Citations

Clear

1892 citation(s) found for "Wu, Kenneth".

Comment on: Negative associations for fasting blood glucose, cholesterol and triglyceride levels with the development of giant cell arteritis: reply
Wadström, Karin , Jacobsson, L. , Mohammad, Aladdin J , Warrington, Kenneth J. , Matteson, Eric L. , Turesson, Carl , Jacobsson, Lennart , Warrington, Kenneth J , Mohammad, Aladdin J , Turesson, Carl

Mayo Clinic

Rheumatology | February 10, 2021 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 7 | Pages: e262-e263

10.1093/rheumatology/keab143 | PMID 33576780 Get It

Variation in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma in the Real World
Chhun, Leena, Zheng, Cheng , Piboonvaranggoon, Jayne, Mallick, Elora, Wren, Jennifer, Nam, Grace, Barquilla, Ricardo Lopez, Dardac, Alexandra, Blau, Sibel , Senecal, Francis M. , Namburi, Swathi, Cowan, Andrew J. , Bensinger, William, Kumar, Shaji , Richardson, Paul G. , Blau, C. Anthony , Richter, Joshua , Richardson, Paul Gerard Guy , Anderson, Kenneth C.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | February 8, 2021 | Volume: 136 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 43-44

10.1182/blood-2020-138705 Get It

Background: Here we describe an online network of patients with cancer, clinicians and researchers, layered on top of a comprehensive real world database of treatments and outcomes, continuously updated in near real time, and initially focused on multiple myeloma. Methods: Patients with multiple myeloma register at www.all4cure.com and sign HIPAA release forms to provide access to all of their medical records from all of the institutions from which they have received care. From the medical records, a structured dataset of treatments and lab results is extracted by a myeloma-dedicated team for display on each patient's de-identified, personalized dashboard. A discussion panel allows more than 1200 participating patients, clinicians and researchers to post comments or questions regarding each patient's specific circumstances. For each patient, lines of therapy and responses are determined according to IMWG and published criteria (Blood [2015] 126: 921-922). Here we report initial results from the treatments and responses among patients with multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukemia. Results: A total of 493 patients includes 26 with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), 51 with smoldering myeloma, 408 with multiple myeloma, and 8 with primary plasma cell leukemia. Among patients with multiple myeloma, 42 (10.3%) had antecedent MGUS and/or smoldering myeloma. The average age is 65.6 (+/- 9.7). 50.9% are male and 49.1% are female. 42 states in the U.S. and 8 other countries are represented. Two patients with multiple myeloma had not started treatment by the time of this report. The remaining 414 patients with multiple myeloma or plasma cell leukemia received 1 to 16 lines of therapy. Among the 414 patients that received at least one line of therapy, a remarkable 89 distinct first line therapies were administered. The most common first line therapies were lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone (n=92), cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, dexamethasone (n=50), lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone + autologous stem cell transplant + lenalidomide maintenance (n=41), lenalidomide and dexamethasone (n=29), and bortezomib and dexamethasone (n=22). 62 patients received a first line therapy that was not received by any other patient in our database. This variation was attributable to participation in clinical trials, variation in the availability of drugs over time and different geographic locations, and the very large number of distinct combinations associated with multi-agent regimens. Seventy six percent of patients with multiple myeloma or plasma cell leukemia received a second line of therapy, 52% received a third line of therapy, 34% received a fourth line of therapy, 23% received a fifth line of therapy, and 18% received a sixth line of therapy. We observed a trend toward a decline in favorable responses with successive lines of therapy (Table 1) consistent with previous reports, with a correlation coefficient between the line of therapy and overall response rate of -0.74. Among the 76 patients who received 6 or more lines of therapy (247 lines of therapy in total), only 7 achieved stringent complete responses (sCRs), of which 5 were associated with a CAR-T therapy. Table 1 also shows a trend toward more rapid changes in treatment associated with later lines of therapy. 57 of 493 patients (12%) are deceased. Conclusions: Our findings reveal remarkable variation in the treatment of myeloma and provide a potentially valuable resource of up to date and current clinical features, prognosis, treatments, side effects, and outcomes of patients with myeloma in the real world. Table 1. Summary of lines of therapy and outcomes across 414 patients with multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukemia. The percentages of patients achieving sCR, ≥ PR (overall response rate - ORR), and ≥MR (clinical benefit rate - CBR) are shown for each line of therapy. Also depicted is the interval mortality and the mean and median number of days between the beginning of a line therapy and the beginning of the next line of therapy. Table Disclosures Richter: Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; X4 pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Adaptive biotechnologies: Consultancy; Secura bio: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Antengene: Consultancy. Chhun:All4Cure: Current Employment. Zheng:All4Cure: Current Employment. Piboonvaranggoon:All4Cure: Current Employment. Mallick:All4Cure: Current Employment. Wren:All4Cure: Current Employment. Nam:All4Cure: Current Employment. Lopez Barquilla:All4Cure: Current equity holder in private company. Blau:All4Cure: Current equity holder in private company. Cowan:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Bensinger:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Regeneron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kumar:Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments, Research Funding; Genecentrix: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Novartis: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Carsgen: Other, Research Funding; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Takeda: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; AbbVie: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; MedImmune: Research Funding; Tenebio: Other, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Cellectar: Other; Sanofi: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Other: Independent Review Committee; IRC member; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Richardson:Celgene/BMS, Oncopeptides, Takeda, Karyopharm: Research Funding. Anderson:Oncopep and C4 Therapeutics.: Other: Scientific Founder of Oncopep and C4 Therapeutics.; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium-Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blau:All4Cure: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company.
Body weight in patients with idiopathic gastroparesis
Parkman, Henry P. , Natta, Mark L. Van , Yamada, Goro , Grover, Madhusudan , McCallum, Richard W. , Sarosiek, Irene , Farrugia, Gianrico , Koch, Kenneth L. , Abell, Thomas L. , Kuo, Braden , Miriel, Laura , Tonascia, James , Hamilton, Frank A., Pasricha, Pankaj J. , Parkman, H P , Abell, T L , Kuo, Braden

