Citations

Introduction: Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are at increased risk of cognitive decline. A proposed mechanism is cerebral hypoperfusion related to vascular dysfunction and impaired cerebral blood flow regulation Hypothesis: Patients with CAD will have lower cerebrovascular function than age- and sex-matched controls, assessed as reactivity to a vasodilatory carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) stimulus. Methods: Adults 40-70years old with CAD were recruited on enrollment to a cardiac rehabilitation program following a cardiac event or hospitalization. Age and sex-matched adults without known disease or cardiovascular risk factors were recruited as healthy controls. Cognitive function was assessed by the Fluid Composite of the NIH Cognition Toolbox. Following a familiarization visit, participants underwent a stepped CO 2 protocol (room air, 2% CO 2 , 4% CO 2 , 6% CO 2 ) while continuously measuring middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) using transcranial doppler ultrasound, mean arterial pressure (MAP), ventilation (VE), and end-tidal CO 2 . Cerebrovascular conductance (CVCi) was calculated as MCAv/MAP. Cerebrovascular reactivity was calculated as the linear regression slope of CVCi against the change in end-tidal CO 2 . The reactivity of MAP and VE (or chemosensitivity) were also calculated. Results: 19 patients with CAD and 10 healthy controls were recruited ( Table 1 ). Compared with controls, patients with CAD had a 2-fold lower cerebrovascular reactivity (p=0.003), higher MAP reactivity (p<0.05), and a trend towards higher chemosensitivity (p<0.1) ( Table 2 ). There were no group differences in resting CVCi or cognition ( Table 2 ). After adjustment for age and sex, lower cerebrovascular reactivity was associated with lower peak oxygen uptake, diabetes, and smoking history ( Table 3 ). Conclusions: Compared with healthy controls, we report that patients with CAD have significantly lower cerebrovascular function, with no differences in cognitive function.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent malignant tumor of the central nervous system. The prognosis of GBM is grim, with a median overall survival of 14.6 months and only 6.9% of patients surviving 5 years after the initial diagnosis. Despite poor outcomes, standard therapy of surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and tumor-treating fields has remained largely unchanged. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has been a paradigm shift in oncology, with efficacy across a broad spectrum of cancer types. Nonetheless, investigations of ICIs in both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM have thus far been disappointing. This lack of clinical benefit has been largely attributed to the highly immunosuppressive nature of GBM. However, immunotherapy still holds promise for the treatment of GBM, with combinatorial strategies offering hope for potentially overcoming these current limitations. In this review, we discuss the outcomes of clinical trials employing ICIs in patients with GBM. Afterward, we review ICI combination strategies and how these combinations may overcome the immunosuppressive microenvironment of GBM in the context of preclinical/clinical evidence and ongoing clinical trials.

