Citations

Abstract Background: This study reports incidence, timing, characteristics, and surveillance imaging of mammographic axillary adenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination. As COVID-19 immunizations continue, with possible booster vaccines upcoming, this study offers timing considerations and potential follow-up recommendations for breast imaging after vaccination. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients (pts) who received at least one COVID-19 vaccine prior to screening (SM) or diagnostic mammography (DM) at Mayo Clinic Florida between January 15 to May 31, 2021. Vaccine-related information was queried by mammography technologists. Adenopathy was assessed by interpreting radiologists and follow-up studies were collated. Mammogram adenopathy included single enlarged node, multiple enlarged nodes, and adenopathy with soft tissue stranding. Ultrasound adenopathy included mildly prominent nodes with preserved fatty hila to rounded nodes with apparent loss of a fatty hilum. Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between days from vaccine and adenopathy. Results: Of 2349 pts, 34 (1.4%) had adenopathy (DM=6; SM=28) and 3 (0.1%) were symptomatic. Presence of axillary symptoms was associated with abnormal imaging (p<0.001) with an odds ratio of 33 in multivariable model. Median time after vaccine for pts with adenopathy was significantly shorter at 14 days compared to 33 days for pts without adenopathy (p<0.001). Incidence of adenopathy decreased as days from vaccine increased (3.4% for 0-14 days, 2.1% for 15-28 days, and 0.4% for > 28 days, p<0.001). After adjusting for being symptomatic, days from vaccine still had a significant impact on finding mammographic adenopathy (for each day after vaccine, OR=0.96, p<0.001). No significant difference was seen based on age (p=0.66), vaccine brand (p=0.66), vaccine dose (p=0.18). ROC analysis to identify a cutoff value for presence/absence of adenopathy was 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.81) at 22.5 days following vaccination. Additional imaging with mammogram and/or ultrasound was requested for 31 pts. These included no follow-up (n=4, 12.9%), repeat ultrasound with or without mammogram in 1-3 months (n=26, 83.9%), and biopsy (n=1, 3.2%, pt with ipsilateral breast cancer with negative results, presumably vaccine induced). To date, all pts who underwent surveillance imaging demonstrated normalization of lymph node appearance. The median time for abnormal imaging related to adenopathy to return to BI-RADS 1 or 2 was 84 (range 13-157) days. Conclusion: The incidence of COVID-19 vaccine-induced adenopathy in this study (1.4%) appeared to be lower than self-reported axillary swelling in COVID-19 vaccine trials (16%) but is still higher than the reported incidence of adenopathy on an otherwise normal SM (0.02-0.04%). The incidence of adenopathy decreased significantly over time and was not present in most pts 28 days after the vaccine. In patients with abnormal adenopathy, followup imaging showed resolution of vaccine-induced adenopathy in most patients by 3 months. Adenopathy(N=34)No Adenopathy (N=2315)P valueAge0.66N342314Median (Range)63.5 (35.0, 83.0)64.0 (30.0, 94.0)Q1, Q351.5, 72.555.0, 71.0Exam type<0.001DM6 (13.3%)39 (86.7%)SM28 (1.2%)2276 (98.8%)Symptomatic<0.001Missing032Yes3 (23.1%)10 (76.9%)No31 (1.3%)2273 (98.7%)Vaccine brand0.66Missing119mRNA-127319 (1.7%)1117 (98.3%)BNT162b214 (1.2%)1138 (98.8%)Other0 (0.0%)41 (100.0%)Vaccine dose0.18Missing0181st9 (2.2%)409 (97.8%)2nd25 (1.3%)1888 (98.7%)Days from vaccine<0.001Median (Range)14.0 (1.0, 91.0)33.0 (0.0, 239.0)Q1, Q38.2, 20.816.0, 61.0Days from Vaccine<0.0010-1418 (3.4%)519 (96.6%)15-2811 (2.1%)513 (97.9%)>285 (0.4%)1283 (99.6%) Citation Format: Kristin Robinson, Santo Maimone, Pooja P Advani, Zhuo Li, Denise Gococo-Benore, Neda Qosja, Ashita Mummareddy, Ahmed M Ashai, Annamaria Wilhelm, Robert Maxwell, Martha Wasserman, Neema Patel, Andrey Morozov, Saranya Chumsri. Incidence and time to resolution of axillary adenopathy on mammography after COVID-19 vaccination [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-03-19.

Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose-limiting side effect of chemotherapy for which no prevention or cure exists. Cancer and cancer treatments can adversely affect nutritional status. Nutrition may play a role in development of CIPN, yet the relationship between nutrition and CIPN is not well understood. Common laboratory values measuring various aspects of nutrition (hemoglobin/hematocrit, vitamin B12, calcium, and magnesium) may be associated with CIPN. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the empirical evidence surrounding the relationship between laboratory measures of nutrition and CIPN among persons with cancer who received neurotoxic chemotherapy drugs. We conducted an extensive review of the literature to identify articles that evaluated relationships between laboratory measures of nutrition and CIPN. A total of eleven articles satisfied the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Participants in the studies had breast or colorectal cancer, lymphoma or multiple myeloma and were receiving a variety of neurotoxic drugs. Hemoglobin/hematocrit, vitamin D, albumin, and magnesium were associated with CIPN. The quality of the studies ranges from fair to good. Evidence suggests that low levels of the above-mentioned tests could be associated with CIPN but additional research is needed.

Anthracyclines are one of the most widely used and effective chemotherapies in oncology, but their most important side effect is the cumulative, dose-related cardiotoxicity leading to congestive heart failure in ~5% of individuals. Methodology and pharmacogenetic studies for predicting which individuals are at high risk and subsequently the development of targeted and individualized cardioprotective plans are beginning to make progress. Here, we review current putative risk genes and variants, the strength of evidence for each genetic association and the interaction between risk genes, in the context of known clinical risk factors and potential novel cardioprotective strategies.

Abstract Background: A previous neoadjuvant study in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) demonstrated that low tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a poor outcome. Activation of RAS/MAPK pathway has been associated with reduced TILs. Preclinical studies showed that MEK inhibitor enhances immune responses and is synergistic with anti PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in TNBC. Methods: The standard Phase I 3+3 study design was used. Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic TNBC with ≤ 3 prior lines of therapy were enrolled. Patients received single agent binimetinib for 2 weeks prior to an addition of pembrolizumab. Dose level 0 was binimetinib at 45 mg oral twice daily continuously and dose level -1 was 30 mg twice daily. Pembrolizumab was given at a fixed dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks in both dose levels. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first 2 cycles in at least one-third of patients. Results: A total of 12 evaluable patients were enrolled in the phase I, 4 patients in dose level 0 and 8 patients in dose level -1. In dose level 0, among 3 out of 4 patients who were evaluable for DLT, 2 patients experienced DLTs, including grade (G) 3 nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and G3 ALT elevation. Thus, the stopping rule was met and the dose level was adjusted to dose level -1. None of the first 3 patients in dose level -1 experienced a DLT. All three experienced other ≥ G3 AEs, including 1 G3 cardiac troponin T increased and 2 with G3 hypertension. 5 additional patients were accrued to dose level -1 and were evaluable for AEs. Three of these were evaluable for DLTs. One patient had G3 ALT/AST increase, deemed a DLT. However, this patient had liver metastasis and had G1 ALT/AST elevation at baseline. Her ALT/AST normalized in 3 weeks after treatment discontinuation and oral prednisone. Other ≥ G3 toxicities in the second group of 5 patients in dose level -1 include G3 hypertension (12.5%), nausea (12.5%), hypokalemia (12.5%), neutrophil count decrease (12.5%) dyspnea (12.5%), peripheral neuropathy (12.5%), and retinal detachment (12.5%). Since less than 1/3 of patients experienced DLT and there was no ≥ G4 AE at least possibly related to treatment over all cycles at any given dose level, the MTD was determined as dose level -1. Five patients are currently enrolled in the phase II section, and 10 more patients are needed. Objective response rate analysis will be performed once study enrollment is completed. Conclusions: The recommended phase II doses for pembrolizumab in combination with binimetinib are 200 mg every 3 weeks and 30 mg twice daily, respectively. The combination appears to be safe with manageable toxicities. Long term durable response has been observed. The phase 2 portion of this trial is currently on going. Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Jun He, David Hillman, Morgan Weidner, Morgan Weidner, Dana Haley, Aline Reis, Kathleen Tenner, Pooja Advani, Kostandinos Sideras, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Edith Perez, Keith Knutson. Results of phase I study of pembrolizumab in combination with binimetinib in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT133.