Mayo Clinic

Neurogastroenterology & Motility | February 8, 2021 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/nmo.13974 | PMID 32930463 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThe classic clinical picture of gastroparesis is a symptomatic patient losing weight. In addition, a number of patients with delayed gastric emptying are obese and/or gaining weight. Our aim was to investigate the factors impacting body weight in patients with idiopathic gastroparesis.MethodsIn patients with idiopathic gastroparesis, detailed history and weight were acquired at enrollment and after 48 weeks. Questionnaires assessed symptoms, food intake, physical activity, and quality of life. Patients underwent laboratory testing, gastric emptying scintigraphy, and water load testing.ResultsOf 138 patients with idiopathic gastroparesis, 10% were underweight (BMI < 18.5), 39% were normal weight (BMI 18.5‐25), 20% were overweight with BMI 25 to 30 kg/m2, and 29% were obese with BMI > 30 kg/m2. Body weight at enrollment was positively associated with oral caloric consumption (P < .001), following a gastroparesis diet (P = .04), nutrition consultation (P = .001), upper abdominal pain (P = .01); and negatively associated with energy expenditure (P = .05), alcohol use (P = .003) and severity of bloating (P < .001). When followed over 48 weeks, 53% patients stayed stable (within 5% of baseline weight), 30% gained, and 17% lost weight. Weight gain over 48 weeks was positively associated with oral caloric consumption (P = .003) and constipation severity (P = .005) at enrollment, and negatively associated with lower abdominal pain severity (P = .007) at enrollment, and associated with improvement in inability to finish meal score (P < .001) at 48 weeks.ConclusionsIn this series of patients with idiopathic gastroparesis, 10% were underweight whereas 29% were obese. Over 48 weeks, 30% of patients increased their body weight ≥ 5%. Diet, activity, and symptoms are important factors associated with body weight in patients with idiopathic gastroparesis.
A Distinctive Adnexal (Usually Paratubal) Neoplasm Often Associated With Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome and Characterized by STK11 Alterations (STK11 Adnexal Tumor)
Bennett, Jennifer A. , Young, Robert H. , Howitt, Brooke E. , Croce, Sabrina , Wanjari, Pankhuri , Zhen, Chaojie, Paula, Arnaud Da Cruz , Meserve, Emily E., Schoolmeester, J. Kenneth , Westbom-Fremer, Sofia , Benzi, Eduardo , Patil, Ninad , Kooreman, Loes , El‐Bahrawy, Mona , Krausz, Thomas, McCluggage, W. Glenn , Weigelt, Britta , Ritterhouse, Lauren L. , Oliva, Esther , El-Bahrawy, Mona A , Zannoni, Gian Franco