Abstract Although immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has produced profound survival benefits in a broad variety of tumors, a proportion of patients do not respond. Treatment failure is in part due to immune suppressive tumor microenvironments (TME), which is particularly true of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Since oncolytic viruses (OV) can generate a highly immune-infiltrated, inflammatory TME, we developed a vesicular stomatitis virus expressing interferon-ß (VSV-IFNß) as a viro-immunotherapy against HCC. Since HCC standard of care atezolizumab/bevacizumab incorporates ICI, we tested the hypothesis that pro-inflammatory VSV-IFNß would recruit, prime, and activate anti-tumor T cells, whose activity anti-PD-L1 ICI would potentiate. However, in a partially anti-PD-L1-responsive model of HCC, addition of VSV-IFNß abolished anti-PD-L1 therapy. Cytometry by Time of Flight showed that VSV-IFNß expanded dominant anti-viral effector CD8 T cells with concomitant, relative disappearance of anti-tumor T cell populations which are the target of anti-PD-L1. However, by expressing a range of HCC tumor antigens within VSV, the potent anti-viral response became amalgamated with an anti-tumor T cell response generating highly significant cures compared to anti-PD-L1 ICI alone. Our data provide a cautionary message for the use of highly immunogenic viruses as tumor-specific immune-therapeutics by showing that dominant anti-viral T cell responses can inhibit sub-dominant anti-tumor T cell responses. However, by chimerizing anti-viral and anti-tumor T cell responses through encoding tumor antigens within the virus, oncolytic virotherapy can be purposed for very effective immune driven tumor clearance and can generate anti-tumor T cell populations upon which immune checkpoint blockade can effectively work.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Belzutifan is a selective inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor 2-alpha that has been FDA approved for Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) syndrome-associated tumors. There is limited real-world evidence in CNS hemangioblastoma. Our objective was to report on our clinical experience with belzutifan. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our institutional (Mayo Clinic Rochester) experience of belzutifan in adults (18 years or older) with VHL and craniospinal hemangioblastomas not amenable to surgery. The study period was October 2021 to March 2023. RESULTS 4 patients (all female) with a median age of 36 years at time of belzutifan initiation were included. Median duration of therapy at last follow-up was 11 months (6-17 months). All patients had radiographic response to therapy after a median of 3 months (2-5 months), with maximal response to therapy after a median of 8 months (3-17 months). Therapy was well tolerated. The most common adverse effect was anemia. No patients had treatment pauses or dose adjustments due to toxicity. No patients experienced hypoxia. DISCUSSION We showed that belzutifan is safe and well-tolerated with strong disease response for CNS hemangioblastoma in adults with VHL, supporting continued use of belzutifan in this patient population. Future studies should assess duration of treatment, effects of cessation after long-term use, and markers of therapeutic response.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive form of brain tumor in adults. Despite maximal surgical resection, irradiation, and chemotherapy, median overall survival (OS) for recurrent GBM (rGBM) remains at only 30 weeks. GBM tumors have an immune-suppressive microenvironment with low numbers of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Interleukin 7 (IL-7) plays a key role in T cell homeostasis and survival, with IL-7 inducing T cell expansion in lymphopenic conditions. Efineptakin alfa (NT-I7), a long-acting IL-7, has been shown to increase effector CD8 T cells and reduce suppressor T-regulatory cells in murine GBM models, with subsequently improved OS. We recently completed a Phase I study in newly diagnosed GBM patients which showed that NT-I7 is safe, well-tolerated, and increased absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs), and determined maximum tolerated dose for Phase II. We hypothesized that NT-I7 may not only mitigate GBM treatment-associated immune suppression, but also potentiate the effect of immune checkpoint blockade, leading to an increase in TILs and improved survival. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining NT-I7 and pembrolizumab in rGBM patients. This is an open-label, single arm one-stage Phase II study of NT-I7 and pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy with surgery for adult patients with rGBM. We plan to enroll 30 evaluable patients, including a 6-patient safety run-in. The primary endpoint is the 9-month OS rate. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, objective response rate, changes in ALC, and adverse events profile. The correlative endpoints include studies to assess the anti-glioma immune response, changes in T cell subsets and functionality, peripheral cytokine quantification, and immunohistochemical analysis of GBM tissue. Longitudinal cerebrospinal fluid proteomics is optional. This study opened in Jan 2023. Six (6) of the planned thirty (30) patients had been enrolled by time of submission.

Abstract BACKGROUND Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of cancer with median overall survival (OS) of 3-6 months following diagnosis. Proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) is a novel treatment option for LMD, permitting whole neuroaxis treatment with tolerable toxicity and improved efficacy compared to conventional photon whole brain radiation therapy and as needed focal spine radiotherapy. Despite this, patients experience progression and succumb to LMD. Addition of systemic therapy to pCSI may improve outcomes. METHODS In this single institution retrospective case series, we report feasibility of combination treatment with pCSI and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in patients with LMD from solid tumors. RESULTS Three patients were treated with pCSI (30 Gy in 10 fractions) and ICI. The first patient developed LMD related to large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of lung primary, diagnosed by imaging and cytology, having previously undergone resection and stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. Clinical and radiographic improvement was noted following pCSI, bevacizumab, and pembrolizumab therapy. Patient experienced disease progression and passed away only after ICI was held due to hypophysitis, with 6-month OS. The second patient developed LMD related to BRAF V600E mutant melanoma, diagnosed by imaging and cytology, having previously undergone ICI and BRAF-targeted therapy. Following pCSI, relatlimab, nivolumab, and BRAF-targeted therapy, the patient remains alive 7 months after LMD diagnosis despite radiographic progression treated with carboplatin, paclitaxel, intrathecal IL-2, ipilimumab, and bevacizumab. The third developed LMD related to BRAF-wildtype melanoma, diagnosed by imaging, having previously received ICI. Patient underwent pCSI followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab, progression-free 5 months after LMD diagnosis. CONCLUSION Addition of systemic therapy to pCSI is feasible for patients with LMD. Combination of ICI and pCSI may confer additional survival benefit, even among patients with prior exposure to ICI. These initial promising results warrant prospective evaluation.

