been shown to exert significant anti-inflammatory effects and has demonstrated efficacy in murine models of autoimmune myocarditis, pericarditis, and heart failure. The ARCHER Study assessed whether a pharmaceutically produced cannabidiol formulation showed beneficial effects on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) endpoints known to predict prognosis in this patient population. Methods In a multicentre international double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 study, we randomly assigned 109 patients within 10 days of CMR confirmed diagnosis of acute myocarditis to 12 weeks of pharmaceutically produced oral cannabidiol (active) or placebo. Dose was titrated up to 10 mg/kg of body weight twice daily. Primary endpoints were the difference in extracellular volume (ECV) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) measured by CMR at week 12. Other CMR endpoints included left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), LV mass, intracellular volume (ICV), LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LVEDV, LVESV), and left-atrial end-systolic volume (LAESV). Results All randomized patients (56 active/53 placebo) completed the study with no loss to follow-up. Study drug appeared safe and well tolerated. Baseline mean ECV 38.9 ± 10.9 ml, GLS −15.3 ± 3.6%, and LVEF 60.6 ± 9.9% were consistent with mild to moderate myocarditis and predominantly intact LV function. Week 12 mean ECV was 33.6 ml in the active group and 37.3 ml in the placebo group, a difference of −3.7 ml, confidence interval (CI): −7.4 to 0.1; P = .0538; GLS was −16.0% in the active group and −15.9% in the placebo group, difference of −0.1, CI: −1.2 to 1.1; P = .90. Left ventricular mass was significantly reduced in the active group at 121.1 g compared to placebo 130.3 g, a difference of −9.2, CI: −16.4 to −2.1; P = .0117. In terms of remodelling, LAESV was significantly reduced in the active group (−8.1 ml; P = .0376) while the reduction in LVEDV failed to reach significance (−7.4 ml; P = .098). Conclusion In mild-to-moderate acute myocarditis, treatment with pharmaceutically manufactured cannabidiol was not associated with a statistically significant change in myocardial ECV or GLS, although a trend towards reduction in ECV was observed. In addition, improvement in other potential markers of myocardial recovery, including a significant reduction in LV mass, was seen in the active treatment group. Further investigation of the therapeutic potential of this therapy in inflammatory cardiac conditions is warranted.

Abstract Background Bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid with or without moxifloxacin (BPaL/M) are recommended oral 6-month treatment regimens for multidrug- or rifampin-resistant (MDR/RR) tuberculosis (TB). Since the US rollout of these regimens in 2019, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and partners have identified patients who failed or relapsed on these regimens. Methods Here, we report a case series of US patients with TB treated with BPaL/M-containing regimens, who experienced adverse outcomes during the period 2022‒2024, including drug resistance, relapse, and treatment failure. Results Clinical and public health outcomes were significant for US patients reported. There were 8 patients identified (n = 8). 5 (62.5%) were male, with a median age 57 years, 2 (25%) were previously treated for TB, and 8 (100%) presented with cavitary disease. This included a patient who died from infectious TB with acquired resistance after exposing over 100 healthcare workers, a waitress who was found to have highly infectious TB at the time of her relapse, and a son who contracted Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) with reduced activity to bedaquiline from his mother in a household transmission event. Conclusions These patients highlight consequences, both for the individual and public health, of relapse and treatment failure in real-life operational settings that may not be readily evident in well-controlled and well-resourced clinical trials. Despite the advent of shorter and better tolerated bedaquiline-based regimens, US clinicians continue to face challenges in managing drug-resistant TB. These data support the need for expert management of these patients beyond routine TB care, as well as the need for close monitoring and follow-up months after treatment completion.

Background: There is growing recognition of the importance of patient-reported tolerability in complementing traditional clinician-reported safety evaluation of cancer therapies. Recent regulatory guidance listed the evaluation of overall side effect impact as a core patient-reported outcome in oncology clinical trials. A single item (‘GP5’) that asks about side effect bother is included in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy and has been used to capture overall side effect impact. This paper sought to expand the evidence base for GP5 by examining its association with clinician-reported treatment-emergent adverse events and patient-reported global health. Methods: We examined six commercial cancer clinical trials that collected GP5. The patient population was drawn from the safety population and the analysis focused on the first on-treatment assessment. Clinician-reported adverse events were classified as symptomatic if such adverse events were considered amenable to patient self-reporting (e.g. nausea). Chi-square tests and Pearson’s correlation were used to examine associations. We considered adverse event grade and frequency, both for symptomatic adverse events and any type of adverse events. Global health was measured using the visual analogue scale of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels measure. ‘Moderate-severe’ bother was characterised as scores of 2–4 on a 0–4 point scale for GP5, and ‘severe’ bother was characterised as scores of 3–4. Analyses were conducted separately for each trial. Results: Data from 3,557 patients were included. Across the trials, most (71.7%–94.2%) patients had an adverse event of some kind, but fewer (17.1%–44.4%) had an adverse event of grade 3 or higher. In general, fewer than 50% of patients (20.6%–44.2%) reported moderate-severe bother and 5.8%–17.% reported severe bother. There were consistent, albeit not always statistically significant, associations between GP5 and adverse events, and GP5/global health correlations ranged from −0.17 to −0.41. Discussion: GP5 is associated with both clinician- and patient-reported symptoms, suggesting its validity and usefulness as part of comprehensive tolerability assessment of cancer trials.

