Citations

Clear

76 citation(s) found for "George, Thomas J".

Impact of Excessive Weight Gain on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes: Results From the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study
Purnell, Jonathan Q. , Braffett, Barbara H. , Zinman, Bernard, Gubitosi‐Klug, Rose , Sivitz, William, Bantle, John P., Ziegler, Georgia, Cleary, Patricia A., Brunzell, John D. , Nathan, D.M., Zinman, B., Crofford, O., Genuth, S., Brown-Friday, J., Crandall, J., Engel, S., Martinez, H., Phillips, M., Reid, M., Shamoon, H., Sheindlin, J., Gubitosi-Klug, R., Mayer, L., Pendegast, S., Zegarra, H., Miller, D., Singerman, L., Smith-Brewer, S., Novak, M., Quin, J., Genuth, Saul, Palmert, M., Brown, E., McConnell, J., Pugsley, P., Crawford, P., Dahms, W., Gregory, N.S., Lackaye, M.E., Kiss, S., Chan, R., Orlin, A., Rubin, M., Brillon, D., Reppucci, V., Lee, T., Heinemann, M., Chang, S., Levy, B., Jovanovic, L., Richardson, M., Bosco, B., Dwoskin, A., Hanna, R., Barron, S., Campbell, R., Bhan, A., Krüger, D., Jones, J.K., Edwards, P.A., Bhan, A., Carey, J.D., Angus, E., Thomas, A., Galprin, A., McLellan, M., Whitehouse, F., Bergenstal, R., Johnson, M., Gunyou, K., Thomas, L., Laechelt, J., Hollander, P., Spencer, M., Kendall, D., Cuddihy, R., Callahan, P., List, S., Gott, J., Rude, N., Olson, B., Franz, M., Castle, G., Birk, R., Nelson, J., Freking, D., Gill, L., Mestrezat, W., Etzwiler, D., Morgan, K., Aiello, L.P., Golden, E., Arrigg, P., Asuquo, V., Beaser, R., Bestourous, L., Cavallerano, J., Cavicchi, R., Ganda, O., Hamdy, O., Kirby, R., Murtha, T., Schlossman, D., Shah, S., Sharuk, G., Silver, P., Silver, P., Stockman, M., Sun, J., Weimann, E., Wolpert, H., Aiello, L. M., Jacobson, A., Rand, L., Rosenzwieg, J., Nathan, D.M., Larkin, M.E., Christofi, M., Folino, K., Godine, J., Lou, P., Stevens, C., Anderson, E., Bode, H., Brink, S., Cornish, C., Cros, D., Delahanty, L., deManbey, A., Haggan, C., Lynch, J., McKitrick, C., Norman, D., Moore, D., Ong, M., Taylor, C., Zimbler, D., Crowell, S., Fritz, S., Hansen, K., Gauthier‐Kelly, C., Service, F. J., Ziegler, G., Barkmeier, A., Schmidt, L., French, B., Woodwick, R., Rizza, R., Schwenk, W. F., Haymond, M., Pach, J., Mortenson, J., Zimmerman, B., Lucas, A., Colligan, R., Luttrell, L., Lopes-Virella, M., Caulder, S., Pittman, C., Patel, N., Lee, K., Nutaitis, M., Fernandes, J., Hermayer, K., Kwon, S., Blevins, A., Parker, J., Colwell, J., Lee, D., Soule, J., Lindsey, P., Bracey, M., Farr, A., Elsing, S., Thompson, T., Selby, J., Lyons, T., Yacoub-Wasef, S., Szpiech, M., Wood, D., Mayfield, R., Molitch, M., Adelman, D., Colson, S., Jampol, L., Lyon, A., Gill, M., Strugula, Z., Kaminski, L., MIRZA, R., Simjanoski, E., Ryan