Citations

Clear

2509 citation(s) found for "Yang, Fu".

Abdominal Symptom Improvement During Clinical Trials of Tenapanor in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: A Post Hoc Analysis
Chey, William D. , Harris, Lucinda A. , Frazier, Rosita , Lacy, Brian E. , Edelstein, Susan , Yang, Yang , Zhao, Suling , Rosenbaum, David P. , Edelstein, Susan , Yang, Yang , Frazier, Rosita D , Lembo, Anthony , Brenner, Darren M. , Chang, Lin

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Gastroenterology | January 31, 2024 | Volume: 119 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 937-945

10.14309/ajg.0000000000002685 | PMID 38294158 Get It

INTRODUCTION: This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of tenapanor on abdominal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Abdominal symptoms assessed included pain, discomfort, bloating, cramping, and fullness. METHODS: The abdominal symptom data were pooled from 3 randomized controlled trials (NCT01923428, T3MPO-1 [NCT02621892], and T3MPO-2 [NCT02686138]). Weekly scores were calculated for each abdominal symptom, and the Abdominal Score (AS) was derived as the average of weekly scores for abdominal pain, discomfort, and bloating. The overall change from baseline during the 12 weeks was assessed for each symptom weekly score and the AS. The AS 6/12-week and 9/12-week response rates (AS improvement of ≥2 points for ≥6/12- or ≥9/12-week) were also evaluated. The association of weekly AS response status (reduction of ≥30%) with weekly complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) status (=0 and >0) was assessed. RESULTS: Among 1,372 patients (684 tenapanor [50 mg twice a day] and 688 placebo), the least squares mean change from baseline in AS was −2.66 for tenapanor vs −2.09 for placebo ( P < 0.0001). The 6/12-week AS response rate was 44.4% for tenapanor vs 32.4% for placebo ( P < 0.0001), and for 9/12-week AS, 30.6% for tenapanor vs 20.5% for placebo ( P < 0.0001). A significant association between weekly CSBM status and weekly AS response status was observed each week ( P < 0.0001), with a greater proportion achieving an AS reduction in patients with >0 CSBMs in a week. DISCUSSION: Tenapanor significantly reduced abdominal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, particularly pain, discomfort, and bloating measured by AS, compared with placebo.
Dynamic Prognosis Prediction for Patients on DAPT After Drug‐Eluting Stent Implantation: Model Development and Validation
Li, Fang , Rasmy, Laila , Xiang, Yang , Feng, Jingna , Abdelhameed, Ahmed , Hu, Xinyue , Sun, Zenan , Aguilar, David , Dhoble, Abhijeet , Du, Jingcheng , Wang, Qing , Zhang, Xinyuan , Xie, Ziqian , Nian, Yi , He, Jianping , Zhou, Yujia , Li, Jianfu , Prosperi, Mattia , Bian, Jiang , Zhi, Degui , Niu, Shuteng , Dang, Yifang , Zhang, Xinyuan , Xie, Ziqian , Nian, Yi , He, JianPing , Zhou, Yujia , Li, Jianfu , Prosperi, Mattia , Bian, Jiang , Zhi, Degui , Tao, Cui , Sun, Zenan , Li, Fang , Niu, Shuteng , Dang, Yifang , Tao, Cui

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the American Heart Association | January 31, 2024 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.123.029900 | PMID 38293921 Get It

Background The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) in conjunction with recent updates in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) management guidelines emphasizes the necessity for innovative models to predict ischemic or bleeding events after drug‐eluting stent implantation. Leveraging AI for dynamic prediction has the potential to revolutionize risk stratification and provide personalized decision support for DAPT management. Methods and Results We developed and validated a new AI‐based pipeline using retrospective data of drug‐eluting stent‐treated patients, sourced from the Cerner Health Facts data set (n=98 236) and Optum's de‐identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (n=9978). The 36 months following drug‐eluting stent implantation were designated as our primary forecasting interval, further segmented into 6 sequential prediction windows. We evaluated 5 distinct AI algorithms for their precision in predicting ischemic and bleeding risks. Model discriminative accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, among other metrics. The weighted light gradient boosting machine stood out as the preeminent model, thus earning its place as our AI‐DAPT model. The AI‐DAPT demonstrated peak accuracy in the 30 to 36 months window, charting an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 90% [95% CI, 88%–92%] for ischemia and 84% [95% CI, 82%–87%] for bleeding predictions. Conclusions Our AI‐DAPT excels in formulating iterative, refined dynamic predictions by assimilating ongoing updates from patients' clinical profiles, holding value as a novel smart clinical tool to facilitate optimal DAPT duration management with high accuracy and adaptability.
Lung Cancer Screening Results Among Population of Different Genders, Ages, Smokers and Non-smokers: A Study Based on Real World Data
Bao, Ting , Li, Zhenzhen , Ji, Guiyi , Tang, Huairong , Yang, Hanwei , Huang, Yan , Wang, Youjuan , Yang, Ping , Li, Weimin

