Citations

BackgroundMany young women with newly diagnosed breast cancer are interested in future pregnancies. Prospective data regarding fertility interest and reproductive patterns after diagnosis are needed to counsel patients.MethodsThe Young Women's Breast Cancer Study is a multicenter, prospective cohort of women who were diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≤40 years between 2006 and 2016. Women complete surveys at baseline, every 6 months for 3 years, then annually. Here, the authors describe fertility interest and pregnancies within 5 years of diagnosis for women with stage 0 through III breast cancer.ResultsOf 1026 eligible participants, 368 (36%) reported interest in future biologic children at least once within 5 years after diagnosis, including 16% at 5 years after diagnosis. Among 130 women who attempted to become pregnant, 90 (69.2%) conceived; and, among 896 women who did not attempt to conceive, 18 (2.0%) became pregnant, with a total of 152 pregnancies resulting in 91 live births. Factors associated with pregnancy included younger versus older age at diagnosis (aged ≤30 vs 36‐40 years: odds ratio [OR], 6.63; 95% CI, 3.18‐13.83; P < .0001; aged 31‐35 vs 36‐40 years: OR, 5.86; 95% CI, 3.37‐10.17; P < .0001) and being nulliparous versus parous (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.56‐4.53; P = .001). The receipt of endocrine therapy versus no endocrine therapy (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.20‐0.59; P = .001) was inversely associated with pregnancy.ConclusionsMany women remain interested in future fertility in the 4 years after a breast cancer diagnosis, indicating that longitudinal fertility discussions are needed. Although a minority of those interested in having children attempted to become pregnant in the first 5 years, most who attempted to conceive did so and had live births.

Abstract The words cure and hope are important terms in oncology, reflecting a balance of aspirations and realism for physicians and patients. Yet, some have suggested that oncologists are reluctant to use these terms. We tested this hypothesis by performing a bibliometric analysis of the frequency of use of these words in JAMA Oncology (JAMA Oncol) and the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO). The text of all articles in 3 categories—primary research, editorials, and narrative essays—appearing in JCO from 2000 to 2018 and in JAMA Oncol from 2015 to 2019 was analyzed. These analyses compared, across these categories, the proportion of articles containing the words cure and hope, as well as the proportion of total sentences containing these words. There were statistically significant differences in frequency of the use of the terms cure and hope as a function of the type of article published in the JCO and JAMA Oncol (2-sided P values ranging from .005 to &lt;.001). Results were similar for both journals, with minor exceptions. Both hope and cure were used in a greater number of articles and sentences in the narrative and editorial categories than in primary research. Moreover, hope was used more often in narrative essays than in editorials. The relative reluctance to use these terms in more scientifically oriented original reports, despite concomitant improvements in oncologic outcomes, may reflect a bias worthy of future exploration.

