Citations

e13156 Background: Breast Cancer (BC) patients are classified as HER2-positive (IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+) or HER2-negative (IHC0, IHC1+ and 2+/ISH-). Within the HER2-negative category, patients who meet HER2-low (IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH-) criteria can benefit from HER2 targeted therapy like trastuzumab deruxtecan. Patients who meet IHC0 criteria with incomplete and faint membrane staining in >0 but ≤10% of tumor cells — defined as “HER2 Ultra-low”, may also benefit from HER2 targeted therapy. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” expression based on re-scored HER2 IHC biopsy slides. Methods: This study utilized EHR data from all three US Mayo Clinic campuses. A total of 300 patients with advanced BC (stages III-IV), and clinically documented HER2 IHC0 status between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023, were identified. One biopsy slide per patient (IHC assay: VENTANA Pathway anti-HER2/neu (4B5) rabbit monoclonal primary antibody) was digitized and scanned at 40x magnification. Two Mayo Clinic pathologists independently scored and reported HER2 status according to 2023 ASCO-CAP guidelines and included tumor stain percentage for each slide. Patients were considered “HER2 Ultra-Low” if their slide was scored as IHC0 with >0% but ≤10% staining. Cohen’s κ was used to quantify agreement between pathologists. Results: The re-scored patients (n=300) had a mean age of 57.8 years (SD=13.5), with ~97% having IHC0 documentation within 30 days of the reviewed biopsy slide. A total of 285 (95%) patients remained classified as IHC0 by at least one pathologist. Of these, 60% (n=171) were determined as “HER2 Ultra-low” by at least one pathologist. The rate of “HER2 Ultra-Low” per pathologist ranged from 43% (n=121) to 45% (n=104). The overall inter-pathologist concordance was 57%; patients with no observable HER2 IHC staining accounted for majority of the concordant patients (Table). Conclusions: About 3 in 5 advanced BC patients originally classified as HER2 IHC0 met the “HER2 Ultra-Low” criteria by at least one pathologist, implying that significant number of additional patients may benefit from HER2 targeted therapy. The relatively low concordance between HER2 expert pathologists in identifying lower levels of HER2 expression suggests the need for increased precision enabled by digital tools, leveraging AI, training for community practice pathologists, and continuing to follow best practice recommendations in determining HER2 IHC status. [Table: see text]

e12641 Background: Many promising agents or combinations regimens relevant to breast cancer lack sufficient clinical information for use in the neoadjuvant setting. To enable acceleration of drug development by reducing time and cost of clinical trial planning and conduct, the Phase I initiative PRE-ISPY Program was created. Methods: The PRE-ISPY Program is built within the I-SPY network, with the overall aim to streamline the regulatory pathway and the processes of trial design, contracting, activation, enrollment, execution, data gathering and analysis, as well as reporting of new therapeutic agents or combinations of relevance to breast cancer. Results: The PRE-ISPY trial is an open-label platform phase IB study designed to evaluate compelling single agent or combination regimens with the overall goal of moving promising drug regimens into I-SPY2 Trial and/or into other oncology-based trials in a timely manner. Graduation of a PRE-ISPY regimen to I-SPY2 is not mandatory. The primary objectives in each study Arm are to determine safety and to obtain preliminary efficacy data of the new regimen in patients with metastatic cancer, including a cohort of breast cancer patients. Each Arm may contain a Part 1 (dose finding) and a Part 2 (dose expansion). The new treatment can be tested also in patients with other solid malignancies than breast cancer, in which the treatment may be applicable, as specified in the design of the Arm. A breast cancer specific cohort is required in Part 2. Candidate treatment regimens are selected with advice from the I-SPY2 Agent Selection Working Group. The PRE-ISPY/Phase IB trial has multiple ongoing drug regimen Arms subsequently added as new protocol appendices through amendments to a Master protocol. There is no randomization; participants are enrolled, and treatment selected according to the relevance of therapy to their disease. Prospective companion biomarkers are evaluated. The current arms under study are PRE1: ALX-148 combined with trastuzumab deruxtecan; PRE2: tucatinib combined with zanidatamab; and PRE3: vidutolimod combined with cemiplimab. Selected agents or therapeutic combinations are tested through this protocol in the I-SPY Network Centers that participate in the PRE-ISPY Program. Toxicities are graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Clinical responses are evaluated based on RECIST v1.1 criteria. Conclusions: Once safety is established, promising regimens can be rapidly transitioned to I-SPY 2.2 or other phase 2/3 trials. The first patient was enrolled on 2/1/2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05868226 .

