Citations

Introduction: Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for adults with relapsed or refractory (r/r) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Blinatumomab is a CD19-directed bispecific T-cell engager that is also approved for r/r B-ALL, and often used as early salvage therapy. Data in the pediatric/AYA population suggest that patients who did not respond to blinatumomab may have inferior outcomes to CD19-directed CAR-T products compared to those who have achieved a response to blinatumomab or were blinatumomab-naïve (Myers et al. J Clin Oncol 2022). In this study, we evaluate the response to blinatumomab and subsequent response to brexu-cel in adults with r/r B-ALL. Methods: Retrospective data were collected from 25 centers across the U.S. as part of the real-world outcomes collaborative study of CAR-T in B-ALL (ROCCA). Consecutive patients treated with brexu-cel from 2021 to 2023 were categorized by blinatumomab exposure status. Those exposed were separated into “blinatumomab responders” (B-R), defined as patients achieving a CR/CRi in response to any number of cycles of blinatumomab, and “non-responders” (B-NR). Each cohort was compared for outcomes of interest. The primary outcome was CR/CRi rate at day 28 following brexu-cel administration. Secondary outcomes were duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Survival outcomes were calculated from day of brexu-cel infusion and were not censored for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation or maintenance therapy. All living patients were censored at data cutoff on June 30, 2023. Survival comparisons were made by log rank test. Results: Among 152 patients who received brexu-cel, the median follow-up time was 8.4 months. Eighty-eight (57%) of 152 r/r B-ALL brexu-cel recipients had received blinatumomab prior to apheresis. The median number of pre-apheresis blinatumomab cycles was 2 (range 1-12). The baseline characteristics of B-R, B-NR, and blinatumomab-naïve (B-NV) patients were similar, including pre-apheresis disease burden and receipt of maintenance therapy following brexu-cel infusion (Table 1). Seventy percent (N= 62) of the blinatumomab-exposed patients were B-R, while 30% (N=26) were B-NR. Rates of CR/CRi at day 28 following brexu-cel infusion were similar between B-R, B-NR, and B-NV patients (79% vs 84% vs 78%, respectively). Most of these remissions were negative for measurable residual disease (MRD), with similar MRD negativity rates in the three groups (table 2). 1-year DOR and PFS were significantly higher in the B-NV group compared to B-R or B-NR (77% vs 49% vs 50%, p<.0001; 60% vs 37% vs 30%, p<.0001). B-NV and B-R had better 1-year survival compared to B-NR (71% vs 65% vs 32%, p<.0001). There were more CD19-negative relapses following brexu-cel in B-NR (29%) and B-R (18%) compared to B-NV patients (8%), although this was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Brexu-cel induced deep responses in a majority of adults with r/r B-ALL, irrespective of prior exposure or response to blinatumomab. Similar to data published by the pediatric CAR-T cell groups, our data draw speculation that adult patients who did not respond to blinatumomab experience shorter overall survival following brexu-cel compared to those who responded to or did not receive blinatumomab. This should be confirmed in a larger, prospective clinical trial. Because this analysis could not account for patients who achieved durable remission after blinatumomab, these differences may not reflect superiority of sequencing brexu-cel before blinatumomab. The higher number of CD19-negative relapses in the blinatumomab-exposed cohort add to the interest in pursuing strategies to address antigen escape following CAR-T cell therapy directed against a previously targeted antigen.

