Citations

AbstractBackgroundA recent phase III trial (NCT01372774) comparing use of stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS] versus whole-brain radiation therapy [WBRT] after surgical resection of a single brain metastasis revealed that declines in cognitive function were more common with WBRT than with SRS. A secondary endpoint in that trial, and the primary objective in this secondary analysis, was to identify baseline biomarkers associated with cognitive impairment after either form of radiotherapy for brain metastasis. Here we report our findings on APOE genotype and serum levels of associated proteins and their association with radiation-induced neurocognitive decline.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected samples from a completed randomized clinical trial, patients provided blood samples every 3 months that were tested by genotyping and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and results were analyzed in association with cognitive impairment.ResultsThe APOE genotype was not associated with neurocognitive impairment at 3 months. However, low serum levels of ApoJ, ApoE, or ApoA protein (all P < .01) and higher amyloid beta (Aβ 1–42) levels (P = .048) at baseline indicated a greater likelihood of neurocognitive decline at 3 months after SRS, whereas lower ApoJ levels were associated with decline after WBRT (P = .014).ConclusionsPatients with these pretreatment serum markers should be counseled about radiation-related neurocognitive decline.

OBJECTIVE Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devasting primary brain tumor with less than a 5% 5-year survival. Treatment response assessment can be challenging because of inflammatory pseudoprogression that mimics true tumor progression clinically and on imaging. Developing additional noninvasive assays is critical. In this article, the authors review various biomarkers that could be used in developing liquid biopsies for GBM, along with strengths, limitations, and future applications. In addition, they present a potential liquid biopsy design based on the use of an extracellular vesicle–based liquid biopsy targeting nonneoplastic extracellular vesicles. METHODS The authors conducted a current literature review of liquid biopsy in GBM by searching the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Articles were assessed for type of biomarker, isolation methodology, analytical techniques, and clinical relevance. RESULTS Recent work has shown that liquid biopsies of plasma, blood, and/or CSF hold promise as noninvasive clinical tools that can be used to diagnose recurrence, assess treatment response, and predict patient outcomes in GBM. Liquid biopsy in GBM has focused primarily on extracellular vesicles, cell-free tumor nucleic acids, and whole-cell isolates as focal biomarkers. GBM tumor signatures have been generated via analysis of tumor gene mutations, unique RNA expression, and metabolic and proteomic alterations. Liquid biopsies capture tumor heterogeneity, identifying alterations in GBM tumors that may be undetectable via surgical biopsy specimens. Finally, biomarker burden can be used to assess treatment response and recurrence in GBM. CONCLUSIONS Liquid biopsy offers a promising avenue for monitoring treatment response and recurrence in GBM without invasive procedures. Although additional steps must be taken to bring liquid biopsy into the clinic, proof-of-principle studies and isolation methodologies are promising. Ultimately, CSF and/or plasma-based liquid biopsy is likely to be a powerful tool in the neurosurgeon’s arsenal in the near future for the treatment and management of GBM patients.

