Citations

Clear

493 citation(s) found for "Warren, C".

Intracranial Occlusion in Cryptogenic Stroke Is Not Predictive of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke: A Propensity‐Score Matched Analysis of the Cardiac Abnormalities in Stroke Prevention and Risk of Recurrence Study
Brorson, James R. , Badillo‐Goicoechea, Elena , Penckofer, Mary , Eklund, Kelsey , Stretz, Christoph , Lineback, Christina M. , Khasiyev, Farid , Kerrigan, Deborah , Lewis, Skylar, Ali, Hamid , Melkumova, Emiliya , Dumitrascu, Oana M. , Parikh, Parth , Doolittle, Charles, Yahnke, Ian, Sathya, Anvitha , Brown, Samantha , Kang, Jieun, Bowman, Anna, Shahrivari, Mahan, Sehgal, S , Alvi, Muhammad , Krishnaiah, Balaji , Kam, Wayneho , Kothari, Sachin , Qdais, Ahmad Abu, Quintela, Gustavo Antezana, Sharma, Richa, Thottempudi, Neeharika, Nedelcu, Simona , Herpich, Franziska , Glover, Patrick , Chahien, Dalia, Liebeskind, David S. , Linares, Guillermo , Daniel, Jean‐Philippe, Kasab, Sami Al , Singh, Eesha , D’Souza, Maria , Gaudio, Elizabeth, Kala, Narendra , Sarkar, Monica , Coevering, Russell J. Van , Thon, Jesse , Thompson, Sean, Lineback, Christina , Brorson, James R , Penckofer, Mary , Eklund, Kelsey , Stretz, Christoph , Lineback, Christina M , Khasiyev, Farid , Kerrigan, Deborah , Ali, Hamid , Aboul-Nour, Hassan , de Havenon, Adam H , Culbertson, Collin J , Melkumova, Emiliya , Jillella, Dinesh V , Dumitrascu, Oana M , Parikh, Parth , Sathya, Anvitha , Brown, Samantha J , Elangovan, Cheran , Sehgal, Siddharth , Sloane, Kelly L , Krishnaiah, Balaji , Kam, Wayneho , Kothari, Sachin , Farooqui, Mudassir , Nahab, Fadi B , Sharma, Richa , Nedelcu, Simona , Herpich, Franziska , Liebeskind, David S. , Linares, Guillermo , Al Kasab, Sami , Aziz, Yasmin , Yaghi, Shadi , Goldstein, Eric D , Van Coevering, Russell J , Thon, Jesse , Stamm, Brian , Siegler, James E , Lineback, Christina M , Daniel, Jean-Philippe Auguste , Smith, Matthew M. , Nour, Hassan Aboul , Havenon, Adam de , Jillella, Dinesh , Doolittle, Charles, Elangovan, Cheran , Sharma, Richa , Thottempudi, Neeharika , D'Souza, Marissa, Aziz, Yasmin , Yaghi, Shadi , Goldstein, Eric , Chen, Lucia , Stamm, Brian , Siegler, James E.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the American Heart Association | September 25, 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 19 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.125.041500 | PMID 40996035 Get It