Background Teclistamab, the first-in-class B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific therapy was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of triple-class exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) after ≥ 4 prior lines of therapy. Because of the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), the step-up dosing (SUD) of teclistamab is commonly administered in an inpatient setting among early users. Mayo Clinic has a well-established hospital-based outpatient program for novel immunotherapies. Since the FDA approval, teclistamab SUD has been administered as part of this program. Each dose of the SUD is administered in an outpatient setting, and the patient is given a remote monitoring kit to regularly measure vital signs and stay connected with the command center for signs and symptoms of CRS and ICANS throughout the entire SUD period. This study aimed to evaluate early safety outcomes and healthcare resource utilization during SUD in real-world (RW) patients who initiated teclistamab under the outpatient administration model across 3 Mayo Clinic locations (Rochester, MN, Phoenix/Scottsdale, AZ, Jacksonville, FL). Methods This was a retrospective study using Mayo Clinic's electronic medical records from October 26, 2022 to June 12, 2023. Eligible patients were adults diagnosed with MM who had initiated commercial teclistamab at any of the 3 Mayo Clinic locations. Patient characteristics, rates and severity of CRS and ICANS, as well as healthcare resource utilization during SUD were described. Time between teclistamab administration and patient check-out was reported for SUD and treatment doses, respectively. Results At the time of data cutoff, 39 patients received at least 1 teclistamab dose across the 3 locations (median age 67.2 years; male: 74%; White: 87%; non-Hispanic: 92%), including 36 patients who initiated teclistamab SUD directly in an outpatient setting. A total of 8 (21%) patients had MM with high-risk cytogenetics and 14 (36%) had prior exposure to other BCMA-targeted therapies. Prevalent comorbidities prior to receiving teclistamab included anemia (77%), hypertension (56%), lytic bone lesions (51%), neutropenia (49%), and hypogammaglobulinemia (41%). Renal impairment or failure was observed in 31% of the patients (Table 1). Almost all patients received acetaminophen (95%), diphenhydramine (95%), and dexamethasone (92%) as pre-medications on the same day as teclistamab administrations during SUD. Of the teclistamab doses with clinic time data, the majority (62%) of doses during SUD required 30 minutes to 1 hour of clinic time for monitoring between administration and check-out. After SUD, the clinic time for weekly treatment doses decreased to less than 30 minutes for most (79%) doses (Figure 1). In patients who completed SUD by data cutoff (n = 37), most patients (70%) received the SUD on a 3-day dose interval (i.e., day 1, 4, 7). The mean time between the first and third doses was 6.3 days. Among the 37 patients with complete SUD, 12 (32%) developed CRS. The highest CRS grade was grade 1 for 10 patients; 1 patient had a grade 2 CRS, and 1 patient had a grade 4 CRS. The patient with grade 4 CRS concurrently decompensated during a dialysis session and all symptoms were considered for CRS grading. A total of 6 patients had recurrent CRS, including 1 patient with 3 events during SUD. All patients who developed CRS during SUD (n=12) were admitted to the hospital for treatment, with a total of 19 admissions across all patients and a median length of stay of 1.7 days per admission. Among patients who were admitted for CRS (n=12), the majority were treated with acetaminophen (92%), diphenhydramine (83%) and dexamethasone (83%); tocilizumab was given to the 2 patients with CRS grade 2 or higher. Only 1 ICANS event (grade 2) was observed in 1 patient during SUD, after dose 3, and the patient was admitted to the hospital for treatment. Conclusion This study evaluated early RW safety outcomes of teclistamab under an outpatient administration model and found the CRS rate and severity to be comparable with other RW evidence generated from various data sources. Outcomes related to teclistamab SUD from Mayo Clinic supported the safety and feasibility of outpatient administration model as a potential option to reduce healthcare resource utilization and improve treatment experiences.

Background: Axi-cel is a US and EU-approved autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for pts with relapsed/refractory large B cell lymphoma after 1 prior therapy as a result of ZUMA-7 (NCT. In ZUMA-1 (NCT02348216), the pivotal study which initially led to the approval of axi-cel in the 3L+ setting, the objective response rate was 83% (58% complete response rate; Locke et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019) and at 5 years follow up an OS rate of 42.6%, 5 years durable response and 5 years disease specific survival at 51% ( Neelapu et al. Blood 2023). T cell-related biology (Immunosign 21; Immunoscore®IC) measured pretreatment in the tumor microenvironment (TME) was associated with response to axi-cel ( Scholler et al., 2022). Increased density of activated PD-1+LAG-3+/−TIM-3−CD8+ T cells, measurable pretreatment, facilitates clinical response in pts post-axi-cel. This expanded analysis characterized the impact of axi-cel treatment on the TME immune contexture and examined associations between immune cell subsets and relapse. Methods: Baseline and post-infusion tumor