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | January 30, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.22541/au.170666202.25160823/v1 Get It

Background Analysis of the real-world data of low-dose spiral CT screening of healthy physical examination population in Southwest China from 2006 to 2017, discussed the standard of low-dose spiral CT screening for high-risk population of lung cancer in China. Methods Incorporate all team subjects who have undergone LDCT screenings at the Health Management Center of West China Hospital of Sichuan University between 2006 and 2017, and analyze the cumulative incidence and age-standardized (Segi population) incidence of lung cancer in the whole population; finally, analysis the age-specific, smoking and non-smokers’ lung cancer incidence. Results A total of 15,996 people who met the enrollment conditions and participated in the LDCT lung cancer screening were included. The average screening interval was 1.12±0.26 years, and the average follow-up time was 5.43±0.82 years; The cumulative number of lung cancer cases with negative baseline screening was 56 cases, and the cumulative incidence rate of lung cancer was 122.1/100,000 (the world standard rate is 60.6/100,000), of which males were 100.0/100,000 (the world standard rate is 45.3/100,000) and women were 156.6 /100,000 (the world standard rate is 94.7/100,000); the cumulative incidence of lung cancer in the smoking group is higher than that in the non-smoking group for both males and females, but the cumulative incidence of lung cancer in the non-smokers of the female population (146.3/100,000) is higher than that of the male population (86.5/10 Million). Conclusion In the real world study of lung cancer screening in Chinese population, we should consider setting different standards for high-risk groups of lung cancer by gender or smoking and non-smokers.
Extrachromosomal DNA Couples with ATM-mediated DNA Damage Response for Genome Instability in Tumors
Gan, Haiyun , Zhou, Jiaqi , Zhang, Yang , Hu, Suili, Deng, Zhiwen , Xu, Yajing, Chen, Jinyi , Yue, Zhen , Yao, Sitong , Tian, Congcong , Wen, Qing , Yan, Lixia , Depies, Olivia M , Liang, Xiao‐Huan , Liu, Xiangyu , Kang, Xing, Li, Xinran , Deng, Zhiwen, Wu, Yu-Chun , Wang, Nan , Chen, Liangming , Yue, Zhen, Yao, Yuan , Yang, Xinran , Tian, Congcong, Liang, Xiaoyan , Chan, Kui Ming , Dai, Junbiao , Wang, Zhiquan , Yu, Chuanhe , Li, Gang

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | January 23, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-3708982/v1 Get It

