Citations

Abstract A better understanding of gene-specific risks for development of breast cancer will lead to improved screening, prevention, and therapeutic strategies for individuals identified to carry germline mutations. We performed targeted massively-parallel sequencing to identify mutations and large genomic rearrangements in 26 known or proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes in 2134 BRCA-negative women with familial breast cancer (FBC). A case-control analysis was performed comparing the frequency of internally classified mutations identified in FBC cases to that in non-Finnish European controls from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) excluding samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Including large genomic rearrangements, mutations were identified in 8.2% of FBC cases compared to 6.2% of ExAC controls, including mutations in high-penetrance genes (0.6% in cases vs. 0.1% in controls), moderate-penetrance genes (3.7% vs 1.7%), and seven cases with two mutations (0.3%). The remainder of FBC cases and ExAC controls had mutations in proposed breast cancer genes (1.6% of cases vs 2.4% of controls), Lynch syndrome genes (0.5% vs. 0.5%) or were heterozygous MUTYH carriers (1.5% vs. 1.5%). Case-control analysis demonstrated significant associations with FBC for ATM, PALB2, and TP53 mutations (OR>3.0, p<10-4), BARD1 mutations (OR=3.2, p=0.012), and CHEK2 truncating mutations (OR=1.6, p=0.041). Our results therefore demonstrate that only approximately 4% of BRCA1/2 negative FBC patients have mutations in genes definitively associated with breast cancer at this time. Large case-control studies are needed to fully evaluate the breast cancer risks associated with moderate penetrance and proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes. Citation Format: Kara N. Maxwell, Thomas Paul Slavin, Jenna M. Lilyquist, Joseph Vijai, Susan L. Neuhausen, Steven N. Hart, Vignesh Ravichandran, Tinu Thomas, Ann Maria, Kasmintan A. Schrader, Raymond Moore, Chunling Hu, Brad Wubbenhorst, Brandon M. Wenz, Kurt D'Andrea, Susan M. Domchek, Mark E. Robson, Paulo Peterlongo, Paolo Radice, James M. Ford, Judy E. Garber, Csilla Szabo, Kenneth Offit, Katherine L. Nathanson, Fergus J. Couch, Jeffrey N. Weitzel. Risks of familial breast cancer associated with known and proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4265. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4265

Abstract Germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for 10% of ovarian cancer (OC), including ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinomas. Pathogenic variants in BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, and other cancer predisposition genes have been observed in another 2% to 5% of OCs. However, the specific genes associated with OC and estimates of risk associated with pathogenic variants in the individual genes are not well defined. We sought to determine the relevance of multigene panel testing results for OC cases. The study was focused on 140,449 individuals, including 10,233 OC cases, receiving clinical panel testing of cancer predisposition genes. Standardized relative risks (SRR) for pathogenic variants in 18 cancer predisposition genes were estimated using reference controls from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). The median (range) age at diagnosis of OC was 57 (21-90) years. OC cases were 76.2% Caucasian, 3.6% African American, 4.6% Asian, 4.7% Hispanic, and 10.9% unknown/other. Among the 10,233 OC cases, 1391 (13.6%) had pathogenic mutations, including 1032 pathogenic mutations among the 7793 Caucasian OC cases (13.2%). Using the non-Finnish European ExAC (excluding TCGA samples) reference controls, the allele frequency for all pathogenic variants in each gene was summed and compared to the frequency of mutations in the Caucasian OC cases. Pathogenic variants in the known OC predisposition genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, MSH2, MSH6, RAD51C, and RAD51D were associated with a high risk of OC (SRR>4.0). Additionally, significant associations were observed for pathogenic variants in suspected OC risk genes ATM and PALB2 (SRR=2.06 and 2.78, respectively). This study identified several genes routinely screened on multigene panel testing that confer high or moderate risks of OC. Associations with known OC predisposition genes were confirmed. In addition, this study provides evidence that PALB2 is a moderate risk OC gene, and that ATM may confer lower to moderate risks of OC. If confirmed in future studies, these risks should be carefully considered in future screening and management of OC patients. In contrast, BARD1 and genes in the MRN complex were not associated with clinically relevant risks of OC. Citation Format: Jenna Lilyquist, Holly LaDuca, Eric Polley, Hermela Shimelis, Chunling Hu, Raymond Moore, Steven N. Hart, Fergus J. Couch, Jill Dolinsky, David E. Goldgar. Multigene panel testing and risk estimates in 10,233 ovarian cancer cases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1287. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1287