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Surgical Pathology | February 6, 2021 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1061-1074

10.1097/pas.0000000000001677 | PMID 33534223 Get It

We describe 22 examples of a novel, usually paratubal, adnexal tumor associated with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome in nearly 50% of cases that harbored STK11 alterations in all tested (n=21). The patients ranged from 17 to 66 years (median=39 y) and the tumors from 4.5 to 25.5 cm (median=11 cm). Most (n=18) were paratubal, with metastases noted in 11/22 (50%) and recurrences in 12/15 (80%). Morphologically, they were characterized by interanastomosing cords and trabeculae of predominantly epithelioid cells, set in a variably prominent myxoid to focally edematous stroma, that often merged to form tubular, cystic, cribriform, and microacinar formations, reminiscent of salivary gland-type tumors. The tumor cells were uniformly atypical, often with prominent nucleoli and a variable mitotic index (median=9/10 HPFs). The tumors were usually positive to a variable extent for epithelial (CAM5.2, AE1/AE3, cytokeratin 7), sex cord (calretinin, inhibin, WT1), and mesothelial (calretinin, D2-40) markers, as well as hormone receptors. PAX8, SF1, and GATA-3 were rarely positive, while claudin-4, FOXL2, and TTF-1 were consistently negative. All sequenced tumors (n=21) harbored alterations in STK11, often with a loss of heterozygosity event. There were no other recurrently mutated genes. Recurrent copy number alterations included loss of 1p and 11q, and gain of 1q, 15q, and 15p. Despite an extensive morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular evaluation, we are unable to determine with certainty the histogenesis of this unique tumor. Wolffian, sex cord stromal, epithelial, and mesothelial origins were considered. We propose the term STK11 adnexal tumor to describe this novel entity and emphasize the importance of genetic counseling in these patients as a significant number of neoplasms occur in association with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.
Clinical Utility of Factor V Leiden (R506Q) Testing for the Diagnosis and Management of Thromboembolic Disorders
Bauer, Kenneth A. , Kujovich, Jody L., Heit, John A. , Press, Richard D.

Mayo Clinic

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | January 29, 2021 | Volume: 126 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1304-1318