Abstract Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) drives the evolution of cancer cells by conferring survival advantages over normal cells. However, the functional importance of ecDNA replication and maintenance is yet to be evaluated, and the molecular components that contributed to these processes remain largely unknown. Here, using CRISPR-C (circularization of genes and chromosomes by CRISPR) technology and synthetic circular DNA mimicking ecDNA identified in tumors, we generated ecDNA-positive (ecDNA+) cell models. Using these models, we identified the proteins involved in ecDNA replication and maintenance and found DNA damage response (DDR)-related pathways were significantly enriched. We further demonstrated that ecDNA replication led to increased DDR and genome instability and DDR was also essential for ecDNA maintenance, consistent with observations that ecDNA+ tumors exhibited higher DDR scores than ecDNA-negative (ecDNA–) tumors in patients. ATM, MDC1, and CHK2, but not ATR, were activated in ecDNA+ cells compared to ecDNA– cells. Moreover, ecDNA+ cells were more sensitive to ATM and CHK2 inhibition. We further found that type II topoisomerase TOP2B and DNA ligase III (LIG3) were critical regulators for ecDNA replication and maintenance and related DDR. In summary, our findings of the reciprocal interactions between ecDNA and DDR provide new insights into detection and therapy for ecDNA+ tumors.
The Global Evolution of Inflammatory Bowel Disease across Four Epidemiologic Stages
Hracs, Lindsay , Gorospe, Julia, Buie, Michael , Quan, Joshua , Goddard, Quinn , Caplan, Léa , Markovinović, Ante , Abbey, Yvonne , Abdullah, Murdani , Balderramo, Domingo , Bernstein, Çharles N. , Burisch, Johan , Chong, Vui Heng , Dotan, Iris , Ouali, Sara El , Forss, Anders, Dao, Hang Viet , Baños, Fabián Juliao , Kaibullayeva, Jamilya , Kobayashi, Taku , Miao, Yinglei , Ng, Ka Kei , Olén, Ola , Simadibrata, Marcellus , Sun, Yang , Turner, Dan , Vergara, Beatriz, Wei, Shu Chen, Yang, Suk‐Kyun , Kobayashi, Taku , Kaplan, Gilaad G. , Windsor, Joseph W. , Cummings, Michael K. , Coward, Stephanie B. , Williamson, Tyler S. , Abreu, María T. , Ahuja, Vineet , Ali, Raja Affendi Raja , Altuwaijri, Mansour A. , Banerjee, Rupa , Benchimol, Eric I. , Bernstein, Charles Noah , Brunet, Eduard , Dutta, Usha , Forbes, Angela J. , Forss, Anders, Gearry, Richard B. , Hartono, Juanda Leo , Hilmi, Ida Normiha , Hodges, Phoebe , Jones, Gareth‐Rhys , Kelly, Paul , Kotze, Paulo Gustavo , Lakatos, Péter L. , Lees, Charlie W. , Limsrivilai, Julajak , Lo, Bobby Zhao Sheng , Loftus, Edward V. , Ludvigsson, Jonas F. , Mak, Joyce Wing Yan , Okabayashi, Shinji , Panaccione, Remo , Paudel, Mukesh Sharma , Quaresma, Abel Botelho , Rubin, David T. , Suzuki, Hidekazu , Toro, Martín , Wei, Shu Chen, Yamamoto-Furusho, Jesus , Ng, Siew C.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | January 23, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-3846147/v1 Get It

Abstract During the 20th century, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was considered a disease of early-industrialized regions in North America, Europe, and Oceania. At the turn of the 21st century, incidence of IBD increased in newly-industrialized and emerging regions in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, while prevalence in early-industrialized regions started to grow steadily. Changes in incidence and prevalence denote evolution of IBD across four epidemiologic stages: Stage 1 (Emergence), characterized by low incidence and prevalence; stage 2 (Acceleration in Incidence), characterized by rapidly rising incidence and low prevalence; and stage 3 (Compounding Prevalence), characterized by decelerating, plateauing, or declining incidence and steadily rising prevalence. A fourth stage (Prevalence Equilibrium) has been proposed where the slope of prevalence plateaus due to shifting demographics of an aging IBD population, but it has not yet been evidenced. To date, these stages have been theoretical without specific incidence/prevalence indicators defining transition points. Using real-world data from 490 population-based studies comprising 80 global regions and spanning over a century (1920–2023), we show spatiotemporal transitions across stages 1–3 and model transition towards stage 4. Understanding the evolution of IBD across epidemiologic stages allows healthcare systems to better prepare for the future worldwide burden of IBD.
Endocrine-Sensitive Disease Rate in Postmenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Rich/ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Fulvestrant, or Their Combination
Cynthia, X. , Sanati, Souzan , Leitch, A. Marilyn , Unzeitig, Gary, Fernández-Martínez, Aranzazu , Fan, Cheng , Gibbs, Richard A. , Dockter, Travis , Hahn, Olwen, Guenther, Joseph M., Caudle, Abigail S. , Crouch, Erika C., Tiersten, Amy , Mita, Monica , Razaq, Wajeeha, Rimawi, Mothaffar F. , Weiss, Anna , Perou, Charles M. , Carey, Lisa A. , Dockter, Travis J, Carey, Lisa A , Perou, Charles M , Rimawi, Mothaffar , Fernandez-Martinez, Aranzazu , Suman, Vera J. , Vij, Kiran R , Anurag, Meenakshi , Hoog, Jeremy , Watson, Mark A. , Hieken, Tina J. , Wang, Yang , Winer, Eric P. , Hunt, Kelly K. , Ellis, Matthew J. , Partridge, Ann H.

