Citations

Abstract Background Progress in clinical trials and drug development for paediatric perianal fistulising CD (pfCD) depends upon accurate, reproducible imaging to assess disease activity and measure treatment response. We evaluated the inter- and intra-rater reliability of existing radiologic disease activity indices and anatomical classification systems previously identified as appropriate for assessment of paediatric pfCD.1 Methods A retrospective cohort (N=50) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams representing a full spectrum of paediatric (<18 years) perianal CD severity was selected by a single expert paediatric radiologist. Methods described by Zou2 were used to estimate sample size. Three separate radiologists (2 paediatric) blinded to clinical information assessed pfCD in the exams using the Magnetic Resonance Novel Index for Fistula Imaging in CD (MAGNIFI-CD), Van Assche Index (VAI), modified VAI (mVAI), Paediatric MRI based Perianal Crohn’s disease (PEMPAC) index, a visual analogue scale (VAS) of overall pfCD disease severity (range, 0-100 mm), as well as with the Park’s and St. James University Hospital anatomic classification systems. Two radiologists read all exams twice, separated by 2 weeks, and 1 radiologist read the exams once (250 total reads). Intra- and inter-rater reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC; equivalent to weighted kappa). Precision of the ICC estimates was quantified with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) obtained using clustered bootstrapping. Degree of reliability was interpreted with benchmarks proposed by Landis and Koch3. Results Median age of children was 13.5 years (IQR 11.4-16.1), and 64% were male. Median Paediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index score at time of imaging was 17.5 (IQR 10-32.5). Substantial (ICC>0.61) inter-rater reliability was observed for MAGNIFI-CD, VAI, and mVAI (Table 1), with the highest ICCs observed for the mVAI (0.72 [0.6 to 0.79]). Moderate (ICC>0.41) inter-rater reliability was observed for PEMPAC, St. James University Hospital classification, and the VAS, and fair (ICC>0.21) inter-rater reliability was observed for Parks classification. Intra-rater reliability was nearly perfect (ICC>0.81) for the VAS, and substantial for all indices except for Parks classification, which had moderate (0.60 [0.44 to 0.75]) intra-rater reliability (Table 1). Conclusion Most existing multi-item MRI-based disease activity indices and the St. James Hospital classification were reliable for the assessment of paediatric pfCD in our cohort. Our preliminary results suggest that the disease activity indices may have utility to measure treatment effect in paediatric pfCD clinical trials. References 1.Crowley E, Ma C, Guizzetti L, Zou G, Lewindon PJ, Gee MS, et al. Recommendations for Standardizing MRI-based Evaluation of Perianal Fistulizing Disease Activity in Pediatric Crohn's Disease Clinical Trials. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2024;30(3):357-69. 2.Zou GY. Sample size formulas for estimating intraclass correlation coefficients with precision and assurance. Statistics in Medicine. 2012;31(29):3972-398 3.Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.

PURPOSE In light of evolving evidence that some patients with node-positive estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) disease may receive less benefit from chemotherapy, this study reports 12-year outcomes of the C9741 trial overall, and by the sensitivity to endocrine therapy (SET2,3) test index, a biomarker measuring endocrine transcriptional activity, to identify patients most likely to benefit from dose-dense chemotherapy. METHODS In all, 1,973 patients were randomly assigned to dose-dense versus conventional chemotherapy. Hazard ratios (HRs) for prognosis and for predictive interaction with chemotherapy schedule were estimated from Cox models of long-term disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). SET2,3 was tested on the 682 banked RNA samples from ER+ cancers. RESULTS Dose-dense chemotherapy improved DFS in the overall study population by 23% (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.90]) and OS by 20% (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95]); the benefits of dose-dense therapy were seen for ER+ and ER-negative subsets, without significant interaction between treatment arm and ER status. Low SET2,3 status was highly prognostic, but also predicted improved outcomes from dose-dense chemotherapy (interaction P = .0998 for DFS; 0.027 for OS), independent of menopausal status. Specifically, low endocrine transcriptional activity predicted benefit from dose-dense chemotherapy, whereas tumor burden and proliferation-driven signatures for molecular subtype classification did not. CONCLUSION At 12-year follow-up, C9741 confirmed the sustained long-term benefit of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer. SET2,3 identified patients with ER+ breast cancer who benefited from dose-dense chemotherapy, and specifically, this benefit was predicted by low endocrine activity in the cancer, rather than tumor burden, molecular subtype, or menopausal status.