Background Intracranial occlusions in embolic stroke of undetermined source are histopathologically similar to cardiac sources of embolism. Whether patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source and intracranial occlusion benefit from anticoagulation is unknown. Methods A multicenter retrospective cohort of adults with cryptogenic stroke was queried for patients with proximal or medium/distal vessel occlusion. The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke, which was assessed in unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models and repeated following 1:1 propensity score matching and biweight kernel density matching. Results Of the 2328 patients who were followed over a median of 1.31 years (interquartile range, 0.34–2.85), 999 (42.6%) had an intracranial occlusion. When compared with patients without an intracranial occlusion, those with an occlusion had fewer atherosclerotic vascular risk factors, more severe symptoms, and less severe cerebral microvascular disease. The rate of recurrent stroke was similar between patients with versus without an intracranial occlusion (6.8%/year [95% CI, 5.7–8.2] versus 7.0%/year [95% CI 6.0–8.1]; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.09 [95% CI, 0.77–1.55]). There was no association between occlusion and recurrent stroke in the adjusted propensity score matching (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.64–1.59]) or kernel density models (HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.62–1.45]). There was no interaction between occlusion and treatment with anticoagulation, sex, age, or high‐risk sources of embolism for the primary outcome in the unmatched and matched analyses. Conclusions Intracranial occlusion in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source is not associated with a greater risk of recurrence when compared with patients without an intracranial occlusion. There was no difference in rate of recurrent stroke with anticoagulation when stratified by presence or absence of occlusion.
Optimal stimulation of the thalamic centromedian nucleus in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: patient series
Xu, Audrey , Guinle, Maria Isabel Barros , Johnstone, T, Teeyagura, Prathyusha , Solidum, Rayann M., Kim, Hyunmi , Parker, Jonathon J. , Buch, Vivek , Porter, Brenda E. , Knowles, Juliet K. , Xu, Audrey , Teeyagura, Prathyusha , Buch, Vivek , Knowles, Juliet K , Warren, Aaron E. L. , Hyslop, Ann , Grant, Gerald A.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons | September 23, 2025 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.3171/case25478 | PMID 40982986 Get It

BACKGROUND Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterized by multiple seizure types, intellectual disability, and distinctive EEG findings. Deep brain stimulation of the centromedian nucleus (CM-DBS) is an emerging therapy for LGS, but pediatric experience remains limited. OBSERVATIONS The authors report a single-center experience with CM-DBS in 6 children and adolescents (ages 12–18 years) with LGS. One patient experienced infection-related device removal after 2 months. The remaining 5 received sustained stimulation for 2.5–5 years. All 5 showed caregiver-reported improvements in seizure burden and alertness, with corroborating Clinical Global Impression–Improvement scores. Three patients exhibited marked seizure reduction following targeted reprogramming toward a previously identified optimal target of stimulation in the anterolateral CM. Pre- and post-DBS scalp EEG recordings were available in 1 patient and showed a reduced burden of interictal discharges. LESSONS CM-DBS is a promising treatment for pediatric, medically refractory LGS when resective approaches are unsuitable. Benefits were sustained over years. Lead localization and direction of stimulation appear important to optimize clinical benefit. These findings support the feasibility and safety of pediatric CM-DBS and highlight the need for prospective trials incorporating EEG-based outcomes and patient-centered measures including comorbidities and quality of life. Early, network-targeted neuromodulation may improve long-term outcomes. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25478
Current practices and trends in surgical decision‐making for children with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome: A cross‐sectional survey by the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium
Chiu, Michelle , Keator, Cynthia, Warren, Aaron E. L. , Knowles, Juliet K. , Samanta, Debopam , Dixon‐Salazar, Tracy , Seinfeld, Syndi, Paolicchi, Juliann , Vidaurre, Jorge , Shellhaas, Renée A. , Clarke, Dave , Bhalla, Sonam , Depositario‐Cabacar, Dewi, Haridas, Babitha , Stafstrom, Carl E. , Erdemir, Gozde , Karakas, Cemal , Chiu, Michelle Y , Koh, Hyun Yong , Vidaurre, Jorge , Patel, Anup D , Loddenkemper, Tobias , Shellhaas, Renée A , Clarke, Dave F , Fine, Anthony , Bhalla, Sonam , Stafstrom, Carl E , Erdemir, Gozde , Karakas, Cemal , Knowles, Juliet K , Patel, Anup D. , Loddenkemper, Tobias , Fine, Anthony L.

