Citations

AbstractBackgroundPreviously, we found that female sex is associated with greater pathology burden in early‐onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) in the Longitudinal EOAD Study (LEADS). Here, we have expanded our analyses by adding APOE‐ε4 carrier status as a further predictor of EOAD pathologic burden.MethodWe included 180 EOAD LEADS participants with available APOE genotype, Flortaucipir PET, Florbetaben PET, and MRI data. Demographic and biomarker differences were analyzed using ANOVA. EOAD participants were split by sex and APOE‐ε4 carrier status. Box plots were created in R and a voxel‐wise multiple linear regression in SPM12 yielded statistical brain maps of gray matter density (GMD), amyloid and tau burden.ResultCompared to males, EOAD females showed significantly greater global amyloid uptake (mean SUVR, p=0.002) and greater tau SUVR in the MetaROI, Braak 3&4 and 5&6 regions (p=0.0007, p=0.001, p=0.01, resp., Table 1). Female APOE‐ε4 carriers showed greater tau SUVR in Braak regions 1&2 than female non‐carriers (p<0.01, Figure 2B). Male APOE‐ε4 carriers showed trend‐level thinner entorhinal cortex than male non‐carriers (p=0.06, Figure 1). Interestingly however, femaleAPOE‐ε4 non‐carriers showed greater global amyloid SUVR than female carriers (p<0.01, Figure 2A). Further, APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers showed significantly thinner medial temporal cortices than carriers in both sexes (M, p<0.05; F, p<0.01). Male APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers also showed significantly lower mean cortical thickness than male carriers (p<0.05, Figure 1). Female APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers showed trend‐level lower mean cortical thickness than female carriers (p=0.06, Figure 1). The FWE corrected SPM12 maps showed significantly greater GM atrophy in the right temporal lobe and greater amyloid burden in a right lateralized occipitoparietal pattern in female APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers compared to female carriers. Further, male APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers showed greater tau uptake in the left frontal lobe than male carriers (Figure 3).ConclusionThese results suggest that APOE‐ε4 non‐carrier status is associated with greater atrophy, amyloid and tau deposition in EOAD. This might be due to the presence of other strong genetic drivers of disease pathology in EOAD.

AbstractBackgroundWe previously reported that in our autopsy‐confirmed cohort of Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB), Parkinson’s Disease Dementia (PDD) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), DLB with parkinsonism (DLB+Park) predicted faster progression of UPDRS‐III scores compared to PDD, DLB without parkinsonism (DLB‐Park), and AD. This study examined annualized rate of change of UPDRS‐III subscales in our cohort.MethodsData included were from participants in Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases (AZSAND) with clinicopathologic diagnosis of DLB (n = 48), PDD (n = 98) or pure AD (n = 48), and longitudinal movement exams. Mixed effects model (accounting for age, education, and sex) was used to determine predicted mean UPDRS‐III and subscale scores (0‐4) for all groups. Individual UPDRS‐III subscale scores were derived for: Body Bradykinesia, Limb Bradykinesia, Gait, Postural Instability, Limb Rest Tremor, Neck Rigidity and Limb Rigidity. Where applicable, scores for multiple limbs involved were averaged.ResultsLongitudinal data was analyzed for over 1430‐participant years. Parkinsonism was present in 65.6% of DLB participants. PDD participants were more likely to be treated with dopaminergic agents (87.8%) compared to (p<0.001) DLB+Park (57.6%), DLB‐park (0%) and AD (2.1%). Frequency (29.4% vs. 29.0%) and severity (mean±SE = 0.4±0.07 and 0.4±0.12) of Limb Rest Tremor was similar for PDD and DLB+park. Limb Bradykinesia frequency and severity were PDD: 100%, 2.4±0.11, DLB+Park: 96.8%, 2.1±0.18, DLB‐Park: 20%, 0.4±0.23, and AD: 62%, 1.1±0.16. Frequency of gait abnormality was 98.5% in PDD, 90.3% in DLB+park, 60% in DLB‐Park and 57.8% in AD. Rigidity was most frequent in the PDD group (88.2%), followed by DLB+Park (71%), AD (19.6%), and none DLB‐park (0%). Over 8 years trajectories for limb bradykinesia and gait were greater for DLB+park than PDD (Figure 1, Cohen’s d range 0.89‐2.18 and 0.63‐1.99 over 8 years, p<0.001).ConclusionOur results suggest that DLB+Park group have faster motor progression predominantly related to gait abnormalities and limb bradykinesia. Future analyses will explore more convergent data, integrated effects of various measures and their differential contributions in this cohort.

