Citations

Background: Preparation for radioiodine (RAI) therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) often requires thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) to achieve thyrotropin (TSH) stimulation. Current guidelines recommend TSH ≥30 mIU/L, a target that prolongs hypothyroidism and worsens quality of life, yet rests on limited evidence. Objective: To evaluate the association between pre-RAI TSH levels and oncologic outcomes in adults with DTC prepared by THW. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing outcomes across pre-RAI TSH thresholds (<30 vs. ≥30, <60 vs. ≥60, and <90 vs. ≥90 mIU/L) in adults with DTC prepared by THW. Primary outcomes included disease-specific mortality, recurrence, and response to therapy. Searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus (inception to March 2025) identified eligible studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the CLARITY tool and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Pooled relative risks (RRs) were calculated using random-effects models. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020158354). Results: This meta-analysis included eight retrospective cohort studies comprising a total of 4651 DTC patients, predominantly women (68.5%) with a mean age of 46 years. All patients underwent THW before RAI. Across all TSH thresholds examined (<30, <60, and <90 mIU/L), higher pre-RAI TSH levels were not associated with better treatment response, lower recurrence, or reduced mortality. Specifically, patients with higher pre-RAI TSH levels (≥30 mIU/L) did not have better oncologic outcomes compared with those with lower levels (<30 mIU/L). At 2- and 3-year follow-up, no significant differences were observed in excellent (pooled RR = 0.87; confidence interval [CI] 0.68–1.11) or indeterminate (RR = 1.28; CI 0.72–2.27) response rates. Similarly, recurrence rates did not differ (RR = 1.45; CI 0.83–2.55), and no study demonstrated a difference in disease-specific mortality across follow-up periods extending up to 10 years. The certainty of evidence for all outcomes was rated very low due to risk of bias, heterogeneity, and imprecision. Conclusions: The current evidence base is insufficient to support or refute the routine use of a specific TSH threshold before RAI administration. These findings question the recommendation to achieve TSH ≥30 mIU/L before RAI and highlight the need for trials to define the minimal effective level of TSH stimulation.

Purpose: The ASPiration to Improve Renal Calculi Removal Effectiveness study showed steerable ureteroscopic renal evacuation (SURE) with CVAC that significantly reduced residual stone volume at 30 days vs standard ureteroscopy (URS). This report presents 2-year health care consumption and stone events (SE) and their link to residual stone volume and other variables ( n = 101 at primary end point; n = 93 at 2 years). Materials and Methods: Logistic regression identified predictors of health care consumption events (HCEs), that is, emergency department visits, hospitalization, surgical retreatment, and SE across the study population. Incidence was compared between the treatment groups with Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Results: At 2 years, residual stone volume was significantly associated with both HCEs and SE. For every 100 mm 3 increase in residual stone volume, the HCE risk increased by 50% to 54%, and the SE risk increased by 70%. Stone-free rate, the number of residual fragments (RFs), and RF total stone burden (based on diameter) were not predictors. Significantly fewer HCEs occurred in the SURE group (3 vs 20 events, p = 0.0004). Survival analysis confirmed this (4.3% vs 20%, log-rank p = 0.02), with a 73% risk reduction (hazard ratio 0.27, 95% Cl 0.09–0.80, p = 0.02). Fewer SE occurred in the SURE group, although not statistically significant. These subjects also had longer event-free survival. Conclusion: High-quality volumetric analysis supports evaluation of stone removal therapies, as residual stone volume predicts HCEs and SE. SURE significantly reduces the downstream incidence and risk of HCEs compared with standard URS.

ABSTRACT Background One in five emergency department (ED) visits is by older adults aged 65+ years. Clinical practice guidelines are needed to optimize patient care by translating the best available evidence into actionable recommendations to guide person‐centered management for this medically complex and growing patient population. Our objective was to understand contributors' experiences and share best practices to inform other guideline working groups. Methods We conducted a qualitative study based on thematic analysis with an interpretivist paradigm in June–July 2025, using semi‐structured interviews of Geriatric Emergency Department (GED) Guidelines 2.0 contributors to understand their experiences. Interviews were transcribed, independently reviewed by team members, and reflexively coded to identify themes. Results We interviewed 18 participants. Four main themes emerged: (1) motivations for participation, (2) varying opportunities to be involved, (3) personal benefits, and (4) challenges for improvement. Participants contrasted the strengths of shared learning and development with the burdens of organization and coordination. Conclusion Contributors to the GED Guidelines 2.0 reported a positive experience. They joined because they wanted to contribute to better care of older patients and to achieve personal and professional goals. Many cited that their roles aligned with their strengths and expertise. They also gained skills and knowledge on systematic reviews and benefited from networking. Future groups planning a similar process should consider having multiple levels of leadership, experts in systematic reviews, regular reminders, and creative incentives to improve the process and foster improved networking opportunities within their disciplines.