biopsy samples were analyzed by multiplex immunohistochemistry ( Brightplex®). Four panels were developed and applied to assess T cell infiltration (CD3 CD8 FOXP3 TIM3 PD1 LAG3 TOX), regulatory T cell subtyping (CD3 CD8 GATA3 TBET RORg BCL6), T cell activation & exhaustion (CD3 CD8 TIM3 LAG3 PD1 GZMB KI67), macrophage (CD68 CD64 CD163 CD204 CD206 PDL1) and MDSC (CD3 CD11B CD68 CD14 CD15 LOX1 S100A9) subsets. Transcriptomic analysis was performed using nCounter® Pan Cancer panel. The association between T cell subtypes and macrophages cell subset density, and probability to relapse was evaluated. T test values were based on Brightplex analysis. Results: 34 tumor biopsies (16 at baseline, 18 post-infusion) from 26 pts were analyzed including 11 relapsed (6 CR/5 PR) and 15 durable response (15 CR). The baseline and post-infusion TME comprised all major macrophages, MDSC and T cell subsets, with diverse distribution across samples analyzed. Low proinflammatory M1 macrophage density was observed at baseline and post-infusion across patients. In relapsed patients, baseline tumors were enriched with a significantly higher proportion of protumoral M2 macrophage (p<0.0001). A shift of M1-M2 polarization was observed between baseline and post-infusion (Baseline 33%M1M2 / 65%M2, post infusion 76%M1M2 / 21%M2, p<0,0001) across the cohort. In contrast, in relapsed patients, M-MDSC cell density was significantly increased post treatment (p=0.0420). In addition, Innate lymphocyte cells subtype 2 (ILC2) cell density, previously described to be positively correlated with improved overall survival in CRC ( Huang et al. 2021 Cancers), was significantly decreased in relapsed patients post infusion (p=0.019).Post-infusion, durable response was associated with a significant increase in pan-Macrophages (p=0.0360) and cytotoxic T cell subset densities: CD8 naïve T cells (p=0.016); Activated Cytotoxic T cell (GZMB+)(p=0.0203); PD1+TIM3+LAG3- cytotoxic T cell (p=0.0117); CD8 regulatory T cell (FOXP3+)(p=0.012). Regarding T helper lineage, ongoing response was associated with a significant increase of: CD4 naïve T cells (p=0.021); T helper Th2 (p=0.020); cytotoxic T lymphocyte TC2 and TC1/TC2 cell densities (respectively p=0.0052 and 0.011).Additional characterization of the immune contexture and correlative analysis of cell subsets will be presented. Conclusion: These results suggest that baseline proportions of protumor M2 macrophages may predict disease relapse after axi-cel treatment. Following infusion, relapse is also associated with spatial enrichment of M-MDSC, whereas durable response is related to increases in T cell subpopulation densities inclusive of cytotoxic T cells, T helper, TC1/TC2 ratios and innate T-subpopulations. These findings suggest that axi-cel treatment drastically impacts tumor immune mobilization, infiltration and contexture, which correlates with long term response.

Background: Cytopenias are a common complication of and prolonged (beyond month 3 post CAR-T infusion), severe (grade 3 or higher) cytopenias can be difficult to manage. Stem cell boosts have been reported to restore hematopoiesis; however, stem cells would need to be available prior to CAR-T therapy for potential use post CAR-T. Most lymphoma patients and limited number of myeloma patients may have pre-collected stem cells in storage. Identifying patients at high risk for prolonged and severe cytopenia post CAR-T at the time of CAR-T evaluation (baseline), before leukapheresis, can help identify the patients for coordination of stem cell collection during CAR-T manufacturing and increase the likelihood that the collected stem cells would be used. In this study, we aim to identify clinical variables at the time of CAR-T evaluation, prior to leukapheresis, that are associated with severe cytopenias at month 3 post CAR-T infusion and identify patients who could be considered for pre-emptive stem cell collection prior to CAR-T therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who received CAR-T products at Mayo Clinic from 01/2016 to 06/2022. Patients with progressive disease in the first year post CAR-T were excluded from the analysis. Baseline (at CAR-T evaluation, prior to leukapheresis) variables were compared between those with and without severe cytopenia at month 3 post CAR-T. Severe cytopenias were defined as hemoglobin (Hg) < 8 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 0.5 x 10 9/L, and/or platelet count (PLT) < 50 x 10 9/L. Statistically significant variables (p<0.05) by analysis were examined for statistical significance in multivariate analysis (MVA). Results: Among the 166 patients who received CAR-T (88 NHL, 78 MM) during the study period, 31 (18.67%) had a severe cytopenia at month . Twenty baseline variables were examined; HGB, PLT, ANC, and c-reactive protein (CRP) We devised a cytopenia risk score using 1 point each for Hg<10 or PLT<100k at baseline, with a range of 0 to 2. Demographics and clinical outcome by cytopenia risk score is shown in Table 1B. A higher percentage of patients with a score of 1 or 2 had a severe cytopenia at month 3 (Figure 1). In particular, there was a . In addition Conclusion: Baseline cytopenias before leukapheresis may identify patients with increased risk for severe cytopenias at month 3 post CAR-T. These patients can have continued slow hematopoietic recovery in the first year. Stem cell collection, if feasible, could be considered before CAR-T to alleviate post-CAR-T severe prolonged cytopenias.