e23536 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has gained prominence as a potential indirect marker for minimal residual disease (MRD) in various cancers, including soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Previous studies have suggested that indirect hematologic ratios – such as Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Monocyte-Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR), Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), and Eosinophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (ELR) may correlate with worse outcomes. We sought to evaluate the correlation of NLR, MLR, PLR and ELR in a real world cohort of Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) and Hispanics (H) with advanced STS. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review at Dignity Health Cancer institute using our Electronic Medical Records (EMR) and Signatera™ assay to obtain our data points. Inclusion criteria were STS patients of all ages and stages of disease with complete records. We reviewed 33 patient charts, 14 NHW and 19 H patients. Of the NHW population, 11 were male (M) and 3 females (F). For the H population, 14 were M, and 5 were F. We utilized Spearman's rank correlation coefficient to assess monotonic relationships between ct-DNA levels and the hematologic ratios. ct-DNA was quantified through standardized assays per Protocol, with the resultant values treated as continuous variables in our statistical analyses. Power considerations, based on expected effect sizes and type I error rate adjustments were performed. Results: The Spearman’s correlation coefficients and p-values indicated varied associations across ethnic groups. For NHW, the correlations were generally weak and non-significant (NLR: r = 0.18, p = 0.54; MLR: r = -0.04, p = 0.89; PLR: r = 0.35, p = 0.21; ELR: r = 0.001, p = 1.00). Conversely, in the Hispanic cohort, stronger and statistically significant correlations were observed, particularly with NLR (r = 0.78, p < 0.0001) and MLR (r = 0.70, p < 0.001). Overall, the correlations across the entire study population did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: This study revealed notable racial variations, particularly in the H population, in the relationship between ctDNA levels and hematologic ratios. The noteworthy associations found with NLR (r = 0.78, p < 0.0001) and MLR (r = 0.70, p < 0.001) highlight the possible usefulness of these ctDNA and these indirect biomarkers in assessing disease status in STS. These findings suggest the possibility of using hematologic ratios, particularly in the Hispanic population, as markers of disease progression similar as ctDNA. Hematologic ratios are more easily accessible to the general population compared to ctDNA in many underserved countries and communities. Future studies with larger cohorts are need to further analyze its validity.

e23535 Background: Our study aims to examine the relationship between the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in patients diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). There is emerging yet limited data on the applicability of ctDNA in STS. LDH is a cheaper readily available test that has been associated with unfavorable overall survival in different malignancies. This research aims to understand the correlation between ctDNA and LDH as a tool to assess its utility as indirect markers of response to treatment in STS. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective chart review on patients diagnosed with STS. Eligibility criteria included a confirmed diagnosis and available measurements of both ctDNA and LDH levels. Correlation was compared between Non-hispanic whites (NHW) and Hispanics (H). Data was sourced from our electronic medical record and Signatera™ assay to obtain the primary endpoints. Specimens were standardized in accordance to Natera’s™ specifications. Study endpoints included the correlation coefficients between ctDNA and LDH levels. A two-stage study design was applied for a robust analysis. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (denoted as r) was employed for statistical analysis, assessing the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between ctDNA and LDH levels. Marker values were treated as continuous variables in these analyses. All analyses were executed in GraphPad Prism software. Results: The cohort comprised 33 patients with STS (14 NHW, 19 H). The median LDH in H was 189 (interquartile range (IQR) = 184) vs 184 (IQR = 105) in NHW. Comparatively, the median ctDNA in H was 0 (IQR = 39.3) and also 0 (IQR = 11.1) in NHW. The overall correlation between ctDNA and LDH levels was moderate positive (r = 0.5, p = 0.002), indicating a consistent, though not necessarily linear, relationship. Subgroup analysis showed r = 0.19 (p = 0.52) in NHW and r = 0.43 (p = 0.1) in H groups, suggesting ethnic variability in the ctDNA-LDH correlation. These findings were statistically significant within the predefined confidence limits and probability values. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated a significant correlation between ctDNA levels and LDH in STS patients, implying that higher ctDNA may be associated with higher LDH levels. This association can lead clinicians in monitoring LDH more frequently as an indirect marker of response to treatment in STS. This correlation suggests an increased tumor burden with a higher inflammatory response, with variations across different racial groups. The wider availability of LDH testing compared to ctDNA in many centers highlights LDH's potential as an indirect marker for STS. Further research with larger prospective cohorts is essential to confirm LDH's role paired with ctDNA in guiding treatment decisions in STS, enhancing its utility in clinical practice.