, D., Johnson, C., Wallia, A., Ajroud-Driss, S., Astelford, P., Leloudes, N., Degillio, A., Schaefer, B., Mudaliar, S., Lorenzi, G., Goldbaum, M., Jones, K., Prince, M., Swenson, M., Grant, I., Reed, R., Lyon, R., Kolterman, O., Giotta, M, Clark, T., Friedenberg, G., Sivitz, W.I., Vittetoe, B., Kramer, J., Bayless, M., Zeitler, R., Schrott, H., Olson, N., Snetselaar, L., Hoffman, R., MacIndoe, J., Weingeist, T., Fountain, C., Miller, R., Johnsonbaugh, S., Patronas, M., Carney, M., Mendley, S., Salemi, P., Liss, R., Hebdon, M., Counts, D., Donner, T., Gordon, J., Hemady, R., Kowarski, A., Ostrowski, D., Steidl, S., Jones, B., Herman, W.H., Martin, C.L., Pop-Busui, R., Greene, D. A., Stevens, M.J., Burkhart, N., Sandford, T, Floyd, J., Bantle, J., Flaherty, N., Terry, J., Koozekanani, D., Montezuma, S., Wimmergren, N., Rogness, B., Mech, M., Strand, T., Olson, J., McKenzie, L., Kwong, C., Goetz, F., Warhol, R., Hainsworth, D., Goldstein, D., Hitt, S., Giangiacomo, J., Schade, D.S., Canady, J.L., Burge, M. R., Das, A., Avery, R.B., Ketai, L.H., Chapin, J.E., Schluter, M.L, Rich, J., Johannes, C., Hornbeck, D., Schutta, M., Bourne, P.A., Brucker, A., Braunstein, S., Schwartz, S., Maschak-Carey, B. J., Baker, L., Orchard, T., Cimino, L., Songer, T., Doft, B., Olson, S., Becker, D., Rubinstein, D., Bergren, R.L., Fruit, J., Hyre, R., Palmer, C., Silvers, N., Lobes, L., Rath, P. Paczan, Conrad, P. W., Yalamanchi, S., Wesche, J., Bratkowksi, M., Arslanian, S., Rinkoff, J., Warnicki, J., Curtin, D., Steinberg, D., Vagstad, G., Harris, R., Steranchak, L., Arch, J., Kelly, K., Ostrosaka, P., Guiliani, M., Good, M., Williams, T., Olsen, K., Campbell, A., Shipe, C., Conwit, R., Finegold, D., Zaucha, M., Drash, A., Morrison, A., Malone, J.I., Bernal, M.L., Pavan, P. R., Grove, N., Tanaka, E.A., McMillan, D., Vaccaro‐Kish, J., Babbione, L., Solc, H., DeClue, T.J., Dagogo-Jack, S., Wigley, C., Ricks, H., Kitabchi, A., Chaum, E., Murphy, M.B., Moser, S., Meyer, D., Iannacone, A., Yoser, S., Bryer‐Ash, M., Schüßler, S., Lambeth, H., Raskin, P., Strowig, S., Basco, M., Cercone, S., Zinman, B., Barnie, A., Devenyi, R., Mandelcorn, M., Brent, M., Rogers, S., Gordon, A., Bakshi, N., Perkins, B., Tuason, L., Perdikaris, F., Ehrlich, R., Daneman, D., Perlman, K., Ferguson, S., Palmer, J., Fahlstrom, R., Boer, I.H.de, Kinyoun, J., Ottingham, L. Van, Catton, S., Ginsberg, J., McDonald, C., Harth, J., Driscoll, M., Sheidow, T., Mahon, J., Canny, C., Nicolle, D., Colby, P., Dupre, J., Hramiak, I., Rodger, NW, Jenner, M., Smith, T., Brown, W., May, M., Hagan, J. Lipps, Agarwal, A., Adkins, T., Lorenz, R., Feman, S., Survant, L., White, N. H., Levandoski, L., Grand, G., Thomas, M., Joseph, D., Blinder, K., Shah, G., Burgess, D., Boniuk, I., Santiago, J., Tamborlane, W., Gatcomb, P., Stoessel, K., Ramos, P., Fong, K., Ossorio, P., Ahern, J., Meadema-Mayer, L., Beck, C., Farrell, K., Quin, J., Gaston, P., Trail, R., Lachin, J., Backlund, J., Bebu, I., Braffett, B., Diminick, L., Gao, X., Hsu, W., Klumpp, K., Trapani, Victoria