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Oncology | January 18, 2024 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 362

10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6038 | PMID 38236590 Get It

Importance Adding fulvestrant to anastrozole (A+F) improved survival in postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen receptor (ER)–positive/ERBB2 (formerly HER2)–negative breast cancer. However, the combination has not been tested in early-stage disease. Objective To determine whether neoadjuvant fulvestrant or A+F increases the rate of pathologic complete response or ypT1-2N0/N1mic/Ki67 2.7% or less residual disease (referred to as endocrine-sensitive disease) over anastrozole alone. Design, Setting, and Participants A phase 3 randomized clinical trial assessing differences in clinical and correlative outcomes between each of the fulvestrant-containing arms and the anastrozole arm. Postmenopausal women with clinical stage II to III, ER-rich (Allred score 6-8 or &amp;gt;66%)/ERBB2-negative breast cancer were included. All analyses were based on data frozen on March 2, 2023. Interventions Patients received anastrozole, fulvestrant, or a combination for 6 months preoperatively. Tumor Ki67 was assessed at week 4 and optionally at week 12, and if greater than 10% at either time point, the patient switched to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immediate surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the endocrine-sensitive disease rate (ESDR). A secondary outcome was the percentage change in Ki67 after 4 weeks of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) (week 4 Ki67 suppression). Results Between February 2014 and November 2018, 1362 female patients (mean [SD] age, 65.0 [8.2] years) were enrolled. Among the 1298 evaluable patients, ESDRs were 18.7% (95% CI, 15.1%-22.7%), 22.8% (95% CI, 18.9%-27.1%), and 20.5% (95% CI, 16.8%-24.6%) with anastrozole, fulvestrant, and A+F, respectively. Compared to anastrozole, neither fulvestrant-containing regimen significantly improved ESDR or week 4 Ki67 suppression. The rate of week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10% was 25.1%, 24.2%, and 15.7% with anastrozole, fulvestrant, and A+F, respectively. Pathologic complete response/residual cancer burden class I occurred in 8 of 167 patients and 17 of 167 patients, respectively (15.0%; 95% CI, 9.9%-21.3%), after switching to neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10%. PAM50 subtyping derived from RNA sequencing of baseline biopsies available for 753 patients (58%) identified 394 luminal A, 304 luminal B, and 55 nonluminal tumors. A+F led to a greater week 4 Ki67 suppression than anastrozole alone in luminal B tumors (median [IQR], −90.4% [−95.2 to −81.9%] vs −76.7% [−89.0 to −55.6%]; P &amp;lt; .001), but not luminal A tumors. Thirty-six nonluminal tumors (65.5%) had a week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10%. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, neither fulvestrant nor A+F significantly improved the 6-month ESDR over anastrozole in ER-rich/ERBB2-negative breast cancer. Aromatase inhibition remains the standard-of-care NET. Differential NET response by PAM50 subtype in exploratory analyses warrants further investigation. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588
2dGBH: Two-dimensional group Benjamini–Hochberg procedure for false discovery rate control in two-way multiple testing of genomic data
Yang, Lu , Chen, Jun , Chen, Jun , Wang, Pei

Mayo Clinic

Bioinformatics | January 17, 2024 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/bioinformatics/btae035 | PMID 38244568 Get It

