Citations

Abstract Background: DLBCL is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype in western countries and is clinically heterogeneous. Gene expression profiling has identified two major biologically distinctive DLBCL subtypes defined by their cell-of-origin (COO): germinal center B-cell (GCB) - characterized by BCL2 rearrangement and C-REL amplification, and activated B-cell (ABC) - characterized by constitutive activation of the NF-kB pathway. We evaluated putative DLBCL risk factors for etiologic heterogeneity as defined by COO. Methods: We used a clinic-based study of newly diagnosed NHL cases and frequency matched controls, enrolled from 2002-2014, with a total of 687 DLBCL cases and 2253 controls for this analysis. Using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue, we determined COO by either digital expression profiling (NanoString; classified as GCB, ABC, undetermined) or clinically using the Hans algorithm (immunohistochemical markers; classified as GCB, non-GCB, undetermined). Integrating these two sources of COO data, there were 271 GCB, 170 non-GCB, and 246 undetermined/missing (mainly due to lack of tissue) cases. Risk factor data were collected from self-administered questionnaires and included family history of hematologic malignancy; history of atopy, allergy, asthma, eczema, or autoimmune disease; blood transfusion; vaccination history; regular low-dose aspirin use; body mass index (BMI) 2 years prior diagnosis/enrollment; smoking history; alcohol consumption (never/current/former); leisure-time physical activity; and recreational sun exposure. Polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals for COO subtypes, adjusted for age, sex and residence. Results: The median age of cases was 64 years with 55% male; the median age of controls was 64 years and 53% male. The association with BMI (30+ vs. 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) was stronger for non-GCB (OR=2.21; 1.40-3.49) than for GCB (OR=1.70; 1.21-2.40) DLBCL (P-heterogeneity 0.02), while a family history of hematologic malignancy was associated with non-GCB (OR=2.27; 1.47-3.50) but not GCB (OR=1.30; 0.86-1.96) DLBCL, although the P-heterogeneity was not significant (P=0.13). For GCB, there was an inverse association with former (vs. never) alcohol use for GCB (OR=0.57; 0.39-0.83) but not for non-GCB (OR=0.98; 0.61-1.57) DLBCL (P-heterogeneity 0.007), and an inverse association with regular use of low-dose aspirin for GCB (OR=0.64; 0.47-0.87) but not for non-GCB (OR=0.88; 0.61-1.25) DLBCL (P-heterogeneity 0.05). No other risk factors evaluated showed important heterogeneity by COO. Conclusions: These initial results suggest most DLBCL risk factors do not show etiologic heterogeneity by DLBCL COO, although associations with BMI and family history with non-GCB DLBCL and alcohol and low-dose aspirin use with GCB DLBCL warrant follow-up. Citation Format: Geffen Kleinstern, Dennis P. Robinson, Lisa M. Rimsza, Melissa C. Larson, Rebecca L. King, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Carrie A. Thompson, Stephen M. Ansell, Matthew J. Maurer, Andrew L. Feldman, Susan L. Slager, Anne J. Novak, Thomas M. Habermann, James R. Cerhan. Evaluation of etiologic heterogeneity for risk of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) subtype defined by cell-of-origin [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 741.

Abstract Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are heterogenous T-cell neoplasms often associated with epigenetic dysregulation. We investigated de novo DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) mutations in common PTCL entities, including angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma and novel molecular subtypes identified within PTCL–not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) designated as PTCL-GATA3 and PTCL-TBX21. DNMT3A-mutated PTCL-TBX21 cases showed inferior overall survival (OS), with DNMT3A-mutated residues skewed toward the methyltransferase domain and dimerization motif (S881–R887). Transcriptional profiling demonstrated significant enrichment of activated CD8+ T-cell cytotoxic gene signatures in the DNMT3A-mutant PTCL-TBX21 cases, which was further validated using immunohistochemistry. Genomewide methylation analysis of DNMT3A-mutant vs wild-type (WT) PTCL-TBX21 cases demonstrated hypomethylation in target genes regulating interferon-γ (IFN-γ), T-cell receptor signaling, and EOMES (eomesodermin), a master transcriptional regulator of cytotoxic effector cells. Similar findings were observed in a murine model of PTCL with Dnmt3a loss (in vivo) and further validated in vitro by ectopic expression of DNMT3A mutants (DNMT3A-R882, -Q886, and -V716, vs WT) in CD8+ T-cell line, resulting in T-cell activation and EOMES upregulation. Furthermore, stable, ectopic expression of the DNMT3A mutants in primary CD3+ T-cell cultures resulted in the preferential outgrowth of CD8+ T cells with DNMT3AR882H mutation. Single-cell RNA sequencing(RNA-seq) analysis of CD3+ T cells revealed differential CD8+ T-cell subset polarization, mirroring findings in DNMT3A-mutated PTCL-TBX21 and validating the cytotoxic and T-cell memory transcriptional programs associated with the DNMT3AR882H mutation. Our findings indicate that DNMT3A mutations define a cytotoxic subset in PTCL-TBX21 with prognostic significance and thus may further refine pathological heterogeneity in PTCL-NOS and suggest alternative treatment strategies for this subset.