Mayo Clinic

Epilepsia Open | September 18, 2025 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1835-1846

10.1002/epi4.70144 | PMID 40965114 Get It

Abstract Objective The objective of this study is to characterize contemporary surgical management practices and factors influencing surgical decision‐making in the management of Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) across pediatric epilepsy centers in the United States. Methods A 45‐item cross‐sectional survey was developed and distributed to Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium centers. Domains included institutional demographics, surgical evaluation timing and goals, presurgical workup, procedural utilization and outcomes, and barriers to surgery. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were performed. Results Thirty‐two pediatric epilepsy centers participated (38% response), the majority comprising pediatric epileptologists at Level 4 National Association of Epilepsy Centers. Most centers (66%) considered surgery after failure of 3–4 antiseizure medications. Presurgical workup typically included brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), long‐term electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, and neuropsychological assessment, while use of functional imaging, magnetoencephalography, and intracranial EEG varied considerably. All centers offered vagus nerve stimulation and corpus callosotomy; 80%–90% offered resection, hemispherectomy, responsive neurostimulation (RNS); 60%–65% offered deep brain stimulation (DBS) and laser ablation. Among centers offering RNS, half targeted thalamic structures exclusively, and the remainder targeted cortical or combined cortical‐thalamic structures; the centromedian nucleus was the preferred thalamic target for RNS and DBS. Surgical decision‐making was influenced by patient characteristics, procedural considerations, and systemic factors. Seizure frequency, family preference, and multidisciplinary input were highly rated across all interventions. Etiology was critical for resection and hemispherectomy, while financial constraints, insurance barriers, and the need for future neuroimaging impacted neuromodulation selection. Scenario‐specific trends included less frequent consideration of DBS and RNS in children under five years, less use of hemispherectomy in older children, preference for corpus callosotomy in children with predominantly drop seizures, and procedural selection based on MRI findings. Significance Substantial variability exists in the surgical management of LGS. These findings highlight critical opportunities to harmonize practices, reduce disparities, and guide comparative effectiveness research to optimize outcomes. Plain Language Summary Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) is a severe form of epilepsy that may require surgery when medications are not effective. This study found that surgical care for LGS varies widely across pediatric epilepsy centers in the United States, including when surgery is recommended, how patients are evaluated, and which procedures are available. Newer approaches such as brain stimulation are being used more often, although access remains inconsistent. These findings highlight the need for clearer treatment pathways to ensure that children with LGS have equitable access to the best possible care.
Biparametric vs Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
