Normalization of the Serum Free Light Chain (FLC) Ratio Is Associated with Superior Overall Survival among Myeloma Patients Achieving Immunofixation Negative State: Results Support Incorporation of Serum FLC Ratio in Stringent CR Definition.
Abstract Background: Traditionally response to therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) is based on changes in the serum and urine monoclonal protein by immunoelectrophoresis. Immunofixation allows for detection of small amounts of monoclonal protein that cannot be quantitated on immunoelectrophoresis. Serum immunoglobulin free light chain (FLC) assay allows for detection of unbound kappa and lambda free light chain and has allowed disease measurement in patients with oligosecretory myelomas and can potentially allow detection of low levels of tumor burden, below the threshold of the standard tests. We examined this hypothesis in patients who had obtained a negative immunofixation in serum and urine following treatment of their MM. Methods: For the purposes of the study, we included selected patients with MM who had measurable monoclonal (M) protein levels at baseline (defined as >1 gm/dL in the serum or >200 mg/24 hour in the urine or involved free light chain > 10 mg/dL) on protein electrophoresis; patients with non-secretory and oligo-secretory myeloma were excluded. We then identified patients who since 1995 had a negative immunofixation in the serum and urine, all done at the same time (within 30 days of each other). Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics; date of diagnosis, last follow up, and follow up status; serum and urine M protein levels at diagnosis; and results of serum and urine immunofixation, and serum free light chain (FLC) ratio within 30 days of the immunofixation were all collected from the existing databases. Results: Eighty-four patients met the criteria for the study, all of whom had measurable disease at baseline and subsequently achieved negative immunofixation in serum and urine. Among these, 46 patients (55%) also had a normal FLC ratio (K/L ratio; 0.26–1.65). Th median time from diagnosis to the documented immunofixation was 7.5 months (range, 1–157). The median overall survival from diagnosis among those with a normal FLC ratio along with negative immunofixation was not reached compared to 76 months for those with abnormal FLC ratio, P = 0.02. The median overall survival from the documentation of negative immunofixation was not reached for the group with normal FLC ratio compared to 46.5 months for those with an abnormal FLC, P = 0.03. Conclusion: Attainment of a normal FLC ratio at the time of serum and urine immunofixation negative status identifies a group of patients with better outcome. The presence of an abnormal FLC ratio likely represents persistence of the clonal population that is secreting none or very small amounts of monoclonal protein. The data presented here supports the inclusion of FLC measurements as part of response criteria for MM as has been done for the definition of stringent CR in the IMWG response criteria. Figure: Overall survival from diagnosis in patients with or with out a normal FLC ratio at the time of serum and urine immunofixation. Figure:. Overall survival from diagnosis in patients with or with out a normal FLC ratio at the time of serum and urine immunofixation.
A Multidisciplinary Quality Initiative for Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Outpatient Transplant with Low Therapy Related Mortality
Abstract Introduction: The Bone Marrow Transplant Program at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) developed a multidisciplinary approach (involving physicians, nurses, pharmacists, dietitians, and financial specialists) for outpatient management of patients undergoing stem cell transplantation. This approach uses an electronic ordering system for diagnostic tests and chemotherapy to minimize medical errors. Table. Patient Characteristics (N=716) Characteristic Value Male, no. of patients (%) 426 (59) Age, median (IQR), y 59 (53–65) Creatinine, median (IQR), mg/dL 1.0 (0.9–1.2) b2-Microglobulin, median (IQR), mcg/mL 2.5 (1.9–3.7) Gammopathies, no. of patients (%) Measured by serum immunofixation or immunoelectrophoresis IgA 148 (21) IgG 414 (58) IgM 6 (1) IgD 12 (2) Light chain 83 (12) Biclonal 6 (1) None 47 (7) Measured by urine immunofixation or immunoelectrophoresis k light chain 402 (56) l light chain 226 (32) Biclonal 1 (0) None 79 (11) Not performed (anuric) 8 (1) Status at stem cell transplant, no. of patients (%) Untreated 4 (1) Plateau 436 (61) Primary refractory 113 (16) Relapse after therapy 93 (13) Relapse during therapy 70 (10) Characteristic Value CD34+ cells, median (IQR), ×106/kg Collected, no. 10.0 (7.6–12.6) Infused, no. 4.7 (3.9–6.2) Sessions of apheresis, median (IQR) 3 (2–5) Engraftment, median (IQR), days after transplantation Neutrophils, 0.5×109/L 13 (12–15) Platelets, 50×109/L 16 (14–22) Duration of hospitalization, median (IQR), d 4 (0–10) Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range. Results: During a 45-month period after implementation of the program (2005-Sept 2007), the day-100 survival rate was 99.5% for low-risk