10.5858/2002-126-1304-cuofvl | PMID 12421138 Get It

Abstract Objective. —To review the current state of the art regarding the role of the clinical laboratory in diagnostic testing for the factor V Leiden (FVL) thrombophilic mutation (and other protein C resistance disorders), and to generate, through literature reviews and opinions of recognized thought-leaders, expert consensus recommendations on methodology and diagnostic, prognostic, and management issues pertaining to clinical FVL testing. Data Sources, Extraction, and Synthesis. —An initial thorough review of the medical literature and of current best clinical practices by a panel of 4 experts followed by a consensus conference review, editing, and ultimate approval by the majority of a panel of 28 additional coagulation laboratory experts. Conclusions. —Consensus recommendations were generated for topics of direct clinical relevance, including (1) defining those patients (and family members) who should (and should not) be tested for FVL; (2) defining the preferred FVL laboratory testing methods; and (3) defining the therapeutic, prophylactic, and management ramifications of FVL testing in affected individuals and their family members. As FVL is currently the most common recognized familial thrombophilia, it is hoped that these recommendations will assist laboratorians and clinicians caring for patients (and families) with this common mutation.
Outcomes of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Receiving Organ Support Therapies: The International Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study Registry
Domecq, Juan Pablo , Lal, Amos , Sheldrick, Christopher R., Kumar, Vishakha K. , Boman, Karen , Bolesta, Scott , Bansal, Vikas , Garcia, Michael A. , Kaufman, Margit, Danesh, Valerie , Anderson, Harry L., Milligan, Patrick S., Denson, Joshua L. , Hill, Catherine A. St., Dodd, Kenneth W. , Gajić, Ognjen, Kashyap, Rahul , Tierney, David M. , Camazine, Maraya , Dapul, Heda , Gharpure, Varsha , Koritala, Thoyaja , Заболотских, И. Б. , Kovačević, Peđja , Asghar, Muhammad Sohaib , McGonagill, Patrick W. , El‐Kassas, Mohamed , Parameswaran, Sreejith , Iwasaki, Yudai , Nenadić, Irina , Djuric, Marko , Lutrick, Karen , Lumelsky, David , Minear, Steven , Tarabichi, Yasir , Dy, Rajany , Galet, Colette , West, T. Eoin , Wilfong, Erin M. , Ramírez, Michelle , Law, Anica C. , Lal, Amos , Bansal, Vikas , Denson, Joshua L , Kashyap, Rahul , Gharpure, Varsha P , Asghar, Muhammad S , Domecq Graces, Juan Pablo , Sheldrick, Christopher R., Harhay, Michael Oscar , Cheruku, Sreekanth , Banner‐Goodspeed, Valerie , Anderson, Harry L., Martin, Greg S. , Gajic, Ognjen , Walkey, Allan J.

Mayo Clinic

Critical Care Medicine | January 29, 2021 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 437-448

10.1097/ccm.0000000000004879 | PMID 33555777 Get It

OBJECTIVES: To describe the outcomes of hospitalized patients in a multicenter, international coronavirus disease 2019 registry. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study including coronavirus disease 2019 patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection between February 15, 2020, and November 30, 2020, according to age and type of organ support therapies. SETTING: About 168 hospitals in 16 countries within the Society of Critical Care Medicine’s Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness University Study coronavirus disease 2019 registry. PATIENTS: Adult hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients who did and did not require various types and combinations of organ support (mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome was hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were discharge home with or without assistance and hospital length of stay. Risk-adjusted variation in hospital mortality for patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation was assessed by using multilevel models with hospitals as a random effect, adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, sex, and comorbidities. Among 20,608 patients with coronavirus disease 2019, the mean (± sd ) age was 60.5 (±17), 11,1887 (54.3%) were men, 8,745 (42.4%) were admitted to the ICU, and 3,906 (19%) died in the hospital. Hospital mortality was 8.2% for patients receiving no organ support ( n = 15,001). The most common organ support therapy was invasive mechanical ventilation ( n = 5,005; 24.3%), with a hospital mortality of 49.8%. Mortality ranged from 40.8% among patients receiving only invasive mechanical ventilation ( n =1,749) to 71.6% for patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, vasoactive drugs, and new renal replacement therapy ( n = 655). Mortality was 39% for patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ( n = 389). Rates of discharge home ranged from 73.5% for patients who did not require organ support therapies to 29.8% for patients who only received invasive mechanical ventilation, and 8.8% for invasive mechanical ventilation, vasoactive drugs, and renal replacement; 10.8% of patients older than 74 years who received invasive mechanical ventilation were discharged home. Median hospital length of stay for patients on mechanical ventilation was 17.1 days (9.7-28 d). Adjusted interhospital variation in mortality among patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation was large (median odds ratio 1.69). CONCLUSIONS: Coronavirus disease 2019 prognosis varies by age and level of organ support. Interhospital variation in mortality of mechanically ventilated patients was not explained by patient characteristics and requires further evaluation.
Criteria for Biopsy Diagnosis of Minimal Volume Prostatic Adenocarcinoma
Iczkowski, Kenneth A. , Bostwick, David G.