Abstract The demand for high-quality faculty development in medical education is more acute than ever. Faculty developers’ responsibilities are growing exponentially as they are called upon to help medical faculty maintain expertise in an evolving array of content domains, curricular and assessment strategies, education technologies, and active learning methods. Faculty development has a long history of supporting medical education colleagues in times of change. More recently expectations for faculty developers are expanding due to (1) increasing enrollment of learners, (2) emphasis on learner-centered teaching practices and competency-based assessment methods, and (3) heightened accreditation standards for training faculty. Yet, faculty development in medical education lacks the conventional structures of a profession, such as an adopted set of competencies. In 2023, a series of sessions at regional, national, and international medical education conferences were held to generate ideas and collect examples of faculty developer competencies from over 100 stakeholders. More than 500 responses were gathered from prompts such as “What are the competencies faculty developers need?” and “What is one of the most valuable faculty developer competencies today?” This perspective offers both a rationale for establishing faculty development in medical education as a profession and a path forward through the provision and broad promotion of clearly defined core competencies. The competencies outlined are intended to help inform those entering or currently working in the profession, recruiters of faculty developers, medical education leaders, institutional partners, those conducting performance appraisals of faculty developers, and the broader medical education community. The aim of this work is to generate discussion among vested medical education and faculty development stakeholders who seek to provide structure, clarify roles, and further define medical education faculty development as a profession.

VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic) syndrome is a systemic disorder characterized by an overlap of hematologic and inflammatory features. Most patients require chronic use of moderate-to-high doses of glucocorticoids (GCs) to maintain disease control. Data on GC-sparing therapies is limited, and there have been no prospective pharmacotherapeutic trials in VEXAS syndrome published to date. Pacritinib, an oral inhibitor of IRAK1, JAK2, and ACVR1, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for VEXAS syndrome. The PAXIS trial is the first prospective, randomized pharmacotherapeutic study conducted in this rare and severe disease. Utilizing a novel study design and disease-specific endpoints, the trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dose levels of pacritinib compared with placebo in patients with VEXAS syndrome (NCT06782373, EUCTR: 2024-516347-41-00).

Abstract Objective To test the effectiveness of a surgical web‐based decision aid (DA) in improving knowledge. Summary of Background Data DAs support decision making by providing information about the options. Methods A stepped wedge trial was conducted in 10 National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program clinics (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology). Clinics were randomized to time of transition from usual care (UC) to delivery of a web‐based DA. Patients with stage 0 through 3 breast cancer being considered for surgery were enrolled. Knowledge (primary outcome) was measured using the Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Quality Instrument and patients were asked, “How informed do you feel?” Intervention effects were tested with linear mixed‐effects models, accounting for surgeon and clinic‐level clustering, time, and enrollment after COVID. Additional models controlled for demographics. Results A total of 44% of DA arm patients reviewed the DA and 58% in UC arm reported reviewing “any information.” Being in the DA arm versus UC was not associated with knowledge. However, “review of information” was associated with higher knowledge. In addition, non‐White race and lower education were associated with lower knowledge. The DA arm was associated with higher perceptions of feeling informed (parameter estimate 1.36; 95% CI, 0.18–2.55; p = .02); this persisted even when controlling for review of information or demographics. Conclusion Improved knowledge was not demonstrate with a web‐based DA versus UC. Interestingly, the DA was associated with a higher likelihood of feeling informed. Future research will explore the discrepancy between patients feeling informed but having low knowledge, especially for disadvantaged patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0376600

