Citations

Abstract The newly proposed revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer's disease (AD) by the Alzheimer's Association (AA) Workgroup represent a significant milestone in the field. These criteria offer objective measures for diagnosing and staging biological AD, bridging the gap between research and clinical care. Although implementation feasibility may vary across regions and settings, improving the availability and accuracy of biomarkers, especially plasma biomarkers, is expected to enhance the applicability of these criteria in clinical practice. The Fall 2023 Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable (AARR) meeting served as a forum for gathering industry perspectives and feedback on these revised criteria, ensuring that the new criteria inform research, clinical trial design, and clinical care. In this article, we outline a summary of the newly proposed “Revised Criteria for Diagnosis and Staging of AD: AA Workgroup” and provide highlights from the AARR meeting in fall 2023. Highlights The Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable (AARR) convened leaders from industry, academia, and government, to review the Revised Criteria for Diagnosis and Staging of AD: AA Workgroup , and gather industry perspectives and feedback on these revised criteria before its publication. The newly proposed revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer's disease (AD) by the AA's Workgroup represent a significant milestone, offering objective measures for the biological and staging of AD and bridging the gap between research and clinical care. Improving the availability and accuracy of biomarkers, especially blood‐based biomarkers (BBMs) is expected to improve clinical research and enhance the applicability of these criteria in clinical practice.

Background: The majority of patients respond to steroid treatment for graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), but the typically high doses and prolonged courses can cause substantial morbidity. GVHD can be classified at onset into two groups with significant differences in treatment response and non-relapse mortality (NRM) by clinical criteria (Minnesota risk) but the more favorable standard risk group still experiences high rates of treatment failure and NRM [MacMillan, BBMT 2015]. We previously validated a serum biomarker-based (ST2+REG3α) risk stratification system, MAGIC algorithm probabilities (MAPs), that can stratify patients both at initiation and during treatment into risk groups for treatment response and NRM [Hartwell, JCI Insight 2017, Srinagesh, Blood Adv 2019]. GVHD that is Minnesota standard risk and has a low MAP (i.e., Ann Arbor 1) at start of treatment represents a low risk group with >80% response rate to steroids and ~10% NRM [Etra, Blood 2023]. We hypothesized that serial monitoring of GVHD symptom severity and MAPs twice (days (d) 7 and 14) in patients with clinical and biomarker defined low risk GVHD could further stratify patients into clinically meaningful groups. Methods: We retrospectively determined MAPs at d7 and 14 in 450 patients with low risk GVHD who participated in a prospective, multi-center, observational trial and were treated with systemic steroids between 2015-2023. MAPs <0.291 at days 7 and 14 were defined as low risk based on a previously validated threshold [Major-Monfried Blood 2018]. Clinical responses were scored as complete (CR), partial (PR), or non-response (NR) by standard criteria. Initiation of second line therapy was considered NR. Patients were categorized into three groups (A-C) based on clinical responses and MAPs at days d7 and 14. A: CR/PR by d14 and low MAP at both d7+14; B: stable or worse GVHD (NR) by d14 with low MAP at both d7 and 14; C: any response with a high MAP at d7 or 14. The endpoints were clinical response at day 28 (overall response rate, ORR=CR or PR), regardless of earlier response status, and 6-month NRM. Results: The median age of the study population was 54 years (range: 0-79); 19% of patients received PT-Cy for GVHD prophylaxis. Target organ involvement was skin ± upper GI (66%), lower GI (23%), isolated UGI (11%), and skin+liver (1%), and GVHD severity was grade I (35%), II (61%), and III (4%) at start of treatment. Patients in group A (n=310, 69%), clinical responders with low MAPs through day 14, had excellent d28 ORR (93%) and very low NRM (4%). GVHD in this group was considered ultra-low risk (ULR) and subset analyses revealed highly consistent d28 ORR and NRM, regardless of target organ severity, age (<18, 18-59, >60), HCT-CI score, conditioning intensity, and GVHD prophylaxis. Group B patients comprised clinical non-responders with low MAPs through day 14 (n=112, 25%); half of them responded by d28 and their NRM was low (8%), albeit double that of group A (p=0.079). Group C was small (n=28, 6%) and included both clinical responders (n=20, 4%) and clinical non-responders (n=8, 2%) who had at least one high MAP through day 14. Their d28 ORR was 54% but NRM increased four-fold (32%) and was significantly worse than patients who maintained low MAPs regardless of clinical response (p<0.001). Conclusion: Serial monitoring by clinical response and biomarkers during the first two weeks of treatment identifies a small number of high risk patients whose GVHD is initially low risk (group C). This group experiences high NRM regardless of clinical response to steroid treatment and may benefit from treatment escalation. Patients with low risk GVHD who do not have an early clinical response to steroids but maintain low MAPs, (group B) have reasonably good long-term outcomes with standard treatment. Finally, serial monitoring identifies a very large subset of patients with ULR GVHD (group A) who respond exceptionally well to standard treatment and experience very low rates of 6-month NRM regardless of pre-transplant characteristics and GVHD prophylaxis. Such patients may benefit from treatment de-escalation strategies such as shorter courses of lower dose steroids, a strategy we are currently testing in a clinical trial (NCT05090384).

