Citations

1059 Background: Relapsed TNBC is characterized by its poor prognosis. B is a synthetic DNA minor groove binding non-cross resistant agent that is fully active against DNA-mismatch repair deficient tumor cells. C increases GSH/GST in which enhances the efficacy of B. Methods: Phase II study in pts with mTNBC. C Day 1 followed by B Day 2, repeated every 21 days. Aim: Efficacy of C + B in mTNBC. Primary endpoint: PFS at 3 mo. Secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response (DOR), 6-mo PFS, OS and AE profile. Tertiary endpoints include assessment of baseline GSH levels, prevalence of BCRA1 mutation and pERK, and correlations with outcome. Results: Closed 3/2012. 48 pts accrued (1 ineligible pt). Median f/u 11.4 mo (6.6-14.8); 2 pts still on treatment. 47 pts evaluable for the PFS endpoint and AEs. 49% received therapy as 3rd-5th line. Median number of cycles = 4 (range 1-15). There are currently 9 confirmed responses (8 PR and 1 CR); DOR = 2.6-14.5 mo. The 3-mo PFS = 51%; 6-mo PFS = 28%; the median TTP is 3.2 mo. AE data: 75% G3/4 hematologic AE: febrile neutropenia 19%. Non-hematologic AEs included G3 (47%) and G4 (15%): G3 fatigue 17%; and no G5 non-heme AE. No correlation of GSH/GST levels with outcome was found. Among 35 pts with evaluable data, no association between BRCA1 expression and outcomes was found. pERK expression was negatively associated with 3-mo PFS, but not 6-mo PFS. Cytoplasmic pERK expression was negatively associated with tumor response (p=0.03). No significant effect of BRCA-1 or pERK expression was found on OS. Conclusions: This trial showed B + C is an active regimen, especially in heavily pretreated mTNBC pts. Correlative data demonstrated a negative association between pERK expression and outcomes. A randomized phase II trial is in development. Clinical trial information: NCT01091454.

6570 Background: Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) can block growth and trigger apoptosis in neoplastic cells. AZD2171 (cediranib) is a highly potent, orally bioavailable, VEGFR-1/2 inhibitor. We conducted a phase II study of the efficacy of AZD2171 for the treatment of MDS. Methods: Adults with MDS (IPSS Int-2 or High) were eligible if they exhibited adequate organ function and ECOG 0-2. The primary endpoint was proportion of responses according to the IWG criteria assessed at one and every 3 months. Prior investigation of cediranib at 45 mg daily in patients with acute leukemia demonstrated toxicity concerns and therefore, the starting dose of this study was lowered to 30 mg daily. Results: A total of 16 pts with MDS (median age 73 years) were enrolled at a 30 mg starting dose, and all were evaluable. Median baseline marrow blasts were 12.0 % (range 2-18); 3 pts (18.8 %) had low, 6 (37.5 %) intermediate, and 7 (43.8 %) had high risk cytogenetics. Prior therapy included azacitidine (n=7), decitabine (n=2), cytarabine (n=2), erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) (n=2), lenalidomide (n=1), or none (n=6). Patients were treated for a median of two 28-day cycles (range 1 to 11). There were no confirmed responses. Patients with baseline blasts > 5% showed no significant reduction in the blast count at 4 and 12 weeks. Median OS was 4.7 mo (95% CI: 2.6 – 11.6). Median TTP was 3.8 mo (95% CI: 1.7 – 10.8). Grade 4 hematological adverse events at least possibly related to cediranib were neutropenia (n=2) and thrombocytopenia (n=4). Grade 3 hematological adverse events at least possibly related to study treatment included: neutropenia (n=3), thrombocytopenia (n=2), and anemia (n=2). Grade 3 non-hematological adverse events included fatigue (n=4), dyspnea (n=3), dehydration (n=2), diarrhea (n=2), nausea (n=2), asthenia (n=1), and hypertension (n=1). Hypertension and proteinuria was uncommon with the 30 mg/day dose. Conclusions: With no confirmed response from 16 patients, cediranib was determined to be ineffective at a dose of 30 mg daily in our patient population. Supported by NCI N01-CM62205, NCI P30-CA014520 and the UW Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center.