Background and Objectives: Faculty members who are underrepresented in medicine (URM) may benefit from mentorship that is designed specifically to meet their unique needs and is focused on improving their career pathways in academic medicine. The Underrepresented in Medicine Mentorship Program (URM-MP) is an academic society-based mentorship program that pairs early career URM faculty with mid- to late-career faculty specifically trained to address URM issues. Methods: During the first 3 years of the program, mentors received web-based training on addressing oppression and marginalization of URM faculty in academic medicine. Mentor and mentee pairs met monthly for 1 year and received support from program leaders through web-based check-in meetings twice per year. Pre- and postassessment data were collected from mentees to help identify their needs and evaluate their experiences. Check-in meetings provided feedback about the program. Results: Fifty-seven URM faculty participated in years 1, 2, and 3. Results of pre- and postsurveys showed that mentees significantly improved their self-perceived effectiveness to enhance their careers, to find resources to perform their jobs, and to navigate the challenges of advancing in academic medicine. Qualitative analyses revealed themes of appreciation for mentors supporting their unique experiences as URM faculty. Check-in feedback further reinforced the relationship aspects of the mentorship as a significant benefit of this program. Conclusions: Society-based mentorship that involves specific training for mentors and fosters trusting mentor-mentee relationships can improve URM faculty’s confidence regarding their ability to succeed in academic medicine.

Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) based gene therapies (GT) have successfully demonstrated significant reduction in vasocclusive crises (VOCs) associated with sickle cell disease (SCD). The efficacy and safety of these products is well established across multiple clinical trials (Kanter et al. NEJM 2022, Frangoul et al. NEJM 2024). This led to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the lentiviral-based gene addition product (lovotibeglogene autotemcel) and CRISPR-Cas9 based gene editing product (exagamglogene autotemcel) for patients with SCD above 12 years of age. As these therapies have a different logistical process compared to a standard allogeneic HSCT, there is a need to develop a collaborative transition of care plan for these patients and families prior to and long after completion of transformative therapies. Methods: Upper Midwest Sickle Cell Curative Therapies Consortium is a collaborative model including multiple stakeholders between 7 centers across the upper Midwest United States, the regional community-based organization (CBO) and National Marrow Donors Program (NMDP). The structure and workflow for this model was presented previously (Blaylark et al. ASH 2023). With the advent of commercial GTs, we developed a multi-specialty care model in collaboration with community stakeholders to address diverse patient and logistical needs for smoother transition to and from these therapies. Discussion: The initial transition is a period of potential gaps in medical care and often high anxiety for patients and families. Thus, when patients and families are considering GT, our care model engages a multidisciplinary team. As part of the comprehensive evaluation prior to gene therapy, an initial shared collaborative checklist includes an extensive medical history, assessment of treatment plan, an individualized pain plan and adherence, transfusion planning (simple or exchange) with setting of target hemoglobin and hemoglobin S% targets, and coordination of multi-specialty consults including apheresis, fertility preservation, child life, and social work. Additionally, pain, psychology, and integrative medicine specialists address not only ongoing concerns, but also help develop a plan for future transition back to the primary site of SCD care (“re-transition”) after GT. Patients undergo neuropsychological evaluations to establish baseline functioning and the role of chronic pain and fatigue, as GT can significantly impact long term cognitive functioning, emotional coping with transitions, and overall daily functioning. When appropriate and available, warm handoffs are encouraged between centers within each of these specialties. Our team also reviews available resources for education and ongoing support through the process and after from national and regional CBOs. Similarly, the post-GT transition is also a period of potential medical care gaps and high anticipated anxiety and concern, as patients go through significant unfamiliar adverse effects followed by the potential for persistent freedom from VOCs. In the post-GT transition, ongoing psychology, integrative medicine, and pain team support; peer mentoring; and support groups are critical for a smooth re-transition to post-GT care and further successful re-transition back into the community. Using this interdisciplinary approach across GT clinical trials, we successfully weaned opioids in 83% of patients (5/6) by day 60 post-GT infusion and successful re-transition of these patients, further highlighting the role of interdisciplinary care. Our team's collaborative approach to SCD care with sickle cell specialists, transplant team and other care providers and CBO continues into the long term follow up period, including ongoing supportive services for both patients and their families. Conclusion: As newer therapies are developed and approved for transformative SCD care, development of a transitional model with early engagement of an interdisciplinary team is critical for empowering sickle cell warriors and for their successful transition back into the community.

