Citations

Introduction Increasing publication of fraudulent clinical trials poses a serious threat to evidence-based medicine. In the VITALITY Study I, we demonstrated that contamination by retracted trials significantly distorts evidence synthesis. The upcoming VITALITY Study II will take a step further and investigate how such problematic evidence undermines the credibility of guideline recommendations. Methods and analyses The VITALITY Study II will adopt a retrospective cohort design and will be structured as three work packages (WPs). To start with, a cohort of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that were contaminated by retracted trials and/or meta-analyses that included retracted trials will be established based on forward citation searching (WP1). Then, recommendations from these CPGs that used evidence from retracted trials and/or meta-analyses that synthesised these retracted trials will be re-evaluated after removing such problematic evidence, in terms of both the direction and strength of effect sizes (WP2). Finally, the subsequent impact on patient outcomes attributable to distorted recommendations will be estimated on a hypothetical population, measured by the number of expected benefit loss and the number of expected harm increment per 100 000 patients (WP3). Ethics and dissemination Formal ethical approval is not necessary for this study as it does not involve human or animal participants, nor does it involve the collection of primary data. We will disseminate the findings through publication in peer-reviewed journals and, whenever possible, presentations at academic conferences.

Abstract Background Robotic left pancreatectomy (RLP) is increasingly adopted worldwide. Current guidelines suggest a learning curve of 21 cases, yet its impact on major morbidity and oncological quality remains uncertain. Methods A retrospective multicentre international study was undertaken across 10 centres in the UK, Spain, Germany, the USA, and Australia (2014–2025). Consecutive patients undergoing RLP were categorised into competency (first 21 cases per centre) or proficiency phase (>21). The primary outcome was major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ IIIa), and secondary outcome was the R1-margin rate. Mixed-effects logistic regression and risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analyses were performed. Results 521 patients underwent RLP, including 200 (38.4%) in the competency phase and 321 (61.6%) in the proficiency phase. Median age was 63 years (IQR 54–73), and 56.4% were female. Rates of major morbidity were similar between phases (14.5% versus 14.0%, P = 0.981), as were R1 margin rates (21.6% versus 19.7%, P = 0.092). Independent predictors of major morbidity included male sex (OR 1.76, P = 0.037), preoperative pancreatitis (OR 2.23, P = 0.031), and multivisceral resection (OR 2.29, P = 0.034). Among patients with adenocarcinoma (n = 110), prolonged operative time (OR 1.39 per hour, P = 0.004) and nodal positivity (OR 2.62, P = 0.047) predicted R1 resection, while learning phase was not associated with margin status. RA-CUSUM demonstrated no excess morbidity over time in any centre. Conclusions In this first multicentre international analysis, the learning phase of RLP did not increase the risk of major morbidity or compromise oncological quality. These findings support the safe global adoption of RLP with appropriate training and case selection.

Importance Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens may be administered after pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (A-IPMNs), although the evidence supporting their use is limited. Objective To evaluate the survival benefit associated with contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after resection in A-IPMNs between 2017 and 2023. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was an international, multicenter study with 69 participating centers across Europe, North America, South America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients undergoing resection for A-IPMNs were included. Data were analyzed from May to August 2025. Intervention Contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, such as gemcitabine-capecitabine (GemCap); 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX), modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX), and S-1. Main Outcome and Measure Overall survival (months). Results Among 1321 patients (median [IQR] age 70 [63 to 76] years; 713 males [54.0%] and 608 females [46.0%]), 781 patients (59.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, while in 181 patients (13.7%) it was omitted due to poor patient fitness. Of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, 568 patients (72.6%) received contemporary regimens, including GemCap (232 patients [29.7%]), FOLFIRINOX (176 patients [22.5%]), mFOLFIRINOX (71 patients [9.1%]), and S-1 (70 patients [9.0%]). The median (IQR) follow-up for the cohort was 64.2 (40.4 to 85.0) months, and the median overall survival was 73.8 months (95% CI, 66.4 to 81.9 months). After 90-day landmark analysis and exclusion of patients ineligible for chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 243:243 patients) was not associated with improved overall survival (median, 82.3 months; 95% CI, 78.2 months to not applicable [NA] vs not reached; 95% CI, 75.3 months to NA; P = .58). Contemporary regimens vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 309:309 patients) was not associated with longer survival, and a mean survival benefit greater than 4.2 months over 5 years was excluded (difference in restricted mean survival, 1.26 months; 95%, −1.72 to 4.24 months). Treatment outcomes did not vary by chemotherapy regimen or disease characteristic (eg, N stage or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival in A-IPMNs, and a randomized clinical trial is indicated.