R., Trapani, V., Cleary, P., McGee, P., Sun, W. , Villavicencio, S., Anderson, K., Dews, L., Younes, Naji , Rutledge, B., Chan, K., Rosenberg, D. , Petty, B., Determan, A., Kenny, D., Williams, C., Cowie, C., Siebert, C., Steffes, M., Arends, V., Bucksa, J., Nowicki, M., Chavers, B., O’Leary, D., Polák, J. (Jaroslav), Harrington, A., Funk, L., Crow, R., Gloeb, B., Thomas, S., O’Donnell, C., Soliman, EZ, Zhang, Z.M., Li, Y., Campbell, C., Keasler, L., Hensley, S., Hu, J., Barr, M., Taylor, T., Prineas, R., Feldman, E.L., Albers, J.W., Low, P., Sommer, C., Nickander, K., Speigelberg, T., Pfiefer, M., Schumer, M., Moran, M., Farquhar, J., Ryan, C., Sandstrom, D., Geckle, M., Cupelli, E., Thoma, F., Burzuk, B., Woodfill, T., Danis, R., Blodi, B., Lawrence, D., Wabers, H., Gangaputra, S., Neill, S., Burger, M., Dingledine, J., Gama, V., Sussman, R., Davis, M., Hubbard, L., Budoff, M., Darabian, S., Rezaeian, P., Wong, N., Fox, M., Oudiz, R., Kim, L., Detrano, R., Cruickshanks, K., Bainbridg, K., Lima, J., Bluemke, D., Turkbey, E., Geest, R. J. van der, Liu, C., Malayeri, A., Jain, A., Miao, C., Chahal, H., Jarboe, R., Nathan, D.M., Monnier, V., Sell, D., Strauch, C., Hazen, S., Pratt, A., Tang, W., Brunzell, J., Purnell, J., Purnell, J., Natarajan, R., Miao, F., Zhang, L., Chen, Z., Paterson, A., Boright, A., Bull, S., Sun, L., Scherer, S., Lyons, T.J., Jenkins, A., Klein, R., Virella, G., Jaffa, A., Carter, R., Stoner, J., Garvey, W.T., Lackland, D., Brabham, M., McGee, D., Zheng, D., Mayfield, R. K., Maynard, J., Wessells, H., Sarma, A., Dunn, R., Holt, S., Hotaling, J., Kim, C., Clemens, Q., McVary, Kevin T. , Cuddihy, Robert , Paterson, Andrew D. , Gubitosi-Klug, Rose A , Paterson, Andrew , Zinman, Bernard , Sivitz, William I. , Ziegler, G., Nathan, D.M., Engel, Samuel S. , Reid, M., Genuth, Saul, McConnell, J., Campbell, R., Carey, J.D., Dd, Etzwiler, Cavallerano, Jerry D. , Larkin, M.E., DeManbey, Andrea, Ajroud-Driss, S., Mudaliar, S., Herman, W.H., Pop-Busui, R., Mech, Michael, Schade, D.S., Schwartz, S., Becker, Dj., Arch, J., Shipe, C., Drash, A L, Pavan, P R , DeClue, Terry J., Raskin, P., Rogers, S., Boer, I.H. de, Dupre, J, Tamborlane, W., Gatcomb, P., Bebu, I., Cleary, P., McGee, P., Steffes, M., Arends, V., Bm, Chavers, Polak, J., Feldman, E. L., Nickander, K. K., Pfiefer, M., Dittz, Dalton , Virella, Gabriel, Mayfield, R. K., Brown, Jonathan D. , Cuddihy, Robert M