Ng, Alexander , Asif, Aqua , Gómez‐Gómez, Enrique , Budäus, Lars, Barrett, Tristan , Radtke, Jan Philipp , Kesch, Claudia, Pham, Tho, Tewari, Ash , Cabello, M.A. Rodríguez , Mynderse, Lance A. , Borghi, Marcelo, Boesen, Lars , Singh, Paras B. , Renard‐Penna, Raphaële , Leow, Jeffrey J. , Pecoraro, Martina , Giannarini, Gianluca , Perlis, Nathan , López-Ruiz, Daniel, Rossiter, Marimo , Khetrapal, Pramit , Chan, Vinson Wai‐Shun , Haider, Aiman , Clarke, Caroline S. , Dickinson, Louise , Mitra, Anita, Margolis, Daniel J. A., Takwoingi, Yemisi , Emberton, Mark , Allen, Clare, Moore, Caroline M. , Kasivisvanathan, Veeru , Collaborators, PRIME Study Group, Briganti, Alberto , Evangelista, Alex, Freeman, Alex , Kirkham, Alex, Zlotta, Alexandre R. , Grey, Alistair, Ryan, Andrew, Borrelli, Antonella , Andrews, Antonette, Finelli, Antonio , Sancho, Arturo Platas, Baring, Ashley, Roy, Ashoke, Issa, Balqiisa, Israël, Bas , González, Carolina Aulló, English, Caroline, Zuiani, Chiara , Amate, Cristina, Yong, Daniel , Rozze, Davide, Lomas, Derek J. , Cannoletta, Donato , Chang, Eileen Wang, Chun, Felix, Zussino, Gaia , Antoch, Gerald , Gandaglia, Giorgio, Sauter, Guido , Thevarajah, Harini, Sorrell, Harriet, McBain, Hazel, Reis, Henning , Pita, Hernando Ríos , Potyka, Ingrid , Collavino, Jeanlou, Koshy, Jincy, Weng, Jing Yi , Withington, John, Egmond, Joke van, Piper, Jon, O’Brien, Jonathan , Rosa, José Valero, Sanz, Juan Luis , Quesada, Juan Mesa, Jannusch, Kai , Corr, Kateri , Haines, Kenneth, Umutlu, Lale , Quarta, Leonardo, Casarotto, Letizia, Gimeno, Linda , Moretti, Lucas, Laschena, Ludovica , Drewes, Lukas, Ostos, Manuel Sanchez, Peris, M., Volpacchio, Mariano , Prentice, Mark, Graefen, Markus , Soligo, Matteo, Boschheidgen, Matthias , Singhera, M., Wenzel, Mike, Fatterpekar, Monali, Al‐Nader, Mulham , Kachanov, Mykyta , Shaida, Nadeem , Muirhead, Nicola , Vasdev, Nikhil , Sanmugalingam, Nimalan , Nørgaard, Nis , Vicente, Pete, Incze, Peter , Ryan, Philip, Rouvier, Philippe , Mead, Phoebe, Mozer, Pierre, Viana, Públio César Cavalcante , Jiménez, Rafael E. , Novotta, Réka, Huang, Richard, O’Sullivan, Richard, Jepsen, Rikke Karlin , Frese, Robert, Clow, Rosemary, Al‐Monajjed, Rouvier , Lewis, Sara , Cashman, Sophia, Pizzolitto, Stefano, Lelie, S., Lindner, Sydney, Al‐Hammouri, Tarek , Sánchez, Teresa González, Reid, Thomas, McClure, Timothy, Maurer, Tobias , Peruzzi, Valeria, Tan, Wei Phin, Nahas, William Carlos, Chong, Yew Lam, Agarwal, Ridhi , Panebianco, Valeria , Girometti, Rossano , Ghai, Sangeet , COBELLI, Francesco DE , Pham, Tho, Taneja, Samir S. , Hu, Jim C. , Dias, Adriano Basso , Falkenbach, Fabian , Kastner, Christof , Schimmöller, Lars , Nathan, Arjun , Punwani, Shonit , Brew‐Graves, Chris , Brembilla, Giorgio , Margolis, Daniel , Giganti, Francesco , Collaborators, PRIME Study Group, Crestani, Alessandro , Sciarra, Alessandro , Evangelista, Alex, Kirkham, Alex P. S. , Grey, Alistair, Blanca, Ana , Bjartell, Anders , Tong, Angela , Warren, Anne Y. , Ciardi, Antonio , Rannikko, Antti , Stabile, Armando , Villers, Arnauld A. , Issa, Balqiisa, Hadaschik, Boris Alexander , English, Caroline L, Lee, Chau Hung , Caris, Christien T.M. , Stempel, Conrad von , Rozze, Davide, Messina, Emanuele , Chun, Felix, Gandaglia, Giorgio, Robert, G. , Caglič, Iztok , Theysohn, Jens Matthias , Grummet, Jeremy , Koshy, Jincy, Wilkinson, John, Withington, John, Egmond, Joke van, Deeks, Jonathan J , O'Brien, Jonathan, Quesada, Juan Mesa, Quarta, Leonardo , Orecchia, Luca , Moretti, Lucas, Rooij, Maarten de , Bicchetti, Marco , Gatti, Marco , Peris, María de los Desamparados Esteban, Roethke, Matthias Claudius , Monte, Maurizio Del, Wenzel, Mike, Takahashi, Naoki , Fleshner, Neil , Albers, Peter , Mead, Phoebe, Visschere, Pieter De , Huang, Richard, Shah, Syed Ahmar , Sanchez, Teresa González, Bathala, Tharakeswara K , Kwast, Theodorus van der , Reid, Thomas, Løgager, Vibeke , Prabhu, Vinay , Wagaskar, Vinayak Gorakhnath , Tan, Wei Phin, Nahas, William Carlos, Witjes, Wim P.J. , Chong, Yew Lam