1083 Background: Pixantrone (Pix) is a novel aza-anthracenedione with structural similarities to mitoxantrone and promising activity against non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Due to the lack of iron binding it is theorized to exhibit less cardiotoxicity than the anthracyclines. Methods: N1031 is a phase II RCT of 2 schedules of Pix, in pts with MBC. Group A pts received 180mg/m2 IV q3 wks, and group B pts 85mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, 15 q4 wks. Eligibility included prior exposure to anthracyclines and/or taxanes, and 1 to 3 regiments in the metastatic setting (minimum of 2 if no prior adjuvant therapy given). Due to lack of long term cardiac safety data no more than 12 cycles were allowed. Frequent cardiac imaging was performed per protocol. Primary endpoint was RR and secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, safety, and QOL. Planned sample size was 25 pts per group. Results: In total 46 pts were evaluable (23 per group), mean age 55.5 yrs (range 38-79), 37% PS 0, 52% PS 1, and 11% PS 2. 80% of pts had prior exposure to doxorubicin, 72% had prior (neo)-adjuvant therapy, 76% were ER+ and 57% received prior HT. Number of prior metastatic regiments was: 1 (28%), 2 (61%) and 3 (11%). Most common adverse events (%) of any grade were: alopecia (74), anemia (74), fatigue (85), nausea (67), ANC decrease (87), and skin disorder (41). Grade 3-4 adverse events (%) at least possibly attributed to Pix and occurring in at least 2 pts were: ANC decrease (57), fatigue (9), increased AST (4%). One pt from each group (4%) had a grade 3 decrease in EF. There were no major differences between the two groups except for more oral mucositis in group A (35% vs 4%). Median number of cycles was 3 in group A (range 1-12) and 2 in group B (range 1-8). There was only 1 confirmed tumor response per group (4%,95% CI: 0.1-22%) prompting early termination of the trial. The median PFS was 2.7 mo (95% CI: 1.8-3.8), and the median OS was 8.9 mo (95% CI: 7.5-N/A). Conclusions: Pixantrone has insufficient activity in patients with MBC exposed to prior anthracyclines and/or taxanes. Adverse events were similar to prior experience with Pix. There were no major differences between the 2 schedules of administration. There was no significant cardiac toxicity seen in this trial. Correlative studies are underway.

CRA1002 The full, final text of this abstract will be available at abstract.asco.org at 12:01 AM (EDT) on Monday, June 4, 2012, and in the Annual Meeting Proceedings online supplement to the June 20, 2012, issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology. Onsite at the Meeting, this abstract will be printed in the Monday edition of ASCO Daily News.

577 Background: BAY 43–9006 targets the ras/raf signaling pathway and inhibits VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3 and or PDGFR-β growth factors. A study was conducted to assess anti-tumor activity and the toxicity profile in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: A two-stage phase II study was conducted with pts with MBC who had measurable disease and were candidates for 1 st or 2 nd line chemotherapy and had previously received an anthracycline and/or a taxane in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or metastatic setting. Pts started with a dose of 400 mg twice daily on days 1–28 of each 4 week cycle. Based on interval adverse events (AEs), a dose reduction was considered as 400 mg given one time daily. Primary endpoint was tumor response defined as a complete or partial response (PR) according to RESIST. The study required 40 pts, but was to be terminated if 0 or 1 responses occurred among 1 st 20 eligible pts. Results: 23 pts enrolled with a median age of 54 (range 37–70) but 3 were declared ineligible. All 23 pts were included in all analyses except efficacy analysis as stated per protocol. Fifteen (65%) had visceral metastasis; 22 (96%) had prior anthracycline treatment (tx); 16 (70%) had prior taxane tx.; 10 (44%) had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease and 14 (61%) had a prior relapse free interval of 12 months (mos) or more. Pts received tx for a median of 2 cycles (range 1–8) with a median follow-up of 7.2 mos. Dose reductions were due to dermatitis/skin rash (3), hand/foot skin reaction (2), hypertension (1) and cramping hands/feet (1). No grade 4 AEs occurred and grade 3 AEs included acne (2), hand/foot skin reaction (1), neutropenia (1), cough (1), wound infection (1), and prolonged PTT (1). Among the 20 pts eligible for efficacy analysis one pt (5%; 95% CI 0.5–20.5%) achieved a PR with duration of 3.6 mos and one pt achieved stable disease for at least 6 mos. The 6-month overall survival rate was 81% and the progression-free survival rates were 53% at 2 mos, 24% at 4 mos and 6% at 6 mos. Median time to progression was 2 mos. Based on the lack of sufficient response, we did not proceed with the 2nd stage of this study. Conclusion: Treatment with oral BAY 43–9006, while well tolerated, does not have sufficient activity to warrant further testing as a single agent in this disease setting. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Genentech Genentech