Abstract Breast cancer risks conferred by many germline missense variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, often referred to as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), have not been established. In this study, associations between 19 BRCA1 and 33 BRCA2 missense substitution variants and breast cancer risk were investigated through a breast cancer case–control study using genotyping data from 38 studies of predominantly European ancestry (41,890 cases and 41,607 controls) and nine studies of Asian ancestry (6,269 cases and 6,624 controls). The BRCA2 c.9104A>C, p.Tyr3035Ser (OR = 2.52; P = 0.04), and BRCA1 c.5096G>A, p.Arg1699Gln (OR = 4.29; P = 0.009) variant were associated with moderately increased risks of breast cancer among Europeans, whereas BRCA2 c.7522G>A, p.Gly2508Ser (OR = 2.68; P = 0.004), and c.8187G>T, p.Lys2729Asn (OR = 1.4; P = 0.004) were associated with moderate and low risks of breast cancer among Asians. Functional characterization of the BRCA2 variants using four quantitative assays showed reduced BRCA2 activity for p.Tyr3035Ser compared with wild-type. Overall, our results show how BRCA2 missense variants that influence protein function can confer clinically relevant, moderately increased risks of breast cancer, with potential implications for risk management guidelines in women with these specific variants. Cancer Res; 77(11); 2789–99. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Existing antiangiogenic approaches to treat metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are weakly effectual, prompting further study of tumor angiogenesis in this disease setting. Here, we report a novel role for sulfatase 2 (SULF2) in driving HCC angiogenesis. Sulf2-deficient mice (Sulf2 KO) exhibited resistance to diethylnitrosamine-induced HCC and did not develop metastases like wild-type mice (Sulf2 WT). The smaller and less numerous tumors formed in Sulf2 KO mice exhibited a markedly lower microvascular density. In human HCC cells, SULF2 overexpression increased endothelial proliferation, adhesion, chemotaxis, and tube formation in a paracrine fashion. Mechanistic analyses identified the extracellular matrix protein periostin (POSTN), a ligand of αvβ3/5 integrins, as an effector protein in SULF2-induced angiogenesis. POSTN silencing in HCC cells attenuated SULF2-induced angiogenesis and tumor growth in vivo. The TGFβ1/SMAD pathway was identified as a critical signaling axis between SULF2 and upregulation of POSTN transcription. In clinical HCC specimens, elevated levels of SULF2 correlated with increased microvascular density, POSTN levels, and relatively poorer patient survival. Together, our findings define an important axis controlling angiogenesis in HCC and a mechanistic foundation for rational drug development. Cancer Res; 77(3); 632–45. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer, and has a strong heritable component, with approximately 15 percent of new cases having family history of breast cancer. Genetic panel testing for patients with a family history of breast cancer has become a popular clinical resource. However, the risk of breast cancer associated with inactivating mutations in the predisposition genes is largely undefined, creating critical limitations in the interpretations of the results from panel testing and subsequent medical management. The Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility Genes (CARRIERS) consortium was established to determine the risk of cancers associated with truncating mutations in the known predisposition genes and to extend these studies to the clinical classification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in the relevant genes. CARRIERS involves screening of approximately 30,000 population-based breast cancer cases and 30,000 study matched controls for mutations in 28 established or proposed breast cancer predisposition genes. Population-based risks for breast cancer associated with mutations in each gene will be estimated. In parallel, 10,000 breast cancer cases from moderate and high-risk breast cancer families will be similarly screened for mutations and the penetrance of the mutations in high-risk families will be estimated. Furthermore, VUS identified by mutation screening will be characterized by functional and family-based studies and models for classification of the clinical relevance of VUS in each gene will be developed. These data are expected to lead to improvements in cancer risk assessment and improved management of patients found to carry mutations or VUS in breast cancer predisposition. Citation Format: Jenna Lilyquist, Peter Kraft, Steven N. Hart, Emily J. Hallberg, Chunling Hu, Raymond Moore, Rohan Gnanaolivu, Susan M. Domchek, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Katherine L. Nathanson, David E. Goldgar, Fergus J. Couch. The CARRIERS consortium: Establishing refined breast cancer risk estimates in known predisposition genes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 810.