Mayo Clinic

JAMA | September 10, 2025 | Volume: 334 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 1170

10.1001/jama.2025.13722 | PMID 40928788 Get It

Importance Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without prostate biopsy, has become the standard of care for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer. Resource capacity limits widespread adoption. Biparametric MRI, which omits the gadolinium contrast sequence, is a shorter and cheaper alternative offering time-saving capacity gains for health systems globally. Objective To assess whether biparametric MRI is noninferior to multiparametric MRI for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective, multicenter, within-patient, noninferiority trial of biopsy-naive men from 22 centers (12 countries) with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (elevated prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level and/or abnormal digital rectal examination findings) from April 2022 to September 2023, with the last follow-up conducted on December 3, 2024. Interventions Participants underwent multiparametric MRI, comprising T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast–enhanced (DCE) sequences. Radiologists reported abbreviated biparametric MRI first (T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted), blinded to the DCE sequence. After unblinding, radiologists reported the full multiparametric MRI. Patients underwent a targeted biopsy with or without systematic biopsy if either biparametric MRI or multiparametric MRI was suggestive of clinically significant prostate cancer. Main outcomes and measures The primary outcome was the proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of men with clinically insignificant cancer. The noninferiority margin was 5%. Results Of 555 men recruited, 490 were included for primary outcome analysis. Median age was 65 (IQR, 59-70) years and median PSA level was 5.6 (IQR, 4.4-8.0) ng/mL. The proportion of patients with abnormal digital rectal examination findings was 12.7%. Biparametric MRI was noninferior to multiparametric MRI, detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in 143 of 490 men (29.2%), compared with 145 of 490 men (29.6%) (difference, −0.4 [95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4] percentage points; P = .50). Biparametric MRI detected clinically insignificant cancer in 45 of 490 men (9.2%), compared with 47 of 490 men (9.6%) with the use of multiparametric MRI (difference, −0.4 [95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4] percentage points). Central quality control demonstrated that 99% of scans were of adequate diagnostic quality. Conclusion and relevance In men with suspected prostate cancer, provided image quality is adequate, an abbreviated biparametric MRI scan, with or without targeted biopsy, could become the new standard of care for prostate cancer diagnosis. With approximately 4 million prostate MRIs performed globally annually, adopting biparametric MRI could substantially increase scanner throughput and reduce costs worldwide. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04571840
Response to Dr. T. Warren Schweitzer's Letter to the Editor
Wedel, Denise J.

Mayo Clinic

Regional Anesthesia: The Journal of Neural Blockade in Obstetrics, Surgery, & Pain Control | September 4, 2025 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 588.1-588

10.1136/rapm-00115550-199722060-00022 Get It

Regional Variations in the Management and Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism: A Five‐Year United States Analysis
Mehta, Aryan , Bansal, Mridul , Ahmad, Khansa , Ingrassia, Joseph, Abbott, J. Dawn, Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra , Ahmad, Khansa , Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra , Mehta, Aryan , Nagaraja, Vinayak

Mayo Clinic

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | August 21, 2025 | Volume: 106 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 2632-2636

