Citations

AbstractBackground & AimsAlthough transient elastography (TE) is used to determine liver stiffness as a surrogate to hepatic fibrosis, the normal range in children is not well defined. We performed a systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis to determine the range of liver stiffness in healthy children and evaluate the influence of important biological parameters.MethodsWe pooled data from 10 studies that examined healthy children using TE. We divided 1702 children into two groups: ≥3 years (older group) and < 3 years of age (younger group). Univariate and multivariate linear regression models predicting liver stiffness were conducted.ResultsAfter excluding children with obesity, diabetes, or abnormal liver tests, 652 children were analysed. Among older children, mean liver stiffness was 4.45 kPa (95% confidence interval 4.34‐4.56), and increased liver stiffness was associated with age, sedation status, and S probe use. In the younger group, the mean liver stiffness was 4.79 kPa (95% confidence interval 4.46‐5.12), and increased liver stiffness was associated with sedation status and Caucasian race. In a subgroup analysis, hepatic steatosis on ultrasound was significantly associated with increased liver stiffness. We define a reference range for normal liver stiffness in healthy children as 2.45‐5.56 kPa.ConclusionsWe have established TE‐derived liver stiffness ranges for healthy children and propose an upper limit of liver stiffness in healthy children to be 5.56 kPa. We have identified increasing age, use of sedation, probe size, and presence of steatosis on ultrasound as factors that can significantly increase liver stiffness.

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, providers and patients must engage in shared decision making regarding the pros and cons of early versus delayed interventions for localized skin cancer. Patients at highest risk of COVID‐19 complications are older; are immunosuppressed; and have diabetes, cancer, or cardiopulmonary disease, with multiple comorbidities associated with worse outcomes. Physicians must weigh the patient's risk of COVID‐19 complications in the event of exposure against the risk of worse oncologic outcomes from delaying cancer therapy. Herein, the authors have summarized current data regarding the risk of COVID‐19 complications and mortality based on age and comorbidities and have reviewed the literature assessing how treatment delays affect oncologic outcomes. They also have provided multidisciplinary recommendations regarding the timing of local therapy for early‐stage skin cancers during this pandemic with input from experts at 11 different institutions. For patients with Merkel cell carcinoma, the authors recommend prioritizing treatment, but a short delay can be considered for patients with favorable T1 disease who are at higher risk of COVID‐19 complications. For patients with melanoma, the authors recommend delaying the treatment of patients with T0 to T1 disease for 3 months if there is no macroscopic residual disease at the time of biopsy. Treatment of tumors ≥T2 can be delayed for 3 months if the biopsy margins are negative. For patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, those with Brigham and Women's Hospital T1 to T2a disease can have their treatment delayed for 2 to 3 months unless there is rapid growth, symptomatic lesions, or the patient is immunocompromised. The treatment of tumors ≥T2b should be prioritized, but a 1‐month to 2‐month delay is unlikely to worsen disease‐specific mortality. For patients with squamous cell carcinoma in situ and basal cell carcinoma, treatment can be deferred for 3 months unless the individual is highly symptomatic.

AbstractMost patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are diagnosed with early-stage disease and managed with active surveillance. The individual course of patients with early-stage CLL is heterogeneous, and their probability of needing treatment is hardly anticipated at diagnosis. We aimed at developing an international prognostic score to predict time to first treatment (TTFT) in patients with CLL with early, asymptomatic disease (International Prognostic Score for Early-stage CLL [IPS-E]). Individual patient data from 11 international cohorts of patients with early-stage CLL (n = 4933) were analyzed to build and validate the prognostic score. Three covariates were consistently and independently correlated with TTFT: unmutated immunoglobulin heavy variable gene (IGHV), absolute lymphocyte count higher than 15 × 109/L, and presence of palpable lymph nodes. The IPS-E was the sum of the covariates (1 point each), and separated low-risk (score 0), intermediate-risk (score 1), and high-risk (score 2-3) patients showing a distinct TTFT. The score accuracy was validated in 9 cohorts staged by the Binet system and 1 cohort staged by the Rai system. The C-index was 0.74 in the training series and 0.70 in the aggregate of validation series. By meta-analysis of the training and validation cohorts, the 5-year cumulative risk for treatment start was 8.4%, 28.4%, and 61.2% among low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients, respectively. The IPS-E is a simple and robust prognostic model that predicts the likelihood of treatment requirement in patients with early-stage CLL. The IPS-E can be useful in clinical management and in the design of early intervention clinical trials.