Background: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 94% and a complete response (CR) rate of 79% in patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) after two or more prior lines of therapy in the ZUMA-5 trial ( Jacobson et al. Lancet Oncol. 2022). Since its FDA approval in March 2021, there has been little evidence on comparative effectiveness (CE) studies of axi-cel vs standard-of-care (SoC), except ones using ZUMA-5 and historical SCHOLAR-5 data (eg, Ghione et al. Blood. 2022). This study was aimed to address this evidence gap in CE of axi-cel vs SoC used to treat r/r FL in real-world settings. Methods: The two data sources in this study were patients who received commercial axi-cel between March 2021 and May 2023 from the CIBMTR and patients who received historical SoC (eg, chemotherapy, anti-CD20 mAb + chemotherapy, immunomodulatory imide drugs) between July 2014 and December 2020 from SCHOLAR-5, which served as an external control of ZUMA-5 trial. The index date was defined as the initiation date of either the infusion for axi-cel patients or the last eligible systemic therapy for SoC patients. Patients were included if they were age ≥ 18, had documented r/r FL with histological grade 1, 2 or 3a, and received at least 2 prior lines of therapy at the index. Patients were excluded if they had transformed diffused large B-cell lymphoma, central nervous system involvement, prior receipt of CAR T or other non-CAR T cellular therapies or allogeneic stem cell transplant, or no post-index information on outcomes. Four effectiveness outcomes were ORR, CR rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Imbalance in observed prognostic risk factors between the two was adjusted via a propensity score analysis using the standard mortality ratio weighting (SMRW). The primary analyses included weighted univariable analysis and multivariable logistic (ORR and CR rate) or Cox (PFS and OS) regressions that were adjusted for the covariates after the SMRW. A sub-analysis of patients age ≥ 65 was conducted using the same methods as the primary analyses. Results: The unweighted study cohort included 376 patients, in which 256 (68%) received axi-cel . Thepatients who received axi-cel were more likely to be younger (median age 61 for axi-cel vs 67 for SoC), have grade 3a FL (37% vs 12%), received 3 or more prior lines of therapy (83% vs 58%), or remained refractory to the last prior therapy (79% vs 73%) vs those who received SoC. The imbalance in the observed prognostic risk factors was mitigated via the SMRW. The weighted univariable analysis, in which the sample size by treatment reflected the SMRW, is shown in Table 1. In patients of all ages, ORR was 92% in axi-cel vs 67% in SoC, and CR rate was 84% vs 37%. Because of varying follow-up lengths by treatment (median 7 months for axi-cel and 37 months for SoC), survival outcomes were reported at month 6, at which time PFS rate was 88% in axi-cel vs 64% in SoC and OS rate was 97% vs 85%. The corresponding proportions for patients age ≥ 65 were similar to those reported for patients of all ages. In the weighted multivariable regressions, axi-cel was associated with statistically significantly better outcomes by all 4 effectiveness measures vs SoC (Table 1). Specifically, in patients of all ages, the odds ratios for axi-cel were 4.93 (95% CI, 2.35−10.34) for ORR and 16.72 (95% CI, 7.03−39.73) for CR rate, and the hazard ratios for axi-cel were 0.41 (95% CI, 0.22−0.77) for PFS and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.06−0.34) for OS. Similar to the patients of all ages in the primary analyses, patients age ≥ 65 in the sub-analysis also demonstrated improved outcomes associated with axi-cel (Figure 1). Conclusions: This study showed that patients with r/r FL after two or more prior lines of therapy treated with axi-cel experienced better outcomes compared with patients treated with SoC, and that older patients also benefited significantly from axi-cel. These findings suggest that axi-cel addresses an important unmet medical need in patients with r/r FL. Future research should include longer follow-up data on outcomes of axi-cel and CE of axi-cel vs other contemporary SoC therapies.

