Citations

ABSTRACT Background Incident atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) is associated with mortality. Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) has shown effectiveness in improving MR and symptoms in AFMR, but previous studies lacked comparison to conservative management. We aimed to study the association of AFMR severity and mitral TEER with symptoms, heart failure hospitalizations (HFH) and all‐cause mortality in moderate/severe AFMR. Methods Consecutive adults with moderate/severe AFMR managed conservatively or with TEER 2010−2023 were identified retrospectively. To ensure similar technique in evaluation in the two groups, variables were obtained from the closest transthoracic echocardiogram before TEER in the TEER group. In addition to multivariable analysis, the association of TEER (vs. conservative management) with HFH and mortality was assessed using propensity‐score matched analyses; the propensity score was based on age, sex, EuroSCORE II, effective regurgitant orifice area, integrative MR severity, and NYHA class III/IV (vs. I/II). Results Among 230 patients with moderate/severe AFMR [mean age 77; 56% females], 46 were managed with TEER. Severe (vs. moderate) AFMR was independently associated with baseline NYHA class III/IV (multivariable OR 2.18 [95% CI 1.13−4.26]) and HFH [multivariable HR 2.75 (95% CI 1.25−6.03)] but not mortality ( p = 0.26). TEER improved MR to ≤ moderate in 93% but was not associated with lower HFH or death rates versus conservative management on multivariable or matched analysis. However, 1‐year NYHA improved more with TEER versus conservative management in patients with baseline NYHA class III/IV (62% vs. 27%, p = 0.03). Rhythm control was associated with improved survival (HR 0.38 [0.15−0.98]). Conclusions AFMR severity was associated with symptoms and HFH but not mortality. MR severity and NYHA class improved with TEER, but the association of TEER with HF hospitalizations or death remains unproven. Randomized studies are needed to evaluate the potential role of TEER and rhythm control on outcomes in AFMR.

Objective: Over 3 million Americans have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Effective guideline directed medical treatments (GDMT) are increasingly available but patients with HFpEF are likely under-detected (particularly women) and not receiving GDMT. Limited data are available informing the extent of HFpEF under-detection in the community. Hypothesis: Among patients with undifferentiated dyspnea and a high risk for unrecognized HFpEF, fewer than 50% will receive a HFpEF diagnosis during two years of follow-up; underrecognition will be greater among women. Methods: We identified 22,134 patients aged ≥30 in the Rochester Epidemiology Project (a medical records linkage system comprising a 27-county region of southeastern Minnesota and western Wisconsin) with evidence of unexplained dyspnea (≥2 ICD codes for dyspnea separated by >1 day) without prior documented etiology including HF or lung disease, during the time period 2018-2022. We calculated the recently validated HFpEF-Age-BMI-Atrial Fibrillation (HFpEF-ABA) score to estimate the probability of underlying HFpEF. Cox proportional hazards models regressed risk for incident HFpEF diagnosis on HFpEF-ABA score (dichotomized as ≥80% vs. <80%) with multivariable adjustment for sex, race and ethnicity. HRs(95%CIs) are presented. Results: Patients were 59±16 yrs, 50.8% women, 88.6% white, 3.1% Black, 3.7% other race, 4.6% Hispanic. Atrial fibrillation prevalence was 9.4% and mean BMI=31.4±7.8. Prevalence of HFpEF-ABA≥80% was 22.4%(n=4,958): 22.7% among women and 22.1% among men. The cumulative incidence of clinically-recognized HFpEF diagnosis at two years follow-up was 9.7% among women and 12.8% among men (log-rank p<0.01). HFpEF incidence was elevated with high HFpEF-ABA scores(≥80%): HR(95%CI) among women=3.72 (3.35, 4.14), and men=3.42 (3.11, 3.76). Among those with clinically diagnosed HFpEF during follow-up, mean time from date of first dyspnea ICD code to HFpEF diagnosis was 1.26 years overall: 1.31 and 1.21 years in women and men, respectively (p=0.05). Conclusions: One in five patients with undifferentiated dyspnea have probable undiagnosed HFpEF, and of that group, only 30% receive a clinical diagnosis, requiring an average of over 1 year to be recognized. The rate of diagnosis is even lower among women than men. Further study is warranted to implement evidence-based algorithms supporting detection of undiagnosed HFpEF in the community, especially in women.