Introduction The United States Thrombotic Microangiopathy (USTMA) Consortium consists of high-volume US referral centers that are committed to collaborative research in TMAs. The USTMA Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (iTTP) registry has compiled retrospective data on demographics, treatments and outcomes in patients with iTTP to create the world's largest database of patients with this rare disease. While there is consensus on the use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for treatment of iTTP, there are no large randomized trials on which to base use of rituximab. The drug is frequently used for refractory or relapsed iTTP, but is currently being used more frequently for de novo (first episode) iTTP. We queried the USTMA iTTP registry to determine whether relapse free survival (RFS) is superior when rituximab is added to TPE and corticosteroids for treatment of iTTP. We hypothesized that the addition of rituximab would improve RFS at 5 years in both de novo and relapsing iTTP. Methods Following IRB approval at each institution, investigators independently reviewed individual patient records to confirm diagnostic criteria and entered demographic, treatment and outcomes data into the REDCap database housed at the University of North Carolina. The diagnosis of iTTP was defined as ADAMTS13 &lt; 10% or ADAMTS13 &lt; 20% with an inhibitor or antibody detected at any point or a clinical diagnosis of iTTP based on presenting characteristics, response to treatment and/or relapsing phenotype before ADAMTS13 testing became available (N=173). Relapse was defined as a recurrence of iTTP after at least 30 days of remission (recurrence within 30 days was considered an exacerbation, or continuation of the prior episode). To explore the effect of rituximab added to TPE and corticosteroids, we first assessed the treatment effect in de novo iTTP patients and then separately in relapse. We constructed Kaplan-Meier curves to compare RFS for patients treated with rituximab plus corticosteroids versus corticosteroids alone in both groups, and compared RFS at specific time points using the Klein method. To better understand whether other patient variables had an effect on RFS in both de novo episodes and relapses, ordinary (time-to-event) and mixed-effects (recurrent time-to-event) Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationships of treatment, race/ethnicity, sex, age, treatment year, and presenting signs/symptoms with the outcome. Analyses were conducted using R version 3.5.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Results As of July, 2019, the USTMA database contains 775 unique study patients with a confirmed diagnosis of iTTP with 1397 unique iTTP episodes. The treatment of patients' de novo iTTP episode was available for analysis in 375 patients, 188 of whom were treated with corticosteroids alone, 131 with corticosteroids plus rituximab, and 56 with other therapies. RFS was significantly higher in patients treated with corticosteroids and rituximab compared to those treated with corticosteroids alone at 1 year (0.93 vs. 0.78, p=0.0002) and 3 years (0.82 vs. 0.66, p=0.004) but not 5 years (0.60 vs. 0.56, p=0.39). In addition, the risk of relapse decreased with later treatment year for de novo iTTP (hazard ratio (HR) 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.99, p=0.03), consistent with rituximab use increasing over time, and was increased in African Americans compared with Caucasians (HR 1.83, 1.10-3.06, p=0.02). We then explored the treatment effect in all iTTP relapses (743 relapses in 426 patients). Here, a significant (p=0.0007) interaction between treatment and race was found. Among African Americans, we found no difference in RFS when rituximab was added (HR 1.15, 0.81-1.62, p=0.43). However, among Caucasians, RFS was significantly improved when rituximab was added (HR 0.15, 0.06-0.35, p&lt;0.0001). Conclusions For de novo iTTP, adding rituximab to corticosteroids for immunosuppression likely delays but does not prevent relapse. Unlike in de novo disease, in patients with relapsed iTTP, we found a novel and significant interaction between race and treatment: while Caucasians had significantly improved RFS with the addition of rituximab, there was no effect on RFS in African Americans. Further investigation is warranted to determine the mechanisms of this difference in the response to rituximab in relapsed iTTP to improve outcomes in African Americans. Figure Disclosures Marshall: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Farland:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Metjian:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Raval:Bayer, Inc: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liles:Imara: Other: PI on Clinical trial- Sickle cell ; Shire: Other: PI on clinical trial Sickle cell ; Novartis: Other: PI on clinical trial Sickle cell . Baumann Kreuziger:CSL Behring: Consultancy; Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Consultancy. McCrae:Rigel Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dova Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chaturvedi:Shire/Takeda: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy. Zheng:Clotsolution: Other: Co-Founder; Shire/Takeda: Research Funding; Ablynx/Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau. Cataland:Ablynx/Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Disclosure: rituximab for immunosuppression in TTP.

