Citations

Clear

7542 citation(s) found for "Ho, Matthew".

Nuclear Medicine Board Review: Questions and Answers for Self-Assessment, 3rd ed.
Morris, Matthew W.

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Roentgenology | February 23, 2013 | Volume: 200 | Issue: 3 | Pages: W322-W322

10.2214/ajr.12.9852 Get It

Case-Based Nuclear Medicine, 2nd ed
Morris, Matthew W.

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Roentgenology | February 23, 2013 | Volume: 200 | Issue: 3 | Pages: W323-W323

10.2214/ajr.12.9851 Get It

Caregivers of Patients With Cancer Fatigue
Clark, Matthew M. , Atherton, Pamela J., Rausch, Sarah M., Frost, Marlene H., Hanson, Jean, Garces, Yolanda I. , Brown, Paul D. , Sloan, Jeff A. , Richardson, Jarrett W., Piderman, Katherine M. , Rummans, Teresa A. , Atherton, Philip J. , Atherton, Pamela J., Lapid, Maria I. , Cheville, Andrea , Atherton, Philip J.

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® | February 23, 2013 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 121-125

10.1177/1049909113479153 | PMID 23434836 Get It

Fatigue is the problematic symptom identified by patients with cancer. However, fatigue has not been widely examined in caregivers of patients with cancer. In this study, 131 caregivers of patients diagnosed with advanced stage cancer and actively receiving radiotherapy reported experiencing the most difficulties with fatigue (mean 46.9; on a 0-100 scale, with a 10-point difference having clinical meaning) at baseline and at a 6-month follow-up (mean 48.3). This is in sharp contrast to other domains of quality of life and functioning being rated in the 60s, 70s and 80s by the caregivers of patients with cancer. Given the level of fatigue reported by the caregivers of patients with cancer, if confirmed by other investigators in larger and more diverse samples, interventions targeting caregiver fatigue should be explored.
Serial infusions of low-dose ketamine for major depression
Rasmussen, Keith G., Lineberry, Timothy W., Galardy, Christine W., Kung, Simon , Palmer, Brian A. , Ritter, Matthew J. , Schak, Kathryn M. , Sola, Christopher L., Hanson, Allison J, Frye, Mark A. , Lapid, Maria I.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Psychopharmacology | February 21, 2013 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 444-450

10.1177/0269881113478283 | PMID 23428794 Get It

Background: Single infusions of ketamine have been used successfully to achieve improvement in depressed patients. Side effects during the infusions have been common. It is not known whether serial infusions or lower infusion rates result in greater efficacy. Methods: Ten depressed patients were treated with twice weekly ketamine infusions of ketamine 0.5 mg/kg administered over 100 min until either remission was achieved or four infusions were given. Side effects were assessed with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Patients were followed naturalistically at weekly intervals for four weeks after completion of the infusions. Results: Five of 10 patients achieved remission status. There were no significant increases on the BPRS or YMRS. Two of the remitting patients sustained their improvement throughout the four week follow-up period. Conclusions: Ketamine infusions at a lower rate than previously reported have demonstrated similar efficacy and excellent tolerability and may be more practically available for routine clinical care. Serial ketamine infusions appear to be more effective than a single infusion. Further research to test relapse prevention strategies with continuation ketamine infusions is indicated.
Expert Consensus Recommendations for the Performance of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Headaches – A Narrative Review
Blumenfeld, Andrew , Napchan, Uri, Bender, Steven D. , Klein, Brad , Berliner, Randall, Schim, Jack , Friedman, Deborah I. , Young, William B. , Robertson, Carrie E. , Silberstein, Stephen D., Ashkenazi, Avi , Ailani, Jessica , Charleston, Larry , Dodick, David W. , Robbins, Matthew S. , Robertson, Carrie E , Friedman, Deborah I , Klein, Brad C

Mayo Clinic

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain | February 13, 2013 | Volume: 53 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 437-446