PURPOSE Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, formerly DS-8201a) is a novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted antibody drug conjugate (ADC) with a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. A dose escalation and expansion phase I study evaluated the safety and activity of T-DXd in patients with advanced HER2-expressing/mutated solid tumors. Here, results for T-DXd at the recommended doses for expansion (RDE) in patients with HER2-low (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization−) breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02564900 ) are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had advanced/metastatic HER2-low–expressing breast cancer refractory to standard therapies. The RDE of 5.4 or 6.4 mg/kg T-DXd were administered intravenously once every 3 weeks until withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, or progressive disease. Antitumor activity and safety were assessed. RESULTS Between August 2016 and August 2018, 54 patients were enrolled and received ≥ 1 dose of T-DXd at the RDE. Patients were extensively pretreated (median, 7.5 prior therapies). The confirmed objective response rate by independent central review was 20/54 (37.0%; 95% CI, 24.3% to 51.3%) with median duration of response of 10.4 months (95% CI, 8.8 month to not evaluable). Most patients (53/54; 98.1%) experienced ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE; grade ≥ 3; 34/54; 63.0%). Common (≥ 5%) grade ≥ 3 TEAEs included decreases in neutrophil, platelet, and WBC counts; anemia; hypokalemia; AST increase; decreased appetite; and diarrhea. Three patients treated at 6.4 mg/kg suffered fatal events associated with T-DXd–induced interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis as determined by an independent adjudication committee. CONCLUSION The novel HER2-targeted ADC, T-DXd, demonstrated promising preliminary antitumor activity in patients with HER2-low breast cancer. Most toxicities were GI or hematologic in nature. ILD is an important identified risk and should be monitored closely and proactively managed.

78 Background: Previous study demonstrated that activation of RAS/MAPK pathway is associated with reduced tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Further study showed that inhibition of MAPK pathway with a MEK inhibitor is synergistic with anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapies. Methods: Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic TNBC with ≤ 3 prior lines of therapy without prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2 therapies were enrolled. Treatment was started with a 2-week run in period with single agent binimetinib. Dose level 0 was binimetinib at 45 mg oral twice daily continuously and dose level -1 was 30 mg twice daily. Pembrolizumab was given at a fixed dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks at both dose levels. Phase I study was based on the standard 3+3 design. Results: A total of 12 patients were enrolled and treated in the phase 1. Five patients were enrolled at dose level 0, 1 patient withdrew prior to treatment and 1 patient was not evaluable for dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Among 3 evaluable patients, 2 patients experienced DLT with grade 3 flank pain and ALT abnormality. Additional 8 patients were enrolled at dose level -1. Out of 6 evaluable patients for DLT, there was 1 DLT observed with grade 3 AST and ALT abnormality. However, this particular patient had liver metastasis with grade 1 AST and ALT abnormality at baseline and her liver function test (LFT) normalized in 3 weeks after treatment discontinuation and oral prednisone. Other grade 1-2 common AEs included rash, LFT increase, abdominal pain, mucositis, nausea, cardiac troponin T increase without EKG change. The efficacy data will be presented at the meeting after the phase II interim analysis. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab in combination with binimetinib at 30 mg twice daily appears to be safe based on the initial cohort. Phase II part is currently ongoing with binimetinib 30 mg twice daily and pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks with a total of 23 patients planned where the safety and efficacy of this combination will be further evaluated. Clinical trial information: NCT03106415.

AbstractChemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy (henceforth, neuropathy) is often dose limiting and is generally managed by empirical dose modifications. We aimed to (1) identify an early time point that is predictive of future neuropathy using a patient‐reported outcome and (2) propose a dose‐adjustment algorithm based on simulated data to manage neuropathy. In previous work, a dose‐neuropathy model was developed using dosing and patient‐reported outcome data from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 40502 (Alliance), a randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel, nanoparticle albumin–bound paclitaxel or ixabepilone as first‐line chemotherapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. In the current work, an early time point that is predictive of the future severity of neuropathy was identified based on predictive accuracy of the model. Using the early data and model parameters, simulations were conducted to propose a dose‐adjustment algorithm for the prospective management of neuropathy in individual patients. The end of the first 3 cycles (12 weeks) was identified as the early time point based on a predictive accuracy of 75% for the neuropathy score after 6 cycles. For paclitaxel, nanoparticle albumin–bound paclitaxel, and ixabepilone, simulations with the proposed dose‐adjustment algorithm resulted in 61%, 48%, and 35% fewer patients, respectively, with neuropathy score ≥8 after 6 cycles compared to no dose adjustment. We conclude that early patient‐reported outcome data on neuropathy can be used to guide dose adjustments in individual patients that reduce the severity of future neuropathy. Prospective validation of this approach should be undertaken in future studies.