Background: Standard treatment for catheter-associated upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) is anticoagulation. If catheter removal is otherwise indicated, it is unknown if catheter removal close to the time of initiation of anticoagulation is associated with a higher incidence of pulmonary embolization. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed at 8 participating institutions through the Venous thromboEmbolism Network US (VENUS). ICD-9/10 codes were used to identify patients with hematologic malignancies and upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) from 1/1/2010 through 12/31/2016. Identified patients underwent medical record review to verify diagnostic codes and determine if a catheter was associated with the upper extremity DVT and assess for outcomes. Patients were excluded if the UEDVT was not catheter provoked or if there were associated lower extremity DVT and/or pulmonary emboli. The anticoagulant start and finish date as well as the timing of the catheter removal, total follow up, and death were recorded. Patients started on anticoagulation at the time of their diagnosis were divided into two groups: 1) anticoagulation with delayed (&gt; 48 hrs) or no catheter removal and 2) anticoagulation with early catheter removal (&lt; 48 hrs). Outcomes were also assessed in patients with no anticoagulation initiation but catheter removal as the only treatment. The primary outcome was clinically identified pulmonary emboli within 7 days and the secondary outcome was pulmonary emboli or death from any cause within 7 days. Baseline characteristics were compared between groups using Χ2 for categorical variables, 2-tailed t-tests for continuous variables, and Wilcoxon rank-sum for nonparametric continuous variables. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the primary and secondary outcomes. Results: 663 patients with hematologic malignancies and isolated catheter-associated UEDVT underwent chart review. 512 patients were treated with anticoagulation of which 312 underwent early catheter removal while 200 had delayed or no catheter removal (Figure 1). 151 patients received no anticoagulation and 119 underwent catheter removal alone as the treatment for the DVT. Among patients who were treated with anticoagulation, the mean age was 52.6 years and 44% were male; age and sex did not differ between patients with early vs. delayed or no catheter removal (Table 1). Type of hematologic malignancy, type of central catheter, and DVT location were significantly different between groups. Patients with PICC lines were more likely to have early catheter removal (71% vs. 49%). The median platelet count was not significantly different among patients treated with anticoagulation, but was lower in patients treated with catheter removal only. Most patients were initially treated with low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and anticoagulation treatment did not differ between groups. Pulmonary emboli within 7 days occurred in 2 patients (0.64%) with early catheter removal compared to 1 patient (0.5%) with delayed or no removal (p=1.0). Pulmonary emboli or any cause death within 7 days occurred in 3 patients (1.0%) with early removal compared to 3 patients (1.5%) with delayed or no removal (p=0.68). In patients treated with catheter removal only (no anticoagulation), there were no pulmonary emboli within 7 days and 3 deaths. All 3 patients with pulmonary emboli within 7 days had PICC lines and leukemia/MDS and the sites of most proximal DVT involvement were brachiocephalic veins (2 patients) and subclavian vein (1 patient). Conclusions: In patients with hematological malignancy and catheter-associated UEDVT, removal of catheters within 48 hours was not associated with increased risk of pulmonary emboli compared to delayed or no removal. Disclosures Billett: Albert Einstein College of Medicine: Patents & Royalties: Patent application pending for NETs AI software. Gaddh:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hema Biologics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics LLC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Oo:Medical Education Speakers Network: Honoraria; Janssen and Janssen: Other: Research: site co-investigator . Jaglal:NOVARTIS: Consultancy. Streiff:Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Research Funding. Baumann Kreuziger:Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy.