Mayo Clinic

Diabetes Care | November 15, 2017 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1756-1762

10.2337/dc16-2523 | PMID 29138273 Get It

OBJECTIVE Intensive treatment (INT) of type 1 diabetes reduces the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events compared with conventional treatment (CONV), but it also results in more weight gain. Our objective was to examine whether excessive weight gain from INT of type 1 diabetes is independently associated with subsequent CVD events. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Quartiles (Q) of weight gain in 1,213 participants aged 18 years and older at enrollment in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) were determined within randomized treatment groups (INT vs. CONV) using change in BMI from baseline to the closeout DCCT visits. Effects of this weight gain on CVD risk factors and outcomes during an additional 20 years of observational follow-up were then determined. RESULTS The Q4 INT group experienced greater proportional weight gain (median change in BMI, 6.08 kg/m2), increases in CVD risk factors, and need for medications for hypertension and lipids compared with the Q1–3 INT and comparable CONV groups. Over a mean of 26 years of follow-up, the numbers of major and total CVD events were not statistically different in Q4 compared with Q1–3 of either the INT or CONV group. By year 14, however, the incident CVD event curve became significantly higher in the Q4 INT group than in the Q1–3 INT groups (P = 0.024) and was similar to that for the CONV group. CONCLUSIONS For the first 13 years after DCCT, INT for type 1 diabetes reduced macrovascular events compared with CONV, even when excessive weight gain occurred. After this, total CVD events significantly increased in the Q4 INT group, becoming equivalent to those in the CONV group. Longer follow-up is needed to determine whether this trend continues and results in more major CVD events.
First report of a prospective trial of proton therapy and concomittant capecitabine for patients with nonmetastatic unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Nichols, R.C., Morris, Christopher G. , Zaiden, Robert, Ahmed, Bestoun , Ho, Meng Wei , Huh, S.N., George, Thomas J. , Johnson, Elizabeth Anne , Mendenhall, Nancy P. , Hoppe, Bradford S.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 3_suppl | Pages: 326-326

10.1200/jco.2014.32.3_suppl.326 Get It

326 Background: Review initial outcomes for patients enrolled on the University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute PC01 protocol for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Methods: The protocol received Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval in 7/2007. The first patient was enrolled in 4/2010. The accrual target was 66 patients to test if the Serious Adverse Event (SAE) ratecould be reduced from 15% (expected) to less than 5%. Protocol therapy consisted of proton therapy to a planning target volume (PTV) dose of 59.4 Cobalt Gray Equivalent (CGE) at 1.8CGE per fraction with concomitant oral Capecitabine (1000mg PO BID 5 days/week on radiation treatment days). Only gross disease was targeted. Results: 12 patients were enrolled. 1 patient died of a gunshot wound 5 days after starting treatment so only 11 patients are reported. Median follow up from start of treatment: 13 months (range 2 to 21 months). Median age: 68 (range 51 to 86) years. Gender: Males 5, Females 6. Race/Ethnicity: 9 White, 2 Hispanic. Overall survival: 90% at 6 months and 60% at 12 months. Freedom from progression: 80% at 6 months and 53% at one year. Local control: 100% at 6 months and 86% at 12 months. Freedom from metastasis: 80% at 6 months and 67% at 12 months.No patient experienced any grade 3 or greater toxicity during treatment or the follow up period. Grade 2 toxicity was limited to a single patient experiencing grade 2 fatigue. Median weight loss over the course of treatment was 1.7 (range: loss of 5.7 to gain of 4.9) Kg. 4 patients were deemed to have had an adequate radiographic response to radiotherapy so as to justify surgical exploration. Conclusions: Proton therapy to 59.4 CGE with concomitant Capecitabine was well tolerated with no grade 2 or greater gastrointestinal toxicities. 4 of 11 patients achieved a radiographic response allowing for attempted surgical resection. The study was closed to accrual on 9/1/2013 due to recognition that slow accrual made achievement of the primary study endpoint unlikely. At the same time, the lack of any meaningful gastrointestinal toxicity suggests significant opportunities for treatment intensification when proton therapy is used in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT00685763.
Comprehensive genomic profiling of advanced colorectal carcinoma in the course of clinical care to identify KRAS insertions not detected by focused molecular testing.
Rankin, Andrew, Schrock, Alexa B. , Elvin, Julia A. , Chmielecki, Juliann , Erlich, Rachel, Morosini, Deborah, Rosenblum, Alan L., Bufill, José A., Helton, Derek A., Sequeria, Judy, Stephens, Phil , Miller, Vincent A. , Ali, Siraj M. , Elvin, Julia A , Frampton, Garrett M. , Grothey, Axel , George, Thomas J. , Klempner, Samuel J. , Ross, Jeffrey S