Introduction: ECOG ACRIN E1910 is a randomized phase III trial that showed that adults with newly diagnosed BCR::ABL1 negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who become MRD negative (<0.01%) after induction chemo who receive blinatumomab with conventional chemotherapy (chemo) have improved survival compared with those who received chemo only (Litzow et al, Blood (2022) 140: Supplement 2, LBA-1). However, not all pts were able to receive all four planned cycles of blinatumomab in consolidation. In this report we assessed outcomes of pts in the blinatumomab arm of the trial who received all 4 cycles of blinatumomab compared to those who received 1-2 cycles. Methods: Patient between the ages of 30 and 70 with newly diagnosed BCR::ABL1 negative B-lineage ALL were enrolled and initially received 2.5 months of combination induction chemo utilizing a BFM-like regimen adapted from the E2993/UKALLXII clinical trial, with pegaspargase (after induction only for patients >=55 years of age) and addition of rituximab for CD20 positive patients. After remission induction (step 1) pts in morphologic complete remission (CR/CRi) received an intensification course of high dose methotrexate with pegaspargase for CNS prophylaxis (step 2). At the conclusion of step 2, remission and MRD status were determined centrally by 6-color flow cytometry with MRD negativity defined as <0.01%. In the primary analysis subset, MRD negative patients were randomized to receive an additional 4cycles of consolidation chemo or 2 cycles of blinatumomab at 28 mcg/day (flat dose) for 28 days each cycle followed by 3 cycles of consolidation chemo, another 4-week cycle of blinatumomab (3rd cycle of blinatumomab) followed by an additional cycle of chemo and then a 4th cycle of blinatumomab (step 3). Following completion of consolidation chemo +/- blinatumomab, pts were given 2.5 years of POMP maintenance therapy timed from the start of the intensification cycle (step 4). Estimates of OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of OS between treatment arms were conducted using the stratified log-rank test and Cox proportional-hazards model with age, CD20 status, rituximab use, and whether pts intend to receive HSCT or not as stratification factors. As the number of cycles needed to optimize outcome has not been studied, an unplanned landmark analysis was used to compare OS of pts in the blinatumomab arm who received all 4 cycles o those who received 1-2 cycles. Time 0 was chosen as 9 months post step 3 randomization (the time that patients were supposed to complete 4 cycles of blina). Four pts who received blinatumomab but died within 9 months post step 3 randomization were therefore excluded from this analysis. Results: The study was activated on December 17, 2013 and closed to enrollment on October 15, 2019. 772 pts were screened for the trial and 488 were enrolled on step 1 induction therapy. The median age of the pts was 51 years (range 30-70). 224 MRD negative pts were randomized, 112 pts to each arm. In the blinatumomab arm 12 pts received 1 cycle (11%), 32 pts received 2 cycles (29%), 4 pts received 3 cycles (4%) and 63 pts received 4 cycles (57%). The OS of pts who received 1-2 cycles of blinatumomab was compared to control (Figure 1) The difference was not significant (hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.34, p=0.22). Fig 2 compares the survival of those who received 1-2 cycles to those who received 4 cycles ( (HR: 0.39, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.16, p=0.076). Conclusion: The addition of blinatumomab to consolidation chemotherapy resulted in a significantly better overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone in pts with newly diagnosed B-lineage ALL who were MRD negative after intensification. This represents a new standard of care for pts aged 30-70 years with BCR::ABL1 negative ALL. The optimal dose and number of cycles is however unknown. In this unplanned subgroup analysis we demonstrate that a survival benefit can only be confirmed in patients who receive the intended 4 cycles of blinatumomab during consolidation. Further studies will be needed to determine if fewer cycles can provide a similar benefit.

Background: Axi-cel is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) LBCL. ZUMA-12 (NCT03761056) is a Phase 2, multicenter, single-arm study of axi-cel as part of first-line treatment in patients with high-risk LBCL. In the primary efficacy analysis (n=37; median follow-up of 15.9 months), axi-cel demonstrated a high rate of investigator-assessed complete response (CR; 78%; 95% CI, 62-90) and an 89% objective response rate (ORR; 95% CI, 75-97). Axi-cel also had a manageable safety profile, with no new safety signals observed in the first-line setting (Neelapu et al. Nat Med. 2022). Here, we report updated efficacy and safety outcomes from ZUMA-12 in all patients treated with axi-cel after a median follow-up of ≥40 months. Methods: Eligible adults had high-risk LBCL, with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (double- or triple-hit histology) per investigator or an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score ≥3, plus a positive interim PET per Lugano classification (Deauville score 4/5) after 2 cycles of an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and anthracycline-containing regimen. Patients underwent leukapheresis, followed by lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine) on Days -5, -4, and -3, and a single axi-cel infusion of 2×10 6 CAR T cells/kg on Day 0. Per investigator discretion, non-chemotherapy bridging could be administered. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed CR rate per Lugano classification (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014). Secondary endpoints included ORR, duration of response (DOR), event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and levels of CAR T cells in blood and cytokines in serum. Results: As of May 3, 2023, 42 patients were enrolled and 40 were treated with axi-cel, with a median follow-up of 40.9 months (range, 29.5-50.2). In total, 37 patients were evaluable for response (centrally confirmed double- or triple-hit histology or IPI score ≥3). The CR rate was 86% (95% CI, 71-95), and 92% (95% CI, 78-98) of patients had an objective response. Patients with centrally confirmed double- or triple-hit histology (n=10) had a CR rate of 90%. Responses were ongoing in 73% of response-evaluable patients at data cutoff. Medians for DOR, EFS, PFS, and OS were not reached. The 36-month estimates for DOR, EFS (Figure 1), PFS, and OS (Figure 2) were 82%, 73%, 75%, and 81%, respectively. All treated patients (n=40) experienced adverse events (AEs) of any grade and 88% of patients had grade ≥3 AEs. Similar to the primary analysis, the most common any-grade AEs were pyrexia (100%), headache (70%), and neutrophil count decreased (55%). No new cases of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurologic events of any grade occurred since the prior data cut and all cases of CRS and neurologic events reported were resolved by data cutoff. Prolonged cytopenias of any grade (present Day ≥30 post-infusion) occurred in 9 patients (n=7 neutrophil count decreased) and were resolved by data cutoff. There were 8 deaths due to progressive disease (n=5) and other causes not related to axi-cel (1 COVID-19, 1 esophageal adenocarcinoma, 1 septic shock on Days 350, 535, and 287 post axi-cel infusion, respectively). Two of the 8 deaths (1 progressive disease and 1 esophageal adenocarcinoma) occurred after the primary analysis. Among treated patients, post-infusion CAR T-cell expansion by peak and area under the curve was 36.9 cells/µL and 368.0 cells/µL×days, respectively, in those with ongoing responses at data cutoff (n=17), 45.1 cells/µL and 413.4 cells/µL×days in those who relapsed (n=6), and 34.7 cells/µL and 566.8 cells/µL×days in non-responders (n=3). Conclusion: In this updated analysis of ZUMA-12 with a median follow-up of ≥40 months, axi-cel demonstrated a high rate of durable responses and no new safety signals. Axi-cel may benefit patients exposed to fewer prior therapies and those with high-risk LBCL, a population with high unmet need and poor outcomes after standard first-line chemoimmunotherapy.

Purpose The predominant pattern of relapse for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who undergo anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy (CART) involves sites previously involved by NHL. Bridging radiotherapy (BRT) has shown to be an effective bridging treatment with excellent local control rates. Our previous work defined limited/oligometastatic lymphoma as disease involving <5 sites. This study is the first to report on the role of BRT for patients with limited (<5 involved sites) disease prior to CART. Methods Following Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective review from 2018 to 2023 across 3 Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota) was performed and identified 139 patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell NHL without bone marrow involvement who received CART and had <5 disease sites prior to leukapheresis. Ann Arbor staging was used to define the number of involved disease sites. An involved disease site included the Ann Arbor anatomical lymph node region(s) harboring the pathological lymph node(s) or any extranodal lesion. Bridging treatment (radiation and/or systemic therapy) was defined as treatment administered between leukapheresis and CART infusion. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS),defined from CART infusion to any disease progression or initiation of post-CART consolidative/salvage therapy. Secondary endpoints included progression -free survival (PFS),defined from CART infusion to any disease progression, and overall survival (OS), defined from CART infusion to death. Results Prior to CART infusion, 44 (32%) patients received BRT and 95 (68%) did not. Bridging systemic therapy was given to 5 (11%) and 34 (36%) patients in the BRT and no BRT groups, respectively (p=0.003). The median number of involved disease sites prior to leukapheresis was 2 (range: 1-4). There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics prior to CART infusion between the BRT and no BRT groups, except for extranodal involvement that was more common in the BRT group (Table 1). The median equivalent 2 Gy dose was 27 Gy (Interquartile range 23-34), and the most common BRT regimen was 20 Gy in 5 fractions. Among the 44 BRT patients, 34 received radiation to all visible PET-avid disease sites, and 10 received radiation to some but not all disease sites. The median follow-up was 20 months. The rate of grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome was 41% in both groups (p=0.99). The rate of grade ≥2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was 21% and 37% in the BRT and no BRT groups, respectively (p=0.059). There were no observed grade ≥3 BRT-related toxicities. Objective response rate by PET 5 point scale was higher in the BRT group (93% versus 79%; p=0.036). Crude rates of progression were 30% in BRT and 55% in no BRT patients, with 9/13 (69%) and 43/52 (83%) patients relapsing in pre-existing sites of disease present prior to CART infusion in the BRT and no BRT group, respectively. Seven (16%) BRT patients relapsed in the radiation field. The 2-year EFS was 50% in the BRT group and 39% in the no BRT group (p=0.01). The 2-year PFS was 55% in the BRT group and 45% in the no BRT group (p=0.017). The 2-year OS was 55% in the BRT group and 62% in the no BRT group (p=0.7). Intriguingly, patients who received BRT to all visible PET-avid disease sites (n=34) had further improvement in 2-year EFS (67% vs 39%, p=0.003) and 2-year PFS (71% vs 46%, p=0.008) compared to no BRT or patients who received BRT to some but not all visible disease sites (n=105). Nine patients (2 in BRT and 7 in no BRT groups) received consolidative radiotherapy for day 30 residual disease with only one patient subsequently experiencing progression. Twenty-five patients (6 in BRT and 19 in no BRT groups) received salvage/palliative RT for post-CART relapsed disease. Thirty-seven (39%) patients in the no BRT group remained without disease progression and did not receive radiation in the bridging, consolidative or salvage/palliative setting. Conclusion Bridging radiotherapy prior to CART infusion for patients with limited (<5 involved disease sites) r/r NHL appears to improve response rate, EFS, and PFS without causing significant toxicities. Approximately one third of patients who do not receive BRT will require subsequent post-CART radiation, and another third will remain free of radiation and disease progression.

Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) consists of autologous T cells genetically modified to express a two-binding domain chimeric antigen receptor (CAR). The target antigen of the CAR is B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), which is highly expressed on malignant plasma cells (PC) from multiple myeloma subjects. In the Phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study, cilta-cel led to early, deep, and durable responses and was approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after four or more prior lines of therapy by FDA. Despite cilta-cel's outstanding overall response rate (97.9%) and duration of response (DOR) in RRMM patients, relapse still occurs. Biomarkers associated with this durable response and acquired resistance remain to be elucidated. We present updated correlative data from the CARTITUDE-1 study. At the ~3 year follow-up (October 2022 data cutoff), 97 patients had received a single infusion of cilta-cel (median 0.71 x10 6 cells/kg [range 0.52 x10 6-0.94 x10 6]); the median follow up was 33.4 months (range 1.5-45.2), median DOR was 33.9 months (95% CI, 25.5-not estimable [NE]) and median PFS was 34.9 months (95% CI, 25.2-NE) (Lin Y et al, ASCO 2023). Drug product (DP), baseline and on-treatment whole blood and bone marrow samples from enrolled patients were analyzed by methods including flow cytometry, MSD immunoassays, Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing (CITE-seq) and TCR sequencing. In CARTITUDE-1, the DP contained a mixture of transduced and non-transduced T cells; the median transduction efficiency was 16% (range 5-32%), with a balanced distribution of CAR+CD4+ and CAR+CD8+ cells, median frequency 12% (range 2-28%) and 6% (range 2-20%), respectively. Further, the DP T cell subset composition was variable but balanced between central (Tcm) and effector memory (Tem) phenotypes. CAR+ T cells expanded reaching a median peak concentration (C max of 730 cells/µL; range 3-13805 cells/µL) in blood between days 12-14 post-infusion and persisted in circulation for a median of 100 days (range 20-912 days). High efficacy (best response) and DOR were achieved despite variable CAR-T cell expansion and lack of detectable CAR-T cell persistence over time. At C max, the CD4:CD8 ratio (based on % of CAR+ cells) was 0.29, demonstrating a CAR+CD8+ T cell preferential expansion, and both CAR+CD4+ and CAR+CD8+ T cells were predominantly of a Tcm phenotype, median 95% (range 62-99.5%) and 96% (range 33-99.7%), respectively. Higher frequency of early-memory T cell phenotypes has been associated with clinical responses to CAR-T therapies in MM (Dancy et al., Blood 2018). CITE-seq analyses showed that DP characteristics such as a high CD8+ stem-like phenotype and a low CD4+ Treg-like phenotype in the CAR+ T cell compartment associated with longer DOR. Some of the most abundant clones in the DP single cell TCR data were CAR+CD8+ T cells expressing granzyme B, suggesting high cytotoxic potential. Additional bulk TCR sequencing data suggest both diversity and individual clonal expansion longitudinally after cilta-cel infusion. We also evaluated tumor and patient intrinsic characteristics at baseline. BCMA expression on bone marrow PC was prevalent and highly variable among RRMM patients; however, expression did not associate with best response or DOR. Further, high ORR was observed in patients with high-risk cytogenetics, high tumor burden (>= 60% bone marrow PC), or baseline plasmacytomas, although with a non-statistically significant shorter PFS. Sustained MRD negativity strongly associated with longer DOR. Conversely, patient-intrinsic characteristics associated with inflammation (CRP, ferritin, neutrophils, pro-inflammatory cytokines) correlated with shorter DOR. Treatment benefit of the magnitude seen with cilta-cel had not been reported with any other approved therapy in this setting. Correlative analyses suggest an emerging profile to help understand such outstanding clinical activity: a balanced CD4/CD8 ratio and Tcm/Tem phenotype of the manufactured DP and preferential expansion of CAR+CD8+ Tcm cells. Further, certain baseline patient-intrinsic and tumor characteristics may explain the longer DOR in the RRMM setting. These investigations help identify markers of response to cilta-cel and may lead to CAR-T cell design or manufacturing strategies that enhance drug product characteristics and thus clinical efficacy.