Abstract Background In BRAF-mutated high-risk melanoma, targeted therapy (BRAF/MEK inhibitors) and checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy have durable benefits as first-line (1L) adjuvant therapy. Based on differing action mechanisms of BRAF/MEK inhibitors and CPI immunotherapies, there is interest in evaluating the activity of 2L adjuvant targeted therapy in decreasing the risk of subsequent recurrence after repeat resection following relapse on/after 1L adjuvant CPI. Patients and methods This was a retrospective review of BRAF V600-mutated resected stage III/IV melanoma patients in the United States, Australia, and The Netherlands who received 1L adjuvant CPI immunotherapy, relapsed locoregionally/distantly, were again resected to no evidence of disease, and received dabrafenib/trametinib (dab/tram) as 2L adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) from initiation of 2L adjuvant dab/tram (RFS-2), analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methods. Results Thirty-eight patients were included (median age 50 years, 63% male, 87% stage III, median follow-up 19 months from 2L dab/tram initiation). Median dab/tram duration was 10.1 months (range: 1 day–22.7 months), with half discontinuing due to progression or adverse events. Median (95% CI) RFS-2 was 18.9 (14.9–28.1) months, with 91%, 81%, and 58% remaining relapse-free at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Most patients remained distant metastasis-free at 6, 12, and 18 months (97%, 85%, and 71%, respectively). Two patients were deceased at the last follow-up, with 97% alive at 18 months. Conclusions Over 80% of patients remained relapse- and metastasis-free at 12 months after 2L dab/tram initiation, with only 2 deaths observed. Dab/tram appears to have activity in the 2L adjuvant setting, although more follow-up is required.

Abstract OBJECTIVES Safety, efficacy and durability are important considerations when selecting a bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (AVR). This study assessed 7-year clinical outcomes and haemodynamic performance of the Avalus bioprosthesis. METHODS Patients indicated for surgical AVR were enrolled in this prospective, nonrandomized trial, conducted across 39 sites globally. The primary end-point of this analysis was freedom from surgical explant or percutaneous valve-in-valve reintervention due to structural valve deterioration (SVD) at 7 years of follow-up, determined using Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis. We also evaluated a composite end-point of SVD and/or severe haemodynamic dysfunction requiring reintervention. Survival, valve-related safety events and haemodynamic performance were assessed. Deaths and safety events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee. RESULTS A total of 1132 patients underwent surgical AVR. Mean age was 70 years; 854 patients (75%) were men. The mean STS risk of mortality was 2.0 ± 1.4%, and 659 patients (58%) had a New York Heart Association classification of I/II. One or more concomitant procedures were performed in 577 patients (51%). At 7 years, the Kaplan–Meier rate of freedom from SVD/severe haemodynamic dysfunction requiring reintervention was 1.2% (0.5–2.5%) with no cases adjudicated as SVD. The survival rate was 82.6% (79.5–85.0%). The KM event rate was 5.7% (4.3–7.7%) for reintervention, 6.3% (4.9–8.3%) for endocarditis and 0.4% (0.1–1.1%) for valve thrombosis. Mean aortic gradient, dimensionless velocity index and effective orifice area were 13.8 ± 5.9 mmHg, 0.42 ± 0.09 and 1.99 ± 0.53 cm2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This analysis demonstrated excellent durability of the Avalus valve with good clinical outcomes and stable haemodynamic performance through 7 years of follow-up.

