Citations

Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients are at risk of splanchnic vein thromboses (SVT). Prior studies have failed to demonstrate a benefit of hydroxyurea therapy in preventing recurrent thrombosis after SVT, but are limited by small sample sizes and inability to account for starting, stopping, or switching of cytoreductive therapies. To better assess the impact of cytoreductive therapy on thrombosis recurrence, we performed a retrospective cohort study of MPN-SVT patients from the international GASTRO-MPN Consortium, treating cytoreductive therapy as a time-dependent covariate. We identified 757 patients, of which 43% were treated with cytoreductive therapy. During a median follow-up of 7.4 years, 256 patients (34%) had thrombosis recurrence; 145 (19%) had SVT extension/recurrence/TIPS thrombosis, 138 (18%) an thrombosis recurrence outside the splanchnic bed (74% were venous). Additionally, 262 patients (35%) experienced clinically relevant bleeding and 170 (22%) died. After adjusting for age, sex, prior thrombosis, timing of MPN diagnosis relative to SVT, anticoagulation initiation within 30 days of SVT diagnosis, MPN type, JAK2 status, other cancers and cirrhosis, cytoreductive therapy was associated with a decreased risk of recurrent thrombosis (HR 0.67 95%CI 0.50-0.89, p=0.01). This was driven by a lower risk of SVT extension/recurrence (HR 0.62 95%CI 0.42-0.90, p=0.01) but not by extra-splanchnic thrombosis recurrence (HR 0.97 95%CI 0.72-1.30, p=0.82). In a subgroup of patients without erythrocytosis/thrombocytosis at initial SVT (n=275), cytoreductive therapy was associated with a HR 0.65 (95%CI 0.40-1.07, p=0.09) for recurrent thrombosis. These data support the use of cytoreductive therapy in MPN-SVT patients to prevent recurrent thrombosis, particularly SVT extension/recurrence.

Abstract Purpose Traditional adverse event (AE) reporting in oncology trials focuses on the single worst CTCAE grade, which may underrepresent chronic or recurrent toxicity burden. We applied a longitudinal toxicity framework to compare toxicity profiles of chemotherapy with or without cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods We pooled two randomized first-line trials in the ARCAD database. AEs examined were diarrhea, rash, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), fatigue, anorexia, and mucositis. Outcomes included grade ≥3 AE, time to first occurrence of maximum grade, early onset (≤6 weeks), and AEL, a normalized measure of cumulative toxicity burden over treatment. Analyses were adjusted for chemotherapy backbone, ECOG performance status, sex, primary tumor location, dose reduction, and treatment duration. Results Compared with Chemotherapy alone (n = 564), Chemotherapy plus cetuximab (n = 738) was associated with higher grade ≥3 rash (21% vs 0.5%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 49.89, 95% CI 15.8–157.4), higher rash AEL (0.257 vs 0.069; adjusted mean difference 0.22, 95% CI 0.21–0.23), and more frequent early-onset maximum rash (67% vs 34%; adjusted OR 4.28, 95% CI 2.72–6.74). Rash AEL remained higher with cetuximab within maximum-grade strata. HFS showed higher grade ≥3 risk and overall AEL with cetuximab, but no within-grade AEL difference, indicating higher overall HFS burden reflected grade distribution rather than within-grade chronicity. No consistent differences were observed for other AEs. Conclusions Incorporating onset timing and AEL distinguished persistent toxicity burden from isolated peak events. This framework may support comparative tolerability assessment when chronic toxicity burden is central to decision-making.

Abstract Objective Surgery is an effective, yet underutilized treatment for children with drug‐resistant epilepsy. Although predictors of surgical outcomes are well described, the decision to recommend surgery varies by institution. We aim to evaluate the rates of not recommending surgery, identify associated patient characteristics, and quantify variability across centers. Methods We queried the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium Surgery database, a prospective multicenter cohort of children (0–18 years) undergoing initial evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Patients with documented surgical decisions were included. Demographic, clinical, and presurgical evaluation variables were compared by surgical recommendation status. Logistic regression identified factors associated with not recommending surgery. Mixed‐effects models quantified between‐center variability. Results Among 2480 patients across 29 centers, 532 (21%) were not recommended epilepsy surgery (median center rate 17%, interquartile range [IQR] 10%–28%). After accounting for patient characteristics associated with surgical candidacy, substantial variation in decision‐making remained across centers, with a median twofold difference in the odds of not recommending surgery between otherwise similar patients evaluated at different institutions (Median Odds Ratio = 2.25; Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = .18). The clinical characteristics most strongly associated with not recommending surgery included monthly or less frequent seizures (odds ratio [OR] 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.75–2.69), non‐structural etiology (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.56–2.61), and taking ≤2 anti‐seizure medications (ASMs) (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.34–2.08, all p 's < .01). These characteristics showed minimal clustering across centers (ICCs < .05). Significance One in five children evaluated for epilepsy surgery are not recommended to pursue surgical treatment. Although clinical factors influence decision‐making, they do not explain the substantial variation in recommendations across pediatric epilepsy centers. Similar children evaluated at different institutions had significant differences in the odds of not being recommended surgery, suggesting that institutional decision‐making contributes importantly to surgical candidacy.

Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer, yet the optimal target definition, dose, and toxicity profile for rib metastases remain uncertain. Objectives We assessed local control (LC), toxicity, and the risk of radiation-induced rib fracture (RF) after SBRT for rib metastases. Design Retrospective multicenter cohort study. Methods We analyzed prostate cancer patients with radiologically diagnosed rib metastases treated with SBRT and >=12 months of follow-up. Outcomes were descriptively compared between gross tumor volume (GTV)-only and GTV plus an intraosseous clinical target volume (CTV) margin. Analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, cumulative incidence functions, and exploratory univariable Cox and logistic regression; no formal equivalence testing or multivariable validation was attempted because event numbers were very low. Results We included 102 patients with a median follow-up of 20 months. The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 97.9% and 96.3%, respectively. At 3 years, local progression was 2.1% in the GTV-only group, absent in patients treated with >=10 mm margins, and numerically highest with 3-5 mm CTV margins (13.5%, p=0.022). Among 13 symptomatic patients, pain control was excellent, with complete or partial response in all patients within 6 months. No grade >=3 toxicities occurred. RFs were rare (n=3, 2.9%), comprising one symptomatic Grade 2 event (0.9%) and two asymptomatic Grade 1 events (2.0%). Baseline symptoms and extraosseous infiltration were associated with RF in exploratory univariable analysis, but confidence intervals were wide. Higher PTV dose exposure, particularly PTV D50% (36.9 vs. 31.1 Gy, p=0.041), was also observed among RF cases. Conclusions SBRT for rib metastases from prostate cancer was associated with high LC, pain relief, and low observed toxicity in this retrospective real-world cohort. GTV-only contouring may be feasible in carefully selected patients staged and planned with PSMA-PET/CT, but the non-randomized design, baseline imbalances, short follow-up, and very low event count preclude drawing conclusions about equivalence or independent validation. RF predictor analyses should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating.

Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case log system establishes minimum clinical experiences for anesthesiology residency. While core program requirements were last updated in 2016, case log minimums themselves have not undergone a major revision in approximately two decades. Consequently, current requirements may not fully reflect changes in anesthetic practice and the evolving scope of perioperative medicine. In anticipation of major ACGME revisions in 2027, this study aimed to develop consensus-driven recommendations for modernizing residency case logs. Methods: A three-round modified Delphi study was conducted with a nationally representative panel of 60 stakeholders, including anesthesiology residency program directors and academic and private practice anesthesiologists. Panelists evaluated a comprehensive list of potential case categories across three domains: technical skills, surgical case characteristics, and patient demographics. In Round 1, panelists proposed minimum numbers or suggested that no requirement was necessary. Rounds 2 and 3 utilized iterative feedback to determine consensus on the necessity of requirements and specific minimum thresholds. Consensus was defined as at least two-thirds agreement. Results: Sixty invited experts completed all three rounds (100% response rate). The panel reached consensus to recommend new minimum requirements across several areas not currently tracked with minimums, including arterial lines (40), central lines (20), fiberoptic intubation (10), one-lung ventilation (10), neuromonitoring (10), POCUS (10 Cardiac, 10 Lung), and NORA (20 cases). Regarding existing requirements, consensus was reached to recommend increasing total peripheral nerve blocks from 40 to 60, with added requirements for anatomic specificity, and cardiac case minimums from 20 to 25. The panel also established consensus definitions for life-threatening pathologies to standardize reporting. The panel did not achieve consensus on several areas, including, for example, whether a minimum requirement for patients younger than 3 months should be maintained. Conclusion: These findings provide stakeholder-validated recommendations to inform upcoming ACGME requirement revisions.

Introduction: Multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) is a sensitive stool-based test for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Limited referral-center data suggest low rates of incident aerodigestive cancers after a positive mt-sDNA and negative colonoscopy; community-based outcomes are unknown. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of adults referred for colonoscopy after positive mt-sDNA in a large community practice (2017–2021). Among patients with negative colonoscopy, we manually recorded post-colonoscopy recommendations, findings if additional colonoscopies had been performed, aerodigestive cancer diagnosis, and last clinical follow-up. Observed cancer incidence was compared with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. Results: Of 1,176 patients completing colonoscopy after positive mt-sDNA, 328 (28%) had negative findings. Median cohort age was 67 (IQR 59-72) years. Colonoscopy was performed at a median of 53 days after mt-sDNA sample collection. Post-colonoscopy recommendations aligned with multi-society task force (MSTF) guidelines in 59% of patients. Thirty-two patients underwent repeat colonoscopy with a median of 3.5 (1.9-4.4) years later; 2 (6.3%) had advanced serrated lesions, and no CRC was detected. Median clinical follow-up was 4.4 (3.4-5.6) years. Seven patients developed aerodigestive cancers (2 pancreatic, 5 lung), consistent with expected age- and sex-adjusted SEER incidence (n=7.62) (p=0.823). Discussion: In this community cohort, when a positive mt-sDNA was followed by negative colonoscopy, rates of subsequent advanced colorectal neoplasia and aerodigestive cancer were low. Most patients received recommendations for subsequent colonoscopy that were consistent with MSTF guidelines. Findings further support the current MSTF recommendation of no additional evaluation for extra-colonic malignancy in asymptomatic patients after high quality follow-up colonoscopy.