Citations

TPS532 Background: Recent studies have shown that FGFR2 fusions may represent recurrent (prevalence ~10-15% in larger cohorts) driver events amenable to therapeutic targeting in patients with advanced, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Methods: This single arm pilot study (NCT02265341) is being conducted at 3 centers (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Mayo Clinic Florida and Mayo Clinic Rochester; enrollment initiated December 2014). Next-generation sequencing based assays and a FISH-break apart assay are used to identify tumors with FGFR2 fusions. Patients must additionally have histologically/cytologically confirmed cholangiocarcinoma, ECOG performance score 0-2, measurable disease, preserved hematologic/renal and hepatic function and absence of cardiac events/stroke in the preceding 6 months. Ponatinib is administered at 45 mg once daily. Patients will be treated until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or patient decision to not pursue further therapy. The primary objective of the study is to estimate the clinical benefit rate (defined as composite of partial response rate, complete response rate and stable disease rate ≥ 4 months; as defined by RECIST criteria v1.1). Secondary endpoints include estimation of progression-free survival, overall survival, CA19-9 response rate (defined as > 50% reduction from baseline) and evaluation of the overall adverse event profile of ponatinib in this patient population. Translational objectives include serial circulating DNA (ct-DNA) monitoring, target knockdown assessments in tumor tissue (p-FGFR2, p-FRS2, p-Akt and p-ERK) and evaluation of mechanisms of resistance through comparison of baseline and progression biopsy samples using multi-platform sequencing (exome, RNA-Seq and methyl-Seq). Additionally, quality of life assessments will be evaluated using EORTC-QLQ-C30 and BIL21 tools. A total of 30 patients will be enrolled into the study (12 of 30 patients have been enrolled). The trial is designed using an underlying assumption of clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 5% with significance level of 0.15 and 80% power to detect a 20% CBR. Clinical trial information: NCT02265341.

452 Background: Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for patients with gallbladder cancer, despite surgical advances many patients ultimately develop recurrent disease. Management of resected gallbladder cancer mostly relies on single-arm trials and retrospective observations. The purpose of our study is to assess the role of adjuvant therapy in stage I-III gallbladder cancer patients who have undergone surgical resection. Methods: Clinical data were collected on 251 patients who underwent surgical resection for stage I-III gallbladder cancer and presented to Mayo clinic from January 2000-December 2015. Patients were then classified into adjuvant treatment group and surveillance only group. Overall survival and recurrence were compared between the two groups. Results: 78 (31.1%) patients received adjuvant therapy while 173 patients were observed only. Patients who received adjuvant tended to be younger (63.0[SD 11] vs 66.2 [SD 13.1]), have higher stage, and underwent extended surgery. Most patients received chemoradiotherapy (55) with 5-Fluorouracil (67.3%) and capecitabine (25.5%) as radiosensitizing agents. 21 patients received additional adjuvant chemotherapy. 27% of patients received chemotherapy as the sole adjuvant treatment. The most common chemo regimens included gemcitabine (52.3%) and gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination (23.8%). On multivariate analysis patients > 65 years(HR 1.53 [1.07-2.19], p = 0.02), males (HR 1.7 [1.2-2.4], p = 0.003), positive margins (2.77 [1.69-4.38], p < 0.01), and stage III (HR 1.91 [1.35-2.70], p < 0.01) had worse overall survival. Patients who underwent extended radical resection (HR 0.73 [0.51-1.05], p = 0.09) had better overall survival. Adjuvant therapy had no statistical significant effect on overall survival (HR 1.10 [0.75-1.59], p = 0.63 or disease free survival (HR 1.05 [0.69-1.59], p = 0.81) on overall population. However, in stage IIIB, patients receiving adjuvant therapy had better overall survival (HR 0.51 [0.25-1.01], p = 0.05) and disease free survival (HR 0.45 [0.19-1.09], p = 0.06). Conclusions: In our study, adjuvant treatment, especially chemoradiation therapy, was only beneficial in patients with stage IIIb gallbladder cancer patients.

