Citations

ABSTRACT Antimicrobial resistance mediated by carbapenemases significantly complicates treatment options. A case report by Morelan et al. (ASM Case Reports 1:e00094-25, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1128/asmcr.00094-25 ) illustrates how delayed recognition of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) production in an Escherichia coli urinary tract infection resulted in suboptimal cefepime therapy, despite in vitro susceptibility. This case underscores the urgent need for clinical laboratories to implement on-site carbapenemase testing, as recommended by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Timely detection of KPC, coupled with reporting strategies for cefepime susceptibility results (suppression or editing results as resistant) in carbapenemase producers, may have facilitated earlier administration of a more appropriate antimicrobial and prevented recurrent infections and readmissions. In this commentary, we highlight recent updates to CLSI guidance for carbapenemase testing and antimicrobial susceptibility reporting strategies. Using this case report as an example, we outline the potential impact of these strategies on patient management and outcomes, further emphasizing the role of the clinical microbiology laboratory in antimicrobial stewardship.

OBJECTIVE Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly capable of academic writing, with large language models such as ChatGPT showing potential to assist or even generate scientific manuscripts. However, concerns remain regarding the quality, reliability, and interpretive capabilities of AI-generated content. The authors’ study aimed to compare the quality of a human-written versus an AI-generated scientific manuscript to evaluate the strengths and limitations of AI in the context of academic publishing. METHODS Two manuscripts were developed using identical titles, abstracts, and tables of a simulated analysis: one authored by a physician with multiple publications, and the other generated by ChatGPT-4o. Three independent and blinded reviewers—two human and one AI—assessed each manuscript across five domains: clarity and readability, coherence and flow, technical accuracy, depth, and conciseness and precision. Each category was scored on a 10-point scale, and qualitative feedback was collected to highlight specific strengths and weaknesses. Additionally, all reviewers were asked to deduce authorship of the manuscripts. RESULTS The AI-generated manuscript scored higher in clarity and readability (mean 9.0 vs 7.2), but lower in technical accuracy (mean 6.3 vs 9.3) and depth (mean 5.5 vs 7.5). However, reviewers noted that the AI version lacked depth, critical analysis, and contextual interpretation. All reviewers accurately identified the authorship of each manuscript and tended to rate the version more favorably when it aligned with their own origin (human or AI); i.e., human reviewers assigned higher scores to the human-written manuscript, while the AI reviewer scored the AI-generated manuscript higher. CONCLUSIONS Although AI models can improve some aspects of scientific writing, particularly clarity and readability, they fall short in critical reasoning and contextual understanding. This reinforces the importance of human authorship and oversight in maintaining the critical analysis and scientific accuracy essential for academic publishing. AI may be used as a complementary tool to support, rather than replace, human-led scientific writing.

Background Non-acute or chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is commonly treated with surgical evacuation followed by middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAe). This two step approach increases procedural complexity and redundancy, hospitalization duration, and patient risk. We hypothesized that cSDH could be managed through a single session endovascular procedure and conducted a multimodal preclinical study to evaluate feasibility. Methods We performed three-dimensional heat mapping of hematoma distribution from preoperative CT scans (n=69) and analyzed middle meningeal artery (MMA) and superior sagittal sinus (SSS) anatomy and perforation trajectories using imaging from 107 patients. Rheological properties of 41 SDH samples were assessed using hybrid rheometry and modeled with the Carreau equation. Aspiration feasibility was tested using a 0.027 inch microcatheter (n=16), and dura perforation forces were quantified with a 28 G needle in fresh cadaveric dura (n=10). Results Heat mapping localized cSDH to the parietal convexities (>80% probability) under the branches of the MMA, with limited midline involvement and proximity to the SSS (<10%). The posterior division of the MMA (diameter 1.23±0.23 mm) accommodated a 0.027 inch microcatheter in >90% of cases, with perforation trajectories targeting high probability hematoma zones in 105 of 107 cases. SDH samples exhibited shear thinning viscosity ( η ₀ =172 mPa×s, η ∞ =2.78 mPa×s), with mean aspiration times of 1.21±0.54 min per 10 mL. Perforation forces averaged 0.68±0.24 N in normal and 1.29±0.48 N in calcified dura (P=0.05). Conclusion Anatomical, rheological, and biomechanical data from this study support the feasibility of endovascular drainage of cSDH through the MMA.

The Dublin ISUP Consensus Conference covered the proceedings on the best practice recommendations on nonurachal glandular lesions of the urinary bladder, bladder diverticular cancers, and molecular features of bladder and urachal glandular lesions. The conference proceedings on urachal neoplasms (except for their molecular features) are published elsewhere. The rationale for convening this conference was the lack of structured and consented pathologic recommendations in these rare lesions. Consensus by participants was reached on the following statements: (1) intestinal metaplasia with dysplasia is considered to be a precursor to primary bladder adenocarcinoma; (2) dysplasia arising from cystitis glandularis should be reported in terms of focality (focal or nonfocal) and grade (low or high); (3) the term “adenocarcinoma” should only be used for carcinomas showing pure (nonurothelial) morphology and should not be used interchangeably in urothelial carcinoma with “glandular differentiation” because of the pathobiological differences and management implications; (4) the different histologic subtypes of bladder adenocarcinoma should be specified in the report; (5) immunohistochemistry has an ancillary role in the work up of bladder adenocarcinoma versus gastrointestinal or Müllerian-type adenocarcinomas; (6) lymphovascular invasion should be included as a parameter when reporting bladder adenocarcinoma; (7) representative or targeted sampling will be sufficient for bladder diverticulum resection specimens; and (8) molecular analysis in genomic profiling should be performed only in advanced or metastatic bladder and urachal adenocarcinomas for targetable therapy. This report on glandular (nonurachal) lesions of the bladder from the Dublin ISUP consensus conference will serve as a best practice recommendation and as a guide for future research on these relatively rare lesions.

In mammals, breathing requires an inspiratory pump to generate a negative intrathoracic pressure and thus pull air into the lungs for gas exchange. Exclusively in mammals, the diaphragm muscle (DIAm) is the major inspiratory pump, which separates the thoracic and abdominal cavities. With DIAm contraction, a negative intrathoracic and positive abdominal pressure are generated [i.e., transdiaphragmatic pressure (P di )]. During breathing, the DIAm is very active, with a duty cycle (time active vs. inactive) similar to that of the heart. Like the heart, this is a pump that cannot fail! Thus, in controlling breathing, the nervous system must activate DIAm to accomplish pump function while avoiding fatigue. The timing of DIAm activations must also be coordinated with activation of the upper airway muscles (the pipes) to avoid airway occlusion and aspiration and the intercostal and abdominal muscles to appropriately stiffen the body cavities. Similarly, neural control and coordination of the DIAm in nonventilatory behaviors (airway protection, swallowing, vocalization, and voiding) are equally complex, with coordinated activation of the DIAm and abdominal muscles. It is becoming increasingly clear that impaired nonventilatory functions underlie the pathophysiology of a variety of medical conditions. In this review, we will delve into the detailed mechanistic underpinnings of the neural control of the DIAm and the symphonic coordination of its activation during breathing and other behaviors. We will attempt to move the field from considering the DIAm only as an inspiratory pump, emphasizing neural control of airway, intercostal, and abdominal muscles that must be coordinated with DIAm activation.