10.1002/ccd.70110 | PMID 40838428 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the most common causes of cardiovascular mortality in the United States. Significant variations in the management of various cardiovascular conditions have previously been reported, but this has been poorly elucidated for pulmonary embolism. Methods During 2016–2020, adult (≥ 18 years) nonelective admissions with PE, admitted to Northeast, Midwest, South, and West geographic regions were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Outcomes of interest included in‐hospital mortality, utilization of PE therapies, non‐cardiac organ support, total hospitalization costs, and hospitalization duration. Results In this 5‐year duration, 904,260 admissions were identified ‐ Northeast, Midwest, South, and West had 166,050 (18.3%), 225,680 (24.9%), 350,160 (38.7%), and 162,370 (17.9%) admissions, respectively. On average, admissions to the Northeast were less comorbid, from a higher socioeconomic status, privately insured, and more commonly admitted to urban teaching and medium‐sized hospitals (all p < 0.001). The Northeast region also had the lowest rates of definitive PE therapies except surgical thrombectomy. In comparison to the Northeast, the in‐hospital mortality was higher in the South and West and lower in the Midwest region (3.1% vs 2.8% vs 3.2% vs 3.3%, p < 0.001). However, on adjusted analysis with Northeast as a reference, in‐hospital mortality was noted to be lower in the Midwest (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67−0.84; p < 0.001), South (aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80−0.98; p < 0.05), and the West (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78−0.99; p < 0.05). Conclusion In this study, we noted significant heterogeneity in the management and outcome of pulmonary embolism across various regions of the United States.
Somatic CRISPR tumorigenesis and multiomic analysis reveal a pentose phosphate pathway disruption vulnerability in MPNSTs
McGivney, Gavin R. , Brockman, Qierra R. , Borcherding, Nicholas , Scherer, Amanda , Rauckhorst, Adam J. , Gutierrez, Wade R. , Solst, Shane R. , Heer, Collin D. , Warrier, Akshaya , Floyd, Warren , Kirsch, David G. , Knepper-Adrian, Vickie, Laverty, Emily A. , Roughton, Grace A. , Spitz, Douglas R. , Taylor, Eric B. , Dodd, Rebecca D. , Knepper-Adrian, Vickie L , Borcherding, Nicholas , Spitz, Douglas R

Mayo Clinic

Science Advances | August 13, 2025 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 33 | Pages: No page available

10.1126/sciadv.adu2906 | PMID 40802750 Get It

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive and chemo-resistant sarcomas with poor survival rates. Loss of CDKN2A or P53 following NF1 disruption is a key event in MPNST development. Here, we used CRISPR-Cas9 somatic tumorigenesis in mice to identify transcriptomic and metabolomic features distinguishing CDKN2A - versus P53 -deleted MPNSTs. Convergent, multiomic analyses revealed that CDKN2A -deleted MPNSTs are especially dependent on the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) and NADPH metabolism for growth and viability. Disruption of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), the PPP rate-limiting enzyme, slowed CDKN2A -deleted MPNST growth and sensitized MPNSTs to standard-of-care chemotherapy. Knockdown of the redox-regulated transcription factor NRF2 slowed MPNST growth and decreased G6PD transcription. Analysis of patient MPNSTs identified a NRF2 gene signature correlating with tumor transformation. Furthermore, G6PD and NRF2 expression in PanCancer TCGA samples correlates with patient survival. This work identifies NRF2-PPP dependency as a targetable vulnerability in these difficult-to-treat MPNSTs, particularly in the NF1/CDKN2A -deleted majority.
‘July effect’ in management and outcomes of patients admitted with pulmonary embolism in the United States, 2016 to 2021
Bansal, Mridul , Mehta, Aryan , Morris, D. Lynn, Mehta, Chirag, Abbott, J. Dawn, Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra , Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra , Jentzer, Jacob C. , Diepen, Sean van

Mayo Clinic

Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings | July 8, 2025 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 675-682