Abstract Sequencing tests assaying panels of genes or whole exomes are widely available for cancer risk evaluation. However, methods for classification of variants resulting from this testing are not well studied. We evaluated the ability of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines to define the rate of mutations and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in 180 medically relevant genes, including all ACMG designated reportable cancer and non-cancer genes, in individuals who met guidelines for hereditary cancer risk evaluation. We performed whole exome sequencing in 404 individuals in 257 families and classified 1640 variants from these genes. Potentially clinically actionable (likely-pathogenic/pathogenic, LP/P) versus nonactionable (VUS/likely-benign/benign) calls were 92% and 88% concordant with locus specific databases and Clinvar, respectively. LP/P mutations were identified in 11 of 25 breast cancer susceptibility genes in 27 BRCA1/2 negative families (11%). Evaluation of 84 additional autosomal dominant cancer susceptibility genes identified LP/P mutations in only four additional families (1.7%), suggesting they do not influence risk in this cohort. However, individuals from nine of 257 families (3.5%) had incidental LP/P mutations in 32 non-cancer disease genes, and 7% of individuals were monoallelic carriers of an LP/P mutation in 39 autosomal recessive cancer syndrome genes. Furthermore, 90% of individuals had at least one VUS. In summary, these data support the clinical utility of ACMG variant classification guidelines. In addition, evaluation of extended panels of cancer genes in breast/ovarian cancer families leads to only an incremental clinical benefit but substantially increases the complexity of the results. Citation Format: Kara N. Maxwell, Steven N. Hart, Joseph Vijai, Kasmintan A. Schrader, Tinu Thomas, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Vignesh Ravichandran, Raymond M. Moore, Chunling Hu, Lucia Guidugli, Brandon Wenz, Thomas P. Slavin, Susan M. Domchek, Mark E. Robson, Csilla Szabo, Susan L. Neuhausen, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Kenneth Offit, Fergus J. Couch, Katherine L. Nathanson. Evaluation of ACMG guideline classified variants in 180 cancer and incidental non-cancer genes in families with breast/ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 5220.

Abstract The prevalence of germline pathogenic mutations in a comprehensive panel of cancer predisposition genes is not well-defined for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). To estimate the frequency of mutations in a panel of 22 cancer predisposition genes, 96 patients unselected for a family history of cancer who were recruited to the Mayo Clinic Pancreatic Cancer patient registry over a 12-month period were screened by next-generation sequencing. Fourteen pathogenic mutations in 13 patients (13.5%) were identified in eight genes: four in ATM, two in BRCA2, CHEK2, and MSH6, and one in BARD1, BRCA1, FANCM, and NBN. These included nine mutations (9.4%) in established pancreatic cancer genes. Three mutations were found in patients with a first-degree relative with PDAC, and 10 mutations were found in patients with first- or second-degree relatives with breast, pancreas, colorectal, ovarian, or endometrial cancers. These results suggest that a substantial proportion of patients with PDAC carry germline mutations in predisposition genes associated with other cancers and that a better understanding of pancreatic cancer risk will depend on evaluation of families with broad constellations of tumors. These findings highlight the need for recommendations governing germline gene-panel testing of patients with pancreatic cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(1); 207–11. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Panel-based germline genetic testing of established breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes is widely used in high-risk clinics to inform on risks of breast and ovarian cancer. While most protein truncating mutations identified in predisposition genes are associated with moderate to high risks of these cancers, variants of uncertain significance (VUS), in the form of missense and intronic variants, have an undefined relevance to cancer. Many hundreds of VUS in BRCA1 and BRCA2 identified by clinical genetic testing over the last 20 years still have uncertain clinical relevance. In addition, VUS in other known predisposition genes are being identified by current panel-testing in up to 10% of individuals without BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. These VUS cause problems in cancer risk estimation and clinical management of patients undergoing clinical genetic testing. In an effort to evaluate the clinical significance of VUS in cancer predisposition genes we have developed functional assays that characterize the impact of the variants on the functions of the proteins encoded by the predisposition genes. In particular, a homology directed repair reporter assay providing a quantitative measure of homologous recombination repair of DNA double strand breaks has been developed for characterization of VUS in homologous recombination associated genes. When applied to 13 known pathogenic and 30 known neutral variants from the DNA binding domain of BRCA2, this assay exhibits 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity. Based on these results a model estimating the probability of pathogenicity of each BRCA2 VUS was developed. The HDR assay and probability model has now been applied to 230 BRCA2 VUS identified through genetic testing. Here we identify 80 BRCA2 variants that are deficient in HDR activity. We further combined these results with prior probabilities of pathogenicity derived from the sequence based Align GVGD in silico prediction model to estimate the posterior probability of pathogenicity for each VUS. Our results suggest that in the absence of family based segregation information, results from the HDR functional assay and in silico prediction models can be used to predict the pathogenicity of BRCA2 VUS. The assay has also been used to characterize VUS in the PALB2 and RAD51C predisposition genes, leading to identification of a subset of missense variants that are deficient in HDR repair activity and may be associated with increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. These results will prove useful for improved risk assessment of carriers of these BRCA2, PALB2 and RAD51C variants and their family members and for validation of other approaches to mutation classification. Citation Format: Fergus J. Couch, Hermela Shimelis, Andreas Schroeder, Chunling Hu, Emily Hallberg, Gary Lipton, Edwin Iversen, Noralane M. Lindor. Characterization of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4685. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4685

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in blood are associated with poor survival of patients with breast, prostate, or colon cancer. We hypothesized that CTCs are associated with poor survival of patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Eighty‐eight patients with CCA were prospectively enrolled at Mayo Clinic Rochester between June 2010 and September 2014. The CellSearch system by Veridex was used for detection of CTCs in peripheral blood. Associations between CTC, patient and tumor characteristics, and survival were examined using the Cox's proportional hazards model. Fifteen patients (17%) were positive for CTC ≥2 and 8 patients (9%) for CTC ≥5. CTCs were associated with tumor extent. CTC ≥2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1‐5.4; P = 0.02) and CTC ≥5 (HR, 4.1; 95% CI: 1.4‐10.8; P = 0.01) were both independent predictors of survival. In subgroup analyses, CTC ≥2 (HR, 8.2; 95% CI: 1.8‐57.5; P < 0.01) and CTC ≥5 (HR, 7.7; 95% CI: 1.4‐42.9; P = 0.02) were both associated with shorter survival among patients with metastasis. There was a trend toward association of CTC ≥5 with shorter survival in patients with nonmetastatic CCA (HR, 4.3; 95% CI: 1.0‐13.8; P = 0.06). CTC ≥2 (HR, 10.5; 95% CI: 2.2‐40.1; P < 0.01) and CTC ≥5 (HR, 10.2; 95% CI: 1.5‐42.3; P = 0.02) were both associated with shorter survival among patients with perihilar/distal CCA. CTC ≥5 was associated with shorter survival of patients with intrahepatic CCA (HR, 4.2; 95% CI: 1.1‐14.1; P = 0.04). Conclusion: CTCs were associated with more‐aggressive tumor characteristics and independently associated with survival in patients with CCA. Assessment of CTCs may be useful for identifying CCA patients at risk of early mortality. (Hepatology 2016;63:148–158)