450 Background: The standard treatment for patients with gallbladder cancer is a combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin based on ABC-02 trial. However, there are no guidelines regarding treatment after first-line therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and overall survival of different second-line regimens. Methods: We identified 203 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer who received palliative treatment between January 2000 and December 2015 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. RECIST criteria was used to assess response. Results: 68 patients received second-line chemotherapy. Median age was 63 years (range: 32-86) and majority were males (60.6%). The median time from the diagnosis to the start of the second line chemotherapy was 8 (1-120) months. The most common used second-line chemotherapy were FOLFOX (14), gemcitabine alone (10), single agent fluoropyrimidine (11), gemcitabine with capecitabine (5), and capecitabine with oxaliplatin (4). There were 30 patients that received 5-fluorouracil based regimens, 20 patients received gemcitabine-based regimen, 3 patients received taxane-based regimen, and 15 patients received other types of chemotherapy. Median progression free survival and overall survival was 2.1 (1.8-2.7) and 16.7 (13.2-21.3) months respectively. There were 10 (52%), 11 (37%), 2 (67%), 5 (33%) with partial response and stable disease in 5-fluorouracil-based, gemcitabine-based, taxane-based, and others, respectively. There were no difference in PFS, with median PFS of 2.5, 2.0, 2.8 and 2.3 months, respectively (p=0.43). The overall survival were 15.7 (8.9-40.2), 15.0 (10.7-21.3), 40.3 (22.0-47.0), and 20.4 (9.2-30.7) months, respectively (p=0.83). There were 27 patients that received single agent chemotherapy and 41 patients that received combined regimen. There were 17 (42%) patients and 13 (48%) patients with partial response or stable disease in single and combined regimen. There were no differences in progression free survival and overall survival between single and multi agent chemotherapy. Conclusions: In this largest single institution study, second-line chemotherapy regimens for gallbladder cancer provided benefit in select patients and there is an urgent need to develop more active therapeutic regimens.

448 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare, lethal cancer with five-year survival of less than 10%. Although incidence rates have been increasing in the United States, ethnic variations in survival have not been investigated. We examined multi-ethnic variation in overall survival (OS) and CCA-specific survival (CSS) using data from the population-based Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program in the four year periods before and after introduction of gemcitabine/cisplatin as treatment for CCA. Methods: The study included data from 9,975 CCA cases reported in SEER between 2006 and 2013. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to examine overall and cholangiocarcinoma-specific survival by ethnicity, age, gender and in the pre- and post- gemcitabine/cisplatin era (2006-2009 vs. 2010-2013). Results: Compared to non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanics had poorer 3-year OS (HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.10-1.26) and 3-year CCA-specific survival (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.16-1.35). Similarly, non-Hispanic Blacks had 3-year OS (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.12-1.30) and 3-year CCA-specific survival (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.13-1.37). Males and older patients also were found to have shorter survival compared to females and younger patients. Also noted was an increase in CCA incidence rate over time (2006-2013) of 5.93%. Among those < 50 versus ≥50 years old, a 23% higher rate of incidence in those < 50 was noted. Overall survival and CSS were both significantly improved for patients post-advent of Gemcitabine/Cisplatin. Statistically significant improvement in CSS pre- and post-advent of Gemcitabine/Cisplatin was noted in non-hispanic whites (p < 0.001) and Hispanics (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Hispanics and non-Hispanic Blacks have worse survival after diagnosis with CCA. Further studies are needed to determine the determinants of poor survival among these groups toward targeted intervention. Significant improvements in OS and CSS have been seen after the advent of Gemcitabine/Cisplatin. The incidence of CCA is rising faster in young persons, under the age of 50, compared with older patients.

398 Background: The PI3K/mTOR pathway has emerged as a potential target for anticancer therapy. Considerable evidence suggests that targeting a single isoform of PI3K (p110α) would have sufficient antitumor activity and improved therapeutic window. Further, PI3KCA mutations, gene encoding isoform p110α, are described in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC). BYL719 is an oral class I α-specific PI3K inhibitor that showed preclinical anti-tumor activity. The first in human phase 1 trial of BYL719 defined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) at 400mg QD. Methods: This was a phase I, single center study (standard 3+3 design). The primary objective was to determine the MTD of BYL719 in combination with gemcitabine (G) and nab-paclitaxel (nabP) as frontline therapy in locally advanced or metastatic PAC. BYL719 was given orally daily (Table). Patients (pts) were restaged q2 cycles. The study was closed prematurely due to slow accrual. Results: Fifteen pts were enrolled (median age was 58 years). Three pts each participated in cohorts 1 and 2. Nine pts were enrolled in cohort 3, but 4 were replaced (3 pts withdrew consent prior to evaluation and 1 missed > 10 days of treatment). One pt in cohort 3 had DLT related to grade 3 nausea and vomiting. A total of 19 grade 3 and 4 adverse events were records as probably or possibly associated with BYL719. The most common ones were hyperglycemia, anemia, and neutrophil count decreased. One pt developed Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) during cycle 7. Although we could not completely exclude BYL719 as a cause, PRES was attributed to G. One pt had sudden death during cycle 4 that was attributed to progression. Only 8 pts were evaluable for response. Two had stable disease, 5 had partial responses and 1 had progression. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.36 months (1.6 to 10 months) and 8.74 months (3.8 to 21.2 months) respectively. Conclusions: The combination of full doses of G + nabP and BYL719 can be safely administered up to BYL dose of 250 mg/day. Clinical trial information: NCT02155088. [Table: see text]