10.1080/08998280.2025.2520125 | PMID 40821483 Get It

Outcomes of Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Treated With Antiplatelet Agents or Anticoagulation
Siegler, James E. , Badillo‐Goicoechea, Elena , Penckofer, Mary , Eklund, Kelsey , Yaghi, Shadi , Stretz, Christoph , Lineback, Christina , Stamm, Brian , Peter, Shani , D’Souza, Marissa , Conyers, Frank, Khasiyev, Farid , Kerrigan, Deborah , Lewis, Skylar, Ali, Hamid , Nour, Hassan Aboul , Sharma, Richa, Glover, Patrick , Thompson, Sean, Alshaer, Qasem , Thottempudi, Neeharika, Melkumova, Emiliya , Chionatos, Rafail , Daniel, Jean-Philippe Auguste, Frankel, Michael , Dumitrașcu, Oana , Parikh, Parth , Doolittle, Charles, Yahnke, Ian, Sathya, Anvitha , Kang, Jieun , Kirchhoffer, Kaitlyn, Bowman, Anna, Smith, M. J., Asabere, Aaron, Shahrivari, Mahan, Sheibani, Nazanin , Krishnaiah, Balaji , Gaudio, Elizabeth, Rothstein, Aaron , Alvi, Muhammad M. , Annam, Saketh , Amankwah, Curtis , Kam, Wayneho , Abburi, Nandini , Rojas-Soto, Diana , Molaie, Amir , Khezri, Nicole, Zubair, Adeel , Abbasi, Mehdi , Coevering, Russell J. Van , Nedelcu, Simona , Herpich, Franziska , Chahien, Dalia, Sehgal, Siddharth, Liebeskind, David S. , Linares, Guillermo , Zha, Alicia , Sarkar, Monica , Xi, Romi, Nelson, Ashley, Qdais, Ahmad Abu, Kasab, Sami Al , Singh, Eesha , Patel, Vivek , Mehndiratta, Prachi , DeMarco, Alexis, Cucchiara, Brett , Omran, Setareh Salehi , Dubinski, Michael , Ackerman, Jiyoun, Thon, Jesse , Brown, Samantha , Siegler, James E , Goicoechea, Elena Badillo , Lineback, Christina M , Conyers, F Garrett , Aboul-Nour, Hassan , Sharma, Richa , Nahab, Fadi B , Glover, Patrick , Alshaer, Qasem N , de Havenon, Adam H , Melkumova, Emiliya , Chionatos, Rafail A , Jillella, Dinesh V , Frankel, Michael R , Dumitrascu, Oana M , Sathya, Anvitha , Smith, Matthew M , Brorson, James R , Elangovan, Cheran , Krishnaiah, Balaji , Sloane, Kelly L , Rothstein, Aaron , Alvi, Muhammad M , Kam, Wayneho , Abburi, Nandini , Farooqui, Mudassir , Molaie, Amir , Zubair, Adeel , Abbasi, Mehdi , Van Coevering, Russell J , Nedelcu, Simona , Liebeskind, David S. , Linares, Guillermo , Zha, Alicia , Abu Qdais, Ahmad , Al Kasab, Sami , Aziz, Yasmin , Mehndiratta, Prachi , Sharrief, Anjail , Cucchiara, Brett L , Salehi Omran, Setareh , Nguyen, Thanh N , Thon, Jesse , Yaghi, Shadi , Stretz, Christoph , Penckofer, Mary , Khasiyev, Farid , Brown, Samantha J , Eklund, Kelsey , Stamm, Brian , Daniel, Jean-Philippe Auguste , D'Souza, Marissa , Sharma, Richa , Thottempudi, Neeharika , Havenon, Adam de , Culbertson, Collin J , Jillella, Dinesh , Daniel, Jean-Philippe Auguste, Ro, Jennifer , Brown, Samantha, Doolittle, Charles, Brorson, James R. , Asabere, Aaron, Elangovan, Cheran , Chen, Lucia , Aziz, Yasmin , Nguyen, Thanh N. , Ackerman, Jiyoun

Mayo Clinic

Neurology | July 3, 2025 | Volume: 105 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.0000000000213876 | PMID 40609061 Get It