Abstract Brains of 42 COVID-19 decedents and 107 non-COVID-19 controls were studied. RT-PCR screening of 16 regions from 20 COVID-19 autopsies found SARS-CoV-2 E gene viral sequences in 7 regions (2.5% of 320 samples), concentrated in 4/20 subjects (20%). Additional screening of olfactory bulb (OB), amygdala (AMY) and entorhinal area for E, N1, N2, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, and S gene sequences detected one or more of these in OB in 8/21 subjects (38%). It is uncertain whether these RNA sequences represent viable virus. Significant histopathology was limited to 2/42 cases (4.8%), one with a large acute cerebral infarct and one with hemorrhagic encephalitis. Case-control RNAseq in OB and AMY found more than 5000 and 700 differentially expressed genes, respectively, unrelated to RT-PCR results; these involved immune response, neuronal constituents, and olfactory/taste receptor genes. Olfactory marker protein-1 reduction indicated COVID-19-related loss of OB olfactory mucosa afferents. Iba-1-immunoreactive microglia had reduced area fractions in cerebellar cortex and AMY, and cytokine arrays showed generalized downregulation in AMY and upregulation in blood serum in COVID-19 cases. Although OB is a major brain portal for SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 brain changes are more likely due to blood-borne immune mediators and trans-synaptic gene expression changes arising from OB deafferentation.

Abstract The Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathological hallmarks amyloid β (Aβ) and tau neurofibrillary (NF) pathology have been reported in the olfactory bulb (OB) in aging and in different neurodegenerative diseases, which coincides with frequently reported olfactory dysfunction in these conditions. To better understand when the OB is affected in relation to the hierarchical progression of Aβ throughout the brain and whether OB pathology might be an indicator of AD severity, we assessed the presence of OB Aβ and tau NF pathology in an autopsy cohort of 158 non demented control and 173 AD dementia cases. OB Aβ was found in less than 5% of cases in lower Thal phases 0 and 1, in 20% of cases in phase 2, in 60% of cases in phase 3 and in more than 80% of cases in higher Thal phases 4 and 5. OB Aβ and tau pathology significantly predicted a Thal phase greater than 3, a Braak NF stage greater than 4, and an MMSE score lower than 24. While OB tau pathology is almost universal in the elderly and therefore is not a good predictor of AD severity, OB Aβ pathology coincides with clinically-manifest AD and might prove to be a useful biomarker of the extent of brain spread of both amyloid and tau pathology.

AbstractBackgroundAlthough parkinsonism is a core feature of Parkinson’s Disease Dementia (PDD) and Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), its evolution is less delineated. We aimed to assess differences in severity and progression of parkinsonian motor symptoms and signs in a community autopsy cohort with clinicopathologic diagnosis of DLB, PDD or Alzheimer’s Disease (AD).MethodData included were from 194 participants in the Arizona study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders with clinicopathologic diagnosis of DLB (n=48), PDD (n=98) (±AD co‐pathology) or pure AD (n=48), and at least two movement exams performed by movement disorders subspecialists who classified PD and parkinsonism according to MDS‐UPDRS criteria. DLB was subgrouped by presence or absence of parkinsonism at final exam (DLB+Park and DLB–Park). Between group trajectory of UPDRS‐II and UPDRS‐III scores were explored using piecewise‐linear and non‐linear MMRM multivariate analysis.ResultOver 1435 participant‐years of longitudinal data were included in the analyses (Figure 1). Mean±SD age at baseline movement exam and death were 76.0±7.5 and 83.4±6.8 years, respectively. At baseline, most participants did not have dementia or substantial motor abnormalities (except motor abnormalities in PDD). DLB (73.9%) and PDD (69.2%) groups had more males than AD (33.3%). Parkinsonism was present in 65.6% of DLB at last exam. Piecewise‐linear MMRM analysis showed baseline UPDRS‐II and UPDRS‐III scores were highest (p<0.001) for PDD (mean±SE: 14.3±0.78 and 27.4±1.64), followed by DLB+Park (5.0±1.05 and 17.4±3.10), DLB‐Park (3.7±2.54 and 3.8±1.35) and AD (3.2±0.88 and 8.0±1.94). Annual rate of increase in UPDRS‐II was greatest for DLB+Park (1.44±0.20) and PDD (1.04±0.08), followed by DLB‐Park (0.89±0.18) and AD (0.30±0.11). Annual rate of increase in UPDRS‐III was highest for PDD and DLB+Park (2.12±0.20 vs 2.64±0.42), followed by DLB‐Park and AD (1.31 ± 0.38 and 0.64 ± 0.22). Preliminary non‐linear MMRM models (Figure 2) further supported substantial between group/subgroup differences in motor trajectories, and progression in DLB‐Park.ConclusionThese preliminary results in a large, well‐characterized clinicopathological community‐based autopsy cohort support that DLB+Park experience comparable, or greater, parkinsonian motor progression to PDD. Future modeling/sensitivity analyses will better delineate expected trajectories of motor progression to add prognostication value in clinic and design of DLB clinical trials.