Citations

AbstractAnti‐CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy (CART) has revolutionized the outcomes of relapsed and/or refractory B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. However, CART is still limited by its availability, toxicity, and response durability. Not all patients make it to the CART infusion phase due to disease progression. Among those who receive CART, a significant number of patients experience life‐threatening cytokine release syndrome toxicity, and less than half maintain a durable response with the majority relapsing in pre‐existing sites of disease present pre‐CART. Radiation therapy stands as a promising peri‐CART and salvage treatment that can improve the outcomes of these patients. Evidence suggests that bridging radiotherapy prior to CART controls the disease during the manufacturing period, augments response rates and local control, cytoreduces/debulks the disease and decreases the severity of cytokine release syndrome, and may prolong disease‐free intervals and survival especially in patients with bulky disease. Consolidative radiotherapy for residual post‐CART disease alters the pattern of relapse and improves local recurrence‐free and progression‐free survivals. Salvage radiotherapy for relapsed post‐CART disease has favorable survival outcomes when delivered comprehensively for patients with limited relapsed disease and palliates symptoms for patients with diffuse relapsed disease. The biology of the disease during the peri‐CART period is poorly understood, and further studies investigating the optimal timing and dosing of radiation therapy (RT) are needed. In this review, we tackle the most significant challenges of CART, review and propose how RT can help mitigate these challenges, and provide The Mayo Clinic experts' approach on incorporating RT with CART.

Abstract Advances in the treatment of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) have resulted in a growing survivor population. There is a lack of data on long-term outcomes among adults with LCH. We conducted a retrospective record review of 219 adults (aged ≥18 years) with LCH. Most common presentation was multisystem (34.2%), followed by single-system pulmonary (32%), unifocal (28.3%), and single-system multifocal (5.5%) LCH. Risk organ involvement (the liver, spleen, or bone marrow) was seen in 8.7% of cases, and 40 of 88 (45.5%) tested cases were BRAFV600E. At a median follow-up of 74 months, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 58.3% and estimated median PFS was 83 months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached; 5- and 10-year OS rates were 88.7% and 74.5%, respectively. Risk organ involvement was associated with worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 4.5) and OS (HR, 10.8). BRAFV600E was not associated with risk organ involvement or survival. When compared with matched unaffected US population, individuals with LCH had a significantly higher risk of overall mortality (standardized mortality ratio [SMR], 2.66), specifically among those aged <55 years at diagnosis (SMR, 5.94) and those with multisystem disease (SMR, 4.12). Second cancers occurred in 16.4% cases, including diverse hematologic and solid organ malignancies. LCH-associated deaths constituted 36.1% of deaths and occurred within 5 years of diagnosis. After 5 years, non-LCH causes of death, including second cancers, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cardiovascular diseases, predominated. Our study highlights, to our knowledge, for the first time, that adults with LCH experience early and late mortality from non-LCH causes and the need for development of targeted survivorship programs to improve outcomes.

Abstract In this retrospective study, BRAF mutation status did not correlate with disease extent or (event-free) survival in 156 adults with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. BRAFV600E was associated with an increased incidence of second malignancies, often comprising hematological cancers, which may be clonally related.

e14594 Background: Voyager-V1 (VV1) is an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus engineered to express interferon beta (IFNβ) to boost cellular antitumor immunity and sodium iodine symporter (NIS). A phase 1 trial investigating a single infusion of VV1 in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma and T-cell lymphoma (TCL) showed promising and durable clinical activity, primarily in patients with TCL. VV1 infects tumor cells and macrophages in the lymph nodes and spleen, resulting in release of tumor antigens and IFNβ that activates and boost cellular antitumor immunity. We present the preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis in patients given one intravenous (IV) dose of VV1. Methods: Patients received 5e9 to 1.7e11 TCID50 (50% tissue culture infective dose) of VV1 given over 30 minutes. We also explored the impact of infusion duration (0.25, 0.5,1 and 3 hours) in 17 patients with solid tumors. The objectives were to determine the impact of viral dose on pharmacokinetics (PK) of VSV and IFNβ. For VSV and IFNβ PK, whole blood was collected in 30 patients on days 1, 2, 3, and 8. Dose levels were 1.7E10, 5E10, and 1.7E11 TCID50. The plasma concentration-time data were estimated with non-compartmental analysis using WinNonlin 8.3. Results: The half-life of VV1 is comparable (10-12h) between dose levels of 1.7e10, 5e10 and 1.7e11. Ideal infusion rate was found to be 30 minutes and provides the highest Cmax and AUC. Most peak concentrations for viremia and IFNβ were achieved between ‘end of infusion’ and 2.5 hours, 4.5 and 24 hours, respectively. Following infusion, a second concentration peak is found in over half the patients leading to highly variable terminal elimination half-life, specifically where the second peak is at 24 hours. There was no second peak for IFNβ levels. Peak plasma concentration and systemic exposure increased in proportion to increased dose, consistent with linear clearance. Conclusions: The 30 minute infusion rate was considered the best as its PK provides the highest Cmax and AUC with no significant CRS differences among other groups. IL-6 and IFNα markers at hour 4 indicate a likely CRS and hour 24 provides a possible prediction of the grade. Cmax and AUC were also highest at 1.7e11 TCID50. This is the recommended dose that will be used in the expansion arm in patients with TCL. Clinical trial information: NCT03017820 , NCT02923466 . [Table: see text]