myeloma patients (transplantation during first plateau; n=202) and 97% for high-risk myeloma patients (refractory, relapsing or second or greater plateau; n=71). The overall day-100 survival rate was 99%(270/273). Analysis of hospitalization trends since inception of the program showed that 39% of patients completed the transplant procedure as outpatients. The median duration of hospitalization for all patients was 4 days; age and serum creatinine levels were predictive of the need for and duration of hospitalization Conclusion: Outpatient stem cell transplantation is feasible for patients with multiple myeloma with a therapy mortality of 1%. Nearly 40% of our patients completed the procedure without hospitalization. Age and serum creatinine levels predicted a higher likelihood of hospitalization. Implementation of out patient transplant requires affordable housing in the community since many third party payers do not support hotel costs despite the reduction of hospital days. The hospital physical plant and patient registration process has to support use of designated hospital rooms for purely out patient practice. The transplant team must have process owners to standardize across all disease categories collection protocols, conditioning regimens, infusion SOP’s and post infusion supportive care guidelines for standard antibiotics, narcotics, laboratory work and transfusion thresholds. A care team meeting between physicians, nursing, dietary, pharmacy, business office, data base and appointment coordinators is essential to coordinate all the multidisciplinary efforts. Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of age greater than or less than or equal to 65 years Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of age greater than or less than or equal to 65 years Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of creatinine greater than or equal to or less than 1.5mg/dL Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of creatinine greater than or equal to or less than 1.5mg/dL
Effect of Venous Thrombotic Events on Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma: Analysis of Thrombotic Events Occurring in E4A03A Randomized Trial of Lenalidomide Plus High-Dose Dexamethasone (RD) Versus Lenalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) in Newly D
Abstract Background: Venous thrombotic events (VTE) are a common complication of therapy with the lenalidomide plus dexamethasone regimen. The incidence of VTE with RD is approximately 20%, and can be lowered with the use of effective thromboprophylaxis, avoidance of erythropoietin, and the use of lower doses of dexamethasone. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of VTE on overall survival of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma by studying events occurring in ECOG E4A03 phase III trial of lenalidomide plus high (standard) dose dex (RD) versus lenalidomide plus low dose dex (Rd) in newly diagnosed myeloma (MM). Methods: Pts with untreated, symptomatic MM were eligible. Pts in the RD arm (Arm A) received lenalidomide 25 mg/day PO days 1–21 every 28 days plus dex 40 mg days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20 PO every 28 days; pts in the Rd arm (Arm B) received lenalidomide at the same dose plus dex 40 mg days 1, 8, 15, and 22 PO every 28 days. The trial initially did not mandate routine thromboprophylaxis, but recommended that such treatment be considered. After the first 264 patients were enrolled the trial was amended to require mandatory thromboprophylaxis of aspirin for all patients, with a recommendation to use stronger thromboprophylaxis with either warfarin (target INR 2–3) or low molecular weight heparin among patients in the RD arm. Results: 445 pts (median age, 65 yrs) were accrued; 223 randomized to RD, 222 to Rd. Median follow-up time is 30 months. Overall VTE including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred in 18.5% of patients; 25.6% in Arm A and 11.4% in Arm B. Rates for the first 4 cycles of treatment were 20.2% in Arm A and 8.2% in Arm B, P<0.01. Rates did not change substantially before and after the prophylaxis amendment. A partial response (PR) or higher was seen in 82.1% of pts who experienced VTE compared with 74.6% of pts who did not experience VTE, P=0.19. Overall VGPR rates also were not inferior. Pts who had VTE, however, had significantly higher other grade 3–5 toxicities such as hyperglycemia (14.6% vs 7.5%, P=0.051), cardiac ischemia (4.9% vs 0.8%, P=0.002), non-neuropathic weakness (13.4% vs 6.4%, P=0.039), infection/pneumonia (17.1% vs 11.1%, P=0.138) and fatigue (18.3% vs 10.5%, P=0.060). In a Cox PH model, VTE status as a time-varying covariate was marginally significant: HR 1.54 95%CI (0.96–2.47), P=0.074, suggesting patients that develop VTE have a higher hazard of death. Conclusions: The occurrence of VTE may adversely affect the survival of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma receiving Rev-Dex. VTE was associated with a higher frequency of other serious adverse events. Prevention of VTE events is a priority. Besides lowering the dose of dexamethasone, studies investigating optimum thromboprophylaxis are needed.
