Citations

Purpose The relevance of inherited pathogenic mutations in cancer predisposition genes in pancreatic cancer is not well understood. We aimed to assess the characteristics of patients with pancreatic cancer referred for hereditary cancer genetic testing and to estimate the risk of pancreatic cancer associated with mutations in panel-based cancer predisposition genes in this high-risk population. Methods Patients with pancreatic cancer (N = 1,652) were identified from a 140,000-patient cohort undergoing multigene panel testing of predisposition genes between March 2012 and June 2016. Gene-level mutation frequencies relative to Exome Aggregation Consortium and Genome Aggregation Database reference controls were assessed. Results The frequency of germline cancer predisposition gene mutations among patients with pancreatic cancer was 20.73%. Mutations in ATM, BRCA2, CDKN2A, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, and TP53 were associated with high pancreatic cancer risk (odds ratio, > 5), and mutations in BRCA1 were associated with moderate risk (odds ratio, > 2). In a logistic regression model adjusted for age at diagnosis and family history of cancer, ATM and BRCA2 mutations were associated with personal history of breast or pancreatic cancer, whereas PALB2 mutations were associated with family history of breast or pancreatic cancer. Conclusion These findings provide insight into the spectrum of mutations expected in patients with pancreatic cancer referred for cancer predisposition testing. Mutations in eight genes confer high or moderate risk of pancreatic cancer and may prove useful for risk assessment for pancreatic and other cancers. Family and personal histories of breast cancer are strong predictors of germline mutations.

262 Background: Inherited and somatic aberrations in DNA repair genes in castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) are associated with poor prognosis, but respond well to poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. We evaluated the prevalence and prognostic impact of harboring germline DNA repair variants in hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). Methods: Germline DNA from buffy coat was sequenced on HiSeq4000 with a median coverage of 200X for DNA repair variants in 20 genes in HSPC and CRPC patients (pts) enrolled in a hospital registry. Pts were divided into two groups; Group A: pts enrolled at the time of CRPC stage; Group B: treatment naïve HSPC stage pts. The primary endpoints were to determine any impact of harboring DNA repair variants on time to progression from HSPC to CRPC and, from CRPC to death. Group A pts were retrospectively analyzed for time to progression from HSPC to CRPC while Group B patients were followed prospectively for outcomes. Statistical analysis included Cox proportional hazard models and Wilcoxon Rank sum test with significance at p≤0.05. Results: In Group A, 51/562 CRPC pts (9.07%) had variants in the 20 genes (most frequently in BRCA2; n = 15). 44/51 pts with variants and 399/511 without variants had died. Median time of progression from HSPC to CRPC with/without variants was 22.1 vs. 25.1 months (mths); p-value = 0.679. Median time from CRPC to death with/without variants was 32.2 Vs. 27.7 mths (p = 0.6). In HSPC Group B, 14/100 pts were identified with germline variants in ATM (n = 5), CHEK2 (n = 3), BRCA1 (n = 2), BRCA2 (n = 2), RAD50 (n = 1), and MSH2 (n = 1). 31/100 have died and median time to progression from HSPC to CRPC with/without variants was 15.6 vs.11.8 mths, p-value = 0.76. Conclusions: Pts with germline DNA repair variants detected in HSPC stage were not associated with poor prognosis. Presence of additional somatic DNA repair gene aberrations in cell-free DNA, not investigated in this cohort may add to the prevalence of DNA repair gene variations in HSPC and together impact prognosis adversely so as to provide a rationale for PARP inhibitor therapy in select HSPC stage pts.