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 497-497

10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.497 Get It

497 Background: As activating RAS mutations have been shown to predict lack of benefit from anti-EGFR therapies in advanced CRC, NCCN guidelines recommend testing for KRAS exon 2 and non-exon 2 mutations; however, these alterations are thought to explain only a subset of de novo resistance to targeted therapy. In a large set of CRC assayed with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in the course of clinical care, we assessed the frequency of less common KRAS short insertions that may predict failure of anti-EGFR therapy. Methods: 4,422 CRC cases were assayed with CGP performed on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation based libraries to a mean coverage depth of > 650X for at least 236 cancer-related genes plus 47 introns from 19 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. All classes of genomic alterations (GA) were identified, including base pair substitutions, insertions/deletions, copy number alterations, and rearrangements. Pertinent available prior molecular testing results and clinical history was reviewed for selected cases. Results: Out of 4,422 CRC cases analyzed, KRAS short variants were identified in 50.9% of cases. A majority of cases contained a KRAS alteration at either codon G12 (35.5%) or G13 (9.1%), while alterations at codons Q61 or A146 were identified in 2.2% and 3.1% of cases, respectively. KRAS insertions were identified in 8 ( < 0.5%) cases. All KRAS insertions identified fell within codons 9-13, and 6/8 cases harbored V9_G10 insertions. Out of 6 patients with prior KRAS testing results available, 5 (83%) were negative by previous testing. Conclusions: CGP identifies KRAS insertions within or adjacent to hotspot regions in CRC cases which have previously tested negative for KRAS mutations. Given the importance of KRAS alterations in predicting lack of response to anti-EGFR therapies in CRC, accurate detection of these alterations in the course of clinical care is essential for effective treatment. CGP offers the possibility of identifying KRAS insertions that may impact efficacy of anti-EGFR targeted therapy and should be considered when previous focused testing for KRAS mutations is negative.
Effect of gonadotropin‐inhibitory hormone on luteinizing hormone secretion in humans
George, Jyothis Thomas , Hendrikse, Megan , Veldhuis, J. D., Clarke, Iain J. , Millar, Robert P. , George, J T , Anderson, Richard A.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Endocrinology | February 10, 2017 | Volume: 86 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 731-738

10.1111/cen.13308 | PMID 28186349 Get It

SummaryBackgroundGonadotropin‐inhibitory hormone (GnIH, human homologue of RFRP‐3) suppresses gonadotropin secretion in animal models, but its effects have not been studied in the human.ObjectiveWe tested the hypotheses that exogenous GnIH inhibits LH secretion (i) in postmenopausal women and (ii) in men concurrently administered exogenous kisspeptin.DesignFollowing in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies to functionally characterize the GnIH peptide, a dose‐finding study (human GnIH: 1·5–150 μg/kg/h, iv for 3 h) was undertaken, and 50 μg/kg/h selected for further evaluation. Five postmenopausal women were administered 50 μg/kg/h iv infusion for 3 h or vehicle on two separate days. Four men were administered kisspeptin‐10 (0·3 μg/kg iv bolus) with simultaneous infusion of GnIH (50 μg/kg/h, iv for 3 h) or vehicle.ParticipantsHealthy postmenopausal women (mean age 58 ± 2 years, LH: 30·8 ± 2·9 IU/l, FSH: 78·7 ± 6·4 IU/l, oestradiol: <50 pmol/l) and men (39·8 ± 2·1 years, mean total testosterone 12·1 ± 1·8 nmol/l, LH 2·2 ± 0·2 IU/l).Primary outcomeChange in area under curve (AUC) of LH during GnIHvs vehicle.ResultsDuring GnIH administration in postmenopausal women, LH secretion decreased (ΔAUC: −9·9 ± 1·8 IU/3 h) vs vehicle (ΔAUC: −0·5 ± 1·7 IU/3 h; P = 0·02). Kisspeptin‐10‐stimulated LH responses in men were not affected by GnIH co‐administration (60‐min AUC of LH 6·2 ± 0·8 IU/h with kisspeptin‐10 alone, 6·3 ± 1·0 IU/h, kisspeptin‐10 with GnIH, P = 0·72). Exogenous GnIH was well tolerated, with no adverse events reported.ConclusionsGonadotropin‐inhibitory hormone decreased LH secretion in postmenopausal women in this first‐in‐human study. Kisspeptin‐stimulated LH secretion in men was not inhibited during concomitant administration of GnIH.
Simulated Lumbar Minimally Invasive Surgery Educational Model With Didactic and Technical Components
Ghobrial, George M. , Lobel, Darlene A., Chitale, Rohan V , Harrop, James Shields