Melphalan and Dexamethasone Is Less Effective for Patients with Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis (AL) with High Bone Marrow Plasmacytosis.
Abstract Introduction: Currently, the most extensively tested treatments for immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) are high dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and melphalan and dexamethasone (MDex). A recent randomized controlled trial comparing the two regimens showed MDex is at least equivalent if not superior to ASCT. Most patients with symptomatic systemic AL have a low plasma cell load; however, approximately 30% have bone marrow plasmacytosis greater than 20% but do not meet criteria for multiple myeloma with significant anemia or lytic bone disease. This leads to the speculation that the plasma cell biology (and therefore outcomes) might differ between low and high plasma cell burden AL. We undertook this study to address whether these two standard regimens are equally effective in AL patients with low and high plasma cell burden. Methods: Patients with confirmed AL treated with MDex were recruited for this study. Some of the patients treated were not ASCT candidates while others were eligible but favored MDex. Hematologic response was defined as 50% reduction in serum M-protein or 90% reduction in urine M-protein if one was present, otherwise a 50% reduction in serum free light chain levels was used. Organ involvement was defined according to the Consensus Opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis. Patients were separated into a high and a low marrow plasma cells (PC) group based on their percentage of bone marrow plasma cells. Cutoff for the bone marrow plasmacytosis was calculated using receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier method. OS was also calculated for 342 AL patients treated with ASCT for comparison. Results: Seventy-three patients with AL received MDex between 05/01 and 05/07. Median follow-up was 16.8 months. At the time of the study, 42.5% had died. Calculating for OS and PFS, the best cutoff for bone marrow plasmacytosis was found to be 20%. In our cohort, 28.8% had >20% bone marrow plasmacytosis. Age (64.8 yr vs 61.0 yr, p = 0.61) and sex (81% male vs 63.4% male, p = 0.13) were similarly distributed between patients with high and low PC. Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) was also comparable between the 2 groups (0.03 ng/ml (high) vs 0.06 ng/ml (low), p = 0.41). Cardiac involvement were similar between high and low PC groups (78.9% vs 85.7% respectively, p = 0.49) but renal involvement was less common in the high PC group (70.6% vs 38.1%, p = 0.01). No differences were noted in the gastrointestinal and neurological involvement. Patients with high PC received a median of 4 cycles of MDex vs 5 in the low PC group (p = 0.68). Hematologic response was achieved in 75% of patients with high PC and 54.9% of the low’s (p = 0.11). A significant difference was noted in the PFS and OS between the 2 groups. The PFS and OS were 13.5m and 15.3m, respectively for patients with high PC but neither was reached in those with < 20% plasmacytosis (p=0.02 and p = 0.03 respectively). In the multivariate analysis, hematologic response, cardiac involvement and plasmacytosis >20% were independent predictors of PFS and OS. To determine if plasmacytosis had the same affect on survival of ASCT treated patients, 342 patients were analyzed. No relationship between OS and % of plasmacytosis was found. Conclusion: Our study suggests that ASCT and MDex may not be equivalent for all AL patients. Even though hematologic response rates were similar, patients with plasmacytosis >20% had a worse OS and PFS when treated with MDex. This disparity in survival was not evident in patients treated with ASCT. This effect was independent of cardiac involvement. If confirmed, this could have a significant impact on the choice of therapy for AL patients. The best therapy may be determined by the extent of marrow plasmacytosis, with higher plasma cells favoring high dose therapy.
