Citations

Aims A number of methods have been described to remove a well-fixed humeral implant as part of revision shoulder arthroplasty. These include the use of cortical windows and humeral osteotomies. The router bit extraction technique uses a high-speed router bit to disrupt the bone-implant interface. The implant is then struck in a retrograde fashion with a square-tip impactor and mallet. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and frequency of the different techniques needed for the removal of a well-fixed humeral stem in revision shoulder arthroplasty. Patients and Methods Between 2010 and 2018, 288 revision shoulder arthroplasty procedures requiring removal of a well-fixed humeral component were carried out at a tertiary referral centre by a single surgeon. The patient demographics, indications for surgery, and method of extraction were collected. Results Of the 288 revisions, 284 humeral stems (98.6%) were removed using the router bit extraction technique alone. Four humeral stems (1.39%) required an additional cortical window. Humeral osteotomy was not necessary in any procedure. Most of the humeral stems removed (78.8%) were cementless. Of the four humeral stems that required a cortical window, three involved removal of a hemiarthroplasty. Two were cemented and two were cementless. Conclusion The router bit extraction technique removed a well-fixed humeral component in a very high proportion of patients (98.6%). This method allows surgeons to avoid more invasive approaches involving a cortical window or humeral osteotomy, and their associated complications. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1280–1284

Objectives: Meniscus repair is desirable over resection to prevent post-meniscectomy arthritis, especially in young and active patients. However, long-term data is currently lacking following isolated meniscus repair, particularly in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to report long-term follow-up of isolated meniscus tears treated by meniscus repair in a pediatric population, and to compare those results to previous mid-term follow-up data reported. We hypothesized that these patients would have satisfactory function and reoperation rates at long-term follow-up. Methods: Patients less than 18 undergoing repair of an isolated (without concomitant ACL injury) meniscus tear performed between 1990 and 2005 were included. At the time of final followup, recurrent tear, reoperations, and IKDC and Tegner scores were determined. With logistic regression, the overall failure between different tear types was calculated. Wilcoxon signed ranks tests were performed to calculate the differences in clinical outcome for different time-points, and Spearman coefficients were calculated for Tegner and IKDC with different variables. Results: At an average followup of 17.6 years (13.1 - 26.0 years), 32 patients with 33 isolated meniscus repairs (29 M: 3F) with an average age of 16.1 (9.9 - 18.7) were included in this study. At early follow-up, complex tears (80%) had a higher overall failure rate compared to simple tears (18.2%). However, no further failures occurred since mid-term follow-up with any tear type. At final follow-up, the average IKDC score was 92.3, which was significantly increased when compared to both preoperative 65.3 (p< 0.0001) and mid-term scores, 90.2 (p= 0.01). However, the average Tegner score (6.5) was significantly lower than both pre-operative 8.3 (p< 0.0001) and mid-term 8.4 (p< 0.0001) scores. There was no correlation for Tegner or IKDC values with any risk factors. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study demonstrates overall good to excellent long-term clinical outcomes following isolated meniscus repair in a pediatric population. Early failure and reoperation rates were variable depending on tear type, with complex multiplanar tears having more failures at short-term follow-up. However, at long-term follow-up, IKDC and Tegner scores were not significantly different for those with complex tears compared to other tear types.

Purpose To compare patellar bone socket and cortical surface fixation techniques for isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and determine whether there was a difference in (1) complication rates, including fracture of the patella; (2) redislocation rates; or (3) patient‐reported outcomes. Methods A literature search was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included patients who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Patients with confirmed concomitant or prior ipsilateral knee procedures, multiligament injury, or less than 3 months of follow‐up were excluded. Risk‐of‐bias assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non‐randomized Studies (MINORS) system. Studies were classified by surgical technique (patellar bone socket group [group S] vs cortical fixation group [group F]), and complications, redislocations, and patient‐reported outcomes were collected. Results A total of 29 studies yielded 981 patients with MPFL reconstruction for inclusion. Of the patients, 620 underwent a patellar bone socket technique and 361 underwent a cortical fixation technique. Patients ranged in age from 11 to 68 years. Patellar fracture rates ranged from 0% to 17% in group S and were 0% in all group F studies. Mean Kujala scores ranged from 83.5 to 93.6 in group S and from 84.4 to 94.5 in group F. Mean Lysholm scores ranged from 84.6 to 91.7 in group S and from 83.5 to 95 in group F. Redislocation rates ranged from 0% to 21% in group S and from 0% to 13% in group F. Although heterogeneous in nature, complication rates ranged from 0% to 28% in group S and from 0% to 4% in group F. Conclusions MPFL reconstruction techniques with patellar bone sockets showed a larger range of complication rates than cortical fixation techniques, although overall, complications remained uncommon. Clinically, the bone socket group had comparable postoperative redislocation rates and patient outcomes to the group treated with cortical fixation techniques. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of Level I through IV studies.