Mayo Clinic

Neurosurgery | February 5, 2017 | Volume: 73 | Issue: suppl_1 | Pages: S107-S110

10.1093/neurosurgery/73.suppl_1.s107 Get It

Abstract BACKGROUND: The learning and development of technical skills are paramount for neurosurgical trainees. External influences and a need for maximizing efficiency and proficiency have encouraged advancements in simulator-based learning models. OBJECTIVE: To confirm the importance of establishing an educational curriculum for teaching minimally invasive techniques of pedicle screw placement using a computer-enhanced physical model of percutaneous pedicle screw placement with simultaneous didactic and technical components. METHODS: A 2-hour educational curriculum was created to educate neurosurgical residents on anatomy, pathophysiology, and technical aspects associated with image-guided pedicle screw placement. Predidactic and postdidactic practical and written scores were analyzed and compared. Scores were calculated for each participant on the basis of the optimal pedicle screw starting point and trajectory for both fluoroscopy and computed tomographic navigation. RESULTS: Eight trainees participated in this module. Average mean scores on the written didactic test improved from 78% to 100%. The technical component scores for fluoroscopic guidance improved from 58.8 to 52.9. Technical score for computed tomography—navigated guidance also improved from 28.3 to 26.6. CONCLUSION: Didactic and technical quantitative scores with a simulator-based educational curriculum improved objectively measured resident performance. A minimally invasive spine simulation model and curriculum may serve a valuable function in the education of neurosurgical residents and outcomes for patients.
Broad Detection of Alterations Predicted to Confer Lack of Benefit From EGFR Antibodies or Sensitivity to Targeted Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer
Rankin, Andrew, Erlich, Rachel, Fakih, Marwan , George, Thomas J. , Lee, Jeeyun , Stephens, Philip J., Miller, Vincent A. , Ali, Siraj M. , Schrock, Alexa B. , Klempner, Samuel J. , Sun, James X. , Grothey, Axel , Ross, Jeffrey S , George, Thomas J , Fakih, Marwan

Mayo Clinic

The Oncologist | September 29, 2016 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1306-1314

10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0148 | PMID 27682134 Get It

Abstract Introduction. A KRAS mutation represented the first genomic biomarker to predict lack of benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Expanded RAS testing has further refined the treatment approach, but understanding of genomic alterations underlying primary and acquired resistance is limited and further study is needed. Materials and Methods. We prospectively analyzed 4,422 clinical samples from patients with advanced CRC, using hybrid-capture based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) at the request of the individual treating physicians. Comparison with prior molecular testing results, when available, was performed to assess concordance. Results. We identified a RAS/RAF pathway mutation or amplification in 62% of cases, including samples harboring KRAS mutations outside of the codon 12/13 hotspot region in 6.4% of cases. Among cases with KRAS non-codon 12/13 alterations for which prior test results were available, 79 of 90 (88%) were not identified by focused testing. Of 1,644 RAS/RAF wild-type cases analyzed by CGP, 31% harbored a genomic alteration (GA) associated with resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in advanced CRC including mutations in PIK3CA, PTEN, EGFR, and ERBB2. We also identified other targetable GA, including novel kinase fusions, receptor tyrosine kinase amplification, activating point mutations, as well as microsatellite instability. Conclusion. Extended genomic profiling reliably detects alterations associated with lack of benefit to anti-EGFR therapy in advanced CRC, while simultaneously identifying alterations potentially important in guiding treatment. The use of CGP during the course of clinical care allows for the refined selection of appropriate targeted therapies and clinical trials, increasing the chance of clinical benefit and avoiding therapeutic futility.
Barriers to a Career Focus in Cancer Prevention: A Report and Initial Recommendations From the American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Prevention Workforce Pipeline Work Group
Fabian, Carol J. , Meyskens, Frank L. , Bajorin, Dean F. , George, Thomas J. , Jeter, Joanne , Khan, Shakila P. , Tyne, Courtney, William, William N. , Jeter, Joanne M, Khan, Shakila, Tyne, Courtney A, George, Thomas J

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | November 3, 2015 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 186-193