Abstract Mobility and cognition impairments are common in older adults, but neurodegenerative pathology contributions are unclear. We examined cross-temporal associations of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)-specific and nonspecific neurodegenerative plasma biomarkers neurofilament light (NfL) with incident mobility and cognitive impairment in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. We hypothesized NfL would show stronger associations with mobility impairment than p-tau181 in a subset of 1,227 cognitively normal participants with biomarker data and no mobility impairment (mean age=75.5±5.0, 56% female, 23% Black) at visit 5 (2011-13). Participants were classified into five functional groups using data from up to four exams: no impairment (n = 587; referent), mobility impairment only (n = 266; gait speed< 0.8m/s), cognitive impairment only (n = 69; adjudicated dementia), dual impairment (n = 243; both) or decline-free death (n = 262) over a mean 6.3 years (0-11 years) of follow-up. A multinomial regression model estimated association of functional groups with p-tau-181 and NfL jointly, adjusted for cardiovascular and demographic factors, BMI, and kidney function. Relative prevalence ratios (RPR; 95% CI) are presented per one-unit higher log-base-2 transformed biomarker (doubling). For mobility and cognitive functional outcomes, p-tau-181 was more robustly supported [Mobility: RPR=1.36, (1.04,1.77); Cognitive: RPR=1.73, (1.10,2.70); Dual: RPR=1.78, (1.15,2.77)] than NfL [Mobility: RPR=1.14, (0.85,1.53); Cognitive: RPR=1.20, (0.70,2.05); Dual: RPR=1.65, (0.86,3.16)]; higher pTau-181 [RPR=1.60, (1.23,2.09)] and higher NfL [RPR=1.94, (1.39,2.71)] were associated with higher risk of decline-free death. A p-tau-181-x-NfL interaction term was not supported. Findings did not support NfL associations with functional outcomes with consideration of p-tau-181. AD blood biomarkers may help identify individuals at greater risk for multifaceted disability.

Abstract Although slower gait speed is associated with cognitive impairment, endurance may be more predictive in older adults with faster gait speed. We examined moderating effects of endurance on the relationship of gait speed with incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia in cognitively normal ARIC participants (n = 2242, mean age=78.6 + 4.3, 58% female, 19% Black). At the sixth exam, endurance was assessed as distance walked at a fast pace (Two Minute Walk, 2MW); usual 4-meter gait speed was also assessed. Cognitive status was adjudicated during the 6th-9th exams (mean follow-up 5.1 years). Multinomial logistic regression models with a 2MW-x-gait speed interaction term estimated relative risk ratios (RRR) of MCI and dementia relative to normal cognition per SD higher gait speed or 2MW distance, adjusting for demographic and cardiovascular factors. Results used representative continuous gait speed and continuous 2MW distance values. Longer 2MW distance was associated with lower risk of MCI and dementia at gait speed <1m/s [e.g. gait speed=0.8: MCI RRR=0.59, 95%CI(0.42, 0.83); dementia RRR=0.29, (0.13, 0.63)] and with dementia at gait speed>1m/s [gait speed=1.2: RRR=0.28, (0.09, 0.81)], but not with MCI (RRR=0.85, (0.57, 1.26)]. Conversely, faster gait speed was associated with lower risk of MCI at low 2MW [100 m; RRR=0.84, (0.74, 0.94)], but was attenuated at high 2MW (150 m; RRR=0.91, (0.84, 1.00)]. A 2MW-x-gait speed interaction term was supported (p = 0.04), primarily driven by differential MCI associations. Combining endurance and gait speed may be especially helpful in identifying cognitively normal older adults at risk for impending early-stage cognitive impairment.

