Citations

Abstract Background: Comorbidities can affect survival of ovarian cancer patients by influencing treatment efficacy. However, little evidence exists on the association between individual concurrent comorbidities and prognosis in ovarian cancer patients. Methods: Among patients diagnosed with invasive ovarian carcinoma who participated in 23 studies included in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, we explored associations between histories of endometriosis; asthma; depression; osteoporosis; and autoimmune, gallbladder, kidney, liver, and neurological diseases and overall and progression-free survival. Using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for age at diagnosis, stage of disease, histology, and study site, we estimated pooled HRs and 95% confidence intervals to assess associations between each comorbidity and ovarian cancer outcomes. Results: None of the comorbidities were associated with ovarian cancer outcome in the overall sample nor in strata defined by histologic subtype, weight status, age at diagnosis, or stage of disease (local/regional vs. advanced). Conclusions: Histories of endometriosis; asthma; depression; osteoporosis; and autoimmune, gallbladder, kidney, liver, or neurologic diseases were not associated with ovarian cancer overall or progression-free survival. Impact: These previously diagnosed chronic diseases do not appear to affect ovarian cancer prognosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(9); 1470–3. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract The Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO) in collaboration with the Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) aims to identify genetic variants and environmental risk factors that impact colorectal cancer (CRC). Over 30 studies from North America, Europe, and Australia participate in GECCO. These studies have collected clinical, epidemiological, and survival data, as well as blood and tumor biospecimens, for over 80,000 CRC cases and controls. The current study aims to conduct targeted deep sequencing of tumors and matching normal DNA to identify recurrent and novel somatic and germline variants in 4,200 CRC cases. To achieve this goal, an AmpliSeq targeted sequencing panel of 1.12 Mbp was constructed to sequence the coding regions of 190 significantly mutated genes identified from whole exome sequencing datasets generated by the Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professional’s Follow-up Study, and The Cancer Genome Atlas. The panel also covers coding regions of 15 genes with germline high penetrance mutations in CRC, 54 regions to detect CRC-related copy number alterations (CNAs), and microsatellite and homopolymer repeat regions to identify defective DNA mismatch repair. Primers were also included to detect Fusobacterium nucleatum DNA in tumor biopsies, as F. nucleatum is thought to promote CRC carcinogenesis. Sequencing of the DNA libraries on Illumina HiSeq 2500 produced a mean coverage of greater than 500X for tumor DNA and 100X for normal DNA, with >85% of the bases covered at the target at 50x. So far, targeted sequencing of >1,500 DNA samples from CRC tumors and normal tissues has identified recurrent and novel somatic mutations, germline genetic variants, and hypermutation status of the tumors due to defective DNA mismatch repair or pathogenic mutations in the POLE gene. Targeted sequencing has also allowed quantification of the F. nucleatum DNA in tumor biopsies; the results were validated by a multiplex QPCR assay. At the AACR annual meeting, we will present targeted sequencing results generated from the first two GECCO-participating studies (n=1,300 cases). These data will be valuable for future association testing of somatic mutations, CNAs, hypermutation status, and F. nucleatum with germline genetic variants, lifestyle, and environmental risk factors and survival. This large study will allow development of better strategies for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of CRC. Citation Format: Syed H. Zaidi, Wei Sun, Jeroen Huyghe, Catherine S. Grasso, Quang Trinh, Charles Connolly, Amy French, Jasmine Mu, Marios Giannakis, Eve Shinbrot, Ivan Borozan, Michael J. Quist, Hermann Brenner, Daniel Buchanan, Peter Campbell, Andrew Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Vincent Ferretti, Charles Fuchs, Andrea Gsur, Marc Gunter, Tabitha Harrison, Michael Hoffmeister, Wen-Yi Huang, Paul Krzyzanowski, Stephen Lee, Mathieu Lemire, Jessica Miller, Danielle Pasternack, Cherie Teney, Elaine Mardis, Polly Newcomb, Lincoln Stein, Lee Timms, David Wheeler, Christina Yung, Niha Zubair, Levi Garraway, Shuji Ogino, Li Hsu, Steven Gallinger, Stephen Thibodeau, Thomas Hudson, Ulrike Peters. Targeted deep sequencing of colorectal tumor tissues to study associations of tumor subtypes with germline genetic, lifestyle, and environmental risk factors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1286. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1286

Investigating the most likely causal variants identified by fine‐mapping analyses may improve the power to detect gene–environment interactions. We assessed the interplay between 70 single nucleotide polymorphisms identified by genetic fine‐scale mapping of susceptibility loci and 11 epidemiological breast cancer risk factors in relation to breast cancer. Analyses were conducted on up to 58,573 subjects (26,968 cases and 31,605 controls) from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, in one of the largest studies of its kind. Analyses were carried out separately for estrogen receptor (ER) positive (ER+) and ER negative (ER–) disease. The Bayesian False Discovery Probability (BFDP) was computed to assess the noteworthiness of the results. Four potential gene–environment interactions were identified as noteworthy (BFDP < 0.80) when assuming a true prior interaction probability of 0.01. The strongest interaction result in relation to overall breast cancer risk was found between CFLAR‐rs7558475 and current smoking (ORint = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67–0.88, pint = 1.8 × 10−4). The interaction with the strongest statistical evidence was found between 5q14‐rs7707921 and alcohol consumption (ORint =1.36, 95% CI: 1.16–1.59, pint = 1.9 × 10−5) in relation to ER– disease risk. The remaining two gene–environment interactions were also identified in relation to ER– breast cancer risk and were found between 3p21‐rs6796502 and age at menarche (ORint = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.12–1.43, pint =1.8 × 10−4) and between 8q23‐rs13267382 and age at first full‐term pregnancy (ORint = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83–0.95, pint = 5.2 × 10−4). While these results do not suggest any strong gene–environment interactions, our results may still be useful to inform experimental studies. These may in turn, shed light on the potential interactions observed.

Abstract Background: Many cancers share specific genetic risk factors, including both rare high-penetrance mutations and common SNPs identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, little is known about the overall shared heritability across cancers. Quantifying the extent to which two distinct cancers share genetic origin will give insights to shared biological mechanisms underlying cancer and inform design for future genetic association studies. Methods: In this study, we estimated the pair-wise genetic correlation between six cancer types (breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate) using cancer-specific GWAS summary statistics data based on 66,958 case and 70,665 control subjects of European ancestry. We also estimated genetic correlations between cancers and 14 noncancer diseases and traits. Results: After adjusting for 15 pair-wise genetic correlation tests between cancers, we found significant (P &lt; 0.003) genetic correlations between pancreatic and colorectal cancer (rg = 0.55, P = 0.003), lung and colorectal cancer (rg = 0.31, P = 0.001). We also found suggestive genetic correlations between lung and breast cancer (rg = 0.27, P = 0.009), and colorectal and breast cancer (rg = 0.22, P = 0.01). In contrast, we found no evidence that prostate cancer shared an appreciable proportion of heritability with other cancers. After adjusting for 84 tests studying genetic correlations between cancer types and other traits (Bonferroni-corrected P value: 0.0006), only the genetic correlation between lung cancer and smoking remained significant (rg = 0.41, P = 1.03 × 10−6). We also observed nominally significant genetic correlations between body mass index and all cancers except ovarian cancer. Conclusions: Our results highlight novel genetic correlations and lend support to previous observational studies that have observed links between cancers and risk factors. Impact: This study demonstrates modest genetic correlations between cancers; in particular, breast, colorectal, and lung cancer share some degree of genetic basis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(9); 1427–35. ©2017 AACR.