Abstract Among 2,186 U.S. adults with invasive cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, we examined the association of COVID-19 treatments with 30-day all-cause mortality and factors associated with treatment. Logistic regression with multiple adjustments (e.g., comorbidities, cancer status, baseline COVID-19 severity) was performed. Hydroxychloroquine with any other drug was associated with increased mortality versus treatment with any COVID-19 treatment other than hydroxychloroquine or untreated controls; this association was not present with hydroxychloroquine alone. Remdesivir had numerically reduced mortality versus untreated controls that did not reach statistical significance. Baseline COVID-19 severity was strongly associated with receipt of any treatment. Black patients were approximately half as likely to receive remdesivir as white patients. Although observational studies can be limited by potential unmeasured confounding, our findings add to the emerging understanding of patterns of care for patients with cancer and COVID-19 and support evaluation of emerging treatments through inclusive prospective controlled trials. Significance: Evaluating the potential role of COVID-19 treatments in patients with cancer in a large observational study, there was no statistically significant 30-day all-cause mortality benefit with hydroxychloroquine or high-dose corticosteroids alone or in combination; remdesivir showed potential benefit. Treatment receipt reflects clinical decision-making and suggests disparities in medication access. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1426

AbstractObjectiveYoung breast cancer patients experience greater psychosocial distress compared with older patients, which raises concern for their risk of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We sought to characterize the prevalence of clinically significant symptoms of PTSD and associated factors among breast cancer survivors diagnosed at a young age.MethodsThe Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study, enrolled 1302 women diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≤ 40 between 2006 and 2016. Participants complete serial surveys, and we obtained additional information from medical record review. Socio‐demographics, anxiety and depression, social support, and psychiatric co‐morbidities and medications were assessed at study baseline (median, 5 months post‐diagnosis). We defined a participant as having clinically significant posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) by scoring ≥50 on the PTSD Checklist‐Specific Version, administered on the 30‐month survey.ResultsAmong 700 women with stage 1‐3 disease, the prevalence of PTSS was 6.3% (95%CI = 4.5‐8.1). In multivariable analyses, PTSS was significantly associated with anxiety (OR 12.43, 95%CI = 5.81‐26.59, P < .0001) and stage 2 vs 1 disease (OR 2.26, 95%CI = 1.04‐4.93, P = .04). PTSS was inversely associated with having a college degree (OR 0.29, 95%CI = 0.13‐0.62, P = .002) and greater social support (OR 0.44, 95%CI = 0.21‐0.94, P = .03).ConclusionsWe found similar rates of cancer‐related PTSS in breast cancer survivors diagnosed at a young age compared with the general breast cancer population despite their well‐documented increased risk of overall distress. Nevertheless, factors associated with posttraumatic stress should be considered at diagnosis and in survivorship to identify young patients who may benefit from psychosocial resources.

514 Background: The 21- gene Breast Recurrence Score predicts benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor positive (ER+), HER-2 negative (-) breast cancer (BC). We aimed to examine whether the 21-gene assay predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: We identified patients with stage I-III ER+/HER2− BC treated with NAC from the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a prospective cohort of women diagnosed with BC at age ≤ 40 years. The 21-gene assay was performed on tumor specimens removed prior to NAC either as part of clinical care or retrospectively for research. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no residual invasive tumor (ypT0/is ypN0). The relationship between Recurrence Score result (RS) and pCR was evaluated using logistic regression modeling. Results: 76 women in the cohort had undergone NAC for ER+, HER2- BC and were eligible for this analysis: 5 had undergone clinical 21-gene assay testing, 71 had banked specimens retrospectively tested. Median age at diagnosis was 36.7 (24.3-40). Most tumors were of ductal histology (78%), high grade (51%), progesterone receptor (PgR) positive (86%), ≥T2 (88%), clinically node positive (74%), and anthracycline and taxane containing protocols were administered in 86% of cases. RS ranged between 5-75 with 50% > 25 and only 4 < 11. Mean RS was significantly higher among tumors achieving pCR vs. non-pCR response (51.9 vs. 26.6, pwilcoxon= 0.0005). pCR rate in patients with RS > 25 was 21% (8/38) vs. 5% in patients with RS < 25 (2/38), with both pCRs in the <25 group in patients with RS 21-25. In univariable analysis, PgR negativity (odds ratio (OR) 5.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-24.89, p = 0.02), high grade (OR 9.03, 95%CI 1.07-76.32, p = 0.04) and higher RS as a continuous variable (OR 1.08, 95%CI 1.04-1.13, p = 0.0003) were associated with a greater likelihood of pCR. In multivariable analysis only RS remained significantly associated with pCR (OR: 1.07, 95%CI 1.01-1.12, p = 0.01): a 7% increase in the odds of pCR for every 1-point increase in RS. Conclusions: In young women with ER+, HER2- BC who received NAC, higher pretreatment RS was associated with an increased likelihood of pCR. Genomic expression profiling assays may have a role in decision-making in young women in need of neoadjuvant therapy. For women with low likelihood of benefiting from NAC, alternative approaches are clearly warranted. Given the demonstrated efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in post-menopausal women, further evaluation in young women should be pursued.