535 Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is a rarer form of breast cancer, accounting for 10% of the disease cases. HER2 overexpression in ILC is infrequent and limited data exist regarding clinical characteristics and outcome of HER2-positive (HER2+) ILC patients (pts) treated with adjuvant trastuzumab. Methods: Patient characteristics were compared between ILC and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) using Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the freedom from mortality and recurrence. Cox regression model was used to evaluate the association between ILC and outcomes adjusted for other characteristics. NanoString technology was used to quantify mRNA to develop immune-related gene signatures. Results: From a total of 3,304 pts, 122 (3.7%) pts had ILC. Pts with ILC were significantly older (median age 54 vs. 49 years), had larger tumors, lower grade, more ER and PR positive tumors, and more lymph node involvement (25.4% had N3 disease compared to 12.7% in IDC). Overall, with KM analysis, pts with ILC had significantly worse overall survival (OS, p = 0.005) and recurrence-free survival (RFS, p = 0.046) compared to IDC. The 15-year freedom from recurrence was merely 57.67% in ILC compared to 72.68% in IDC. A significant number of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) ILC pts developed late recurrence with cumulative event rates increasing from 23% at 5 years to 42% at 15 years. Nevertheless, in multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for other clinical characteristics, including age, tumor size, grade, ER/PR, and lymph node status, lobular histology was not significantly associated with worse outcome for OS (HR = 1.19, 95%CI 0.67-2.1, p = 0.55) and RFS (HR = 1.5, 95%CI 0.9-2.5, p = 0.12), as compared with IDC. However, ILC pts appeared to have similar degree of benefit from trastuzumab, with RFS HR = 0.58 compared to HR = 0.67 in the entire population. For immune landscape, there was no significant difference in gene signatures related to CD45, CD8, B cells, or cytotoxic cells. However, ILC had more enrichment in mast cell gene signature and fewer macrophage, NK CD56dim, and regulatory T cell signatures compared to IDC (p < 0.05). Conclusions: HER2+ ILC has distinct clinical characteristics and immune landscape compared to IDC. ILC pts appeared to have worse outcome compared to IDC likely because ILC pts often presented with more locally advanced disease. However, similar benefit of trastuzumab was observed in ILC pts. Due to high risk of late relapse in HR+ HER2+ ILC, extended adjuvant endocrine therapy should be considered in this group of high-risk pts. Clinical trial information: NCT00005970.

Objective Outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) have significantly improved necessitating focus on survivorship. Methods We undertook a web-based survey in collaboration with International Myeloma Foundation (IMF) to explore patient awareness and psycho-physical impacts of MM. The survey was viewed on the IMF website by 1,324 individuals from 32 countries. Results The survey responses were available from 959 individuals, with 62% who completed the survey. Treating doctors were the most frequent source of MM-related information. Only 56% patients admitted full compliance with treatment. Treatment side effects bothered 86% responders, including >50% admitting to pain, peripheral neuropathy and asthenia. Majority (57%) reported some degree of depression, 82% had discontent with their quality of life and only 35% reported being satisfied with their coping mechanisms. Patients ≥65 years of age reported more peripheral neuropathy (p = 0.007) and difficulty with ability to work (p = 0.015). Conclusions We report the prevalence of psychologic, social and physical domains as well as patient-physician relationship dynamics. This knowledge can help improve MM survivorship.Introduction

Abstract Background: Although risk of late relapse in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer is well established, most existing data pertain to the HR+ HER2-negative (HER2-) subgroup. CTS5 is one of the models for predicting risk of late relapse in HR+ HER2- breast cancer. However, the value of this model in HR+ HER2+ disease is less known, particularly in the context of adjuvant trastuzumab. Here, we evaluated CTS5 in patients with early stage HR+ HER2+ breast cancer treated in the NCCTG N9831 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology) and NSABP B-31 (NRG) trials. Methods: Stage I-III HR+ (ER+ and/or PR+) HER2+ breast cancer patients who were free of recurrence after 5 years in N9831 and B-31 trials were included. The online CTS5 calculator was used to determine CTS5 score and risk group (low, intermediate, and high) based on age, tumor size, grade, and number of involved nodes. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates, Cox regression models, and C index were used for analysis. N9831 and B-31 trials were analyzed separately. Results: 1,204 patients in N9831 and 658 patients in B-31 met the entry criteria. Baseline characteristics were similar between both trials, including median age, tumor size, and follow up. Similar distribution within CTS5 risk group was observed in both trials; 68.2% and 70.1% patients were high risk, 24% and 21.9% as intermediate risk, as well as 7.8% and 8.1% as low risk classified in N9831 and B-31, respectively. Using univariate Cox regression analysis, CTS5 score as a continuous variable was associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the entire study cohort, including patients who received chemotherapy alone or in combination with trastuzumab, (HR 1.37, 95%CI 1.03-1.81, p=0.03, C index 0.57 in N9831 and HR 1.36, 95%CI 1.06-1.76, p=0.02, C index 0.54 in B-31), but not in patients who received concurrent trastuzumab (HR 1.19, 95%CI 0.73-1.2, p=0.49, C index 0.54 in N9831 and HR 1.35, 95%CI 0.96-1.9, p=0.08, C index 0.54 in B-31). As categorical variable in the entire study cohort, CTS5 risk group was not significantly associated with RFS among patients with intermediate vs. low (HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.18-1.22, p=0.12 and HR 1.61, 95%CI 0.66-3.92, p=0.29) and high vs. low (HR 1.23, 95%CI 0.57-2.67, p=0.6 and HR 1.93, 95%CI 0.85-4.41, p=0.12) with the C index of 0.58 and 0.53 in N9831 and B-31 respectively. There was also no significant difference in RFS among 3 CTS5 risk groups with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Among patients who received concurrent trastuzumab, similar trends were observed with no statistical difference in RFS between high vs. low (HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.24-1.97, p=0.48 and HR 1.44, 95%CI 0.52-3.96, 0.49) with the C index of 0.55 and 0.51 in N9831 and B-31, respectively. Paradoxically, patients with intermediate risk had better RFS than low risk (HR 0.18, 95%CI 0.03-0.97, p=0.05) in N9831 but no significant difference in B-31 (HR 1.31, 95%CI 0.44-3.95, p=0.63). Conclusions: While CTS5 score as a continuous variable was associated with outcome in overall HR+ HER2+ population, this model was not prognostic in patients receiving adjuvant trastuzumab in both N9831 and B-31 trials. Furthermore, the correlation (C index) was modest and CTS5 risk group as a categorical variable could not stratify outcome in this group of patients. This study underlines the need to develop a new prognostic model to better delineate the risk of late relapse in HR+ HER2+ breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab as this model can facilitate clinical decision for extended adjuvant endocrine therapy. Support: BCRF-19-161, U10CA180821, U10CA180868 and U10CA180822 (NRG), Genentech. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Citation Format: Tanyami Pai, Angelica Gil, Yaohua Ma, Zhuo Li, Pooja Advani, Moreno Moreno-Aspitia, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Edith A. Perez, Yan Asmann, Katherine Pogue-Geile, E. A. Thompson, Saranya Chumsri. Prognostic value of clinical treatment score post-5 years (CTS5) and late relapse risk in hormone receptor-positive HER2-positive breast cancer in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831 (Alliance) and NSABP B-31 (NRG) trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS6-03.