Importance Excess body fat plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). HU6 is a novel, controlled metabolic accelerator that enhances mitochondrial uncoupling resulting in increased metabolism and fat-specific weight loss. Objective To assess efficacy and safety of HU6 in reducing body weight, improving peak volume of oxygen consumption (VO 2 ) and body composition among patients with obesity-related HFpEF. Design, Setting, and Participants The Exploratory Phase 2A, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose Escalation Study of Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacokinetics of HU6 for Subjects With Obese HFpEF (HuMAIN-HFpEF) trial was a multicenter, dose-escalation randomized clinical trial among patients with chronic stable HFpEF and obesity. Data were analyzed from July to October 2024. Intervention HU6 treatment for 19 weeks, starting at 150 mg per day and potentially up titrated to 450 mg per day based on safety and tolerability vs placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was change in body weight. Results Of 66 participants randomized (mean [SD] age, 64.5 [12] years; 38 female [58%]; mean [SD] weight, 110.9 [22.4] kg), 56 completed the trial. HU6 (vs placebo) significantly decreased weight (between-group difference, −2.86 kg; 95% CI, −4.68 to −1.04 kg; P = .003), total fat mass (between-group difference, −2.96 kg; 95% CI, −4.50 to −1.42 kg; P &amp;lt; .001), and percentage visceral fat (between-group difference,−1.3%; 95% CI, −2.1 to −0.5%; P = .003), with no significant loss of muscle mass. There were no statistically significant changes in peak VO 2 , 6-minute walk distance, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level, N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide level, or diastolic function. Serious adverse events were noted in 5 participants (4 in the HU6 group; 1 in the placebo group), including 1 death, all judged unrelated to treatment. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with obesity-related HFpEF, treatment with HU6 for 19 weeks led to modest but statistically significant weight loss without significant changes in peak VO 2 . Larger trials of longer duration are warranted to determine whether longer-term administration of HU6 can improve exercise function, quality of life, and cardiovascular outcomes in this increasingly common disorder. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05284617

Abstract Aims Left ventricular (LV) ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) refers to the ratio of afterload (effective arterial elastance) to contractility (end-systolic elastance) as an integrated marker of cardiac performance. We sought to determine whether the echocardiographic VAC ratio, defined using the ratio of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) to stroke volume (SV), predicted mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). Methods and results Mayo Clinic CICU patients from 2007 and 2018 were included. Ventricular-arterial coupling ratio was calculated as the Teichholz LVESV divided by the SV calculated from LV outflow tract Doppler. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was all-cause 1-year mortality. A total of 4685 patients were included with a median age of 69 (58, 79) years (37.2% females), with acute coronary syndrome in 54.9% and heart failure in 49.0%. A higher VAC ratio was associated with greater severity of illness, worse echocardiographic findings, and more use of critical care therapies. A total of 329 (7%) patients died during hospitalization. Patients with a higher VAC ratio had higher in-hospital mortality overall and in each admission diagnosis subgroup. After multivariable adjustment, patients with a VAC ratio &gt;2 were at higher risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.17–2.28, P = 0.010). One-year mortality was higher for patients with a higher VAC ratio, especially VAC &gt;2. Conclusion Ventricular-arterial uncoupling was associated with worse outcomes in an unselected CICU cohort. The echocardiographic VAC ratio is a simple non-invasive bedside measure that can be used for risk prediction in the CICU.