Response Duration with Initial Therapy Is a Major Predictor of Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma: Analysis from Multiple Phase III ECOG Clinical Trials
Abstract Background: Outcome of patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) is influenced by a variety of baseline prognostic factors, most importantly presence of chromosomal abnormalities. Nevertheless, these biologically determined risk-factors do not account for a significant subset of patients whose outcome varies greatly from what one expects based on the underlying prognostic characteristics. We have previously demonstrated that outcome in myeloma is dictated not only by baseline risk-factors but also response to therapy (R2, risk and response dependent outcome). We studied response duration following initial therapy as a prognostic factor for long-term overall survival in myeloma in three ECOG clinical trials that enrolled patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Methods: Data from three studies with long-term, mature follow up were analyzed: E9486, E5A93, and E1A00. The regimens used in these studies included Thalidomide/Dex, Dex, VBMCP, VBMCP + alpha-IFN, and VBMCP + Cyclophosphamide. Among progressed/relapsed patients, the association between time to progression and overall survival since relapse was explored using Cox proportional hazards model, in which time to progression was analyzed as a continuous variable. In addition, the association between response duration and overall survival since relapse was explored similarly among relapsed responders. Treatment effect and calendar time of diagnosis have been adjusted in the model. Also, to determine the best cut off point associated with the best differentiation of patients with short OS after relapse, an outcome-oriented method using log likelihood value was applied. Results: Among the 1136 patients enrolled in the three studies, 625 patients who have documented disease relapse have been included in the current study. Of these, 471 patients had responded to the treatment before relapse. Only 33 patients are alive as of Dec., 2007. For all 625 patients, the time to progression (continuous variable) was significantly associated with overall survival from the time of relapse/progression (P<0.0001), with hazard ratio of 0.77 (95%CI: 0.72~0.81) at time to progression increasing by 1 year (i.e., the later the progression/relapse, the lower the risk). The best cutoff point of the time to progression is 3 yrs (the 75th percentile). The hazard ratio of patients progressing within 3 yrs since randomization vs. after 3 yrs is 2.4 (95% CI: 1.9 ~ 2.9) and P-value<0.0001. The median OS from relapse was 0.96 years for the former vs. 2.43 years in the latter group (Figure). Among the 471 relapsed responders, the response duration (continuous variable) was also significantly associated with overall survival since relapse (P<0.0001), with hazard ratio of 0.76 (95%CI: 0.70~0.81) at response duration increasing by 1 year (i.e., the longer the response duration, the lower the risk). The effects seen with each regimen are detailed in the table. The best cutoff point of the response duration is 2 yrs (median). The hazard ratio of patients with response duration less than or equal to 2 yrs vs. more than 2 yrs is 2.1 (95% CI: 1.7 ~ 2.6) and P-value<0.0001. Conclusions: Among patients treated with alkylator based therapy, the duration of response from the initial therapy is an important predictor of the subsequent outcome among patients with myeloma. Given the heterogeneity of the disease and imprecise predictive ability of the known baseline prognostic factors, the duration of response to initial therapy should be taken into account, to deliver risk and response-adapted therapy. The prognostic value of this feature across different clinical trials, points towards the role of underlying disease biology, both disease aggressiveness and ability to rapidly develop resistance to therapies as two important determinants of outcome. Table 1: Hazard ratio of overall survival since relapse for patients progressed within 3 yrs since randomization vs. after 3 yrs in each treatment arm Treatment arm Treatment arm HR (95% CI) P-value TTP<=3yrs vs. >3 yrs Thal/Dex N/A N/A Dex 0.4 (0.05, 3.9) 0.46 VBMCP(E5A93+ E9486) 1.9 (1.4, 2.7) 0.0001 VBMCP+alpha2IFN (E5A93+ E9486) 3.0 (2.2, 4.1) <0.0001 VBMCP+CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE 2.3 (1.5, 3.6) 0.0001 Response duration <=2 yrs vs. >2 yrs Thal/Dex 0.2 (0.003, 18.5) 0.51 Dex 0.15 (0.02, 0.98) 0.048 VBMCP(E5A93+ E9486) 1.7 (1.2, 2.3) 0.0009 VBMCP+alpha2IFN (E5A93+ E9486) 3.0(2.1, 4.3) <0.0001 VBMCP+CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE 2.1 (1.4, 3.3) 0.006 Figure 1: Overall survival since relapse between patients progressed within 3 yrs since randomization vs. after 3 yrs. Figure 1:. Overall survival since relapse between patients progressed within 3 yrs since randomization vs. after 3 yrs.