Background: Two National Cancer Institute-funded pharmacovigilance programs have identified 49 serious hematology-related ADRs since 1998. The programs, called RADAR (Research on Adverse Drug events and Reports) and then SONAR (Southern Network on Adverse Reactions) involve > 50 institutions and > 75 co-investigators worldwide. The work builds on three prior studies evaluating “Davids and Goliaths” in medical oncology and in cardiology (PLOS One, eClinicalMedicine, and Journal of Scientific and Professional Integrity). Here we review the hematology focused safety investigations of RADAR/SONAR. Methods: Data were based on initial safety signals being identified by a RADAR/SONAR co-investigator. Then, case-series were derived. Collaborations with basic scientists allowed for basic science correlative studies. Results were disseminated primarily as Brief Report in the literature and Black Box warnings on the related drug. In some instances, studies identified hematologic toxicities that prevent FDA from approving a submitted drug application. Results: sADRs were frequently identified based on very small case series, including ticlopidine-and clopidogrel associated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (22 and 10 patients, respectively), thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated venous thromboembolism (9 and 5 patients, respectively), rituximab-associated progressive multi-focal leukoencephalopathy (22 patients), peginesatide-associated fatal anaphylaxis (5 patients), and COVID-19 vaccine associated immune thrombocytopenia (1 patient). Meta-analyses provided data for epoetin- and darbepoetin-associated mortality among cancer patients and lenalidomide- and thalidomide-associated venous thromboembolism. Following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, RADAR/SONAR investigated social media and pre-prints (COVID-19 vaccine associated cerebral vein thrombosis and immune thrombocytopenia). Time from FDA approval to sADR discovery was a median of 5 years (range, 0 months (thalidomide-associated venous thromboembolism) to 34 years (ciprofloxacin-associated neuropsychiatric toxicity). Basic science correlative studies identified ADAMTS13 autoantibodies (ticlopidine), leachates that developed in a multi-dose vial (peginesatide), anti-red blood cell antibodies (epoetin-associated pure red cell aplasia), and high-risk genes (fluoroquinolones and rituximab). Overall, RADAR/SONAR studies are estimated to have saved over 1 million lives and also resulted in overall payments to the Department of Justice of $1.5 billion (related to marketing of unsafe drugs). Discussion: RADAR/SONAR has proven to be a very important adjunct to FDA and pharmaceutical manufacturer-led safety investigations for hematology, paralleling the success in medical oncology and in cardiology. Going forward, independent centers of excellence for safety-focused investigations such as the CERSI network and the SENTINEL network (both are NIH funded) should be broadened to include a hematology-focused safety center.

We demonstrate the fruitfulness of using card sort activities as an engagement method by detailing community consultation for ethical, legal, and social implications of sociogenomics. Readers are provided with a user-guide for card sort engagement through: (1) an overview of the card sort activity and its merits for engagement, (2) detailed methods of sorting for values-elicitation and prioritization goals, and (3) strategies to design this approach for other participatory research designs. Our intent is to add to meaningful exchanges between community engaged researchers and empirical bioethicists.