AbstractPrior case reports have suggested that treating thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) may relieve intractable migraine headaches, but there has been no case series large enough to show when underlying TOS should be suspected as a contributor to migraine burden. This observational followed by questionnaire study was performed in an outpatient neurology practice to identify clinical features of patients with migraine in which TOS contributed to migraine burden. We report the clinical features of 50 consecutive patients (48 women, 2 men, age = 43.9+/12.7 years) who were treated for chronic migraine and TOS (20 migraine with aura, 28 migraine without aura, two hemiplegic migraines). Headaches had become chronic within 1 year of onset in 21 patients (42%) with characteristics as follows (percentages are based on known data): greater severity ipsilateral to TOS limb pain (38/50=76%), presence of limb swelling (32/48=67%), and worsened by recumbency (32/38=84%). Thirty‐two patients eventually needed surgery, which included percutaneous transluminal venoplasty, 1st rib removal, scalenectomy, pectoralis minor tenotomy, and/or vein patching. The mean improvement of headaches on the treated side was 72 ± 26.7%; 12 patients experienced complete resolution of headaches after treatment of TOS (follow‐up 7.2 ± 5.2 months). Questionnaire responders reported significant reductions in headache days (18.3 ± 8.6 to 11.1 ± 10.8 days/month, p < 0.0016), severity (7.8+/2.5 to 5.4 ± 2.9, p < 0.00079), and need for emergency care (3.6 ± 4.0 to 0.71 ± 1.3 visits/year, p < 0.0029). Chronic migraines can be important manifestations of TOS. Early transition to a chronic state, lateralized limb pain, and headaches worsened by recumbency are clues to the contribution of TOS pathology. Addressing the TOS contribution to migraine can significantly reduce migraine headache burden.

Abstract The field of infectious diseases (ID) offers a rewarding career path and is widely viewed as an essential subspecialty in medicine. However, in recent years, these positive aspects have been overshadowed by concerns surrounding low fellowship match rates, undercompensation, and burnout. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Fellowship Training Program Directors Committee met in 2023, discussed the future of ID as a specialty, and sought to develop strategies to highlight the value and opportunities of ID for future generations, as well as underscore the importance of and provide tools for positive messaging to trainees about the subspecialty. This paper presents ideas generated at this meeting and is meant to serve as a reference for ID training program directors, as well as the wider ID community, in uplifting and shaping the future of the field.

Abstract Patients with NF1-PN experience pain and other symptoms that negatively impact functioning and quality-of-life. We present patient- and parent proxy-reported HRQoL outcomes from ReNeu (NCT03962543), a pivotal, phase 2b trial of mirdametinib, an investigational MEK1/2 inhibitor, in adults and children (≥2 y) with NF1-PN causing morbidities. Fifty-eight adults and 56 children received mirdametinib (2 mg/m2 BID; 3-weeks-on/1-week-off, 28-d cycles). Change in HRQoL was assessed by Pediatric QoL Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 Generic Core Scales from baseline across the 24-cycle treatment phase; change from baseline at Cycle 13 (C13) was a prespecified secondary endpoint. PedsQL is a HRQoL measure for adults and children with a Total Score (TS) and 4 subscales: physical, emotional, social, and school/work. Items are reported on a 0-100 scale (higher scores=better HRQoL). Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as change from baseline &gt;9.7 points for adults, &gt;8.5 points for child self-report, and &gt;9.0 points for parent proxy-report. PedsQL-TS improvement (least-squares mean, LSM [SE] change) from baseline at C13 was 3.9 (1.6; P=.018; n=34) for adults, 4.0 (2.4; P=.096; n=38) for children by self-report, and 5.6 (1.9; P=.005; n=43) by parent proxy-report. PedsQL-TS improvements for adults and children by parent proxy-report (not by children self-report) were observed early (at C5 and C3, respectively) and sustained through C24. Clinically meaningful improvement in PedsQL-TS from baseline at C13 was achieved by 37% (10/27) adults, 45% (13/29) children by self-report, and 47% (15/32) children by parent proxy-report (among patients who could have achieved a clinically meaningful change from baseline). Significant (P&lt;.05) improvement from baseline to C13 was reported for physical (adults, children, and parent proxy-report), school/work (adults), and emotional and social (parent proxy-report) subscales. Adults and children (by parent proxy-report) with NF1-PN had clinically meaningful, early, and sustained improvement in HRQoL over the course of mirdametinib treatment.