The Prevalence of Abnormal Coagulation Parameters in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Primary Systemic Amyloidosis and Its Impact on Outcome
Abstract Background: Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is an incurable plasma cell disorder associated with varying degree of organ infiltration with light chain derived amyloid protein and consequent organ dysfunction. Various acquired coagulopathies, predominantly Factor X (FX) deficiency have been previously described in AL. The factor deficiencies are thought to be due to the direct binding of blood coagulation proteins to amyloid fibrils. Little is known regarding the prognostic significance of abnormal coagulation parameters in AL patients (pts). Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval, we performed a retrospective review of the medical records of 625 consecutive pts who had presented within 3 months of a diagnosis of AL to be evaluated at Mayo Clinic from June 2001 to June 2006. 540 pts had coagulation studies performed within 2 months of presentation. 51 of those pts were on oral anticoagulation and were excluded from the analysis. Results: Of the 489 pts included in the analysis, the median age was 62 years and 61% were male. The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 26.8 months. Table 1 lists the prevalence of abnormal coagulation tests in the remaining 489 patients. Prothrombin time (PT) was available in the majority of pts. 61 pts (12.6%) had elevated PT, and 63 pts (20.4%) had a decreased FX. 37 of the 61 pts with elevated PT had available FX levels, of which 31 (84%) of those had a decreased FX, suggesting that the cause of elevated PT was mostly due to a low FX. Indicators of hepatic involvement such as alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin levels were higher among the patients with prolonged PT and low FX. An elevated PT (more than 12.4 seconds) was strongly predictive of an adverse outcome, with a median OS of 8.7 months compared to a median OS of 29 months (p<0.0001) in pts with normal PT (Figure 1). Similarly, pts with decreased FX (less than 60% activity), was associated with significantly worse outcomes with a median OS of 14.9 months versus a median OS of 33 months (p<0.0001) in pts with normal FX (Figure 2). In a Cox proportional hazards model containing cardiac troponin (cTnT), NT-Pro BNP, serum alkaline phosphatase, and free light chain difference (involved minus uninvolved), prolonged PT or FX deficiency were independently prognostic for overall survival. Conclusion: Abnormalities of PT and FX are seen in a sizable proportion of pts with newly diagnosed AL. An elevated PT and or FX deficiency appear to adversely affect the outcome of these patients. It is likely that the elevated PT in these patients relate to FX deficiency in the majority which in turn may reflect the amyloid ‘burden’. The effect of other organ involvement like the hepatic involvement may also have an impact on FX and PT. Table 1. Prevalence of abnormal coagulation testing in patients with newly diagnosed primary systemic amyloidosis. Coagulation study N (Test results available) N of abnormal results (%) Elevated prothrombin time 486 61 12.6 Elevated activated partial thromboplastin time 312 48 15.4 Elevated thrombin time 315 84 26.7 Elevated fibrinogen 140 118 84.3 Decreased Factor II activity 62 26 41.9 Decreased Factor V activity 63 9 14.3 Decreased Factor VII activity 63 17 27 Decreased Factor X activity 309 63 20.4 Elevated D-dimer 130 72 55.4 Figure 1. Survival grouped by normal versus elevated Prothrombin time. Figure 1. Survival grouped by normal versus elevated Prothrombin time. Figure 2. Survival grouped by normal versus low Factor X levels. Figure 2. Survival grouped by normal versus low Factor X levels.