INTRODUCTION: The American College of Gastroenterology assembled a multidisciplinary task force to evaluate the current state and future direction of artificial intelligence (AI) in gastroenterology, hepatology, and endoscopy leading to the development of consensus-based recommendations for responsible AI integration in clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 32 subject-matter experts and 12 industry partners, representing diverse practice settings and expertise, conducted subgroup literature reviews across 5 key areas (endoscopy, practice management clinical applications, training and education, inflammatory bowel disease and liver disease, ethics and equity). Draft statements were developed and rated on a 5-point Likert scale using a modified Delphi process. A consensus was set at ≥70% combined agreement. Nonconsensus items were revised and revoted electronically. RESULTS: A total of 43 statements, 40 (93%) reached consensus in round 1 and the remaining 3 achieved consensus after round 2. Evidence supports computer-aided detection improving adenoma detection rate and miss rate in controlled studies, with mixed real-world impact and insufficient long-term outcomes (e.g., interval colon cancer rate). Recommendations emphasize thorough validation and reduction of bias by heterogeneous Data sets. Outside endoscopy, ambient AI scribes, natural language processing (NLP)-enabled coding, workflow optimization, and previous authorization support show potential. Training recommendations endorse a structured AI curriculum while preserving independent procedural competence to avoid deskilling. In inflammatory bowel disease and hepatology, AI could help improve diagnostic accuracy, help predict risk of disease progression, and help guide therapy. Equity, governance, and reimbursement statements call for chain-of-custody data protections, specialty-society oversight, and payment models that reward quality and cost reduction. DISCUSSION: This consensus outlines how AI can augment rather than replace clinical expertise while promoting safety, transparency, interoperability, and equity. Priorities include pragmatic and prospective trials, multi-institutional data-sharing consortia, bias mitigation, and workforce training to enable trustworthy and clinically impactful AI adoption in gastroenterology, liver, and endoscopy care.

Ultrasound‐guided nerve blocks (USGNBs) are increasingly used in the emergency department (ED) as a safe and effective part of multimodal pain management. Their use has been shown to reduce reliance on opioids and procedural sedation, improve pain scores, and enhance functional outcomes for patients. Additionally, USGNBs in the ED have a complication rate of 0.4%, markedly lower than procedural sedation (4–11%), and they significantly reduce opioid requirements, which is critical considering the current opioid epidemic and the risks of persistent opioid use and overdose. Despite these benefits, relevant concerns about medicolegal liability, informed consent, evolving standards of care, may still influence the adoption of USGNBs in clinical practice. To address these issues, this review examines the legal risks associated with USGNBs by drawing on current clinical literature, closed claims data, and case law. We highlight common adverse events such as peripheral nerve injury and local anesthetic systemic toxicity and assess their legal implications. Potential legal risk including liability related to alternatives like opioid use and procedural sedation, are discussed. While the risk of litigation remains low when best practices are followed, failing to offer a USGNB when clearly indicated may increasingly be viewed as a liability if preventable complications occur. This article aims to provide a practical, interdisciplinary framework, including legal risk assessment, training, credentialing, and risk mitigation, to help clinicians, educators, and hospital administrators safely and confidently integrate USGNBs into ED practice.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Understanding comorbidities’ combined impacts on dementia risk may offer a more comprehensive understanding of individuals’ risk. Using machine‐learning, we grouped individuals with similar midlife risk profiles into clusters and explored associations with dementia risk. METHODS Participants without dementia at baseline (1987–1989) from the prospective Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study were included (ages 45–64 years; N = 15,250). Using unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis, nine clusters were created and defined based on 14 midlife morbidities. The associations with incident dementia ( N = 3272 cases, median follow‐up 25 years) and deaths ( N = 9099) were evaluated using time‐to‐event regression models. RESULTS Compared with the healthiest cluster (Cluster 1), Clusters 2 (smoking) (hazard ratio [HR](95% confidence interval [CI]) = 1.62 (1.08, 2.43)), 5 (obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and hypertriglyceridemia) (HR(95%CI) = 1.91 (1.35,2.70)), and 7/8 (atrial fibrillation/heart failure) (HR(95%CI) = 2.69 (1.59,4.57)) were associated with dementia. Accounting for competing risk of death in the Fine‐Gray subdistribution model negated the cluster‐dementia association. DISCUSSION Midlife morbidity clusters are important for dementia and mortality risk.