RET fusions appear in 1%-2% of non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). The results from the ARROW study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03037385 ) supported US Food and Drug Administration approval of pralsetinib, an oral selective RET inhibitor, for metastatic RET -altered NSCLC and RET fusion–positive thyroid cancers. ARROW was a phase I/II open-label study of pralsetinib 400 mg once daily in RET fusion–positive NSCLCs. Coprimary end points were overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Key secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). At data lock (May 20, 2024), 281 patients initiated pralsetinib (median treatment duration, 15.0 months). ORR (measurable disease patients; n = 259) was 78% (95% CI, 69 to 86) for treatment-naïve patients and 63% (95% CI, 54 to 71) for prior platinum-based chemotherapy patients. Median OS was 44.3 months (95% CI, 30.9 to 53.1), 50.1 months (95% CI, 28.3 to not reached) in treatment-naïve patients, and 39.7 months (95% CI, 27.8 to 53.2) in prior platinum patients. Common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were anemia (21%), hypertension (15%), and decreased neutrophils (13%). Three treatment-related deaths occurred (pneumonia, n = 2; interstitial lung disease and rhabdomyolysis, n = 1 each). Safety was consistent with previous ARROW reports; no hypersensitivity was reported in patients receiving prior immunotherapies. Pralsetinib produced robust, durable responses with manageable safety in treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLCs, confirming previous findings with longer follow-up.

Precis: This retrospective multicentre study of 77 NTG eyes undergoing phacoemulsification and Hydrus implantation showed a sustained reduction in medication burden, while maintaining IOP levels. Complications were rare and nonsight-threatening. Purpose: To evaluate 36-month outcomes of combined phacoemulsification and Hydrus Microstent implantation (Phaco-Hydrus) in eyes with normal tension glaucoma (NTG). Methods: This multicentre retrospective study included 77 NTG eyes from Singapore and Canada that underwent Phaco-Hydrus between 2014 and 2023. Primary outcomes were changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication burden, and cumulative success probabilities from Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses. Longitudinal changes were analysed using generalized estimating equations. Results: Of 77 eyes, 31 completed 36 months of follow-up. Mean baseline IOP and medications was 13.5±2.5 mm Hg and 1.7±0.9, respectively. No significant reductions in IOP were observed. A sustained reduction in medication use was observed at all follow-up timepoints ( P ≤0.001). At 36 months, medication use decreased by −0.7±0.2 [adjusted mean difference±SE of the mean [SEM]]. Proportion of medication-free eyes increased from 7.8% (n=6/77) at baseline to 45.2% (n=14/31) at 36 months. Cumulative success probabilities varied widely based on definitions. When defined as a decrease in ≥1 medication from baseline without an increase in IOP, or IOP ≤15 mm Hg and reduced ≥20% from baseline while medication-free, and no additional laser or incisional glaucoma surgery, this was 40.7% at 36 months. No visual field mean deviation progression was detected. Adverse events were infrequent and nonsight-threatening. Conclusion: In eyes with NTG, Phaco-Hydrus may offer a greater role in medication reduction or achieving a medication-free status over 36 months, rather than absolute IOP reduction.

Abstract Despite growing interest in AI for pancreatic cyst management, no prior study has systematically investigated how lesion characteristics influence model behavior or provided a comprehensive explainability analysis in IPMN malignancy risk stratification. We present the first multi-center study integrating explainable AI with uncertainty quantification to evaluate how cyst type, size, and location affect deep learning performance in IPMN malignancy prediction. Our retrospective study analyzed 170 IPMNs from seven centers using a radiomics-deep learning fusion model. Cases were stratified by dysplasia grade, IPMN type, size, and location; with model interpretability assessed using SHAP, LIME, Grad-CAM, and uncertainty quantification. Overall accuracy was 67.1%, with model uncertainty lower for correct versus incorrect predictions (0.72 vs 0.78, p < 0.001). On subgroup analysis: Low-Risk lesion accuracy exceeded High-Risk (81.3% vs. 42.9%, p < 0.001), BD accuracy was inversely correlated with cyst size while MD remained stable, and body and whole-pancreas cysts stratified more accurately than tail cysts (77.8%, 76.6% vs. 47.8%). AI models face significant, previously uncharacterized performance drops when evaluating complex high-risk IPMNs. Our study shows that integrating uncertainty quantification can successfully flag unreliable predictions, enabling a selective-prediction framework where clinicians can confidently rely on AI for low-risk, low-uncertainty lesions while deferring high-uncertainty cases to expert review.

