Citations

Abstract Glans hypermobility (GH) is a well-described clinical entity that can have significant implications for cosmesis and function, resulting in sexual dissatisfaction, penile pain, and early device erosion, with an estimated incidence of 0.04–10%. We developed a novel grading scale to assess GH severity intraoperatively during primary inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement and describe a modified glanspexy technique to correct GH when encountered during IPP placement. A total of 530 patients underwent primary device implantation. Of these, 139 (26%) had hypermobility. Employing our new scaling system, grade 1, 2, and 3 GH was seen in 86 (16%), 29 (5.5%), and 24 (4.5%) cases, respectively. Increased implant size correlated with decreased likelihood of GH incidence. Each increase in implant size by 1 cm decreased the incidence of detecting GH by 11% (OR = 0.89; p = 0.015). 11 patients underwent primary GH repair using our described technique. At one-year follow-up, one patient required repeat glanspexy for recurrent bothersome GH and a second patient developed a suture granuloma at the glanspexy incision requiring unilateral cylinder explant. Our modified glanspexy technique can be used to correct GH in any direction and is a useful tool for the prosthetic surgeon’s armamentarium.

Abstract Introduction Penile Implant reservoir complications continue to drive surgical technique innovation to avoid catastrophic complication typically affiliated with theoretical placement in the space of Retzius. The high submuscular technique (versus initially described low submuscular) aimed to reduce migration/herniation. Most high submuscular technique complications are cosmetic, however, unintentional bowel injury and difficulty with extraction of these reservoirs has been reported. Furthermore, reservoirs left via drain and retain technique have been reported to cause significant bowel complications most typically when the reservoir or pressure regulating balloon unknowingly resides intraperitoneally. Objective We report outcomes of two surgeons who independently invented and published novel techniques allowing for low submuscular reservoir placement (and thus avoid blind puncture above the arcuate line) to help avoid reservoir complications. Methods Two surgeons’ technique outcomes were assessed. The first surgical technique (T1) involves suturing an additional implant connector collar to the pubic bone with a permanent stitch. This collar acts as a backstop to prevent reservoir herniation or migration into the scrotum. It can also be used to prevent upward migration of drain and retain reservoirs as the retained reservoir is capped. The second surgical technique (T2) involves placing a right angle outside in of the fascia after a pocket is cleared below the muscle and pulling the implant tubing through this defect. This approach stops the prb or reservoir at the puncture site. Results T1 was performed 55 times for reservoir fixation and 7 times for drain and retain fixation. Mean follow up is 11 months. One infection occurred necessitating reservoir removal (and cutting of permanent stitch) which was easily accomplished. No other complications or patient complaints from this technique have occurred. Average case time increase is 5-10 minutes. T2 has been performed 31 times for reservoir fixation with no complications or patient complaints. Average case time increase is < 5 minutes. Conclusions Although submuscular reservoir techniques decrease catastrophic complications and are widely adopted, they are not without risk. We report success of two independent techniques that demonstrate safety and feasibility with low reservoir placement. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Mayo Clinic – Rochester

Abstract Introduction Erectile dysfunction (ED) stems from a variety of etiologies and often requires a multidisciplinary approach to optimize patient care. Objective We sought to assess attitudes and confidence regarding the treatment of erectile dysfunction across different provider types. Methods Responses were obtained through an anonymous, email-based survey of our institution's providers in the disciplines of urology, internal medicine, and family medicine. We created a novel tool of 25 5-point Likert scale questions regarding ED treatment. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and Fisher’s exact test and sorted by respondent specialty. Ethical Committee approval was obtained before study. Results 138 health care providers returned surveys, including 58 internists (IM), 47 family physicians (FP), and 33 urologists (GU). FP and IM responses showed significant overlap with a few key statistically significant differences. In general, IM was much more positive in VED, penile implant as an option, penile implant satisfaction, and penile implant risk. 37% of IM agreed or strongly agreed inflatable penile prosthesis risk is low vs 6% FP (p = .0032). IM also more strongly supported team-based care and referral to specialists IM 71% vs. 51% FP (p = .0012). (Figures) When comparing GU versus FP + IM 24/25 questions revealed statistically significant differences revealing greater GU confidence and knowledge about ED with only the importance of a team-based approach not differing. Noteworthy points include 46% vs. 18% confidence for a detailed sexual history for GU vs. FP + IM (all other points % and same provider sequence). IIEF usage and familiarity were 61 vs. 3 and 88 vs. 18, respectively. 100 and 85 strongly/agreed that good options remained after pills failed. Regarding inflatable penile prosthesis, agreement or strong agreement for patient willingness to undergo surgery for ED 67 vs. 13; patient satisfaction 91 vs. 25, partner satisfaction 80 vs. 25; and would repeat surgery or recommend to a friend was 82 vs. 17. Finally, and perhaps most notably 83 vs. 11 of providers were aware that Medicare covered implants. (Figures). Conclusions Conclusions This survey reveals significant knowledge gaps for treatment options and outcomes for ED. Targeted provider education, particularly about penile prostheses, could optimize patient care. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Discrimination and sexual harassment within the workplace have a negative impact on well-being and productivity and are often underreported due to lack of comfortability in confronting the offender. Objective We aim to assess the prevalence of these abusive behaviors within a urology department and the impact of a dedicated training session on comfortability reporting/confronting discrimination and harassment. Methods Employees within a urology department at a single institution were invited to take a survey regarding discrimination and harassment both before and after a dedicated training session on reporting and confronting these behaviors. Statistical analyses were performed between pre- and post-survey groups, genders, and roles within the department. Results A total of 166 employees completed the pre-training survey, while 79 (47.6%) completed the post-training survey. 116 (69.9%) respondents identified as female. Roles within the department included physician (48/166, 28.9%), advanced practice provider (21/166, 12.7%), nurse (42/166, 25.3%), and nonclinical staff (51/166, 30.7%). The training demonstrated a positive impact in respondent comfort level with addressing gender discrimination, where 19/23 (82.6%) people who answered neutral/ disagree/strongly disagree changed their answer to agree/strongly agree compared to 7/56 (12.5%) who changed their answers in the opposite way (p=0.02). More women reported experiencing sexual harassment at least once a year compared to men (38.6% vs. 16.7%, p<0.0001). Patients were the most commonly reported offenders of abusive behaviors towards staff. Conclusions Specific training on strategies for addressing abusive behaviors can help employees feel empowered to confront gender discrimination by both patients and their peers. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir herniation or migration may occur with space of Retzius or submuscular placement. The dangers of high submuscular placement include bowel or bladder perforation (from blind instrument passage) and or bowel herniation (from unintentional peritoneal placement and stretching of small opening with reservoir filling). Even under direct vision submuscular placement, reservoirs can ultimately reside into the scrotum, retroperitoneum, and lateral abdominal wall. The Transfascial Fixation (TFF) technique was recently developed to prevent reservoir migration with placement either submuscularly or in the space of Retzius, but video of this technique has not been previously published. Objective To visually demonstrate the proper surgical technique of TFF during IPP reservoir placement. Methods An IPP surgical candidate at high risk of complications should reservoir migration occur was identified. Video of TFF technique performed during IPP surgery was recorded using an in-light overhead camera and a GoPro aseptically positioned on the lead surgeon. Results Successful demonstration of TFF technique during IPP placement. Conclusions TFF technique is a feasible option to aid prevention of penile implant reservoir herniation. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast, Boston Scientific, Metuchen Pharmaceuticals, Acerus Pharmaceuticals, Endo Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Inc.