Abstract Motivation Emerging omics technologies have introduced a two-way grouping structure in multiple testing, as seen in single-cell omics data, where the features can be grouped by either genes or cell types. Traditional multiple testing methods have limited ability to exploit such two-way grouping structure, leading to potential power loss. Results We propose a new 2D Group Benjamini–Hochberg (2dGBH) procedure to harness the two-way grouping structure in omics data, extending the traditional one-way adaptive GBH procedure. Using both simulated and real datasets, we show that 2dGBH effectively controls the false discovery rate across biologically relevant settings, and it is more powerful than the BH or q-value procedure and more robust than the one-way adaptive GBH procedure. Availability and implementation 2dGBH is available as an R package at: https://github.com/chloelulu/tdGBH. The analysis code and data are available at: https://github.com/chloelulu/tdGBH-paper.
Image‐based multiplex immune profiling of cancer tissues: translational implications. A report of the International Immuno‐oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer
Jahangir, Chowdhury Arif , Page, David B. , Broeckx, Glenn , Gonzalez, Claudia Aura, Burke, Caoimbhe, Murphy, Clodagh, Reis‐Filho, Jorge S. , Gupta, Rajarsi , Vieth, Michael, Hida, Akira I. , Kahila, Mohamed M. , Kos, Zuzana , Verbandt, Sara , Thagaard, Jeppe , Khiroya, Reena, Haab, Gabriela Acosta , Ács, Balázs , Alvarado‐Cabrero, Isabel , Baharun, Nurkhairul Bariyah, Bellolio, Enrique , Bheemaraju, Vydehi, Blenman, Kim RM, Fujimoto, Luciana Botinelly Mendonça , Burgues, Octavio, Cheang, Maggie C.U. , Ciompi, Francesco , Cooper, Lee , Coosemans, An , Corredor, Germán, Portela, Flávio Luis Dantas , Deman, Frederik , Dudgeon, Sarah , Elghazawy, Mahmoud , Fernandez‐Martín, Claudio , Fineberg, Susan , Gnjatic, Sacha , Halama, Niels , Hanna, Matthew G, Harbhajanka, Aparna , Hartman, Johan , Hewitt, Stephen M. , Husain, Zaheed, Irshad, Sheeba , Kataoka, Tatsuki R. , Kawaguchi, Kosuke, Khramtsov, Andrey , Kirtani, Pawan , Korski, Konstanty, Scott, Ely, Lænkholm, Anne‐Vibeke , Lang‐Schwarz, Corinna , Larsimont, Denis , Lennerz, Jochen K. , Li, Xiaoxian , Maley, Sai, Narasimhamurthy, Vidya Manur, Marks, Douglas K. , Mehrotra, Ravi , Durga, Kharidehal, Mittal, Shachi , Mushtaq, Shamim , Hussain, Nighat , Papathomas, Thomas , Perera, Rashindrie , Pinard, Christopher J. , Pinto‐Cardenas, Juan Carlos , Rau, Tilman T. , Ribeiro, Joana , Hytopoulos, Evangelos, Mahon, Sarah, Siziopikou, Kalliopi P. , Sotiriou, Christos, Stenzinger, Albrecht , Symmans, Fraser, Tanaka, Sunao , Taxter, Timothy , Tejpar, Sabine , Thompson, E. Aubrey , Tramm, Trine , Tran, William T, Verghese, Gregory , Viale, Giuseppe , Wahab, Noorul , Walter, Thomas , Waumans, Yannick , Wen, Hannah Y. , Yang, Wentao , Bartlett, John M.S. , Loibl, Sibylle , Loi, Sherene , Stovgaard, Elisabeth Specht , Salgado, Roberto , Gupta, Rajarsi R , Chardas, Alexandros , Dantas Portela, Flavio Luis , Elghazawy, Mahmoud , Gonzalez-Ericsson, Paula I , Grigoriadis, Anita , Hart, Steven N , Hartman, Johan , Kataoka, Tatsuki R , Rau, Tilman T , Rimm, David , Verghese, Gregory E , Wahab, Noorul , Gnjatic, Sacha , Broeckx, Glenn , Cheang, Maggie Chon U , Lennerz, Jochen , Loi, Sherene , Reis-Filho, Jorge S , Acs, Balazs , Walter, Thomas , Irshad, Sheeba , McDonald, Elizabeth S. , Ly, Amy , Harms, Paul W. , Diest, P. J. van , AbdulJabbar, Khalid , Adams, Sylvia , Almeida, Jonas S. , Ardalan, Farid Azmoudeh , Badve, Sunil , Hardas, Alexandros , Corredor, Germán , Demaria, Sandra , Fox, Stephen B. , Giltnane, Jennifer Margaret , González-Ericsson, Paula I. , Hart, Steven N. , Horlings, Hugo , Janssen, Emiel A. M. , Kawaguchi, Kosuke , Kiraz, Umay , Kodach, Liudmila L. , Aktürk, Güray , Kovács, Anikó , Lerousseau, Marvin , Madabhushi, Anant , Michiels, Stefan , Minhas, Fayyaz , Moore, David , Penault-Llorca, Frederique Madeleine , Pruneri, Giancarlo , Pusztai, Lajos , Rajpoot, Nasir , Rapoport, Bernardo L. , Rimm, David L. , Vincent‐Salomon, Anne , Saltz, Joel , Sayed, Shahin , Sughayer, Maher A. , Sur, Daniel Genel , Symmans, W. Fraser , Teuwen, Jonas , Tran, William T, Laak, Jeroen van der , Yuan, Yinyin , Denkert, Carsten , Savas, Peter Stephen , Gallagher, William M. , Rahman, Arman