Introduction Relapsed or refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a dismal prognosis. Treatment options are limited and include fludarabine (Flu) and cytarabine (Ara-C), +/- anthracyclines (e.g., FLAG-Ida). Recent progress has been limited to targeted therapies, which benefit only a subset of the population; efforts to develop cellular therapies have not been met with success. NKX101 is an NK cell therapy derived from healthy donors and engineered to express an NKG2D ligand-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) to enhance killing of malignant cells, as well as a membrane bound form of interleukin (IL)-15 to promote persistence and activity. Because Ara-C is known to upregulate NKG2D ligand expression, use of Flu/Ara-C as an alternative to standard Flu/cyclophosphamide (Flu/Cy) for lymphodepletion (LD) was tested for NKX101. Methods Six patients with r/r AML were enrolled in this cohort of NKX101-101, a Phase 1 safety study. All patients had received at least one prior line of therapy, as well as approved targeted therapies for those with underlying genetic mutations. Patients received NKX101 at a dose of 1.5 billion (B) viable CAR+ cells/dose on Days 0, 7, and 14 after LD comprising Flu (30 mg/m2) and Ara-C (2 g/m2) each once daily for five days and 2 days of rest. Efficacy assessments were performed on Day 27 and included bone marrow aspiration and biopsy. Additional treatment cycles of LD and NKX101 were given to some patients to deepen or consolidate responses. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and cytokine sampling were performed throughout the treatment cycle(s). Results At baseline, five out of six patients had poor-risk genetic features, including TP53 mutation; the median bone marrow blast count was 35% (range: 20 - 86%). Patients had received a median of two prior lines of therapy, with all patients having previous venetoclax exposure (Table 1). All patients received at least three doses of NKX101 at 1.5 B cells/dose. There were no cases of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), or graft-versus-host disease of any grade in any patients (Table 2). Myelosuppression and infection were the most common higher-grade toxicities. Four out of six patients had CR/CRi, with three out of six achieving CR. Three of these patients had no detectable MRD by flow, and one had 0.18% RUNX1-RUNX1T1 translocation via polymerase chain reaction testing on bone marrow. One subject was taken to consolidative hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and remains in CR. Another subject received a consolidative cycle of therapy and remains in CR. A third subject had three cycles of treatment with successive decrease in disease burden and remains in CRi. The fourth subject had CR after one cycle of treatment. PK profiling showed that NKX101 was consistently detected and correlated with infusion days (Figure 1). Cytokine data showed minimal post-infusion elevations above baseline; no association was observed between clinical response and elevation of serum cytokines (including IL-15, IL-6, IFNγ, IL-10, and IL-8). Data on the expression of NKG2D ligands (MICA, MICB, ULBP1, and ULBP3) in subject bone marrow samples were obtained via multiplex immunohistochemistry. This was evaluated as a composite H-score. Responders were split between those with relatively low ligand expression and those with higher ligand expression, suggesting that further factors may contribute to NK cell resistance. Conclusions Alternative LD with Flu/Ara-C followed by NKX101 shows promising early responses including MRD negativity in r/r AML. The toxicity profile of this regimen is manageable and was consistent with underlying AML and exposure to LD, without any events of CRS or ICANS. Expansion of enrollment and longer follow-up are needed. Despite being an allogeneic, non-HLA-matched cell product, NKX101 persisted for up to three weeks in PK testing. Directly comparing the data from patients treated with Flu/Cy with NKX101 versus Flu/Ara-C with NKX101 suggests that Flu/Ara-C can replace the Flu/Cy regimen common to CAR T cell therapy as LD without compromising overall NKX101 exposure.