e23534 Background: The use of tumor genomic profile (TGP) has led to improved genomic-directed therapies in many solid cancers. Due to its heterogeneity, soft tissues sarcomas (STS) have not benefited much from these genomic advances. Emerging research indicates that about 30% STS have actionable alterations which can lead to potential treatment options (Gounder et al. Nature 2022). Our study aimed to compare the differences in genomic-directed therapy between Non-Hispanic White (NHW) and Hispanic (H) patients with STS at Dignity Health Cancer Institute. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records using the electronic medical record. Our study specifically examined patients diagnosed with STS, with a sample size of 14 NHW and 19 H individuals.The eligibility criteria consisted of known diagnosis of STS with completed TGP. We conducted a descriptive analysis using GraphPad Prism Software, where mutations were evaluated as continuous variables. The statistical significance of differences between groups was assessed using an unpaired t-test, with a significance level of < 0.05. Results: We found 73 tumor alterations, with 11 potentially targetable (15.2%). Most patients had negative to low tumor mutational burden (0-2 mut/Mb) with only 2 patients with high TMB ( > 10 mut/Mb). The most common mutations were TP53 and CDK4 with 9 patients (12%) each. The NHW group had an average of 2.57 mutations (standard deviation = 2.87), whereas the H group had an average of 1.42 mutations (standard deviation = 1.35). The median values were 2 and 1, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.21). The average for mutations of unknown significance was 1.54 in NHW individuals, while it was 1.00 in Hispanics. In the NHW group showed 11 males and 3 females, while the H group included 14 males and 5 females. There was no significant difference in gender representation between the two groups (p = 1). 3 patients (9%) received non-FDA approved treatments based on TGP (1 CDKN2A-abemaciclib, 1 CDK4-ribociclib and 1 IDH1-ivosidenib) and 2 patients (6.6%) were enrolled in clinical trials. Conclusions: Our investigation reveals that there is no statistically significant disparity in the frequency of mutations between NHW and H groups in our sample. Nevertheless, there was an evident inclination towards an increased frequency of mutations in NHW. Similarly, the occurrence of mutations with uncertain significance was slightly higher in NHWs, although the difference was not statistically significant. Only a minority of patients had targetable mutations or were enrolled in clinical trials. However, the routine use of genomic profiles may lead to more personalized treatments. Our research emphasizes the need to expand the use of comprehensive genomic profiles to increase directed treatments for patients with STS.

e23533 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown promise as a biomarker for cancer detection and tracking in multiple malignancies like melanoma, colon and lung. Due to the heterogeneity of sarcoma, there has been limited research on ctDNA as a tool for measuring minimal residual disease (MRD). Differences in baseline in ctDNA for STS in racial minorities have been poorly studied. To identify potential racial differences in the efficacy of this tool, this study compares the quantitative values of baseline ctDNA between non-Hispanic white (NHW) and Hispanic (H) patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Methods: The medical records of 33 STS patients who had ctDNA analysis from Natera™ were examined retrospectively at Dignity Health Cancer Institute.There were 19 H patients and 14 NHW patients in the group. All Black (B), Asian (A), and Other (O) racial groups were excluded due to lower numbers. GraphPad Prism software was used to examine the baseline ctDNA levels. Using continuous measures for statistical analysis, we conducted descriptive statistics and determined the mean, standard deviation, and median ctDNA levels for each group. The ctDNA levels were compared between groups using a two-tailed t-test with a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: The average ctDNA levels were 416.675 (standard deviation = 1349.394) in NHW and 300.305 (standard deviation = 1000.543) in H. The median levels were 0 for both groups. The statistical analysis showed that there was no significant differences in the baseline ctDNA levels between the two groups (p = 0.73). Furthermore, the gender distribution among NHW and Hs in the cohort was comparable, with a p-value of 1.00. Conclusions: This study establishes that there is no substantial differences in baseline levels of ctDNA between H and NHW patients with STS. These findings indicate that ctDNA levels in these populations can be equally utilized for diagnostic and monitoring reasons in clinical settings. Nevertheless, to gain a comprehensive understanding of the racial disparities in ctDNA utility and its implications in customized treatment for STS, it is necessary to conduct more extensive research with larger sample sizes and incorporate additional variables.