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Pathology | January 17, 2024 | Volume: 262 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 271-288

10.1002/path.6238 | PMID 38230434 Get It

Abstract Recent advances in the field of immuno‐oncology have brought transformative changes in the management of cancer patients. The immune profile of tumours has been found to have key value in predicting disease prognosis and treatment response in various cancers. Multiplex immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence have emerged as potent tools for the simultaneous detection of multiple protein biomarkers in a single tissue section, thereby expanding opportunities for molecular and immune profiling while preserving tissue samples. By establishing the phenotype of individual tumour cells when distributed within a mixed cell population, the identification of clinically relevant biomarkers with high‐throughput multiplex immunophenotyping of tumour samples has great potential to guide appropriate treatment choices. Moreover, the emergence of novel multi‐marker imaging approaches can now provide unprecedented insights into the tumour microenvironment, including the potential interplay between various cell types. However, there are significant challenges to widespread integration of these technologies in daily research and clinical practice. This review addresses the challenges and potential solutions within a structured framework of action from a regulatory and clinical trial perspective. New developments within the field of immunophenotyping using multiplexed tissue imaging platforms and associated digital pathology are also described, with a specific focus on translational implications across different subtypes of cancer. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
CCR5 and CCL5 gene expression in colorectal cancer: comprehensive profiling and clinical value
Battaglin, Francesca , Millstein, Joshua , Yang, Yan , Xiu, Joanne , Arai, Hiroyuki , Wang, Jingyuan , Innocenti, Federico , Kawanishi, Natsuko , Lenz, Annika , Algaze, Sandra , Zhang, Wu, Khoukaz, Taline, Torres, Evanthia T. Roussos , Seeber, Andreas , Abraham, Jim , Shields, Anthony F. , Goldberg, Richard M. , Lenz, Heinz‐Josef , Arai, Hiroyuki , Lou, Emil , Lenz, Heinz-Josef , Baca, Yasmine , Wang, Jingyuan , Ou, Fang‐Shu , Mumenthaler, Shannon M. , Jayachandran, Priya , Soni, Shivani , Lou, Emil , Philip, Philip A. , Weinberg, Benjamin A. , Marshall, John L , Venook, Alan P. , Korn, Wolfgang Michael

Mayo Clinic

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | January 11, 2024 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e007939

