Citations

Abstract Treatment options for glioblastoma remain limited, particularly for those who are not eligible for traditional resection, whether due to lesion location or inability to tolerate open craniotomy. Maximal-safe resection followed by radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide offers the best outcomes for patients. Unfortunately, not all tumors are amenable to conventional surgical resection at the time of diagnosis with only about 1/3 of patients able to receive a gross-total resection and 15-25% of patients receiving biopsy only, thus reducing their projected overall survival to 9 months. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive, cytoreductive tool, that has demonstrated safety as a surgical approach to treat primary brain tumors. METHODS Data from LAANTERN prospective multicenter registry (NCT02392078) was analyzed to determine clinical outcomes for patients with new and recurrent IDH wild-type glioblastoma (N=89). Demographics, intraprocedural data, adverse events, KPS, health-economics, and survival data were prospectively collected then analyzed separately for newly diagnosed GBM (N=29) and recurrent GBM (N=60). RESULTS Median overall-survival was 9.73 months (95% CI: 5.16, 15.91) for newly diagnosed patients and median post-procedure survival was 8.97 (6.94, 12.36) months for recurrent patients. Median overall-survival for newly diagnosed patients receiving post-LITT chemoradiotherapy was 16.14 months (6.11, not reached). The median length of hospital stay was 50 hours and 80% of patients were discharged to home. CONCLUSIONS LITT offers an effective cytoreductive approach for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent IDH wild-type glioblastoma. Importantly, its use in newly diagnosed patients who receive post-LITT chemoradiotherapy leads to a median OS similar to that of patients treated with conventional surgical resection. LITT remains an important alternative for patients with inoperable tumors or those not amenable to resection. Enrollment in LAANTERN is ongoing and these cohorts will be revisited as data continues to mature. Benefits beyond cytoreduction are also being actively explored.

Abstract BACKGROUND Standard of care (SOC) and patient survival in glioblastoma have changed little in the past 17 years. We evaluated in a phase 3 trial whether adding an autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccine (murcidencel) to SOC extends survival. Patients and METHODS Newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients were randomized 2:1 to either murcidencel or placebo. Under a crossover design, all patients could receive murcidencel following tumor recurrence. All parties remained blinded regarding treatments before recurrence. Patients thus received murcidencel at new diagnosis (nGBM) or at recurrence (rGBM) following crossover from placebo. The primary and secondary endpoints compare overall survival (OS) with contemporaneous, matched external controls. Four sets of analyses were conducted to ensure rigorous matching of the controls, reduce biases, and confirm the robustness of the results. RESULTS 331 patients were enrolled. With the crossover, 89% received murcidencel. Median OS (mOS) for nGBM patients (n = 232) was 19.3 months from randomization (22.4 months from surgery) with murcidencel vs. 16.5 months from randomization in the controls (HR = 0.80, p = 0.002). Survival at 48 months from randomization was 15.7% vs. 9.9%, and at 60 months was 13% vs. 5.7%. For rGBM (n = 64), mOS was 13.2 months from relapse vs. 7.8 months in the controls (HR = 0.58, p < 0.001). Survival at 24 months post-recurrence was 20.7% vs. 9.6%, and at 30 months post-recurrence was 11.1% vs 5.1%. In nGBM patients with methylated MGMT (n = 90), mOS was 30.2 months from randomization (33 months from surgery) with murcidencel vs. 21.3 months from randomization in the controls (HR = 0.74, p = 0.027). The treatment was well tolerated, with only 5 serious adverse events deemed at least possibly related to the vaccine. CONCLUSION Clinically meaningful and statistically significant survival extension was seen in both nGBM and rGBM patients treated with murcidencel and SOC compared with contemporaneous, matched external controls who received SOC alone.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Immunotherapies targeting PD-1 in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) have shown limited activity. We hypothesize combining therapies targeting immunosuppressive pathways with cytotoxic and antiangiogenic therapies will improve survival. This nonrandomized, noncomparative Phase II study examines safety and efficacy of an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (retifanlimab), hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), and bevacizumab, with or without an IDO1 inhibitor (epacadostat), in patients with rGBM. METHODS This is an open-label Phase II study of two regimens. Regimen A examines retifanlimab (500mg IV Q4W) + bevacizumab (10mg/kg IV Q2W) + HFRT (3.5Gy/day x 10) in patients with IDH1/2-WT rGBM. Regimen B adds epacadostat. Key inclusions include dexamethasone ≤ 4 mg/day and reirradiation candidacy. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) probability at 9 months (OS-9). An increase of OS-9 from 38% (bevacizumab alone) to 60% was considered clinically relevant and required 24 efficacy evaluable patients. RESULTS Regimen A accrual is complete; interim results are as follows: 26 rGBM enrolled, with 24 evaluable [median age 64.2 years (42.1-81.8); 29% female; 29% MGMT promotor methylated; 33.3% with multi-focal disease; median KPS 90 (70-100); median baseline dexamethasone 0 mg (0-4) and ALC 1,000 cells/µl (300-3,700)]. Patients received a median of 6 cycles as of May 2022 (2-24). Median follow-up is 16.0 months. Interim median PFS is 7.0 months (95%CI: 4.5~11.1) and median OS is 12.2 months (95%CI 7.1~18.0). Regimen A met primary endpoint with OS-9 of 67% (95%CI: 44~82%). Overall response rate is currently 58% (95%CI: 36.94~77.2%). There were five possible immune-related grade 3+ toxicities to date (n = 1 each colitis, vomiting, and seizure; n = 2 diarrhea). Regimen B is enrolling. CONCLUSIONS Interim analysis suggests combination retifanlimab, HFRT, and bevacizumab in rGBM is generally well-tolerated, with encouraging OS and PFS at the time of submission. Correlative analysis is ongoing and will be presented at the meeting.