Abstract Abstract 1828 Poster Board I-854 Background IgM Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM) are two hematologic diagnoses with the common variable of an IgM monoclonal gammopathy. Distinguishing these two diagnoses is critical as the approach to therapy is different. A study by Avet-Loiseau et al demonstrated the presence of t(11;14) translocations in 7 of 8 patients with IgM MM that was absent in all of a series of 17 cases of WM (Semin Oncol 2003 30:2;153). However, 6 of the 8 IgM MM cases lacked classic lytic lesions. Method A priori, based on the literature and the natural history of MM, we defined IgM MM as a symptomatic clonal plasma cell proliferative disorder characterized by a serum IgM monoclonal protein (regardless of size) plus presence of t(11;14) on fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or lytic bone lesions felt to be related to the underlying plasma cell disorder. The cases for the study were screened by a computerized database search for ‘IgM’ and ‘Myeloma’ of all patients seen at Mayo Clinic in the last 30 years at all three sites (Rochester, Arizona and Florida). Patients identified on the computerized screen were then audited by chart review to identify the study cohort. Results 38 cases were identified on initial screen of the computerized database as potential patients with IgM MM. Of these, a total of 22 cases met our specific definition of IgM myeloma (t(11;14 and/or lytic lesions). Of the remaining 16 cases, 8 were IgM MGUS, 5 were WM based on clinical presentation (hyperviscosity, lymphadenopathy and organomegaly) and biopsy findings of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, 1 was excluded due to lack of information, and the remaining 2 patients were indeed considered to have clinical IgM MM. Interestingly, these two patients did not have either the t(11;14) or lytic lesions, but rather had immunophenotypic features suggestive of MM and not WM (CD138+, CD20-). Table 1 summarizes the clinical characteristics of the 22 patients who met our criteria for IgM MM. All 22 patients had lytic bone lesions. Of the 17 evaluated with FISH, 6 (35%) demonstrated the t(11;14) abnormality. Median overall survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 37 months represented in Figure 1. Conclusion IgM MM is a discrete clinical entity that can and should be distinguished from WM. Our definition of IgM MM is designed to be specific and requires the presence of a symptomatic IgM secreting plasma cell proliferative disorder plus presence of t(11;14) and/or lytic bone lesions felt related to the underlying plasma cell disorder. In this, the largest series of patients with IgM MM, the t(11;14) abnormality is very specific for IgM MM, but may not be sensitive, being present in approximately 1/3 of patients. The median overall survival is similar to non-IgM myeloma patients treated during this period, and much shorter than what would be expected for WM. The minority of symptomatic patients with IgM monoclonal gammopathy who do not meet this criteria, but have immunophenotypic features more suggestive of MM rather than WM need further study. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

PURPOSE Recent trials have shown potential benefit of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy and relatively high risk of recurrence (RoR) after 5 years in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) breast cancer. Although risk of late relapse in HR+ HER2− breast cancer is fairly well defined, the risk in HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer treated with adjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy remains largely unknown. METHODS We included 3,177 patients with HER2+ breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy alone or with trastuzumab from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00005970 ) and National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-31 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00004067 ) trials. RESULTS Overall, HR+ breast cancer was significantly associated with improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) during the first 5 years (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.77; P < .001). Among patients treated with trastuzumab, cumulative hazard for RFS was lower in patients with HR+ HER2+ breast cancer during the first 5 years (10.96% v 17.48%; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.79; P < .001). However, there was no significant difference in RFS based on HR status during years 5 to 10 (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.88; P = .12). A comparable degree of trastuzumab benefit was observed in HR+ and HR− breast cancers ( P for interaction = .87). Furthermore, we observed low RoR in years 5 to 10 among patients with HR+ HER2+ breast cancer: 3.23% in patients without lymph node involvement (N0) and 6.39% in patients with involvement of one to three lymph nodes (N1). CONCLUSION The benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab persists for a long time. A distinct pattern of recurrence was observed between HR+ and HR− HER2+ disease but with similar degree of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab. RoR in years 5 to 10 in HR+ HER2+ breast cancer is low, particularly in patients with N0 or N1 disease.