Mayo Clinic

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | January 28, 2021 | Volume: 124 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 98-107

10.5858/2000-124-0098-cfbdom | PMID 10629139 Get It

Abstract Context. —Minimal volume prostatic adenocarcinoma (defined as involving less than 5% of biopsy tissue) is diagnosed increasingly today because of successful cancer screening. We previously described the diagnostic category called atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP), suspicious for but not diagnostic of malignancy, present in about 2.5% of routine prostatic needle biopsy specimens. Objective. —To establish the criteria enabling a distinction between ASAP and cancer. Design. —We prospectively evaluated clinical and histologic findings from all 319 patients consecutively diagnosed as having ASAP or minimal cancer by prostatic needle biopsy in a consultation service. Seventeen histopathologic features were assessed. Results. —Fifty-six patients (18%) had ASAP, and 100 (31%) had minimal cancer; the remaining 163 (51%) had benign diagnoses, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, or larger amounts of cancer. The mean age of patients with ASAP did not differ from that of patients with minimal cancer (64.2 years vs 63.3 years; P = .65). In 10 of 17 histopathologic findings, ASAP differed significantly from minimal cancer. Among architectural findings, ASAP foci averaged 0.4 vs 0.8 mm ( P < .0001) and comprised a mean of 11 vs 17 acini ( P < .0001). Infiltrative growth occurred in 75% of ASAP foci and 100% of minimal cancers ( P < .0001). Among cytologic findings, ASAP was significantly less likely than cancer to have mitotic figures (0% vs 10%, respectively; P < .01) or prominent nucleoli in at least 10% of cells (55% vs 100%, respectively; P < .0001) and showed more frequent nuclear hyperchromasia (44% vs 9%, respectively; P < .0001) and less nuclear enlargement ( P = .0002). Luminal blue mucin secretions were less common in ASAP than cancer (6% vs 33%, respectively; P < .0001), but eosinophilic granular secretions and crystalloids were about equally frequent. Concomitant high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was present in 23% of ASAP cases and 57% of cancers ( P < .0001). Moderate-to-severe atrophy confounded 59% of cases with ASAP and 35% of cancers ( P = .003); both ASAP foci and cancer were associated with inflammation in about a quarter of cases. In each case with ASAP, we stratified our level of suspicion among 3 categories (favor benign, uncertain, and favor carcinoma). As suspicion increased so did the mean nuclear enlargement and percentage of cases with infiltrative growth and nuclear hyperchromasia (all P < .05). Conclusions. —These criteria, which differ significantly between ASAP and minimal volume cancer, can help to separate patients for whom a second biopsy is recommended from candidates for prostatectomy or other therapy.
Factors that contribute to the impairment of quality of life in gastroparesis
Parkman, Henry P. , Wilson, Laura , Yates, Katherine P. , Koch, Kenneth L. , Abell, Thomas L. , McCallum, Richard W. , Sarosiek, Irene , Kuo, Braden , Malik, Zubair , Schey, Ron , Shulman, Robert J. , Grover, Madhusudan , Farrugia, Gianrico , Miriel, Laura , Tonascia, James , Hamilton, Frank A., Pasricha, Pankaj J. , Parkman, H P , Abell, T L , Kuo, Braden

Mayo Clinic

Neurogastroenterology & Motility | January 25, 2021 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/nmo.14087 | PMID 33493377 Get It