Phase II Study of Melphalan, Prednisone and Lenalidomide Combination for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Are Not Candidates for Stem Cell Transplantation
Abstract Melphalan (M), Prednisone (P) and Lenalidomide (R) are active in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). We evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of MPR in a phase I/II trial. Results of phase I part were previously reported (Blood2006, 108(11) abst 3558). M 5 mg/m2 on days (d) 1–4, 60 mg/m2 d 1–4 and R 10 mg d 1–21 of a 28 day cycle was determined as MTD for the phase II study. Methods: Patients with previously untreated MM who were not candidates for stem cell transplantation, age ≥18 yr, ECOG PS 0–3, evaluable or measurable disease, ANC >1500, platelets > 100,000 and creatinine ≤ 3.0 mg/dL were eligible. All patients received aspirin 325 mg/d as DVT prophylaxis. Routine antibacterial prophylaxis was not used. G/GM-CSF was used at the discretion of the treating physician for neutropenia. Response rate (RR), confirmed on two consecutive determinations was the primary end-point. The study had 90% power to detect a RR of at least 45%. Results: Twenty-six patients were accrued between July ’06 and Feb ’08. The median age was 74 y (64 – 87y), 17 (65%) were men. Six, 13, 6, 1 (23%, 50%, 23%, and 4%) patients had ECOG PS 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Three (12%), 11 (42%) and 10 (38%) patients were ISS stage 1, 2 and 3. A total of 106 cycles were administered; median 4.5 (1–13). Seventy-seven % patients experienced at least 1 grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Neutropenia (42%/8%) and thrombocytopenia (20%/8%) were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events followed by anemia (16%/0%), fatigue (8%/4%), rash (11%/0%), and hyperglycemia (4%/0%). There were 20 treatment delays in 9 patients, and 18 dose reductions (9 in R, 11 in M and 1 P) occurred in 7 patients, most commonly because of neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Eleven patients (42%) required G-CSF treatment. Eleven patients are currently receiving treatment; 15 have gone off study (4 completed per protocol, 3 refused, 3 adverse effects, 3 unrelated illnesses, 2 other). Median follow up of survivors is 8 m (0 – 22m). Eighteen (69 %; 95%CI 48–86) patients had a PR or better according to International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria; 3 (12 %) CR, 5 (19 %) VGPR and 10 (38%) PR. Median number of cycles before achieving a response was 2 (1 – 11). Median Progression Free and Overall Survival is 16.7m (95% CI 11.2–23.0), and 23 m (95% CI: 22 – 23), respectively. Conclusions: MPR combination is feasible with a manageable toxicity profile and has significant activity in the treatment of patients with MM who are not candidates for stem cell transplant, with an overall response rate of 69%, and a CR plus VGPR rate of 31%. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was the most common toxicity, seen in up to 50% of patients in this cohort of predominantly elderly patients. Dose reduction in R and/or M was required in 27% patients. No patient developed neuropathy or thromboembolic complications.
Long Term Follow-up of Patients with Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis Treated with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone.