Abstract Background: Young women with breast cancer (BC) often receive aggressive local therapy and are more likely to undergo (bilateral) mastectomy and receive postmastectomy radiation (RT) than older women. Our previous work suggested better quality of life (QOL) outcomes among women undergoing breast conserving therapy (BCT) vs. mastectomy, even with reconstruction (recon), although limited data was available regarding recon. In the current analysis, we sought to understand the impact of recon, accounting for RT, on long-term satisfaction and QOL. Methods: Between 10/2016-11/2017, we administered the BREAST-Q, a validated patient-reported outcomes measure designed to evaluate satisfaction and QOL after breast cancer surgery and recon, to 743 women in the Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study, a multi-site prospective cohort that enrolled women diagnosed (dx’d) at age &lt; 40 from 2006-2016. Demographic and treatment information was obtained by surveys and chart review. Recon was defined as autologous, implant or complex (combination of autologous and implant). Mean BREAST-Q scores for each domain (breast satisfaction, physical, psychosocial, and sexual) were compared by recon types and stratified by receipt of RT; higher BREAST-Q scores (range: 0-100) indicate better QOL. Linear regression was used to identify predictors of BREAST-Q scores. Results: 584 women with Stage 0-3 BC completed the Breast-Q at a median of 5.7 [range 2-10] years from dx), 357 (61%) had mastectomy and recon and were included in the analytic sample. Median age at dx was 36 years; 85% had stage 0, 1 or 2 disease; 41% received RT and 76% underwent bilateral mastectomy. 90.5% underwent immediate recon; of which 65.5% were tissue expander placement. Definitive recon included autologous tissue in 16%; implants in 81% and complex recon in 3%. Mean BREAST-Q breast satisfaction, psychosocial, and physical well-being scores differed based on recon type accounting for RT (Table 1). Significantly lower scores for breast satisfaction were seen in women having implant +RT. Scores were not impacted by bilateral procedure, timing of recon, use of tissue expander, extent of axillary surgery, cancer stage or other treatment factors. In multivariate analyses, receipt of RT, lymphedema and implant-based recon were associated with lower breast satisfaction scores. Physical well-being scores were lower for those with complex recon, for non-White women, for women who reported being financially uncomfortable, for those with lymphedema, and for those &lt;5 years from surgery. Psychosocial well-being scores were lower for women who received RT, had BMI &gt;25, and for those who reported being financially uncomfortable. Sexual well-being scores were lower for women with a BMI &gt;25 and for those who reported being financially uncomfortable. Conclusion Type of recon and receipt of radiation among young survivors who undergo mastectomy and recon for early breast cancer appears to have a differential impact on satisfaction and QOL. Our finding of lower breast satisfaction among young women who received RT, particularly after implant recon, underscores the importance of counseling regarding surgical options, especially for women who may receive RT after mastectomy and who are candidates for BCT. Table 1. Unadjusted BREAST-Q scores stratified by RTBREAST-Q DomainAutologous -RT N=29Autologous +RT N=27Implant -RT N=174Implant +RT N=113Complex N=13Global p-valueSatisfaction with Breasts, mean (sd)67 (19)63 (18)64 (18)53 (18)58 (22)&lt;0.01Physical well-being, mean (sd)81 (13)80 (14)80 (15)77 (14)67 (18)0.01Psychosocial well-being, mean (sd)71 (18)64 (18)72 (20)66 (23)62 (20)0.03Sexual well-being, mean (sd)54 (21)50 (24)52 (20)47 (22)48 (27)0.26RT= radiation Citation Format: Laura Dominici, Jiani Hu, Hee Jeong Kim, Tari King, Kathryn Ruddy, Rulla Tamimi, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Lidia Schapira, Virginia Borges, Stephen Come, Ellen Warner, Julia Wong, Ann Partridge, Shoshana Rosenberg. BREAST-Q satisfaction and quality of life outcomes in young women undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction for breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-1.