7530 Background: Oncolytic virotherapy is a novel immunomodulatory therapeutic approach currently under study for relapsed refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. The engineered Vesicular Stomatitis Virus VSV-IFNβ-NIS used in this study encodes interferon beta (IFNβ) and sodium iodine symporter (NIS). Virally-encoded IFNβ serves as an index of viral proliferation and enhances host anti-tumor immunity. Herein, we report the updated results of the phase 1 clinical trial NCT03017820 of a one-time administration of systemic VSV-IFNβ-NIS among patients (pts) with R/R multiple myeloma (MM), T cell Lymphoma (TCL) and Acute myeloid Leukemia (AML) with particular focus on the TCL cohort treated at the highest dose level (DL4) without Ruxolitinib. Methods: VSV-IFNβ-NIS was administered as a single IV dose following a classical 3+3 phase I trial, starting at 5e9 TCID50 DL1 through 1.7e11 TCID50 DL4. A dose expansion cohort of 8 additional R/R TCL pts was added at DL4 in view of an initial signal of activity. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of VSV-IFNβ-NIS as a single agent. Secondary objectives were determination of safety profile and preliminary efficacy of VSV-IFNβ-NIS. Adverse events (AEs) are reported based on CTCAE V4; cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grading was based on Lee (Blood 2014) criteria. Results: To date, a total of 43 pts received VSV-IFNβ-NIS: MM (N=21), TCL (N=21) and AML (N=1). In the TCL cohort: at DL4 Group A (no Ruxolitinib), 12 pts were registered, but only 11 pts were treated (mycosis fungoides (MF) N=3; ALK- ALCL N=1; PTCL-NOS N=2; AITL N=4; Nodal PTCL, TFH N=2; ages 33-79). These pts received a median of 3 lines of therapy (range: 1-5). No dose limiting toxicities were observed. Grades 3 and higher AEs were hematologic with transient lymphopenia (63.6%), neutropenia (36.4%) being the most common. The non-hematologic AEs observed included unique toxicities such as CRS grades 1-2 (81.8%); the transient transaminitis grade 1-2 (36.4%) and grade 3 (27.3%) along with thrombocytopenia grade 1-2 (63.6%) and grade 3 (18.2%) were a reflection IFNβ toxicity. All the AEs observed were short lived. Responses were seen in pts with PTCL. At DL4, in pts with systemic PTCL (N=9), there were 5 responses including 3 complete responses (CR) with two long-lasting at 24 months, an ongoing 15 month CR, and a 5 month CR, and 2 partial responses (PR) lasting 5 months in one pts and 6 months in the other. Conclusions: These updated results of single agent VSV-IFNβ-NIS which include pts with PTCL treated at the highest dose level and a dose expansion cohort demonstrates not only the safety of VSV-IFNβ-NIS but also a strong efficacy signal in pts with PTCL with impressive durable responses. Two expansion cohorts at DL4 have been added (20 additional PTCL, 10 B-cell lymphoma pts) to obtain additional data on tolerability and efficacy and biomarkers of response in these pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03017820 .

1533 Background: FDA-approved chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) and bispecific T cell engager (TCE) therapy are most commonly managed inpatient. Here we report our experience with hospital-based outpatient (HBO) management of patients (pts) receiving FDA-approved CAR-T or TCE and a predictive model for increased risk of early hospitalization (≤3 days post CAR-T). Methods: We reviewed the outcomes of pts who received FDA-approved CAR-T (axi-cel, brexu-cel, ide-cel, cilta-cel) or TCE (teclistamab) in the HBO unit between 3/2021 and 1/2023 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Results: HBO is closely integrated with inpatient practice and includes the same specialty trained clinical team. It is the first point of contact 24/7 for pts and triage evaluations. CAR-T and TCE are given on HBO followed by monitoring per REMS and as clinically needed until admission criteria is met. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) tools were used as part of outpatient monitoring. Out of 169 CAR-T pts, 87 (51%) were dosed with new indication/products (follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, myeloma). Among those, 80 (92%) pts were dosed outpatient, among whom 21 (27%) were never hospitalized. CRS and ICANS incidences were comparable to that reported in registration studies. Median time to first admission from CAR-T infusion was 1 day (range, 0-9), with 31% (n=18/59) of admissions after day 3 post infusion. The most common cause of hospitalization was fever (n=40, 59%). Median length of hospital stay was 4 days (range, 1-49). Median time to tocilizumab (n=45, 80%), steroid (n=1, 2%), escalation of oxygen support (n=7, 12%), vasopressor (n=2, 3%), ventilator (n=1, 2%), hemodialysis (n=1, 2%) and ICU transfer (n=3, 5%) was 1 day (range, 0-31) after first admission. Use of bridging therapy, elevated CRP and LDH were predictive of early admission (ROC AUC 0.62). Four pts received teclistamab on HBO and enrolled in RPM. Data from more pts will be reported at ASCO. Conclusions: Our expanded study in CAR-T and TCE confirms that HBO is feasible and that CAR-T and TCE can be safely dosed outpatient. Approximately 31% of pts were admitted after 3 days from CAR-T infusion, and 27% of our pts were never admitted. Variables associated with aggressive disease can predict early hospitalization in pts receiving FDA-approved CAR-T. Extension of HBO practice to TCE is feasible.[Table: see text]