Background: Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a potentially fatal hematologic disorder characterized by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and ischemic organ impairment. The incidence of iTTP is higher among African-Americans (AA), however, differences in presentation and outcomes have not been fully investigated. In a multi-center cohort of patients with iTTP from the United States Thrombotic Microangiopathy (USTMA) Consortium, we tested the hypothesis that AA race is an independent predictor of poor outcomes including iTTP related mortality and relapse. Methods: We queried data from the USTMA iTTP registry, which currently includes data from 785 individual patients from 15 institutions across the United States. Data from at least one iTTP episode are available for 734 patients. The cohort is 35.1% (N = 272) White, 58.7% (N = 455) African American, 0.4% (N=3) Asian, 1.8% (N=14) Hispanic, and 4.0 % (N=31) other/unknown race. We restricted our analyses to AA and White participants because of small numbers in the other groups. We compared presenting features and treatments using the chi-squared test and t-test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. A relapse was defined as a recurrent iTTP episode occurring at least 30 days after last therapeutic plasma exchange. To evaluate relapse-free survival, we included only patients enrolled in the registry at their first TTP episode (144 White and 246 AA) since patients presenting with a relapse as their index episode are already confirmed to have relapsing iTTP. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to compare relapse-free survival in White and AA patients, and a Cox regression model was developed to evaluate the independent effect of race on relapse, adjusting for potential confounders including age, sex, and the use of rituximab. Results: Demographics and presenting features of 390 individuals (144 White and 246 AA) presenting with a first episode of iTTP are shown in Table 1. Presenting symptoms including fever, confusion, seizure, memory deficits, stupor, headache, stroke, chest pain, abdominal pain, fatigue, and dark urine were similar between Whites and AA except for petechiae, which were more frequently documented in Whites (28.8% vs 17.7%, p=0.011). Presenting laboratory studies were also comparable though AA had a higher rate of elevated serum troponin (50.6% vs 32.5%, p=0.003), lower hemoglobin level (8.27 ± 0.13 vs 8.81 ± 0.19, p=0.0176) and platelet count (20.3 ± 1.2 vs 26.2 ± 3.2, p=0.0432). In addition to therapeutic plasma exchange and corticosteroids, rituximab was administered to 23.7% of White patients and 22.7% of AA during their first iTTP episode (P=0.815). Median time to platelet count recovery (days of daily plasma exchange until normal platelet count for two consecutive days) was shorter in AA compared with White patients [5 (IQR 4, 10) vs. 8 (IQR 5, 14), log rank P = 0.004]. AA race remained a significant predictor of the shorter time to platelet count recovery [HR 1.44 (95% CI 1.12, 1.85), P=0.004] after adjusting for rituximab therapy [HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.0.46, 0.80), P<0.001], female sex [HR 0.95 (95% CI 0.73, 1.22), P=0.669], age [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.99, 1.01), P=0.682], platelet count [HR 1.00 (95% CI 0.99, 1.04), P=0.820] and LDH at presentation [HR 1.00 (95% CI 1.00, 1.00), P=0.525]. Death during the first episode occurred in 8.9% of White patients and 5.5% of AA patients (P=0.206). Relapse-free survival after the first episode of iTTP was lower in AA than White patients (Figure 1). AA race was associated with the reduced relapse free survival [HR 1.79 (95% CI 1.08, 2.98), P=0.024] in a Cox regression model adjusted for age [HR 1.00 (95% CI 0.98, 1.01), P=0.683], sex [HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.60, 1.54), P=0.867], and rituximab therapy [HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.55, 1.59), P=0.806]. Conclusion: African Americans with iTTP have a higher relapse rate and shorter relapse free survival after the first episode of the disease compared with Caucasian patients, which is independent of age, sex and rituximab therapy. Contrary to our hypothesis, acute outcomes of iTTP (time to platelet count recovery and mortality) were not worse in AA patients. The factors contributing to the higher relapse rate in AA with iTTP need to be further investigated. Our findings suggest that AA patients may also benefit from closer follow up. Disclosures Farland: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Metjian:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Raval:Bayer, Inc: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liles:Shire: Other: PI on clinical trial Sickle cell ; Imara: Other: PI on Clinical trial- Sickle cell ; Novartis: Other: PI on clinical trial Sickle cell . Baumann Kreuziger:CSL Behring: Consultancy; Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Consultancy. McCrae:Dova Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zheng:Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Ablynx/Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Clotsolution: Other: Co-Founder; Shire/Takeda: Research Funding. Cataland:Alexion: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ablynx/Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chaturvedi:Shire/Takeda: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy.

Abstract Abstract 3209 Background: The red blood cell folate (RCF) assay has historically been recommended as a more reliable indicator of tissue folate stores compared to the serum folate (SF) assay, as it is not affected by recent ingestion of food. However, the RCF assay suffers from inherent problems with imprecision and accuracy, which are not encountered with SF measurements. Furthermore, following the advent of required folic acid supplementation of many foods by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1992, folate deficiency is increasingly rare. Very few studies have looked at the value of the RCF versus the SF. We undertook a 10 year retrospective analysis of RCF and SF results to determine the clinical utility of RCF beyond that of SF. Methods: We retrieved all RCF and SF results from the laboratory information system at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) ordered on inpatients and outpatients between 1999–2009. Data for patients who had concurrent orders for SF and RCF were analyzed and chart reviews were conducted on those patients with normal SF but low RCF. Abnormal values were defined by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES)/Center for Disease Control (CDC) criteria for folate deficiency (SF< 3.0 ng/ml, RCF < 140 ng/ml). Results: A total of 152,166 SF and 15,708 RCF were performed over the decade of the study. The prevalence of folate deficiency using only SF values was 0.39% and 0.27% using only RCF values. There were 1082 patients in which SFA and RCFA were ordered concurrently (Table 1). Only 1 patient (0.09%) had both abnormal SF and RCF. Chart reviews of the 4 patients with a normal SF but low RCF were as follows: 1) a 6 year old (yo). male with known folic acid transporter deficiency treated with Leucovorin. 