Abstract BACKGROUND Dexamethasone is commonly used to manage peritumoral edema and alleviate neurologic symptoms in patients with intracranial tumors. The optimal dexamethasone dose for brain metastases is unknown and widely variable. Recent literature reports the most common regimen is 4 mg four times daily. However, the half-life of dexamethasone is 35-54 hours, suggesting that such frequent dosing may be unnecessary. We explored the dose-effect relationship of dexamethasone on brain metastases patient outcomes to improve quality of care. METHODS We retrospectively identified 100 patients (1/1/2016 – 12/31/2022) with brain metastases who were treated with dexamethasone and had adequate follow-up. All patients received standard oncologic care including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or surgical intervention. We evaluated the association between dexamethasone dosing regimens (&lt; 4 mg twice daily versus &gt; 4 mg three times daily), clinical outcomes (performance status, clinical and radiographic response to corticosteroids, survival), and dexamethasone adverse effects during the acute presentation and at first neuro-oncologic follow-up. RESULTS Seventy-two patients received less frequent dexamethasone dosing (&lt; 4 mg twice daily), while 28 received more frequent dexamethasone dosing (&gt; 4 mg three times daily). Patients with higher frequency dexamethasone dosing were more likely to have radiographic evidence of midline shift (p &lt; 0.001), compression of ventricles (p &lt; 0.001), and herniation (p = 0.0020) at presentation. Those with more frequent dosing more often demonstrated radiographic response to dexamethasone (67.9% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.0323), but there were no differences in symptomatic improvement, Karnofsky Performance Status, seizure reduction, survival, or the frequency of adverse events (e.g., hyperglycemia, hypertension, infection, psychosis) between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that for most patients with brain metastases, less frequent dexamethasone dosing may lead to clinical outcomes that are similar to those patients who received more frequent dosing. However, higher doses of dexamethasone can be considered for those with more concerning radiologic features.

Abstract BACKGROUND Dexamethasone is commonly used for symptomatic management in primary central nervous lymphoma (PCNSL). The optimal dosing scheme for dexamethasone is unknown and practice patterns widely vary among clinicians. In this study, we explored the dose-effect relationship of dexamethasone on PCNSL outcomes to better influence quality care for these patients. METHODS We retrospectively identified 24 Mayo Clinic patients (1/1/2018 – 12/31/2022) with pathologically confirmed PCNSL who received dexamethasone. All patients otherwise received standard oncologic care including methotrexate-based systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The association between dexamethasone dosing regimens and clinical outcomes (performance status, clinical and radiographic response, survival) in addition to potential adverse effects were evaluated in the acute phase of presentation and at first post-treatment oncology follow up. RESULTS Nine patients received less frequent dexamethasone dosing (4 mg twice daily or less), while 15 received more frequent dexamethasone dosing (4 mg four times daily). Fourteen patients received dexamethasone prior to biopsy, 2 of which (1 in each cohort) had a non-diagnostic biopsy and required a second procedure 3 weeks to 3 months later to confirm PCNSL diagnosis. There were no statistically significant differences in time to diagnosis from presentation or clinical and radiographic improvement including Karnofsky Performance Status, reduction in seizures, or survival between the two cohorts. Additionally, there were no differences in the frequency of adverse events (e.g., hyperglycemia, hypertension, infection, psychosis) between the two dosing regimens. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that more frequent dexamethasone dosing is not associated with better clinical outcomes in the symptomatic management of PCNSL. Twice daily or less frequent dosing can be considered without compromising patient outcomes.