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma diagnostic criteria have been redefined with the 5th edition of WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Glioblastomas are defined as IDH wildtype diffuse astrocytic glioma tumors with one of the following features: microvascular proliferation, or necrosis, or TERT promoter mutation, or EGFR gene amplification, or +7/-10 chromosome copy number changes. The aim of this study is to establish the impact of extent of resection in overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (WT), WHO grade 4 (WHO 2021). METHODS Systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify studies comparing OS and PFS after gross total resection (GTR) vs subtotal resection (STR) or biopsy for glioblastoma IDH-WT. Prognostic hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS were analyzed using a random-effects model. RESULTS We identified 1439 publications. Nine studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria. 788 patients underwent GTR out of 1818. The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in OS and PFS duration when undergoing GTR for glioblastoma IDH-WT with a median OS of 20 months 95% CI (17-25) compared to 12 months 95% CI (9-15) for STR or biopsy and a median PFS of 11 months 95% CI (9-12) for GTR compared to 7 months 95% CI (5-7) for STR or biopsy respectively. GTR showed a 49% significant reduction of mortality risk HR=0.51 95%CI (0.42-0.59) and a 44% significant reduction of progression risk HR=0.56 95%CI (0.41-0.71) compared to STR or biopsy. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review indicates that GTR may be associated with improved OS and PFS compared to STR or biopsy for Glioblastoma, IDH-WT, WHO grade 4 (WHO 2021). However, this is limited by variable study design and significant clinical and methodological heterogeneity among studies.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Glioblastomas (GBMs) are highly aggressive tumors. A common clinical challenge after standard of care treatment is differentiating tumor progression from treatment-related changes, also known as pseudoprogression (PsP). Usually, PsP resolves or stabilizes without further treatment or a course of steroids, whereas true progression (TP) requires more aggressive management. Differentiating PsP from TP will affect the patient's outcome. This study investigated using deep learning to distinguish PsP MRI features from progressive disease. METHOD We included newly diagnosed GBM patients who met the inclusion criteria, including a new or increasing enhancing lesion size within the original radiation field and who had clinical, medication, and any histopathology available. The interpretation of the MR images at the image inclusion time point had to be indeterminate. We labeled those who subsequently were stable or improved on imaging and clinically as PSP and those with clinical and imaging deterioration as TP. A subset of subjects underwent a second resection. We labeled these subjects as PSP or TP based on the histological diagnosis. We performed skull stripping, coregistered contrast-enhanced T1 MRIs with T2-weighted images for each patient and used them as input to a 3-D Densenet121 model. We used several augmentation techniques and five-fold cross-validation to achieve more robust predictions. RESULT We included 124 patients who met the criteria, and of those, 63 were PsP and 61 were TP. We trained a deep learning model that achieved 76.4% (ranged 70%-84%, SD 5.122) mean accuracy over the 5 folds, 0.7560(ranged 0.6553-0.8535, SD 0.069) mean AUROCC, 88.72% (SD 6.86) mean sensitivity, and 62.05%(SD 9.11) mean specificity. CONCLUSION We report the development of a deep learning model that distinguishes PsP from TP in GBM patients treated per the Stupp protocol. Further refinement and external validation are required prior to widespread adoption in clinical practice.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Plasma extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been shown as a promising source for biomarker identification in glioblastoma (GBM) and could help differential diagnosis, treatment evaluation and tumor progression monitoring. These EVs are enriched in molecular signatures indicative of their cell origins, giving an indication of the key players in this pathology. In this project, we aimed to identify diagnostic biomarkers for GBM plasma EVs and their cells of origin. METHODS: Plasma EV samples were prepared following the MIFlowCyt-EV guideline of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles, then stained for EV markers (CD9/CD63/CD81) and markers indicative of cell origins (CD31/CD45/CD41a/CD11b). Actin phalloidin was used as a negative marker. Stained plasma samples were analyzed using a Cytek Aurora flow cytometer. Percentages of different EV subpopulations were analyzed and compared between GBM and normal donor (ND) plasma EVs (reference group). Further clustering analysis was performed on EV events by t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and self-organizing maps on flow cytometry data (FlowSOM) analysis. The predictive value of multiparametric qualities derived from the reference group was tested in blinded test group samples. RESULTS: Percentages of CD9, CD81, and CD11b positive EVs were higher in GBM patient plasma, while ND plasma had more CD41a positive EVs. GBM plasma EVs had unique multiparametric signatures compared to ND plasma EVs based on t-SNE and FlowSOM analysis. Our analysis also identified 15 distinct EV subpopulations which differed in size and various surface marker expression levels. Eight of these subpopulations were enriched for GBM EVs, while three were enriched for ND EVs. Our method of multiparametric analysis demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity in predicting disease status in human samples. CONCLUSIONS: GBM plasma EVs have a unique surface marker expression profile and distinct EV subpopulations compared to ND plasma EVs. Multiparametric signatures show promise as potential diagnostic markers of GBM.