10.1200/jco.2015.63.5979 | PMID 26527778 Get It

Purpose To assist in determining barriers to an oncology career incorporating cancer prevention, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Cancer Prevention Workforce Pipeline Work Group sponsored surveys of training program directors and oncology fellows. Methods Separate surveys with parallel questions were administered to training program directors at their fall 2013 retreat and to oncology fellows as part of their February 2014 in-training examination survey. Forty-seven (67%) of 70 training directors and 1,306 (80%) of 1,634 oncology fellows taking the in-training examination survey answered questions. Results Training directors estimated that ≤ 10% of fellows starting an academic career or entering private practice would have a career focus in cancer prevention. Only 15% of fellows indicated they would likely be interested in cancer prevention as a career focus, although only 12% thought prevention was unimportant relative to treatment. Top fellow-listed barriers to an academic career were difficulty in obtaining funding and lower compensation. Additional barriers to an academic career with a prevention focus included unclear career model, lack of clinical mentors, lack of clinical training opportunities, and concerns about reimbursement. Conclusion Reluctance to incorporate cancer prevention into an oncology career seems to stem from lack of mentors and exposure during training, unclear career path, and uncertainty regarding reimbursement. Suggested approaches to begin to remedy this problem include: 1) more ASCO-led and other prevention educational resources for fellows, training directors, and practicing oncologists; 2) an increase in funded training and clinical research opportunities, including reintroduction of the R25T award; 3) an increase in the prevention content of accrediting examinations for clinical oncologists; and 4) interaction with policymakers to broaden the scope and depth of reimbursement for prevention counseling and intervention services.
Classification of current anticancer immunotherapies
Galluzzi, Lorenzo , Vacchelli, Erika , Pedro, José Manuel Bravo‐San , Buqué, Aitziber , Senovilla, Laura , Baracco, Elisa Elena, Bloy, Norma , Castoldi, Francesca , Abastado, Jean-Pierre, Agostinis, Patrizia , Apte, Ron N., Aranda, Fernando , Ayyoub, Maha , Beckhove, Philipp , Blay, Jean‐Yves , Bracci, Laura , Caignard, Anne , Cavallo, Federica , Celis, Estaban, Clayton, Aled , Coussens, Lisa M. , Dhodapkar, Madhav V. , Eggermont, Alexander , Fearon, Douglas T. , Fučíková, Jitka , Galon, Jérôme , Garg, Abhishek D. , Ghiringhelli, François , Gilboa, Eli , Gnjatic, Sacha , Hoos, Axel , Jäger, Dirk, Kaliński, Paweł , Kärre, Klas , Kepp, Oliver , Kiessling, Rolf , Klein, Eva, Knuth, Alexander, Lewis, Claire E. , Lugli, Enrico , Mach, J P, Mattei, Fabrizio , Mavilio, Domenico , Melero, Ignacio , Melief, Cornelis J.M., Moretta, Lorenzo , Odunsi, Adekunke, Palucka, A. Karolina, Porgador, Angel , Prendergast, George C. , Restifo, Nicholas P. , Rizvi, Naiyer A. , Schreiber, Hans , Seliger, Barbara , Shiku, Hiroshi , Špíšek, Radek , Srivastava, Pramod K. , Vile, Richard G. , Wagner, Hermann, Weber, Jeffrey S. , Zitvogel, Laurence , Zou, Weiping , Abastado, Jean‐Pierre, Castelli, Chiara , Cerundolo, Vincenzo , Colombo, Mario P. , Fridman, Wolf H. , Gabrilovich, Dmitry I. , Giaccone, Giuseppe , Hosmalin, Anne , Kirkwood, John M. , Liblau, Roland , Lotze, Michael T. , Mittendorf, EA , Okada, Hideho , Peter, Marcus E. , Pienta, Kenneth J , Rabinovich, Gabriel A , Sautès‐Fridman, Catherine , Silva‐Santos, Bruno , Smyth, Mark J. , Speiser, Daniel E. , Talmadge, James E. , Tartour, Éric , Burg, Sjoerd H. van der , Eynde, Benoı̂t J. Van den , Whiteside, Theresa L , Wolchok, Jedd D. , Kroemer, Guido , Gnjatic, Sacha , Blay, Jean-Yves , Galon, Jerome , Weber, Jeffrey