Abstract Background: Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is an incurable plasma cell disorder. Lenalidomide, especially in conjunction with dexamethasone, has been shown to be highly active in patients with multiple myeloma. We previously reported a hematologic response rate of 41% and an organ response rate of 23% among 22 AL patients treated with lenalidomide and on-demand dexamethasone (Dispenzieri et al, Blood 2007). Long term outcomes of AL patients treated with lenalidomide have not yet been described. Methods: Thirty-seven patients were treated on an IRB approved treatment trial with single agent lenalidomide, starting doses of 25 mg in 22 and reduced dose of 15 mg in the last 15. If progression within or no evidence of hematologic response after 3 cycles, dexamethasone was added. Patients were classified according to cardiac biomarker stage (cut-offs for serum troponin T <0.035 ng/ml and NT-proBNP <332 pg/ml--Stage I neither above cutoff; Stage III, both above cut-off; and Stage II, any one above cut-off). Survival estimates were done according to the methods of Kaplan and Meier. Results: Median age was 64 years (range 44–88), with 70% male. Sixty-five percent of patients were previously treated, and the median time from diagnosis to study entry was 8.9 months (range 0.4–237). The biomarker staging breakdown was: I, 16%; II, 43%; and III, 41%. As of 7/11/08, 5 patients remain on active therapy. The overall hematologic response rate was 43% (1 CR and 15 PR), with only one patient responding to single agent lenalidomide, and the overall organ response rate was 20%. If one excludes the 13 patients who did not complete 3 months of therapy and have the opportunity of having dexamethasone added to their program, the respective hematologic and organ response rates were 62% and 32%. With a median follow-up of 33.6 months (range 14.4–42), twenty-two patients (59%) have died, but only 2 had deaths possibly related to treatment. Median duration of response, progression free survival and overall survival were 31 months, 14.8 months (95%CI: 5.7–28.1), and 18.8 months (95%CI: 11.7-not reached), respectively. Overall survival from diagnosis was 48 months (95%CI: 21.6–153.6). As shown in Table below, outcomes were dependent on underlying risk stratification and ability to stay on therapy. High risk patients were more likely to drop out early and less likely to respond. High risk patients had shorter OS All Patients Outcome Stage I Stage II Stage III p N 6 16 15 Survival from enrollment, mo NR 18.8 (11.7–33.6) 5.7 (3.2–18.3) 0.01 Survival from Diagnosis, mo NR 48.4 (20.4–62) 21.1 (11.2–31.7) 0.005 Progression Free Survival, mo 34.7 (33.7–NR) 18.3 (6.2–28.1) 4.4 (3–8.6) NS Drop out by cycle 4, % 17 31 60 NS Median # of cycles administered 31 6 3 0.04 Time to response, mo 6.2 (3.6–9.3) 6.4 (5.2–NR) 4.7 (3.8–NR) NS Hematologic response rate, % 83 38 27 0.05 Organ response rate, % 40 20 13 NS Duration of Response, mo NR 27.2 (13.6–NR) NR NS Subgroup analysis of patients receiving >3 cycles of therapy (i.e getting Len and Dex) N 5 12 7 Time on therapy, mo 35.2 8 10.5 Hematologic Response Rate, % 100 50 56 Organ response rate, % 50 27 25 Conclusions: Based on these data, single agent lenalidomide is not recommended for patients with AL; however, lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone can be associated with good progression free and overall survival rates, even among patients with relapsed or refractory disease.
Prognostic Impact of the Plasma Cell Labeling Index (LI) in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients Treated with Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (Thal/Dex) or Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (Len/Dex).