Abstract Introduction Inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir herniation or migration may occur with space of Retzius or submuscular placement. The dangers of high submuscular placement include bowel or bladder perforation (from blind instrument passage) and or bowel herniation (from unintentional peritoneal placement and stretching of small opening with reservoir filling). Even under direct vision submuscular placement, reservoirs can ultimately reside into the scrotum, retroperitoneum, and lateral abdominal wall. The Tubing, Hitch And Lasso, Intussusception Anchor (THALIA) technique was recently developed to prevent reservoir migration with placement either submuscularly or in the space of Retzius, but video of this technique has not been previously published. Objective To visually demonstrate the proper surgical technique of THALIA during IPP reservoir placement. Methods An IPP surgical candidate at high risk of complications should reservoir migration occur was identified. Video of THALIA technique performed during IPP surgery was recorded using an in-light overhead camera and a GoPro aseptically positioned on the lead surgeon. Results Successful demonstration of THALIA technique during IPP placement. Conclusions THALIA technique is a feasible option to aid prevention of penile implant reservoir herniation. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast

Abstract Introduction Penile duplex Doppler ultrasound (PDDU) is an important test to diagnose and guide treatment recommendations for peyronie’s Disease and erectile dysfunction. When patients do not achieve optimal rigidity during their evaluation we may be underestimating their degree of curvature and erection response which can impact treatment recommendations. Objective To evaluate specific examination conditions that may negatively impact the patient experience in men undergoing PDDU. Methods We developed a survey to evaluate patient experience during PDDU. Specific questions addressed preferences regarding the type of clinician performing the examination (physician versus advanced practice provider), provider gender, and specific modifiable conditions about the examination room. The survey was administered to thirty-five consecutive patients at a single academic practice. Patients were asked to complete portions of the survey before and after the examination to limit bias. Results 113 patients completed the survey. Prior to starting the testing, 48% of patients (n=54) had no provider preference, whereas 43% (n=49) preferred a physician as the performing clinician. 70% of patients (n=79) had no provider gender preference. All patients received at least a single dose of intracavernosal erectogenic medication at the start of their assessment. After completing PDDU, 40% of patients (n=45) reported that room conditions negatively impacted their ability achieve an adequate erectile response in the clinic. As shown in Figure 1, bright fluorescent overhead lighting (29%) and hallway noise (21%) were the most frequent contributing factors. When asked about opportunities to improve future patient experience, 38% (n=43) recommended dimming the room lights, 31% (n=35) would enjoy a warm blanket, and 36% (n=41) would favor gentle music or background sounds. 32% (n=36) felt that using call button, as opposed to routine staff checks to verify erectile response, would be desirable. Despite these preferences, the mean overall patient experience on a scale of 0-10 (0=poor, 10=excellent) was high at 9.3 (SD 1.2). Conclusions Despite high patient-reported satisfaction, we found that patients undergoing PDDU for PD and ED reported a preference towards (i) softer/dimmer lights, (ii) sound machine to drown out hallway noise, (iii) aa warm blanket, (iv) a call system to alert staff of a satisfactory erectile response. Further investigations are necessary to determine whether these simple modifications can improve the patient experience and exam efficiency. Disclosure No