BACKGROUND: Despite favorable hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects, endothelin receptor antagonists have not improved outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF), possibly because they cause fluid retention. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial (SERENADE [Macitentan in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Pulmonary Vascular Disease]), we evaluated the effects of an endothelin receptor antagonist, macitentan, in patients with HF, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%, and pulmonary vascular disease. After a 4-week placebo run-in (to ensure clinical stability), followed by a 5-week single-blind macitentan run-in, patients who did not exhibit fluid retention were randomized to macitentan or placebo. The primary end point was change in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; baseline to 24 weeks); secondary end points included change in KCCQ (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) clinical summary score (baseline to 24 weeks) and time to worsening HF by 52 weeks. RESULTS: Of 230 patients enrolled, 28 were excluded during the placebo run-in, 60 excluded during the macitentan run-in, and 142 were randomized. Macitentan had no effect on change in NT-proBNP (geometric mean ratio [macitentan/placebo], 1.02 [90% CI, 0.88–1.19]; P =0.79) or on secondary end points (placebo-corrected change in KCCQ clinical summary score, −3.5 [90% CI, −8.2 to +1.2]; P =0.22). Worsening HF occurred in 20 (28%) patients assigned to macitentan and 13 (18%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 1.48 [90% CI, 0.83–2.67]; P =0.24). More macitentan-treated patients developed fluid retention (16 [23%] versus 10 [14%]) and cardiac adverse events (33 [46%] versus 22 [31%]) versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a novel enrichment trial design to target pulmonary vascular disease and exclude treatment-related fluid retention in patients with HF and preserved/mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, macitentan neither lowered NT-proBNP nor improved HF outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifiers: NCT03153111 and NCT03714815.

BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced hypertension (EIH) is common in adults with coarctation of the aorta (COA), but there are limited data about hemodynamics and outcomes in such patients. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in arterial load during exercise in patients with COA with versus without EIH, and the relationship to clinical outcomes. METHODS: We compared Doppler-derived arterial load indices (effective arterial elastance index, total arterial compliance index, systemic vascular resistance index), and clinical indices of disease severity (pulmonary congestion, aerobic capacity, and cardiovascular biomarkers) between adults with repaired COA and healthy controls. EIH was defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) at peak exercise >210 mm Hg in men or >190 mm Hg in women. RESULTS: In this prospective cohort study, we assessed patients with COA (n=41, age 43±14 years, 26 [63%] men) and healthy controls (n=41). Although both groups had similar resting systolic BP, the COA group had higher Doppler-derived arterial load indices at rest, as well as a greater rise in systolic BP and Doppler-derived arterial load indices at each stage of exercise, leading to a higher prevalence of EIH in the COA group (37% versus 10%; P =0.004). Compared with patients with COA without EIH (n=26, 63%), those with EIH had higher arterial load at rest and during exercise, as well as worse cardiac dysfunction, pulmonary congestion, and biomarkers of cardiovascular remodeling, despite no significant differences in resting systolic BP. CONCLUSIONS: BP assessment during exercise can improve risk stratification and identify patients who may benefit from intensification of medical therapy.

Abstract Heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction is associated with elevated left atrial pressure at rest due to fluid overload or during exercise, leading to pulmonary venous congestion. Even with available treatments, heart failure hospitalizations remain high, and improvements in quality-of-life scores and functional capacity are modest. Thus, there is growing interest in non-pharmacological methods to decompress the left atrium and improve heart failure symptoms and outcomes. Left-to-right shunts have emerged as a potential therapeutic option to reduce left atrial hypertension, improve quality of life, and impact long-term outcomes. This nascent field carries both potential therapeutic promise and many unanswered questions. Recent data have questioned whether the effects of this therapy vary based on the left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary vascular resistance, and/or right ventricular structure and function. This review discusses the basis for left-to-right shunt therapies, synthesizes past and ongoing clinical trials, and offers future directions.