AbstractBackgroundUnderstanding factors that impair quality of life (QOL) in gastroparesis is important for clinical management. Aims: (a) Determine QOL in patients with gastroparesis; (b) Determine factors that impair QOL.MethodsGastroparetic patientsAQ6 underwent history and questionnaires assessing symptoms (PAGI‐SYM and Rome III), QOL (SF‐36v2 and PAGI‐QOL), depression (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]), and anxiety (State Trait Anxiety InventoryAQ7).Key Results715 gastroparesis patients (256 diabetic (DG), 459 idiopathic (IG)) were evaluated. SF‐36 physical component (PC) score averaged 33.3 ± 10.5; 41% had impaired score <30. SF‐36 PC scores were similar between diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. Impaired SF‐36 PC associated with increased nausea/vomiting and upper abdominal pain subscores, acute onset of symptoms, higher number of comorbidities, use of narcotic pain medications, and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). SF‐36 mental component (MC) score averaged 38.9 ± 13.0; 26% had impaired score <30. Poor SF‐36 MC associated with diabetic etiology, higher Beck depression inventory, and state anxiety scores. PAGI‐QOL score averaged 2.6 ± 1.1; 50% had a score of <2.6. Low PAGI‐QOL associated with higher fullness, bloating, and upper abdominal pain subscores, more depression and Trait anxiety, smoking cigarettes, need for nutritional support, progressively worsening symptoms and periodic exacerbations.Conclusions & InferencesMultiple measures show poor QOL present in gastroparesis. Several areas impacted on reduced QOL: (a) Symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain, as well as IBS; (b) Etiology and acute onset and progressively worsening symptoms; (c) Comorbidities and psychological factors such as anxiety and depression; (d) Patient‐related factors such as smoking. Targeting the modifiable factors may improve patient outcomes in gastroparesis.
The ARREST Pneumonia Clinical Trial. Rationale and Design
Levitt, Joseph E. , Festić, Emir , Hedlin, Haley , Mahaffey, Kenneth W. , Rogers, Angela J. , Matthay, Michael A. , Elie, Marie‐Carmelle , Bansal, Vikas , Mosier, Jarrod , Bansal, Vikas , Mosier, Jarrod M , Desai, Manisha , Gajic, Ognjen

Mayo Clinic

Annals of the American Thoracic Society | January 25, 2021 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 698-708

10.1513/annalsats.202009-1115sd | PMID 33493423 Get It

Abstract Patients hospitalized for pneumonia are at high risk for mortality. Effective therapies are therefore needed. Recent randomized clinical trials suggest that systemic steroids can reduce the length of hospital stays among patients hospitalized for pneumonia. Furthermore, preliminary findings from a feasibility study demonstrated that early treatment with a combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a bronchodilator can improve oxygenation and reduce risk of respiratory failure in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Whether such a combination administered early is effective in reducing acute respiratory failure (ARF) among patients hospitalized with pneumonia is unknown. Here we describe the ARREST Pneumonia (Arrest Respiratory Failure due to Pneumonia) trial designed to address this question. ARREST Pneumonia is a two-arm, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of a combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a β-agonist compared with placebo for the prevention of ARF in hospitalized participants with severe pneumonia. The primary outcome is ARF within 7 days of randomization, defined as a composite endpoint of intubation and mechanical ventilation; need for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy or noninvasive ventilation for &gt;36 hours (each alone or combined); or death within 36 hours of being placed on respiratory support. The planned enrollment is 600 adult participants at 10 academic medical centers. In addition, we will measure selected plasma biomarkers to better understand mechanisms of action. The trial is funded by the U.S. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 04193878).
Content and Accessibility of United States Medical School Websites During COVID-19 and the Online Interview Season
Moore, Marlena, Smith, Jacob , Woolstenhulme, Jonathan B. , Markham, Dane J. , Rhees, Joshua, Poole, Kenneth , Patel, Naresh K. , Pollock, Jordan Riley , Patel, Naresh

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | January 22, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-147236/v1 Get It

Abstract BackgroundMost medical school applicants use the internet as a source of information when applying for medical school. Previous analyses have evaluated residency and fellowship websites, however, an in-depth analysis regarding medical school websites is lacking.MethodsWe evaluated 192 United States medical school websites for presence or absence of 39 items relevant to medical school applicants. Items fell into 7 general categories: curriculum, research, demographics of incoming class, admissions information, faculty, financial aid, and social.ResultsOf the 192 websites evaluated (152 allopathic and 40 osteopathic schools), websites contained a mean of 23 items (59%) with a standard deviation of 4.2 items. ConclusionOur study examining United States Medical School websites revealed a lack of online information for medical school applicants. As medical school interviews transition to being online during the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of the medical school website to applicants becomes increasingly crucial. The information contained in our study could be used to improve accessibility and information on medical school websites, which could help both applicants and medical schools themselves.