Abstract ReNeu (NCT03962543) is a trial of the investigational, oral, selective MEK1/2 inhibitor (MEKi) mirdametinib in adults (≥18 years) and children (2-17 years) with NF1-PN. Skin adverse events (AEs) were common in ReNeu, and some discontinuations were noted with low-grade AEs. A multidisciplinary team retrospectively reviewed skincare practices at one high-enrolling site (n=12) with no discontinuations due to skin AEs; these were incorporated into ReNeu trial recommendations and recently updated. The purpose was to prevent/manage skin AEs and maintain protocol treatment adherence. MEKi skin AEs vary by pubertal status, therefore recommendations also vary by pubertal status. All patients were counseled to adopt hygienic skincare practices, including bathing daily, and using mild cleansers and hypoallergenic skin moisturizers (cream or ointment-based emollient; minimum BID) to prevent dry skin. Prepubescent patients were advised to incorporate diluted bleach baths (3-4 times/week) when initiating mirdametinib or after rash development. Treatments recommended for mild-to-severe dermatitis were hydrocortisone cream (2.5% BID) on face/skinfold areas and triamcinolone ointment (0.1% BID) on trunk/extremities. Treatments for mild acneiform eruptions included topical clindamycin lotion (1.0% BID) until resolution, with optional hydrocortisone cream (2.5% BID). For moderate-to-severe acneiform eruptions, cephalexin (20 mg/kg/day divided BID, max 500 mg, ≤6 weeks), amoxicillin (25 mg/kg/day divided BID, max 875 mg, ≤6 weeks), or oral fluconazole (20 mg/kg/day, max 100 mg, 5 days then once weekly for 3 months) were suggested. Postpubescent patients were advised to initiate topical 1.0% clindamycin lotion and oral doxycycline or minocycline (50-mg daily, 3 months) with mirdametinib initiation. Patients with subsequent mild-to-severe acneiform eruptions were advised to apply hydrocortisone cream (2.5% BID) or triamcinolone ointment (0.1% BID). Referral to a dermatologist was suggested for all patients with uncontrolled dermatitis, worsening acneiform eruptions, or infection. Proactive skincare practices appeared effective at this site, but prospective validation is necessary before making clinical recommendations.

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with NF1-PN in the phase 2b ReNeu trial (NCT03962543) of mirdametinib in adults (N=58, ≥18y) and children (N=56, 2-17y) had a deeper median (range) best reduction (adults: -41% [-90% to 13%]; children: -42%, [-91% to 48%]) from baseline in target PN volume than previously published in trials of other agents in NF1-PN. METHODS In the 24-cycle (1-cycle=28d) treatment phase, objective response rate (ORR) was the percentage with confirmed objective responses (OR) of ≥20% target PN volume reduction from baseline on consecutive MRIs (by blinded independent central review). This analysis includes patients achieving deep response (&gt;50% best reduction from baseline in target PN volume) regardless of OR and inclusive of patients in the long-term follow-up. Exploratory analysis of baseline characteristics compared patients with deep response and patients with ≤50% volume reduction. RESULTS ORR was 41% (24/58) in adults and 52% (29/56) in children treated with mirdametinib. 62% (15/24) of adults and 52% (15/29) of children who achieved OR had deep response. To further characterize deep response, 2 adults and 3 children with deep response without confirmation or in long-term follow-up were included. Of those with a deep response, 35% (6/17) of adults and 72% (13/18) of children were investigator-defined as having progressing PN. Patients achieved deep response regardless of baseline age, sex, target PN volume, tumor location, or progression status. For adults and children, median time to best percent change from baseline in PN volume for patients achieving deep response was 25.4 and 21.8mo; for patients with reductions of ≥20% to ≤50% was 15.3 and 15.2mo; for patients with reductions of &lt;20% was 7.8 and 4.2mo, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Patients had a similar likelihood of achieving deep response across assessed baseline characteristics. A trend between deep response and longer treatment duration suggests a benefit of prolonged therapy with mirdametinib.