aims: We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the SVEAT score in predicting 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in comparison with the well-established HEART and TIMI scores. background: Acute chest pain (ACP) is a common symptom in emergency departments. Various risk stratification tools have been developed to assess patients presenting with ACP. The Simple Vascular Event Assessment Tool (SVEAT) is the most recent scoring system introduced, based on five variables: Symptoms of chest pain, history of Vascular disease, ECG, Age, and Troponin-I. objective: We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the SVEAT score in predicting 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in comparison with the well-established HEART and TIMI scores. method: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted across five databases until June 22, 2024. Four studies comprising 1,520 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The predictive accuracy of the SVEAT, HEART, and TIMI scores for 30-day MACE was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I² statistic, with values over 75% indicating significant heterogeneity. Indirect comparisons among the scores were performed using the Z-test. result: Pooled AUC for the SVEAT score was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.98), indicating superior predictive accuracy compared to the HEART (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.81-0.92) and TIMI (AUC: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69-0.96) scores. However, significant heterogeneity (I² = 90.6%) was observed across studies, potentially due to variations in patient demographics, clinical settings, and outcome definitions. Despite the higher AUC, indirect Z-test comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences between the scoring systems. conclusion: SVEAT score demonstrates potential as an accurate tool for predicting 30-day MACE in patients with ACP. other: N/A

Background: ASCO recommends extended venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) following cancer surgery. However, these recommendations were based on trials using routine venography, which detects asymptomatic VTEs, and real-life efficacy is not well studied. We aimed to assess the association of extended VTE prophylaxis with the incidence of clinically significant VTE after elective cancer surgery. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective, population-based cohort study, we identified patients who underwent surgical resection for lung, breast, esophageal, gastric, pancreas, and colon cancer from 2010 to 2017 using the SEER–Medicare linked dataset. Patients were divided into 1 of 2 main groups for comparative analyses: those who received extended VTE prophylaxis after cancer surgery and those who did not. Patients who received extended VTE prophylaxis after cancer surgery were identified as those prescribed prophylactic doses of LMWH or a DOAC within 7 days of discharge, as captured in Medicare Part D files. Results: A total of 113,739 Medicare beneficiaries were identified, of whom 1,570 (1.4%) received extended VTE prophylaxis. There was a year-over-year increase in the use of extended VTE prophylaxis during the study period, rising from 0.6% in 2010 to 3.3% in 2017. The overall incidence of VTE was 1.6% at 1 month, 4.3% at 6 months, 5.7% at 12 months, with significant differences observed across cancer types ( P <.001). However, patients who received extended VTE prophylaxis had a higher 1-year cumulative incidence of postoperative VTE compared with those who did not (11.4% vs 5.3%; P <.001), an association that was consistent across cancer sites. In adjusted analyses, extended VTE prophylaxis was independently associated with an increased risk of VTE (hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3–2.0; P <.001). Extended prophylaxis was also associated with a higher 1-year incidence of bleeding events compared with patients who did not receive prophylaxis (12.0% vs 8.5%; P <.001). Conclusions: The utilization of extended VTE prophylaxis after cancer surgery remains low, although it has increased every year. Paradoxically, patients who received extended VTE prophylaxis had higher incidences of clinically significant VTE and bleeding compared with those who did not, likely reflecting patient selection and surveillance bias after surgery. In light of these findings, national guidelines recommending postoperative extended VTE prophylaxis, and its use as a surrogate for quality of care, should continue to be re-examined.

ABSTRACT Background Antiplatelet management in patients hospitalised for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requires balancing risks of rebleeding and clinical vascular events. Aims Evaluate the impact of antiplatelet resumption timing post‐endoscopy on rebleeding and clinical vascular events. Methods We performed a retrospective nationwide cohort study of patients hospitalised with post‐PCI GIB on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using the Vizient Clinical Database. Co‐primary outcomes were 30‐day rebleeding and 90‐day clinical vascular events after endoscopy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed. Results Among 2979 patients with both antiplatelet agents held before endoscopy for GIB (46.0% upper; 34.8% lower), antiplatelet resumption > 7 days post‐endoscopy was associated with decreased 30‐day rebleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.49–0.87]) and increased 90‐day clinical vascular events (HR 1.18 [1.02–1.36]) compared to restarting ≤ 1 day post‐endoscopy. Among 869 patients with one antiplatelet agent held before endoscopy for GIB (47.3% upper; 36.3% lower), resumption at > 7 days vs. ≤ 1 day had HR 0.69 (0.41–1.14) for rebleeding and HR 1.41 (0.97–2.04) for clinical vascular events. HRs for antiplatelet resumption > 3 days vs. ≤ 1 day post‐endoscopy were similar. Conclusions Antiplatelet resumption > 7 days after endoscopy in patients hospitalised with post‐PCI GIB is associated with decreased 30‐day rebleeding but increased 90‐day clinical vascular events compared with resumption ≤ 1 day post‐endoscopy. Similar tradeoffs were noted with antiplatelet resumption > 3 days post‐endoscopy. To optimise competing risks of rebleeding versus clinical vascular events, antiplatelet therapy should be resumed no later than 7 days post‐endoscopy, and preferably within 3–4 days.