2) a 58 yo male with history of gout, hypertension, psoriasis, and hyperlipidemia with normal hemoglobin (Hb) and MCV. 3) a 65 yo male with chronic diarrhea and suspected alcohol abuse; slight macrocytosis (MCV=100.3 fL) but normal Hb. 4) a 51 yo male with multifactorial gait disorder and alcohol abuse. There was a previous history of vitamin B12 deficiency but B12 levels were normal at this time. The CBC was notable for macrocytosis (MCV=115.1 fL) without anemia. Only in patient 4 did the RCF value result in the institution of folic acid supplementation. Conclusions: The RCF provides no additional information beyond that provided by the SF in virtually all situations. Thus SF alone is sufficient for assessment of folate stores. However, there is no evidence to support routine ordering of either SF or RCF, as true folate deficiency in the current era of FDA mandated folic acid supplementation is exceedingly rare. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 2919 Background: Sideroblastic anemias can be either hereditary due to congenital mutations in factors critical for iron processing or heme biosynthesis, or acquired; acquired sideroblastic anemias may be induced by alcohol or medications, but are usually idiopathic. Pyridoxine, a form of vitamin B6, plays a critical role in heme synthesis as a cofactor for δ-aminolevulinic acid synthetase (ALAS). Some subtypes of congenital sideroblastic anemia, such as those associated with mutations in the ALAS2 gene encoding the erythrocyte-expressed isoform of ALAS, may respond to pyridoxine therapy at doses ranging from 5–500 mg/day. Anecdotal reports of improvement with pyridoxine therapy in cases of acquired idiopathic sideroblastic anemia (AISA) have led to widespread clinical use of this agent in patients with refractory anemia with ring(ed) sideroblasts (RARS) and refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia associated with ring sideroblasts (RCMD-RS). However, there are no systematic studies of the effectiveness of pyridoxine in AISA. Methods: We reviewed clinical and laboratory data from 231 adult patients with marrow aspirate-proven AISA (i.e., RARS or RCMD-RS, based on 2001 WHO criteria) evaluated at our institution between 1994 and 2007. Responses to pyridoxine were assessed using 2006 International Working Group (IWG) standardized criteria for MDS (erythroid response with hemoglobin increase by '1.5 mg/dl). The relationship between response to pyridoxine and disease subtype or International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) stratification was assessed using χ2 test, using a p-value limit of <0.05 for statistical significance. Results: 86 of the 231 patients (42%) were treated with pyridoxine for an average of 19 months (range 1–114 months) at a mean dose of 167 mg/day (range 50–600 mg/day). Sufficient follow-up data to allow response evaluation were available from 74 (86%) of the 86 patients who received pyridoxine. Only 5/86 patients (6.8%) receiving pyridoxine met IWG response criteria for hematological improvement, but 3 of these 5 patients also received erythropoetin and 1 also received prednisone concomitantly with pyridoxine therapy. Therefore, only 1/86 (1.4%) patient's improvement in hemoglobin could be attributed to pyridoxine monotherapy. ALAS2 genotype data were not available from these 5 patients. The dose of pyridoxine was not associated with response to therapy (187.5 mg daily in responders vs. 157 mg daily in non-responders (p=0.60). Patients with RCMD-RS were more likely to be treated with vitamin B6 compared to patients with RARS (p=<0.001), possibly because of more severe anemia, but response to pyridoxine did not differ significantly between subtypes (3/49 vs. 2/25, response in RARS vs. RCMD-RS; p=0.76). Among the 74 evaluable patients, 3/46 patients in the low IPSS risk group responded to pyridoxine, compared to 2/24 of patients in the Intermediate-1 risk group and 0/4 in the Intermediate-2 risk group (p=0.82). Adverse effects associated with pyridoxine included new onset of irreversible symptomatic peripheral neuropathy in 2/86 patients (2.3%). Conclusions: Pyridoxine is commonly prescribed to patients with AISA in clinical practice, and this agent is often continued for a long period of time despite lack of evidence of objective response. Pyridoxine is an ineffective therapy in AISA that induces symptomatic peripheral neuropathy in some patients. Therefore, pyridoxine therapy should be limited to patients with known or suspected congenital mutations that confer pyridoxine responsiveness, and therapeutic trials should be brief to avoid adverse effects. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Introduction Measurement of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) is used for the diagnosis and management of patients with diabetes. Methods for measuring HbA1C are classified on the basis of charge differences (cation exchange chromatography) or structural differences (boronate affinity chromatography). Some cation exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyzers may be prone to interferences from hemoglobin variants. Historically, our lab used two methods to report HbA1C results: cation exchange HPLC (VariantII) with reflex to boronate affinity HPLC (Ultra2) methods. A new analyzer (BioRad D-100) with improved interference detection and thresholds for interference was evaluated. The objectives of this study were (1) assess the comparability of HbA1c results between D-100, VariantII, and Ultra2; (2) evaluate the need for maintaining a reflex method; and (3) calculate cancellation rates before and after implementing D-100. Methods HbA1c was measured by cation exchange methods using VariantII Turbolink, D-100 (BioRad), and boronate affinity using Ultra2Affinity (Trinity Biotech) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations with the following analytical measuring ranges (AMRs), 4.0% to 17.6%, 4.0% to 18.0%, and 4.0% to 17.6%, respectively. D-100 was compared to VariantII (n = 26) and Ultra2 (n = 31) using residual patient samples from provider-ordered HbA1c having no chromatography flags and with the following chromatography flags on VariantII (n = 113): variant window (n = 41), HbA1c <4.0% (n = 24), HbA1a + HbA1b >5% (n = 19), HbF >5% (n = 9), P3 >10% (n = 6), HbA1c >17.6% (n = 4), unknown peak (n = 3), labile 5% to 15% (n = 3), labile >15% (n = 3), and HbS >60% (n = 1). The cancelation rates were calculated at baseline (January 1-31, 2018) and postimplementation of D-100 (September 20, 2018, to January 22, 2019). Results HbA1c results from D-100 were within ±0.3 or 5% with the following frequencies: Ultra2 in 96.2% (25/26) with VariantII in 96.8% (30/31) using samples with no chromatography flags. A total of 113 samples with abnormal VariantII flags were tested using D-100 with 82% (n = 92) not exceeding interference limits for result reporting. These D-100 results were within ±0.3 or 5% of Ultra2 results with the following frequencies: 38.5% (10/26) of samples below (n = 23) or above (n = 3) the AMR, 85.3% (29/34) of results with Hb variant flags, 68.0% (17/25) with unknown/minor peaks, and 71.4% (5/7) with HbF <15%. The clinical concordance was also assessed according to the following decision limits: normal <5.6%, prediabetic = 5.7% to 6.4%, and diabetic >6.5%. Results were concordant in 88% with variant peaks (12/13 w/HbA1c <5.6%, 8/11 w/HbA1c = 5.7%-6.4%, 10/10 w/HbA1c >6.5%), 84% with minor peaks (5/6 w/HbA1c <5.6%, 0/2 w/HbA1c = 5.7%-6.4%, 16/17 w/HbA1c >6.5%), and 86% with HbF (3/3 w/HbA1c <5.6%, 2/3 w/HbA1c = 5.7%-6.4%, 1/1 w/HbA1c >6.5%). Results above/below AMR had 100% concordance (>16.0% or <4.4%). The frequency of VariantII rule violation was 2.1% in January 2018, with 53 of 117 having results confirmed as <4.0% or >16.0% by Ultra2, 2 of 117 reported by Ultra2, and 62 being cancelled due to HbF >15% (n = 23) or variant Hb >60% (n = 39). The frequency of rule violation using only D-100 since implementation was 2.2%. Conclusion Implementation of D-100 has removed the need for boronate affinity reflex testing and maintained similar cancellation rates.