10.1111/head.12053 | PMID 23406160 Get It

Objective To describe a standardized methodology for the performance of peripheral nerve blocks ( PNB s) in the treatment of headache disorders. Background PNBs have long been employed in the management of headache disorders, but a wide variety of techniques are utilized in literature reports and clinical practice. Methods The A merican H eadache S ociety S pecial I nterest S ection for PNBs and other I nterventional P rocedures convened meetings during 2010‐2011 featuring formal discussions and agreements about the procedural details for occipital and trigeminal PNBs . A subcommittee then generated a narrative review detailing the methodology. Results PNB indications may include select primary headache disorders, secondary headache disorders, and cranial neuralgias. Special procedural considerations may be necessary in certain patient populations, including pregnancy, the elderly, anesthetic allergy, prior vasovagal attacks, an open skull defect, antiplatelet/anticoagulant use, and cosmetic concerns. PNBs described include greater occipital, lesser occipital, supratrochlear, supraorbital, and auriculotemporal injections. Technical success of the PNB should result in cutaneous anesthesia. Targeted clinical outcomes depend on the indication, and include relief of an acute headache attack, terminating a headache cycle, and transitioning out of a medication‐overuse pattern. Reinjection frequency is variable, depending on the indications and agents used, and the addition of corticosteroids may be most appropriate when treating cluster headache. Conclusions These recommendations from the A merican H eadache S ociety S pecial I nterest S ection for PNBs and other I nterventional P rocedures members for PNB methodology in headache disorder treatment are derived from the available literature and expert consensus. With the exception of cluster headache, there is a paucity of evidence, and further research may result in the revision of these recommendations to improve the outcome and safety of these interventions.
Lipomas of the cerebellopontine angle and internal auditory canal
White, James R. , Carlson, Matthew L. , Neff, Brian A., Driscoll, Colin L. W., Lane, John I. , Link, Michael J., Gompel, Jamie J. Van

Mayo Clinic

The Laryngoscope | February 10, 2013 | Volume: 123 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1531-1536

10.1002/lary.23882 | PMID 23401141 Get It

Objectives/HypothesisTo describe the presentation and clinical course of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) and internal auditory canal (IAC) lipomas.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study at a tertiary academic referral center.MethodsAll patients presenting with a CPA or IAC mass radiographically consistent with a lipoma on high‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were identified. Data including presenting symptomatology, tumor characteristics, management strategy, and patient course were collected.ResultsBetween 1996 and 2012, 15 patients were diagnosed with a CPA or IAC lipoma at the authors' institution and were included in the analysis. The mean duration of radiological and clinical follow‐up was 3.4 years and 5.1 years, respectively. Eight lesions were confined to the IAC, while seven involved the CPA. The median tumor size at diagnosis was 7.2 mm; one patient demonstrated tumor growth on serial MRI while the remaining subjects did not have radiological progression. The most common presenting symptoms were sensorineural hearing loss (40%) and tinnitus (33%); five patients were diagnosed after incidental discovery on MRI. Fourteen patients were managed with observation, while one subject underwent subtotal resection. None of the observed patients reported worsening symptoms at last follow‐up.ConclusionsWhile rare, lipomas should be included in the differential diagnosis of CPA and IAC lesions. Owing to a generally benign clinical course and high morbidity associated with resection, microsurgery should only be considered in cases of definite tumor enlargement with intractable symptoms from mass effect. Careful radiological evaluation is critical for establishing an accurate diagnosis in order to prevent unnecessary morbidity associated with resection.Level of Evidence2b.
Iatrogenic splenectomy during nephrectomy for renal tumors
Wang, Jeffrey K., Tollefson, Matthew K. , Kim, Simon P. , Boorjian, Stephen A. , Leibovich, Bradley C. , Lohse, Christine M. , Cheville, John C. , Thompson, R. Houston

Mayo Clinic

International Journal of Urology | February 5, 2013 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 896-902