Background The immune response to infections may become dysregulated and promote myocardial damage contributing to heart failure (HF). We examined the relationship between infection‐related hospitalization (IRH) and HF, HF with preserved ejection fraction, and HF with reduced ejection fraction. Methods and Results We studied 14 468 adults aged 45 to 64 years in the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) Study who were HF free at visit 1 (1987–1989). IRH was identified using select International Classification of Diseases ( ICD ) codes in hospital discharge records and was treated as a time‐varying exposure. HF incidence was defined as the first occurrence of either a hospitalization that included an ICD, Ninth Revision ( ICD‐9 ) discharge code of 428 (428.0–428.9) among the primary or secondary diagnoses or a death certificate with an ICD‐9 code of 428 or an ICD, Tenth Revision ( ICD‐10 ) code of I50 among any of the listed diagnoses or underlying causes of death. We used multivariable‐adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to assess the association between IRH and incident HF, HF with reduced ejection fraction, and HF with preserved ejection fraction. Median follow‐up time was 27 years, 55% were women, 26% were Black, mean age at baseline was 54±6 years, 46% had an IRH, and 3565 had incident HF. Hazard ratio (HR) for incident HF events among participants who had an IRH compared with those who did not was 2.35 (95% CI, 2.19–2.52). This relationship was consistent across different types of infections. Additionally, IRH was associated with both HF with reduced ejection fraction and HF with preserved ejection fraction: 1.77 (95% CI, 1.35–2.32) and 2.97 (95% CI, 2.36–3.75), respectively. Conclusions IRH was associated with incident HF, HF with reduced ejection fraction, and HF with preserved ejection fraction. IRH might represent a modifiable risk factor for HF pathophysiology.

Abstract Introduction Secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR) is a highly prevalent valve disease. STR and Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) share common features including exertional intolerance and high burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and pulmonary hypertension (PH), making it challenging to disentangle HFpEF from TR. The incidence of clinically-recognized HFpEF in STR and its impact on mortality are not well established. Purposes To define the incidence of newly diagnosed HFpEF and its impact on mortality in a cohort of patients with significant STR and to evaluate the likelihood of a larger hidden burden of HFpEF. Methods Patients with a first diagnosis of ≥moderate-severe STR between 2004-2019 at our institution were retrospectively included. Patients with left ventricle ejection fraction &lt;50%, left-sided valve diseases, and intracardiac device leads were excluded. HFpEF was identified by manual chart review as well as by use of ICD codes. The estimated prevalence of HFpEF was evaluated using an H2FPEF score ≥6, which corresponds to a ≥90% probability of having HFpEF. Results Of 2118 patients (mean age 70 ± 14, 36% females), 1057 (50%) had systemic hypertension (HTN) and 1091 (51%) had AF, with median 2.3 years of follow-up. From this cohort, 536 (25%) patients were diagnosed with HFpEF based upon chart review during the follow up period, while ICD diagnosis was only present in fewer than 50% of these patients (254). High H2FPEF score was present in 880 patients (41.5%), of whom 383 received a chart diagnosis of HFpEF, while 153 patients with H2FPEF score &lt;6 received a chart HFpEF diagnosis. The cumulative incidence of chart-based diagnosis of HFpEF was 20.8% (N=158) at 1-year and 38.6% (N=273) at 5-years in patients with an H2FPEF score ≥6 and 5.5%(N=60) at 1-year and 11.1%(N=111) at 5-years in those with a score &lt;6 (Figure). In Cox regression analyses, the diagnosis of HFpEF during follow-up was associated with increased mortality (HR 2.14, CI 1.86-2.46, p &lt; 0.001) after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diuretics, HTN, pulmonary hypertension, chronic kidney disease and AF. Conclusions The incidence of clinically documented HFpEF in a cohort of patients with significant STR at index evaluation is high (25%). Use of ICD code underestimates clinical recognition, with the actual burden of HFpEF probably being even greater, as indicated by an H2FPEF score ≥ 6. Among those with significant STR, HFpEF diagnosis is an independent risk factor for mortality.