Abstract Faster gait speed and better endurance have been cross-sectionally and jointly associated with a lower likelihood of dementia. However, gait speed associations plateau above 1m/s, suggesting gait speed may be less predictive at near normal speeds. This study examined prospective associations of gait speed, endurance, and moderating effects of endurance on gait speed associations with incident dementia among ARIC participants without dementia at Visit 6 (2016-2017) who completed assessments of endurance ( 2- Minute Walk (2MW), meters) and usual-pace 4-meter gait speed (m/s) (n = 2767, mean age 78+/- 4.3 years, 43% male, 18% Black). Dementia was adjudicated using neuropsychological tests, functional assessments, informant interviews, and medical/vital record surveillance over a median of 3.3 years follow-up. Cox regression models estimated the hazard ratio (HR, 95% CI) for dementia, incorporating gait speed, 2MW, gait speed-by-2MW interaction, demographic, and cardiovascular factors. In separate models, each standard deviation higher 2MW [HR = 0.62, (0.50,0.76)] and faster gait speed [HR = 0.63, (0.50,0.81)] were associated with lower incident dementia risk. However, when jointly adjusting for 2MW and gait speed, higher 2MW was associated with a 32% lower incident dementia risk [HR = 0.68,(0.51, 0.90)], but faster gait speed was not statistically associated with incident dementia [HR = 0.85, (0.62,1.16)]. Moderating effects were not supported (gait speed-x-2MW interaction, p = 0.14). Although both endurance and gait speed predict dementia, endurance may be more informative across the gait speed spectrum, whereas gait speed may be more feasible for clinical settings. Longer follow-up and more dementia events may better inform differential utilities of gait speed and endurance measures.

This Viewpoint discusses the practice of molecular testing for the classification of thyroid nodules and explores related questions regarding automation, transparency, and clinical reasoning.

ABSTRACT Introduction Positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial flow reserve (MFR) is a robust indicator of coronary vascular health and a strong predictor of cardiovascular risk. Clinical guidelines typically use fixed MFR thresholds (e.g., <2.0) to stratify risk, yet this approach overlooks individual variation, particularly by age and sex. We aimed to establish age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles and to evaluate their prognostic and predictive performance for cardiovascular risk assessment, in comparison with conventional fixed-threshold MFR approach. Methods Using data from the REFINE PET registry (24,820 patients from 12 sites), we measured PET MFR and derived age- and sex-adjusted MFR reference percentiles using quantile regression in patients without known coronary artery disease. All patients were categorized into percentile-based quartile groups. The primary outcome for prognostic and prediction analyses was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or heart-failure hospitalization. Time-to-event associations were evaluated using covariate-adjusted survival models, with cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HR) estimated at 1 and 5 years in the derivation dataset, an independent but similar validation dataset A, and a high-risk validation dataset B. Predictive performance for MACE was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and reclassification metrics, comparing percentile-based models with models using a fixed MFR threshold (<2.0). Results Among participants (mean age 66.5 years; median follow-up 3.6 years), age- and sex-adjusted MFR quartile groups were strong independent predictors of MACE, with adjusted HR increasing stepwise across quartile groups at both early and later follow-up. At 1 year, HR (95% CI) comparing the lowest to the highest quartile group were 4.06 (3.41–4.82) in the derivation cohort, 3.31 (2.32–4.71) in validation cohort A, and 2.35 (2.05–2.70) in validation cohort B. At 5 years, the corresponding HR were 2.18 (1.86–2.56), 1.77 (1.31–2.40), and 1.59 (1.36–1.86). Percentile-based models demonstrated consistently higher discrimination, better calibration, and greater net reclassification for MACE at both time points compared with fixed-threshold MFR models. Although 67.2% of patients had preserved MFR (>2.0), cardiovascular risk increased steadily across MFR percentiles even within this range. Conclusion Age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles provide a reliable, clinically actionable measure of vascular health, improving cardiovascular risk stratification by better capturing age- and sex-related heterogeneity in vascular risk. Compared with traditional fixed-threshold approaches, MFR percentiles demonstrate improved predictive performance for cardiovascular risk assessment across diverse patient populations. CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE What is new? In a large, multinational real-world registry of more than 24,000 patients undergoing PET MPI, we derived age- and sex-adjusted myocardial flow reserve (MFR) percentiles, establishing a lifespan-based reference framework with age-specific reference values. Age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles showed a strong, graded association with 1- and 5-year cardiovascular risk and demonstrated improved prognostic and predictive performance compared with fixed MFR thresholds and models without MFR across independent derivation and validation datasets, including a higher-risk cohort. Lower adjusted MFR percentiles were consistently associated with higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and heart-failure hospitalization. What are the clinical implications? Age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles provide a personalized, dynamic measure of coronary vascular health that improves cardiovascular risk stratification by accounting for age- and sex-related heterogeneity. A percentile-based approach may help clinicians better identify patients at elevated cardiovascular risk who may warrant closer monitoring or intensified preventive strategies, while avoiding unnecessary intervention in lower-risk individuals. By integrating macrovascular and microvascular dysfunction, age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles offer a clinically interpretable marker of vascular aging that may inform future research on aging biomarkers, novel therapeutics and cardiovascular risk assessment across the spectrum of atherosclerotic and microvascular disease.