Abstract Background: Breast cancer arising in young women is more likely to have higher risk features than in older women and more likely to be associated with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. We previously reported a higher distribution of luminal B-like tumors among young women. Here we present the clinical and pathologic features of invasive disease in a large prospective cohort of young women with breast cancer, and associations between surrogate molecular subtype and BRCA 1/2 mutation status. Methods: Among 1,297 young women (aged ≤40 years) with breast cancer enrolled from 2006-2016, tumor histopathological features were examined by central review, and biomarker status was extracted from pathology reports. Based on histologic grade and biomarker expression, invasive tumors were categorized as luminal A-like (LA=ER/PR+ and HER2-, histologic grade 1 or 2), luminal B-like (LB=ER/PR+ and HER2+, or ER/PR+, HER2-, and grade 3), HER2 enriched (E) (ER/PR- and HER2+) or triple negative (TN=ER-, PR- and HER2-). Tumor stage, clinical characteristics, and BRCA status were retrieved by medical record review (and patient survey for BRCA status if not in medical record). Results: The majority of women presented with early stage invasive disease (8% stage 0, 32% stage 1, 40% stage 2, 15% stage 3; 5% stage 4). Among invasive tumors with evaluable molecular phenotype (n=1,136), 57% were high grade and the distribution of subtypes was: 33% LA, 42% LB, 8% HER2E, and 16% TN (Table 1). Among different age groups (≤ 30, 31-35, and 36-40 years), there were no significant differences in molecular phenotype, tumor stage, tumor grade or histopathological features including presence of tumor necrosis, lymphocytic infiltration, and central fibrotic focus. 96% of women were tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations, and 127 (11%) tested positive: 65% were BRCA1+, and 35% were BRCA2+ (table 2). Among BRCA1+ patients, 2% of cancers were LA, 30% LB, 5% HER2E, and 62% TN; among BRCA2+, 29% were LA, 56% LB, 2% HER2E, and 13% TN. These proportions were relatively consistent across age groups. BRCA1+ patients’ tumors were proportionately more TN and BRCA2+ patients’ tumors more likely to be LB/HER2 negative (p&lt;0.0001), irrespective of age category. Conclusion: In a large cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≤40, there was no association between age group (≤ 30, 31-35, vs. 36-40 years) and tumor stage, grade, or tumor molecular phenotype among women with invasive disease. As in older women, tumor molecular phenotype does vary by BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation status, which has implications for prevention and treatment. Table 1. Subtype by age groupTotal (n=1136)≤30 yrs (n=144)31-35 yrs (n=314)36-40 yrs (n=678)p=0.42Luminal A-like377 (33%)48 (33%)99 (32%)230 (34%)Luminal B-like477 (42%)59 (41%)137 (44%)281 (41%)• ER/PR+, HER2-, grade 3245 (22%)27 (19%)68 (22%)150 (22%)• ER/PR+, HER2+232 (20%)32 (22%)69 (22%)131 (19%)HER2E95 (8%)13 (9%)34 (11%)48 (7%)Triple Negative187 (16%)24 (17%)44 (14%)119 (18%) Table 2. Subtype by BRCA statusTotal(n=1136)BRCA1+(n=82)BRCA2+(n=45)No mutation/not tested(n=1009)p&lt;0.0001Luminal A-like377 (33%)2 (2%)13 (29%)362 (36%)Luminal B-like477 (42%)25 (30%)25 (56%)427 (42%)• ER/PR+, HER2-, grade 3245 (22%)21 (26%)18 (40%)206 (20%)• ER/PR+, HER2+232 (20%)4 (5%)7 (16%)221 (22%)HER2E95 (8%)4 (5%)1 (2%)90 (9%)Triple Negative187 (16%)51 (62%)6 (13%)130 (13%) Citation Format: Yaileen D Guzman-Arocho, Shoshana M. Rosenberg, Philip Poorvu, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Greg Kirkner, Craig Snow, Rulla M. Tamimi, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Lidia Schapira, Virginia F. Borges, Steven E. Come, Elena F. Brachtel, Ellen Warner, Ann H. Partridge, Laura C. Collins. Clinicopathological features and BRCA 1/2 status in a large prospective cohort of young women with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-02.