Abstract Background Body fluid samples (BFs) with low pH have demonstrated underrecovery of enzyme activity. The aims of this study were (1) measure the frequency of abnormal pH in BFs received for clinical chemistry testing, (2) calculate recovery of analytes in BFs undergoing pH titration, and (3) investigate the mechanism of pH interference. Methods Residual BFs submitted for physician-ordered testing to the Central Clinical Laboratory (Mayo Clinic) were utilized for this study. BFs were centrifuged 10 minutes (3,200 rpm) prior to pH measurement (pH meter, Accumet X15; Fisher Scientific) and analysis. A Roche Cobas c501 (Roche Diagnostics) analyzer was used to measure amylase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, glucose, albumin, total protein, bilirubin (all Roche Diagnostics reagents), and lipase (Sekisui Diagnostics). pH was measured in 122 BFs received between 10/23/2018 and 10/26/2018 within 24 hours of receipt. pH titration was performed using pooled BFs of similar source/type. Each pool was titrated over a range of pH (≤2 to ≥10) in 1-unit increments by addition of a fixed volume of acid (6M HCL) or base (6M NaOH). Analytes were measured before and after acid/base addition. Average percent recovery was calculated (measured/expected × 100%) from n = 3 to 9 pH measurements. A low pH BF pool was spiked (<5% by volume) with a high-concentration BF to investigate mechanism of enzyme underrecovery. Additionally, low pH BF pool was neutralized by addition of base and % recovery calculated. For all titration/spiking experiments, a control sample having the same volume of diluent (7% bovine serum albumin or saline) was used to account for the effects of dilution. Results BFs received (n = 122) had mean (SD) pH = 8.0 (0.6) with 6.6% (n = 8) having pH <7.0 and 2.5% (n = 3) having pH <6.0. All recovery (%) and pH data are expressed as mean (range) values. Amylase recovery (initial pH = 8.4-8.9) was 1.3 (0.9-2.2)% at pH = 1.6 (1.0-2.2) (n = 6), 55.6 (37.4-67.0)% at pH = 4.4 (3.5-5.4) (n = 6), 81.4 (74.0-85.2)% at pH = 6.2 (6.1-6.5) (n = 3), 90.1 (84.4-95.4)% at pH = 7.5 (7.3-7.7) (n = 3), 98.8 (96.2-101.7)% at pH = 10.0 (9.8-10.2) (n = 3), and 14.5 (1.4-38.9)% at pH = 11.9 (11.5-12.1) (n = 3). LDH recovery (initial pH = 8.2-8.5) was 1.4 (0.1-3.7)% at pH = 1.7 (1.0-2.4) (n = 6), 18.3 (0.5-39.7)% at pH = 4.5 (3.5-5.4) (n = 6), 63.6 (54.9-68.4)% at pH = 6.2 (6.1-6.5) (n = 3), 85.9 (80.2-90.7)% at pH = 7.2 (6.8-7.4) (n = 3), 46.1 (36.4-61.0)% at pH = 10.0 (9.8-10.2) (n = 3), and 9.8 (0.0-28.9)% at pH = 11.3 (10.4-12.1) (n = 3). Lipase recovery (initial pH = 8.2-8.9) was 10.4 (<1-18)% at pH = 1.8 (1.0-2.4) (n = 6), 73.9 (62.6-85.5)% at pH = 4.2 (3.4-5.2) (n = 3), 92.4 (90.8-93.5)% at pH = 6.2 (6.0-6.5) (n = 3), 96.3 (95.6-96.8)% at pH = 7.3 (6.8-7.7) (n = 3), and 92.9 (89.3-96.8)% at pH = 9.9 (9.8-10.1) (n = 3) and 80.9 (0.0-78.6)% at pH = 11.3 (10.4-12.1) (n = 3). Creatinine, BUN, albumin, glucose, total protein, and bilirubin recovery were 97.9 (92.2-102.9)%, 100 (96.6-103.1)%, 99.9 (97.6-102.4)%, 100.2 (97.8-103)%, 100.2 (98.7-101.9)%, and 100.1 (92.-105.9)%, respectively, between pH 1.3-11.7 (n = 9). Recovery of amylase, LDH, or lipase was <1% after spiking enzymes into BF pool with pH <3. pH adjustment to normal (pH = 8.6-9.0) also resulted in recovery of <1%. Conclusion Enzyme activity in BFs was not affected (90%-110% recovery) when pH = 7.4-8.5 for LDH, pH = 7.3-10.2 for amylase, pH = 6.0-9.9 for lipase, and pH = 1.3-11.7 for all other analytes. An irreversible loss of enzyme activity occurs at low pH. Few clinical BFs have pH <7.0, but laboratories should have awareness.