Importance Long-term outcomes of radiotherapy are important in understanding the risks and benefits of therapies for patients with brain metastases. Objective To determine how the use of postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is associated with quality of life (QOL), cognitive function, and intracranial tumor control in long-term survivors with 1 to 4 brain metastases. Design, Setting, and Participants This secondary analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial included 48 institutions in the US and Canada. Adult patients with 1 resected brain metastases but limited to those with 1 to 4 brain metastasis were eligible. Unresected metastases were treated with SRS. Long-term survivors were defined as evaluable patients who lived longer than 1 year from randomization. Patients were recruited between July 2011 and December 2015, and data were first analyzed in February 2017. For the present study, intracranial tumor control, cognitive deterioration, QOL, and cognitive outcomes were measured in evaluable patients who were alive at 12 months from randomization and reanalyzed in June 2017. Interventions Stereotactic radiosurgery or WBRT. Main Outcomes and Measures Intracranial tumor control, toxic effects, cognitive deterioration, and QOL. Results Fifty-four patients (27 SRS arm, 27 WBRT arm; female to male ratio, 65% vs 35%) were included for analysis with a median follow-up of 23.8 months. Cognitive deterioration was less frequent with SRS (37%-60%) compared with WBRT (75%-91%) at all time points. More patients declined by 2 or more standard deviations (SDs) in 1 or more cognitive tests for WBRT compared with SRS at 3, 6, and 9 months (70% vs 22%, 46% vs 19%, and 50% vs 20%, respectively). A 2 SD decline in at least 2 cognitive tests was associated with worse 12-month QOL in emotional well-being, functional well-being, general, additional concerns, and total scores. Overall QOL and functional independence favored SRS alone for categorical change at all time points. Total intracranial control for SRS alone vs WBRT at 12 months was 40.7% vs 81.5% (difference, −40.7; 95% CI, −68.1% to −13.4%), respectively. Data were first analyzed in February 2017. Conclusions and Relevance The use of SRS alone compared with WBRT resulted in less cognitive deterioration among long-term survivors. The association of late cognitive deterioration with WBRT was clinically meaningful. A significant decline in cognition (2 SD) was associated with overall QOL. However, intracranial tumor control was improved with WBRT. This study provides detailed insight into cognitive function over time in this patient population. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01372774 ; ALLIANCE/CCTG: N107C/CEC.3 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology/Canadian Cancer Trials Group)

Abstract Background Hemangioblastomas pose an inherent surgical risk due to the potential for high intraoperative blood loss, especially in larger tumors. One approach to minimize this risk is to use preoperative embolization. Herein, we present our institutional experience treating large and giant cerebellar hemangioblastomas. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of 19 patients with cerebellar hemangioblastomas that had a maximal diameter of >3 cm. We performed a literature review and included individual patient-level data that met our >3 cm diameter cerebellar hemangioblastoma inclusion criteria. Results Our cohort consisted of 19 patients that received a total of 20 resections for their cerebellar hemangioblastomas. Preoperative embolization was utilized in eight cases (38.1%). One patient experienced transient neurological complications after embolization (12.5%). Tumors of patients in the embolization group had larger median total, solid, and cystic volumes and were more likely to involve the cerebellopontine angle than those in the non-embolized group. Compared with non-embolized patients, embolized patients had less decrease in their hemoglobin, lower volumes of estimated blood loss, reduced rates of postoperative complications and permanent deficits, and greater instances of neurological improvement. The larger cohort (obtained from the combining our cohort with patients identified during a literature review) consisted of 99 patients with 39 receiving preoperative embolization. Conclusion It is important to examine individual patient characteristics when determining eligibility for preoperative embolization. However, improvements in endovascular techniques have made preoperative embolization a safe and effective procedure with minimal risks that can be performed in many patients.