Abstract INTRODUCTION First classified in 2000, pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) is an uncommon intracranial malignancy. Given recent codification and rarity, there is no consensus on management and treatment is often provider dependent. METHODS Within an institutional database, we identified 10 patients with PPTID diagnosed between 2009 and 2022. Medical records were reviewed for demographic data, presenting symptoms, extent of disease, surgical interventions, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Progression free survival, overall survival, and neurocognitive outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS Median age at diagnosis was 36 (range 13-73), 40% women, 60% Caucasian. Nine patients had tumor involvement limited to the pineal region and one patient had multifocal intracranial tumor involvement with leptomeningeal disease. Two patients had gross total resection (GTR) alone, three had GTR followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), two had subtotal resection (STR) followed by craniospinal irradiation (CSI), two had biopsy followed by adjuvant RT, and one had biopsy with CSI and chemotherapy. At median follow up of 31 months (range 3-88 months), only one patient, who had received biopsy, CSI, and chemotherapy, had progression of disease and no patients are deceased. Two patients treated with CSI had adverse neurocognitive outcomes, which was not observed with focal RT. CONCLUSIONS Our limited case series suggests GTR followed by surveillance, GTR followed by focal RT, and any extent resection followed by CSI may all achieve durable disease control in patients with PPTID. Treatment selection should be individualized and potential neurocognitive toxicities should be considered.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Medulloblastomas (MB) are embryonal tumors arising in the cerebellum, predominantly affecting pediatric patients. Recognition of molecularly defined subgroups has advanced management. Factors influencing the prognosis and management of adult MB patients remain poorly understood. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our experience with adult (> 18 years at initial diagnosis) MB patients, diagnosed between 1992-2020. Molecular subtyping corresponding to the 2021 WHO Classification was performed. Kaplan-Meier estimates (Log-rank test assessing for group differences) were performed for univariate survival analysis with cox regression used for multivariate (subgroup, age, gender, disseminated disease, extent of resection) analyses. RESULTS Our cohort included 76 adult MB patients (62% male), with a median age of 31.7 years (range: 18-66) at diagnosis, and median follow-up of 7.7 years (range: 0.6-26.9). 58 patients had sufficient tissue for molecular characterization by immunohistochemistry and corresponded to the SHH-activated (n=37; 64%), non-WNT/non-SHH (n=12; 21%), WNT-activated (n=9; 15%) subgroups. At initial diagnosis, all patients underwent radiotherapy, with 97% (n=66) receiving craniospinal irradiation with a boost either to the posterior fossa (75%) or tumor bed (22%); and underwent gross total resection (n=51; 67%) and chemotherapy (n=56; 75%). Median overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort was 14.8 years (93% 2-year OS; 86% 5-year OS; 64% 10-year OS) and was longer for younger patients (< 30: > 15.4 years, > 30: 9.9 years; Log-rank p< 0.001). No significant OS difference was identified by MB molecular subgroup (SHH, TP53-wt: 14 years, WNT: 11.4 years, non-WNT/non-SHH: > 14.8 years; Log-rank p=0.1167) or extent of resection. Only age at diagnosis remained significant in multivariate survival analyses. DISCUSSION We report one of the largest retrospective cohorts in adult MB patients with molecular subtyping. Survival and molecular subgroup frequencies were similar to previous reports. Survival was longer for younger patients and was not significantly different by MB molecular subgroup or extent of resection.

ImportanceCytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation.ObjectiveTo determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings.ExposuresImmunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm.ResultsThe median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79).Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701

Abstract BACKGROUND Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers associated with brain metastases (BM). Up to 50% of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) develop BM which portends a poor prognosis, with a median survival of 4.4-7.3 months. There is a lack of effective systemic therapy. Irinotecan is a topoisomerase-1 inhibitor with a response rate of 5-23% in advanced breast cancer. Nal-IRI is an intravenous liposomal formulation of irinotecan, with greater efficacy in tumor growth inhibition and the ability to cross the blood brain barrier (BBB) than irinotecan, resulting in a prolonged survival in preclinical TNBC BM models. Additionally, Nal-IRI has demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity in patients with TNBC- BM in a phase-I trial (NCT01770353). Pembrolizumab is a humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody which has shown efficacy in TNBC. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the combination of Nal-IRI and pembrolizumab can provide a synergic effect to control the CNS disease and prolong survival in TNBC with progressive BM. METHODS This is a phase II, single arm trial with a safety lead-in to evaluate the efficacy of nal-IRI (50-70mg/m2 IV Q2W) in combination with pembrolizumab (400mg IV Q6W). Simon’s 2-stage design is used, with 18 patients in the 1st stage and additional 24 at 2nd stage for a total of 42. The first 6 patients will serve as a safety lead-in. Key eligibilities include: histologically/cytologically confirmed TNBC with new or progressive BM; prior immunotherapy is allowed but not prior nal-IRI/irinotecan; prior sacituzumab-govitecan is permitted if disease stable for ≥16-week while on therapy and ≥24-week washout prior to starting trial; measurable disease; and ≤4 prior lines of therapy in the metastatic setting. The primary endpoint is CNS disease control rate (DCR) at 6 months using RANO-BM criteria. Secondary endpoints include CNS and non-CNS ORR, PFS and OS. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05255666)

Abstract INTRODUCTION High grade gliomas (HGG) are devastating diseases with largely unchanged survival outcomes despite decades of research. Recent studies suggest the interleukin 13 receptor subunit alpha 2 (IL-13Rα2) is selectively upregulated in up to 80% of HGG, including glioblastoma (GBM) and diffuse midline gliomas (DMG) harboring H3K27 alterations. Immunotoxins targeting IL-13Rα2 have been demonstrated as safe and have shown some benefit for patients with HGG in previous phase I/II and III clinical trials. We hypothesized that by using GB-13 (IL13.E13K-PE4E), a novel peptide-toxin that binds IL-13Rα2 with high specificity and possesses a Pseudomonas exotoxin moiety, we would enhance the anti-tumor effects of this immunotherapy for HGG in vitro and in vivo while decreasing off-target toxicity. METHODS We examined the pharmacological effects of GB-13 in multiple patient-derived cell lines and rodent models of HGG. GBM and DMG lines were used to confirm IL-13Rα2 expression and sensitivity towards GB-13. Tumor naïve rats were evaluated for toxicity, and orthotopic PDX mice were used to monitor tumor size and survival following loco-regional infusion of GB-13. RESULTS GB-13 induced a potent cytotoxic response strongly predicated on IL-13Rα2 expression in vitro. No treatment-related adverse effects were noted after 7-day continuous intracranial infusion of GB-13 in tumor naïve rats. Further, in IL-13Rα2-upregulated orthotopic PDX mice, direct intratumoral administration of GB-13 via convection-enhanced delivery abrogated tumor growth and prolonged survival. CONCLUSIONS Given these promising results as well as the critical need for novel therapies in CNS malignancies, we are progressing to human trials using GB-13 targeting recurrent HGG. Ongoing safety studies in tumor-bearing animals will be able to define dose levels for the initial adult study-arm and the following pediatric study-arm. In this Phase 1 clinical trial, we hypothesize that loco-regional infusion of GB-13 will safely enhance tumor clearance by causing selective killing of IL-13Rα2-upregulated HGG cells.