Mayo Clinic

Oncotarget | September 15, 2015 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 12472-12508

10.18632/oncotarget.2998 | PMID 25537519 Get It

A Phase I Study of Cixutumumab (IMC-A12) in Combination with Temsirolimus (CCI-779) in Children with Recurrent Solid Tumors: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Report
Fouladi, Maryam , Perentesis, John P. , Wagner, Lars M. , Vinks, Alexander A. , Ahern, Charlotte H., Mercer, Carol A. , Krueger, Darcy A. , Houghton, Peter J. , Doyle, L. Austin, Weigel, Brenda J. , Blaney, Susan M. , Reid, Joel M. , Thomas, George , Chen, Helen

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Cancer Research | December 2, 2014 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1558-1565

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0595 | PMID 25467181 Get It

Abstract Purpose: To determine the MTD, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetics, and biologic effects of cixutumumab administered in combination with temsirolimus to children with refractory solid tumors. Experimental Design: Cixutumumab and temsirolimus were administered intravenously once every 7 days in 28-day cycles. Pharmacokinetic and biology studies, including assessment of mTOR downstream targets in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, were performed during the first cycle. Results: Thirty-nine patients, median age 11.8 years (range, 1–21.5), with recurrent solid or central nervous system tumors were enrolled, of whom 33 were fully assessable for toxicity. There were four dose levels, which included two dose reductions and a subsequent intermediated dose escalation: (i) IMC-A12 6 mg/kg, temsirolimus 15 mg/m2; (ii) IMC-A12 6 mg/kg, temsirolimus 10 mg/m2; (iii) IMC-A12 4 mg/kg, temsirolimus 8 mg/m2; and (iv) IMC-A12 6 mg/kg, temsirolimus 8 mg/m2. Mucositis was the predominant DLT. Other DLTs included hypercholesterolemia, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and increased alanine aminotransferase. Target inhibition (decreased S6K1 and PAkt) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was noted at all dose levels. Marked interpatient variability in temsirolimus pharmacokinetic parameters was noted. At 8 mg/m2, the median temsirolimus AUC was 2,946 ng • h/mL (range, 937–5,536) with a median sirolimus AUC of 767 ng • h/mL (range, 245–3,675). Conclusions: The recommended pediatric phase II doses for the combination of cixutumumab and temsirolimus are 6 mg/kg and 8 mg/m2, respectively. Clin Cancer Res; 21(7); 1558–65. ©2014 AACR.
Small Molecule Inhibitor YM155-Mediated Activation of Death Receptor 5 Is Crucial for Chemotherapy-Induced Apoptosis in Pancreatic Carcinoma
Zhao, Xiangxuan , Puszyk, William, Lu, Zaiming , Ostrov, David A. , George, Thomas J. , Robertson, Keith D. , Liu, Chen , Robertson, Keith D , George, Thomas J , Liu, Chen

Mayo Clinic

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | October 24, 2014 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 80-89

10.1158/1535-7163.mct-14-0229 | PMID 25344582 Get It

Abstract Despite much effort, pancreatic cancer survival rates are still dismally low. Novel therapeutics may hold the key to improving survival. YM155 is a small molecule inhibitor that has shown antitumor activity in a number of cancers by reducing the expression of survivin. The aim of our study is to understand the mechanisms by which YM155 functions in pancreatic cancer cells. We established the antitumor effect of YM155 with in vitro studies in cultured cells, and in vivo studies using a mouse xenograft model. Our data demonstrated that YM155 reduced the expression of survivin; however, downregulation of survivin itself is insufficient to induce apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. We showed for the first time that treatment with YM155 increased death receptor 5 (DR5) expression in pancreatic cancer cells. We found that YM155 induced apoptosis by broad-spectrum inhibition of IAP family member proteins (e.g., CIAP1/2 and FLIP) and induced proapoptotic Bak protein upregulation and activation; the antitumor effect of YM155 treatment with either the DR5 agonist lexatumumab or gemcitabine on pancreatic cancer cells was synergistic. Our data also revealed that YM155 inhibits tumor growth in vivo, without apparent toxicity to the noncancerous human pancreatic ductal epithelial cell line. Together, these findings suggest that YM155 could be a novel therapeutic agent for pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(1); 80–89. ©2014 AACR.