Evidence for massage therapy (MT) in hospice patients remains limited. We conducted a prospective pilot study on MTs impact on quality of life of hospice patients and caregivers. Patient-caregiver dyads were enrolled if patients scored ≥5 on pain, depression, anxiety, or well-being using the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised (ESAS-r). The patient received MT weekly for up to 3 massages with assessments completed at baseline, after each massage, and 1 week after the final massage for patients and at baseline and 1 week after final massage for caregivers. A satisfaction survey was completed at study completion. A pro-rated area under the curve (AUC) was utilized to assess the primary endpoints of change in ESAS-r for patient ratings of pain, depression and anxiety as well as the Linear Analogue Self-Assessment (LASA). Median difference scores (end of study value)-(baseline value) for each participant and caregiver were calculated. Of 27 patients and caregivers enrolled, 25 patients received MT. Fifteen patients completed all 3 MT sessions and were given the final symptom assessment and satisfaction survey and their caregivers completed final assessments. The proportion of patients considered success (AUC > baseline) in the primary endpoints were the following: pain 40.9%, depression 40.9%, anxiety 54.5%, LASA 54.5%. Median difference scores were largely zero indicating no significant temporal change in symptoms. Patients were highly satisfied with MT. This pilot study indicated that MT was a feasible and well-received intervention in our population of patients with inadequately controlled symptoms.

230 Background: Inpatient mortality review is commonly used to improve patient care. Individual review of outpatient deaths is less common, yet 30-day mortality after hospital stay is an important quality metric. In this study, we sought to identify opportunities for care improvement by reviewing outpatient mortalities for cancer patients who died within 30 days of hospitalization. Methods: We identified 48 patients at Mayo Clinic Florida, with a hematologic (heme) or solid tumor (onc) cancer, who died within 30 days of an index hospital stay in 2018. We created a 32-question review survey to address quality of care around the hospital stay. The review team consisted of 1) heme or onc attendings, 2) heme/onc fellows, and 3) palliative care attendings. Each case was reviewed by one member of each of the 3 groups, split into heme or onc cases. Discrepancies in objective data points were resolved by the research team. Results: Of 143 surveys sent to 13 physicians (3 heme), 112 responses from 11 physicians (1 heme) for 47 patients were received. Twenty-one patients (45%) received cancer therapy within 30 days of death, and 23 (49%) were admitted >2 times in 2 months prior to death. For onc cases, attendings rated prognosis as discussed 83% of the time, vs 65% of fellows and 39% of palliative care; in heme cases, the attending rated prognosis as discussed 11% of the time, vs 86% of fellows and 50% of palliative care. In heme cases, the attending rated expected survival <3 months in 33% of cases vs 71% by fellows and 89% by palliative care; in onc cases, the reviews were more consistent (79% attending, 85% fellow, 93% palliative care). See Table for timing of prognosis discussions and palliative care involvement. Conclusions: The most common improvement opportunities identified by reviewing heme/onc patients who died within 30 days of a hospital stay included documented prognosis discussion and involvement of palliative care. Opportunities differed between heme and onc patients. Future directions include identifying and mitigating barriers that providers face in reaching these goals for their patients. [Table: see text]