10.1136/jitc-2023-007939 | PMID 38212126 Get It

Background The C-C motif chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5)/C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) axis plays a major role in colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to characterize the molecular features associated with CCR5 / CCL5 expression in CRC and to determine whether CCR5 / CCL5 levels could impact treatment outcomes. Methods 7604 CRCs tested with NextGen Sequencing on DNA and RNA were analyzed. Molecular features were evaluated according to CCR5 and CCL5 tumor gene expression quartiles. The impact on treatment outcomes was assessed in two cohorts, including 6341 real-world patients and 429 patients from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)/SWOG 80405 trial. Results CCR5 / CCL5 expression was higher in right-sided versus left-sided tumors, and positively associated with consensus molecular subtypes 1 and 4. Higher CCR5 / CCL5 expression was associated with higher tumor mutational burden, deficiency in mismatch repair and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels. Additionally, high CCR5 / CCL5 were associated with higher immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of MMR proficient tumors. Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed upregulation of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 cancer immunotherapy pathway, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) signaling, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) signaling in cytotoxic T lymphocytes, whereas several inflammation-related pathways were downregulated. Low CCR5 / CCL5 expression was associated with increased benefit from cetuximab-FOLFOX treatment in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial, where significant treatment interaction was observed with biologic agents and chemotherapy backbone. Conclusions Our data show a strong association between CCR5/CCL5 gene expression and distinct molecular features, gene expression profiles, TME cell infiltration, and treatment benefit in CRC. Targeting the CCR5/CCL5 axis may have clinical applications in selected CRC subgroups and may play a key role in developing and deploying strategies to modulate the immune TME for CRC treatment.
Lung Cancer in Ever- and Never-Smokers: Findings from Multi-Population GWAS Studies
Li, Yafang , Xiao, Xiangjun , Li, Jianrong , Han, Younghun , Cheng, Chao , Fernandes, Gail , Slewitzke, Shannon E. , Rosenberg, Susan M. , Zhu, Meng , Byun, Jinyoung , McKay, James , Lam, Stephen , Chen, Chu , Bojesen, Stig E. , Landi, Maria Teresa , Risch, Angela , Wichmann, H-Erich , Goodman, Gary E. , Field, John K. , Shete, Sanjay , Liu, Geoffrey , Andrew, Angeline S. , Grankvist, Kjell , Johansson, Mikael , Caporaso, Neil E. , Aldrich, Melinda C. , Schwartz, Ann G. , Gorlov, Ivan , Purrington, Kristen S. , Liu, Yanhong , Mandal, Diptasri , Gaba, Colette , Brennan, Paul , Xia, Jun , Fernandes, Gail F , Bossé, Yohan , McKay, James , Albanes, Demetrius , Lam, Stephen , Tardón, Adonina , Chen, Chu , Bojesen, Stig E , Landi, Maria T , Johansson, Mattias , Risch, Angela , Bickeböller, Heike , Wichmann, H-Erich , Christiani, David C. , Rennert, Gad , Arnold, Susanne M , Goodman, Gary E , Field, John K , Davies, Michael P A , Shete, Sanjay , Marchand, Loïc Le , Liu, Geoffrey , Hung, Rayjean J , Andrew, Angeline S , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , Sun, Ryan , Zienolddiny, Shanbeh , Grankvist, Kjell , Johansson, Mikael , Caporaso, Neil E , Cox, Angela , Hong, Yun‐Chul , Lazarus, Philip J. , Schabath, Matthew B , Aldrich, Melinda C , Schwartz, Ann G , Gorlov, Ivan , Purrington, Kristen S , Yang, Ping , Liu, Yanhong , Wilson, Richard K , Pinney, Susan M , Mandal, Diptasri , Willey, James C , Brennan, Paul , Xia, Jun , Shen, Hongbing , Amos, Christopher I , Han, Younghun , Cheng, Chao , Byun, Jinyoung , Bossé, Yohan , Albanes, Demetrius , Tardón, Adonina , Johansson, Mattias , Bickeböller, Heike , Rennert, Gad , Arnold, Susanne M. , Davies, Michael P.A. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Hung, Rayjean J. , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Zienolddiny, Shanbeh , Cox, Angela , Schabath, Matthew B. , Yang, Ping , Bailey‐Wilson, Joan E. , Pinney, Susan M. , Willey, James C. , Shen, Hongbing , Amos, Christopher I.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | January 5, 2024 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 389-399

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0613 | PMID 38180474 Get It

Abstract Background: Clinical, molecular, and genetic epidemiology studies displayed remarkable differences between ever- and never-smoking lung cancer. Methods: We conducted a stratified multi-population (European, East Asian, and African descent) association study on 44,823 ever-smokers and 20,074 never-smokers to identify novel variants that were missed in the non-stratified analysis. Functional analysis including expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) colocalization and DNA damage assays, and annotation studies were conducted to evaluate the functional roles of the variants. We further evaluated the impact of smoking quantity on lung cancer risk for the variants associated with ever-smoking lung cancer. Results: Five novel independent loci, GABRA4, intergenic region 12q24.33, LRRC4C, LINC01088, and LCNL1 were identified with the association at two or three populations (P &lt; 5 × 10−8). Further functional analysis provided multiple lines of evidence suggesting the variants affect lung cancer risk through excessive DNA damage (GABRA4) or cis-regulation of gene expression (LCNL1). The risk of variants from 12 independent regions, including the well-known CHRNA5, associated with ever-smoking lung cancer was evaluated for never-smokers, light-smokers (packyear ≤ 20), and moderate-to-heavy-smokers (packyear &gt; 20). Different risk patterns were observed for the variants among the different groups by smoking behavior. Conclusions: We identified novel variants associated with lung cancer in only ever- or never-smoking groups that were missed by prior main-effect association studies. Impact: Our study highlights the genetic heterogeneity between ever- and never-smoking lung cancer and provides etiologic insights into the complicated genetic architecture of this deadly cancer.