Background: Meniscal repair is desirable over resection to prevent postmeniscectomy arthritis, especially among young and active patients. However, long-term data are currently lacking following isolated meniscal repair, particularly in the pediatric population. Purpose/Hypothesis: To report long-term follow-up of isolated meniscal tears treated by meniscal repair in a pediatric and adolescent population and to compare those results with previous midterm follow-up data reported. The authors hypothesized that these patients would have satisfactory function and reoperation rates at long-term follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Forty-four patients aged ≤18 years undergoing repair of an isolated meniscal tear (without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament injury) between 1990 and 2005 were included. At the time of final follow-up, recurrent tear, reoperations, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner scores were determined. With logistic regression, the overall failure among tear types was calculated. Wilcoxon rank sum analysis were performed to calculate the differences in clinical outcome for different time points, and Spearman coefficients were calculated for Tegner and IKDC with different variables. Results: At a mean follow-up of 17.6 years (range, 13.1-25.9 years), 32 patients with 33 isolated meniscal repairs (29 male, 3 female) with a mean age of 16.1 years (range, 9.9-18.7 years) at surgery were included in this study. At early follow-up, the overall failure rate was 14 of 33 (42%); complex tears (80%) and bucket-handle tears (47%) had higher overall failure rates when compared with simple tears (18.2%), although only complex tears had a significantly higher failure rate. However, no further failures occurred since midterm follow-up with any tear type. At final follow-up, the mean IKDC score was 92.3, which was significantly increased when compared with preoperative (65.3, P < .0001) and midterm (90.2, P = .01) scores. The mean Tegner score (6.5) was significantly lower than both preoperative (8.3, P < .0001) and midterm (8.4, P < .0001) scores. There was no difference in Tegner or IKDC score for patients with successful versus failed repair. Conclusion: In conclusion, while there was a high early failure rate, this study demonstrated overall good to excellent long-term clinical outcomes after isolated meniscal repair in an adolescent population, even for those requiring reoperation. Early failure and reoperation rates were variable, depending on tear type, with complex multiplanar tears having more failures at short-term follow-up. However, at long-term follow-up, IKDC and Tegner scores were not significantly different for those with complex tears as compared with other tear types.

Background: Studies have shown good and excellent clinical and radiographic results after meniscal repair. Limited published information exists on the long-term outcomes, however, especially in a pediatric and adolescent population. Purpose: To determine long-term results of meniscal repair and concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in a pediatric and adolescent population. Specifically, the aims were to determine the clinical success rate of meniscal repair with concomitant ACL reconstruction, compare results with midterm outcomes, and analyze risk factors for failure. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Cases of meniscal repair with concomitant ACL reconstruction between 1990 and 2005 were reviewed among patients aged ≤18 years. Patient demographics, injury history, and surgical details were recorded, and risk factors for failure were analyzed. Physical examination findings and clinical outcomes at latest available follow-up were collected. Subjective knee outcomes were compared with midterm results. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were used to evaluate the available data. Results: Forty-seven patients (30 females, 17 males) with a mean age of 16 years (SD, 1.37) and a mean follow-up of 16.6 years (SD, 3.57) were included in this study. Overall, 13 patients (28%) failed meniscal repair and required repeat surgery at the time of final follow-up. Of the 13 failures, 9 underwent a subsequent meniscectomy; 2, meniscectomy and revision ACL reconstruction; 1, meniscal repair and revision ACL reconstruction; and 1, meniscal repair and subsequent meniscectomy. Mean International Knee Documentation Committee scores improved from 47.9 preoperatively to 87.7 postoperatively ( P < .01), and the mean score at long-term follow-up (87.7) did not significantly differ from that at the midterm follow-up (88.5) at a mean 7.4 years ( P = .97). Mean Tegner Activity Scale scores improved from 1.9 preoperatively to 6.3 postoperatively ( P < .01) and decreased from 8.3 at preinjury to 6.3 at final long-term follow-up ( P < .01). Conclusion: In conclusion, the long-term overall clinical success rate (failure-free survival) was 72% for repair of pediatric and adolescent meniscal tears in the setting of concomitant ACL reconstruction. Patients reported excellent knee subjective outcome scores that remained favorable when compared with midterm follow-up.

Background: Meniscal repair is desirable over resection to prevent post-meniscectomy arthritis, especially in young and active patients. However, long-term data is currently lacking following meniscus repair, particularly in the pediatric population. Purpose: To report long-term follow-up of isolated meniscus tears treated by meniscal repair in a pediatric population, and to compare those results to previous mid-term follow-up data reported. We hypothesized that these patients would have satisfactory function and reoperation rates at long-term follow-up. Methods: Patients less than 18 that had a meniscal repair procedure performed between 1990 and 2005 were included. Concomitant ACL reconstructions were excluded from the present study. At the time of final follow-up, recurrent meniscus tear, reoperation rates, and IKDC and Tegner scores were determined. Wilcoxin signed ranks tests were performed to calculate the differences in clinical outcome for the 3 time points (pre-operative, average 7 years post-op, and average 18 years post-op) and Spearman coefficients were calculated for Tegner and IKDC with different variables. Results: At an average follow-up of 18 years (range 13.2 - 25.9 years), 34 patients with 35 isolated meniscus repairs (4F: 30 M) with an average age of 16 (9.9 - 18.7) were included in this study. Of the 35 knees (34 patients), none had “failed” or re-injured their affected meniscus since mid-term follow-up in 2008. The average IKDC score was 92.1 which was found to be significantly increased when compared to both preoperative IKDC 64.7 (P<.0001) and mid-term IKDC scores, 89.8 (p=.02). However, the average Tegner score (6.5) was significantly lower than both pre-operative 8.28 (p<.0001) and the mid-term Tegner average 8.25 (p<.0001). Patients with a meniscus re-tear and subsequent partial meniscectomy had lower IKDC scores than clinically successful repairs (88.9 vs 94.0), but this did not reach statistical significance (p=.09). There was no correlation for Tegner or IKDC values with 1) rim width, 2) current age, 3) time elapsed since surgery, or 4) time from injury to surgery. There were also no differences in Tegner or IKDC scores when comparing; medial versus lateral, left versus right, tear types, surgical repair technique, or male vs female. Conclusion: This study demonstrates very good clinical long-term outcomes following meniscal repair in a pediatric population.