10.1111/iju.12065 | PMID 23379901 Get It

ObjectivesTo evaluate risk factors associated with iatrogenic splenectomy during nephrectomy and to assess outcomes among patients undergoing nephrectomy for renal tumors.MethodsOf 4323 patients who underwent nephrectomy at Mayo Clinic between 1992 and 2008, 33 (0.8%) had an iatrogenic/unplanned splenectomy. In a case–control study design, controls without splenectomy were matched 1:3 based on age, sex, surgical date, side of the renal tumor, surgical approach and surgeon. Perioperative features and survival were evaluated using conditional logistic and Cox regression.ResultsAmong the 33 iatrogenic splenectomy patients, the majority (94%) underwent radical, open and left‐sided nephrectomy. Primary tumor classification ≥T3 was the only clinicopathological risk factor significantly associated with splenectomy (odds ratio 3.4; P = 0.02). Compared with controls, patients with an iatrogenic splenectomy were more likely to have longer operative time (205 vs 171 min; P = 0.02), higher estimated blood loss (1.3 vs 0.3 L; P = 0.001), longer length of stay (median 7 vs 5 days; P = 0.03) and a higher likelihood for postoperative complications (odds ratio 5.3; P = 0.002). With a median of 9.8 years of follow up, splenectomy patients tended to have greater all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.6; P = 0.07), although this difference approached statistical significance.ConclusionsIatrogenic splenectomy is a rare complication during nephrectomy and is associated with locally advanced tumors (≥pT3). It also carries prognostic significance for adverse perioperative outcomes and possibly diminished survival, although this warrants further study.
Margin mapping in transoral surgery for head and neck cancer
Hinni, Michael L., Zarka, Matthew A., Hoxworth, Joseph M. , Hoxworth, Joseph M

Mayo Clinic

The Laryngoscope | February 4, 2013 | Volume: 123 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1190-1198

10.1002/lary.23900 | PMID 23382042 Get It

Objectives/HypothesisTo evaluate the results of patients treated by transoral laser microsurgery and margin mapping with attention to deep margin dimensions in the lateral pharyngeal wall.Study DesignA microscopic margin analysis of multiblock surgical specimens applied to a prospectively accrued case series of squamous cell carcinoma of the palatine tonsils.MethodsThere were 128 tonsil cancers analyzed that were removed transorally, using microscopic margin mapping by surgeon and pathologist. The closest deep and peripheral margins were assessed. The results were then related to a study of the normal dimensions of the lateral pharyngeal wall in 20 healthy patients using magnetic resonance imaging. Outcome measures included number of positive margins, narrowest margin, local control, and disease‐free and overall survival.ResultsThe average closest margin was 1.98 mm (range, 0.30–6.50 mm) deep and 2.82 mm (range, 1.00–5.00 mm) peripheral. There was one positive margin encountered in the previously untreated group (1%), and one local recurrence ultimately developed. Radiographic measures revealed a mean minimal thickness of the lateral pharyngeal wall musculature of 2.4 mm. With mean follow‐up of 4.3 years (range, 2–14 years), the 5‐year estimate for local control is 99%, disease‐free survival is 94.5%, and overall survival is 76%.ConclusionsMargin mapping achieves a low rate of positive margins and is associated with good local control. Based on lateral pharyngeal wall anatomy, wide margins are often unobtainable and may be unnecessary so long as the final inked margin is clear.Level of Evidence4.
A Proposed Model to Study Immunologic Changes during Chronic Rhinosinusitis Exacerbations: Data from a Pilot Study
Rank, Matthew A. , Hagan, John B., Samant, Shefali, Kita, Hirohito , Kita, H

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy | January 31, 2013 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 98-101

10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3850 | PMID 23562196 Get It

Background One way to gain insight into the pathophysiology of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is to study the immunologic changes that occur with exacerbation. This study describes the immunologic changes during CRS exacerbation Methods We performed a prospective study to investigate the immunologic changes seen during exacerbation of CRS with nasal polyposis. We recruited adult subjects who met clinical criteria for CRS with sinus CT scan within the past 5 years with Lund-Mackay score of >5 and nasal polyps. Subjects underwent a baseline visit with collection of nasal secretion and nasal wash. With acute worsening of symptoms, subjects underwent 6 near-consecutive-day collections and one follow-up collection 2 weeks later. IL-6, IL-33, eosinophil major basic protein (MBP), eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and uric acid were measured on the nasal samples from each visit. Results A total of 10 subjects were recruited and 9 had acute worsening of CRS during the study period. Eight of the nine subjects were women and ages ranged from 26 to 56 years. At baseline, most inflammatory parameters were low and eight of the nine subjects were on intranasal corticosteroids. Compared with baseline measurements, IL-6, MBP, MPO, EDN, and uric acid were significantly elevated during CRS exacerbation. Levels of IL-6 and MBP (r = 0.47) levels as well as IL-6 and MPO (r = 0.75) were both significantly correlated (p < 0.01). Conclusion Prospective study of CRS exacerbations is feasible and provides insights into the immunologic mechanisms of CRS.