Background: The human sulfatase 1 (SULF1) and sulfatase 2 (SULF2) genes modulate cell signaling and homeostasis in many tissues. Gene expression analyses have implicated SULF2 in disease pathogenesis, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but changes in brain SULF2 expression have not been directly established. Objective: To investigate the expression of SULF1 and SULF2 in brain tissues from AD cases and cognitively normal controls. Methods: Autopsy tissue from AD cases ( n = 20) and age-and gender-matched cognitively normal controls ( n = 20) were identified from the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Patient Registry neuropathology database. Tissue slides were stained for SULF1 and SULF2 protein expression in the hippocampus and frontal lobe and an expression score computed from the proportion of cells stained and the intensity of staining (range 0 [no expression] to 9 [marked expression]). Results: SULF2 expression was reduced in AD cases. Compared to cognitively normal controls, SULF2 expression in AD cases was significantly decreased in the hippocampal Cornu Ammonis (CA) (mean score of 6.5 in cases versus 8.3 in controls; p = 0.003), in the gray matter of the parahippocampal gyrus (5.6 in cases versus 7.6 in controls; p = 0.003), and in the frontal lobe gray matter (5.4 in cases versus 7.4 in controls; p = 0.002). There was no difference in SULF1 expression in the hippocampus or frontal lobe of AD cases and controls. As expected there were no differences in SULF1 or SULF2 expression in white matter in AD cases compared to cognitively normal controls. Conclusion: Decreased SULF2 in specific regions of the brain occurs in AD.

Abstract Purpose: The relevance of inherited pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes to pancreatic cancer (PC) is not well understood. Several small studies have identified pathogenic variants in 4% to 14% of unselected PC patients using multigene panels of predisposition genes, but only BRCA2, ATM, and PALB2 have been clearly implicated in this disease. We aimed to assess the clinical and molecular characteristics of PC patients referred for hereditary cancer genetic testing, and to estimate the risk of PC associated with pathogenic variants in panel-based cancer predisposition genes. Methods: PC patients (n=1,819) were ascertained from a large cohort of over 140,000 patients undergoing multigene panel testing (MGPT) of predisposition genes between March 2012 and June 2016 at a single diagnostic laboratory. Clinical histories and molecular results were reviewed and summarized. Gene-level variant frequencies among PC cases were compared to those from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) to calculate gene-specific pancreatic cancer risk ratios. Results: PC patients were predominantly Caucasian (76.5%) and female (58.9%), with a median age at diagnosis of 61 years (51.7). Of these, 33.5% reported additional cancer primaries, and 44.8% reported a family history of PC. Overall, 15.4% of PC patients were found to have at least one pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in panel-based predisposition genes. Genes with the highest frequencies of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants included BRCA2 (3.9%), ATM (3.6%), CHEK2 (excluding p.Ile157Thr) (2.0%), PALB2 (1.5%), VHL (1.4%), CDKN2A (1.2%), BRCA1 (0.8%), and MSH6 (0.8%). 21.8% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers did not meet BRCA1/2 testing criteria and 61.5% of MSH6 carriers did not meet Lynch syndrome testing criteria. No CDKN2A families met diagnostic criteria for familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome, and 44% did not report any personal or family history of melanoma. To estimate associations between pathogenic variants and pancreatic cancer, Caucasian PC cases were compared to non-Finnish European, non-TCGA ExAC reference controls. Pathogenic variants in ATM, BRCA2, CDKN2A, MSH6, and PALB2 were significantly associated with high PC risks. Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 were associated with a moderate risk of PC (RR=2.7). Conclusions: These findings shed light on the spectrum of mutations that can be expected for PC patients referred for cancer predisposition testing. The results confirm the associations of CDKN2A and BRCA2 variants with PC, and expand on the phenotypic spectrum associated with these variants. Furthermore, these results suggest that ATM, PALB2, and MSH6 may be high-risk PC genes, warranting further investigation in case-control and family-based studies. Citation Format: Holly LaDuca, Chunling Hu, Hermela Shimelis, Eric Polley, Jenna Lilyquist, Mary Helen Black, Brigette Tippin Davis, David E. Goldgar, Jill Dolinsky, Fergus J. Couch. What have we learned from pancreatic cancer patients undergoing multigene panel testing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4286. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4286