Abstract Background: The plasma cell labeling index (LI), a slide-based measure of the percentage of bone marrow plasma cells in the S-phase of cell cycle, is a powerful prognostic tool in multiple myeloma (MM). A high LI is a marker of poor outcome, and is a useful adjunct to cytogenetics and fluorescent in-situ hybridization to risk-stratify MM patients. It has been shown to provide additional prognostic information in International Staging System (ISS) stages 1 and 2 patients treated with conventional chemotherapy ± autologous stem cell transplantation. However, the impact of a high LI is not known in patients receiving novel agents that have been integrated into the current treatment paradigm of newly diagnosed MM. The objective of this study was to determine the value of LI in patients treated with thalidomide-dexamethasone (Thal/Dex) or lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Len/Dex). Patients and Methods : Data from 125 newly diagnosed MM patients enrolled in clinical trials with either thalidomide (200mg/d) plus dexamethasone (Thal-Dex; n=50), or lenalidomide (25 mg/d on days 1–21 of a 4-week cycle) plus dexamethasone (Len-Dex; n=75) as initial therapy, were utilized. Patients within both the studies were categorized into 2 LI groups based on baseline LI: high (≥1%) vs. low (<1%) LI. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Kaplan Meier method, and compared between the two LI groups within the Thal Dex and Len-Dex studies using log rank tests. Results : The median follow-up for patients on Thal-Dex and Len-Dex was 7.5 and 3 years, respectively. 36% (18/50) of patients in the Thal-Dex study and 35% (26/75) in the Len-Dex study had high LI. The baseline patient-characteristics, including age, stage (ISS), lactate dehydrogenase, calcium, hemoglobin and creatinine were comparable between the 2 studies. The median OS for patients receiving Thal-Dex was 4.7 years (95% CI 3.1–8.1); 2.3 years (95% CI 1.3–4.6) for patients with LI ≥1 compared to 6.9 years (95% CI: 3.9–NA) for those with LI <1 (P=0.02). The median OS for patients on Len-Dex was not reached for either the high or low LI group (P=0.80). The median PFS for all Thal-Dex patients was 1.7 years (95% CI: 1.4–3.1); 1.3 years (95% CI: 0.2–2.0) for patients with high LI vs.2.3 years (95% CI: 1.3–3.3) for patients with low LI; P = 0.01. The median PFS for Len-Dex patients was 2.6 years (95% CI: 1.8–3.1) years, and no significant difference was observed between the 2 LI groups, with PFS of 2.3 years (95% CI: 1.4–3.1) for patients with high LI, and 3.1 years for patients in the low LI group. Due to a shorter median follow-up of Len-Dex patients, a separate analysis censoring all patients in both the studies at 3 years was performed with similar results. Conclusion : LI remains a significant determinant of PFS and OS in newly diagnosed MM patients treated with Thal-Dex, with high baseline LI predicting poorer outcome. In contrast, during first 3 years of follow-up, the unfavorable prognostic effect of LI is not apparent with Len-Dex therapy, and longer follow-up is needed to determine if Len-Dex therapy overcomes the poor prognostic effect of high LI. Figure Figure
Immunoglobulin Variable Light Chain Restriction, Cytokine Expression and Plasma Cell-Stromal Cell Interactions in POEMS Syndrome Patients
Abstract POEMS syndrome is defined by the presence of peripheral neuropathy (P), organomegaly (O), endocrinopathy (E), monoclonal protein expression (M), and skin changes (S). In addition, patients also have sclerotic bone lesions, papilledema, extravascular volume overload, thrombocytosis, and restrictive lung disease/pulmonary hypertension. A striking but inexplicable feature of the clonal plasma cells in patients with POEMS is that they are virtually always lambda restricted. More surprising is that of the 81 functional immunoglobulin light-chain variable-region genes (IgVL) available in the plasma cell/B cell repertoire, among the 13 cases in which variable gene light chain usage has been reported, all have been either IgVL1-40 or IgVL1-44. The molecular mechanisms triggering the initiation and the progression of POEMS syndrome or the clonal expansion of plasma cells marking this condition remain unclear. We have analyzed the immunoglobulin heavy and light chains sequences in the plasma cells of POEMS patients at the Mayo Clinic Rochester. We found that in 8 out of the 9 patients tested, we could document heavy chain clonality in any given patient; however, no restriction of gene usage among patients was observed in the variable regions of these chains. In the case of light chains, in 14 out of 17 patients we could document not only clonality but also restriction of light chain variable gene usage to IgVL1-40 or IgVL1-44. Our goal is to understand the relevance of this restricted expression of light chain variable region, and its effect on the communication between plasma cells and the neighboring stromal cells that might provide more insight into the disease pathology. To this end, we are generating viral vector constructs that will harbor the germline or mutant versions of IgVλ1-40 and IgVλ1-44 genes and introduced into pre-established malignant plasma cell lines (i.e. myeloma cell lines). We will assay the effects of this over expression in terms of alterations in the expression of cytokines such as VEGF and TNF, and on plasma cell-stromal cell interaction (in a co-culture system). Results from these assays will be discussed.