Abstract Background: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is prevalent among breast cancer survivors and more intense in younger women. Given that FCR is a powerful determinant of quality of life and is associated with healthcare utilization, identifying who may be at risk for experiencing elevated FCR without resolution can inform the timing and targeting of interventions. Methods: Participants included women diagnosed (dx’d) at age ≤40 enrolled in the Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study, a multi-site prospective cohort surveyed at baseline and regularly in follow-up. Surveys include the 3-item Lasry Fear of Recurrence Index which measures the degree of concern about recurrence and current health using 4-point Likert response options that provide a score ranging from 3-12; higher scores indicate greater concern. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to classify distinct FCR patterns from baseline (median of 5 months from dx) through 3 years post-dx. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify the associated patient (socio-demographics and BRCA status), disease (stage, ER/PR/HER2) and treatment (surgery, chemotherapy) characteristics associated with each trajectory. Variables significant at p&lt;0.05 in univariable models were entered into the final multivariable model. Results: 965 women with Stages 0-III breast cancer were included in the analysis, with a median age at dx of 37. Participants were predominantly non-Hispanic White (85%), partnered (76%) and had completed college (84%). There was a significant decrease in median FCR scores from baseline to year 3 (9 vs. 8, Wilcoxon signed-rank test P&lt;0.01). Five FCR trajectories (Table) were identified: 1) 10.5% of participants reported low/stable FCR from baseline over follow-up; 2) 33.1% had moderate FCR that improved over time; 3) 5.5% had moderate FCR scores at baseline that worsened over time; 4) 30% had high FCR scores at baseline that improved over time; 5) 20.8% had high FCR at baseline that remained high at all time points. In the fully adjusted multinomial model, younger age at dx and Stage 3 and 2 (vs. 1) disease were associated with higher odds of being in the high/stable trajectory. Having a lumpectomy (vs. mastectomy) was associated with higher odds of being in a high/stable as well as moderate/improving trajectory while White (vs. non-White) women had higher odds of being in a trajectory of improving FCR. Receipt of chemotherapy and financial discomfort were significantly associated with assignment to specific FCR trajectories in univariate analyses, however did not remain significant in the adjusted model. Being partnered, BRCA mutation status, and ER/PR/HER2 status were not significantly associated with any FCR trajectory classification in univariate or multivariate analyses. Conclusion: While FCR improves over time for many young women with breast cancer, a substantial minority (26%) had FCR that was severe and did not improve or worsened over time. Younger women with higher stage disease who are at risk for high levels of unresolved FCR may benefit from intervention including early referral to mental health professionals. Ongoing monitoring of women at risk for developing FCR following active treatment is warranted. Table Mean FCR score for each trajectoryBaselineYear 1Year 2Year 3TrajectoriesLow/Stable (N=103)5.725.605.545.45Moderate/Improving (N=331)7.907.487.287.09Moderate/Worsening (N=34)6.748.329.6410.54High/Improving (N=294)9.889.419.088.67High/Stable (N=203)11.0211.0811.0310.88 Citation Format: Lidia Schapira, Yue Zheng, Shari Gelber, Philip Poorvu, Kathryn J Ruddy, Rulla Tamini, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Steve Come, Virginia Borges, Ann Partridge, Shoshana Rosenberg. Trajectories of fear of cancer recurrence in young breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-09.