e23526 Background: Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic factors have been implicated in the variability of survival rates among soft tissue sarcoma (STS). These disparities are multifactorial and may reflect differences in disease biology, access to care, treatment responses, and others. In situations where different racial groups have equitable access to healthcare, healthcare disparities can decrease, and survival gaps can narrow. Differences in survival in STS in racial minorities have been poorly studied. Recognizing the potential impact of such disparities, our study thereby contributes to the ongoing discourse on healthcare equity in STS outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 30 STS patients, stratifying them into Hispanic (H) and non-Hispanic white (NHW) groups at Dignity Health Cancer Institute in Phoenix, Arizona. The Mann-Whitney U test was chosen to compare survival distributions, given the non-normal distribution of our sample. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was applied to determine statistical significance. All analyses were executed in GraphPad Prism software. Results: Our cohort comprised 13 (43%) NHW and 17 (57%) H patients. The mean ages were 57.2 years for NHW and 48.9 years for H, with a balanced gender distribution across groups. The most common subtypes of STS in NHW were liposarcoma (n = 3, 23.1%), and spindle cell carcinoma (n = 2,15.4%). Comparatively, the most common subtypes of STS in H were liposarcoma (n = 5, 29.4%) and leiomyosarcoma (n = 3, 17.6%). All patients were diagnosed with Stage 4 STS. Treatment modalities differed marginally, with NHW patients undergoing more surgical interventions, while H patients were more frequently administered chemotherapy. Median overall survival from the start of first-line therapy was 412 days for NHW and 500 days for H patients. Despite the longer median overall survival observed in Hispanics, the intergroup difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.68). Conclusions: The similar survival times between H and NHW STS patients at our institution may hint at an equitable provision of care across racial demographics in a relatively controlled single-center experience. However, the trend of extended survival in the Hispanic group, while not statistically confirmed, raises questions that merit further inquiry. This study serves as a preliminary exploration into racial disparities in STS, advocating for larger-scale research with more diverse patient populations. Further studies are essential to understand these findings and identify and optimize factors contributing to narrowing the survival gap in minorities, with the goal of enhancing STS prognosis for all racial groups.

Abstract The ACE-536-MF-001 trial enrolled patients with myelofibrosis (n = 95) into 4 cohorts: patients in cohorts 1 and 3A were non–transfusion dependent (NTD) and had anemia; patients in cohorts 2 and 3B were transfusion dependent (TD); and patients in cohort 3A/3B had stable ruxolitinib treatment before and during the study. All patients received luspatercept (1.0-1.75 mg/kg, 21-day cycles). Treatment was extended if clinical benefit was observed at day 169. The primary end point was anemia response rate (NTD, ≥1.5 g/dL hemoglobin increase from baseline; TD, transfusion-independence) over any 12-week period during the primary treatment period (weeks 1-24). Overall, 14% of patients in cohorts 1 and 3A, 10% in cohort 2, and 26% in cohort 3B met the primary end point. In cohorts 1 and 3A (NTD), 27% and 50% of patients, respectively, had mean hemoglobin increase of ≥1.5 g/dL from baseline. Among TD patients, ∼50% had ≥50% reduction in transfusion burden. Reduction in total symptom score was observed in all cohorts, with the greatest response rate seen in cohort 3A. Overall, 94% of patients had ≥1 adverse event (AE); 47% had ≥1 treatment-related AE (TRAE; 11% grade ≥3), most frequently hypertension (18%), managed with medical intervention. One patient had a serious TRAE leading to luspatercept discontinuation. Nine patients died on treatment (unrelated to study drug). In most patients, ruxolitinib dose and spleen size remained stable. In patients with myelofibrosis, luspatercept improved anemia and transfusion burden across cohorts; the safety profile was consistent with previous studies. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03194542.

Abstract Background Use of anti-carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (anti-CRE) agents such as ceftazidime/avibactam has been associated with improved clinical outcome in cohorts that primarily include patients infected with CRE that are resistant to meropenem (MCRE). Objectives To clarify whether patients with CRE resistant to ertapenem but susceptible to meropenem (ertapenem-only-resistant Enterobacterales; EORE) benefit from therapy with anti-CRE agents. Methods Patients treated for CRE infection in hospitals in the USA between 2016 and 2019 and enrolled in the CRACKLE-2 study were included. The primary outcome was the desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) assessed at 30 days after index cultures. Results The EORE group included 213 patients and the MCRE group included 643. The demographics were similar between the groups except for the patients’ race and origin before admission. The MCRE group received anti-CRE agents for definitive therapy significantly more frequently compared with the EORE group (30% versus 5% for ceftazidime/avibactam). We did not observe a significant difference between the groups in the adjusted DOOR probability of a more desirable outcome for a randomly selected patient in the EORE group compared with the MCRE group (52.5%; 95% CI, 48.3%–56.7%). The MCRE group had a similar proportion of patients who died at 30 days (26% versus 21%) and who were discharged to home (29% versus 40%), compared with the EORE group. Conclusions Patients with clinical EORE infection rarely received anti-CRE agents, but attained similar outcomes compared with patients with MCRE infection. The findings support current IDSA treatment guidance for meropenem- or imipenem-based therapy for treatment of EORE infections.