OBJECTIVE The profound immunosuppression found in glioblastoma (GBM) patients is a critical barrier to effective immunotherapy. Multiple mechanisms of tumor-mediated immune suppression exist, and the induction of immunosuppressive monocytes such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) is increasingly appreciated as a key part of this pathology. GBM-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) can induce the formation of MDSCs. The authors sought to identify the molecular consequences of these interactions in myeloid cells in order to identify potential targets that could pharmacologically disrupt GBM EV–monocyte interaction as a means to ameliorate tumor-mediated immune suppression. Heparin-sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) are a general mechanism by which EVs come into association with their target cells, and soluble heparin has been shown to interfere with EV-HSPG interactions. The authors sought to assess the efficacy of heparin treatment for mitigating the effects of GBM EVs on the formation of MDSCs. METHODS GBM EVs were collected from patient-derived cell line cultures via staged ultracentrifugation and cocultured with monocytes collected from apheresis cones from healthy blood donors. RNA was isolated from EV-conditioned and unconditioned monocytes after 72 hours of coculture, and RNA-sequencing analysis performed. For the heparin treatment studies, soluble heparin was added at the time of EV-monocyte coculture and flow cytometry analysis was performed 72 hours later. After the initial EV-monocyte coculture period, donor-matched T-cell coculture studies were performed by adding fluorescently labeled and stimulated T cells for 5 days of coculture. RESULTS Transcriptomic analysis of GBM EV–treated monocytes demonstrated downregulation of several important immunological and metabolic pathways, with upregulation of the pathways associated with synthesis of cholesterol and HSPG. Heparin treatment inhibited association between GBM EVs and monocytes in a dose-dependent fashion, which resulted in a concomitant reduction in MDSC formation (p < 0.01). The authors further demonstrated that reduced MDSC formation resulted in a partial rescue of immune suppression, as measured by effects on activated donor-matched T cells (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The authors demonstrated that GBM EVs induce broad but reproducible reprogramming in monocytes, with enrichment of pathways that may portend an immunosuppressive phenotype. The authors further demonstrated that GBM EV–monocyte interactions are potentially druggable targets for overcoming tumor-mediated immune suppression, with heparin inhibition of EV-monocyte interactions demonstrating proof of principle.

Abstract In the following brief report, we highlight the advances in the neuro-oncology space from the ASCO 2022 Annual Meeting. We put into context the phase 2 and 3 trials and how these may alter the standard of care going forward. In addition, we highlight some other earlier work that will lead to future and potentially practice-changing trials.

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) has poor prognosis despite aggressive treatment. Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines are promising, but widespread clinical use has not been achieved, possibly reflecting manufacturing issues of antigen choice and DC potency. We previously optimized vaccine manufacture utilizing allogeneic human GBM tumor cell lysate and potent, mature autologous DCs. Here, we report a phase I study using this optimized DC vaccine in combination with standard therapy. Methods Following surgical resection and radiation with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ), newly diagnosed adult GBM patients received intradermal DC vaccines plus TMZ. Primary endpoints were safety and feasibility. Immune and treatment responses were recorded. Results Twenty-one patients were enrolled in this study. One progressed between leukapheresis and vaccine manufacture. Twenty patients received treatment per protocol. Vaccine doses (≥15) were generated following a single leukapheresis for each patient. No dose-limiting vaccine toxicities were encountered. One patient had symptomatic, histologically proven pseudoprogression. Median progression-free survival was 9.7 months. Median overall survival was 19 months. Overall survival was 25% at 2 years and 10% at 4 years. One patient remains progression-free 5 years after enrollment. Specific CD8 T-cell responses for the tumor-associated antigen gp100 were seen post-vaccination. Patients entered the trial with a leukocyte deficit compared to healthy donors which partly normalized over the course of therapy. Conclusions This vaccine platform is safe and highly feasible in combination with standard therapy for newly diagnosed patients. Imaging, histological, survival, and immunological data suggest a positive biological response to therapy that warrants further investigation.