AbstractIdentifying biomarkers associated with disease progression and drug resistance are important for personalized care. We investigated the expression of 121 curated genes, related to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs) responsiveness. We analyzed 28 human multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines with known drug sensitivities and 130 primary MM patient samples collected at different disease stages, including newly diagnosed (ND), on therapy (OT), and relapsed and refractory (RR, collected within 12 months before the patients’ death) timepoints. Our findings led to the identification of a subset of genes linked to clinical drug resistance, poor survival, and disease progression following combination treatment containing IMIDs and/or PIs. Finally, we built a seven‐gene model (MM‐IMiD and PI sensitivity‐7 genes [IP‐7]) using digital gene expression profiling data that significantly separates ND patients from IMiD‐ and PI‐refractory RR patients. Using this model, we retrospectively analyzed RNA sequcencing (RNAseq) data from the Mulltiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) CoMMpass (n = 578) and Mayo Clinic MM patient registry (n = 487) to divide patients into probabilities of responder and nonresponder, which subsequently correlated with overall survival, disease stage, and number of prior treatments. Our findings suggest that this model may be useful in predicting acquired resistance to treatments containing IMiDs and/or PIs.

Abstract The objective of this study was to explore differences in outcomes between first-line rituximab plus bendamustine (R-B) and R-CHOP/R-DHAP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin) in transplant-eligible patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). A population-based cohort of 97 patients aged 18 to 65 years with stage II-IV MCL, consecutively treated with R-B was retrospectively identified at BC Cancer. Baseline characteristics, response rates, and outcomes were compared with the cohort of 232 patients with MCL randomized to the R-CHOP/R-DHAP arm of the MCL Younger trial. The primary endpoint was the hazard ratio (HR) of the progression-free survival (PFS) comparison between both groups, adjusted for MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI), Ki67 index, and blastoid/ pleomorphic morphology. Ann Arbor stage, lactate dehydrogenase, MIPI, blastoid morphology, and MCL35 assignments were similar between both groups. The overall response rate (ORR) to R-B was 90% (54% complete response [CR]); 77% of patients proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and 78% received maintenance rituximab (MR). The ORR to R-CHOP/R-DHAP was 94% (54% CR); 78% proceeded to ASCT and 2% received MR. There were no differences in PFS in unadjusted (HR, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-1.41; P = .56) or adjusted (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.45-1.37; P = .40) comparisons. There were no clear differences in secondary endpoints in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. This retrospective adjusted comparison of 2 independent cohorts of younger patients with MCL suggests that R-B with ASCT and maintenance rituximab is a feasible and effective first-line treatment, with outcomes comparable to R-CHOP/R-DHAP with ASCT.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma with variable clinical outcomes. Commonly used risk stratification tools (Ki67 IHC, MIPI) in newly diagnosed MCL are not frequently used when selecting therapy, resulting in treatment choice being dictated by age and co-morbidities rather than disease biology. The MCL35 risk score was developed as a more reliable measure of proliferation and has been shown to be prognostic and can risk stratify younger transplant eligible MCL patients into three groups with significantly different overall survival (OS; Scott et al. 2017; Holte et al. 2018) but has not been evaluated in older transplant ineligible patients. We report results evaluating the prognostic value of the MCL35 assay in older MCL patients (≥65) treated with frontline bendamustine/rituximab (BR). METHODS: Archived tissue samples from 119 patients age ≥65 years treated with BR from collaborating Lymphoma/Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project (LLMPP) sites and the LEO/MER cohort were collected and analyzed using the MCL35 assay and stratified into three distinct risk groups (low, standard, and high risk). Association between MCL35 proliferation scores and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and hazard ratios were calculated. Associations between Ki67, s-MIPI, p53 IHC status, morphology and OS were also evaluated. RESULTS: The MCL35 assay was run on tissue samples from 119 patients. Median patient age was 74 (range 65-93) and 69.5% were male. Ki67 was <30% in 29 patients (24%) and ≥30% in 90 patients (76%). Simplified MIPI (s-MIPI) score was 0-3 in 21 patients (24%), 4-5 in 42 patients (48%) and ≥6 in 25 patients (28%). Thirty-one did not have sufficient data to calculate a s-MIPI score. MCL35 was low risk in 51 patients (43%), standard risk in 39 patients (33%) and high risk in 29 patients (24%). Eleven patients had blastic morphology, 7 had pleomorphic morphology and the remainder were classic morphology (n=56). Of 57 samples with p53 IHC staining 7 (12.3%) were positive. At a median follow up of 33.4 months, 82 patients were alive and 35 had died. Patients with high risk MCL35 score had inferior OS compared to low risk (HR 2.27, 95% CI: 1.03-5.00; p=0.042) while standard risk was not statistically significant compared to low risk (HR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.37-2.0; p=0.740)(Figure 1). Ki67 IHC using a cutoff of ≥ 30% and 10%-29% was not significantly associated with OS compared to Ki67 <10% ( Ki67 ≥ 30% vs. Ki67 < 10%, HR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.12-6.41; p=0.892, Ki67 ≥ 10%-29% vs. Ki67 < 10%, HR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.04-2.83; p=0.303), however high s-MIPI score (≥6) (s-MIPI ≥6 vs. s-MIPI 0-3, HR 3.86, 95% CI 1.20-12.5; p=0.024) and positive p53 IHC (HR: 9.51, 3.26-27.7; p <0.001) were both associated with poor OS. Eighteen cases were blastic/pleomorphic by morphology, 12 of which were in the high-risk group by MCL35, and this subset also had worse survival than classic MCL (p=0.0052). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest high risk MCL35 score is a prognostic biomarker of poor OS in patients >65 with MCL treated with BR. Conversely, Ki67 was not significantly associated with OS in these patients. Additional clinical validation using a larger sample size from the E1411 study is planned. If similar results are found, the MCL35 assay in combination with s-MIPI and p53 status may have utility in stratifying patients into risk adapted treatment arms in future prospective clinical trial designs. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Maurer: BMS: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Research Funding. Villa: Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; NanoString Technologies: Honoraria. Habermann: Seagen: Other: Data Monitoring Committee; Incyte: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Tess Therapeutics: Other: Data Monitoring Committee; Morphosys: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Loxo Oncology: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Eli Lilly & Co.,: Other: Scientific Advisor. Cohen: Janssen, Adicet, Astra Zeneca, Genentech, Aptitude Health, Cellectar, Kite/Gilead, Loxo, BeiGene, Adaptive: Consultancy; Genentech, BMS/Celgene, LAM, BioINvent, LOXO, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, M2Gen, Takeda: Research Funding. Hill: Celgene (BMS): Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gentenech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZenica: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte/Morphysis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Raess: Scopio Labs: Research Funding. Scott: Celgene: Consultancy; NanoString Technologies: Patents & Royalties: Patent describing measuring the proliferation signature in MCL using gene expression profiling.; BC Cancer: Patents & Royalties: Patent describing assigning DLBCL COO by gene expression profiling--licensed to NanoString Technologies. Patent describing measuring the proliferation signature in MCL using gene expression profiling. ; Rich/Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy. Rimsza: NanoString Technologies: Other: Fee-for-service contract.

Abstract Introduction: Low-grade B-cell lymphomas (LGBCL), aside from follicular lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, account for approximately 10% of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas and consist of several subtypes. While a majority of LGBCL cases have an overall favorable prognosis, we have previously shown that cases who have an event (relapse or progression, transformation, or re-treatment) within 24 months of diagnosis (EFS24) have an inferior overall survival (OS) compared to those achieving EFS24 (Tracy et al., AJH 2019;94:658-66). However, the underlying biological characteristics associated with early failure and aggressive disease across LGBCL subtypes are unknown. In this study, we used matched transcriptomic, genomic, and immune profiling data from LGBCL cases, the largest cohort to date, and asked whether there were unique biological phenotypes across different LGBCL subtypes and whether we could identify signatures associated with aggressive LGBCL. Validation of the prognostic utility of this signature was performed on a previously published, independent cohort of 63 pre-treatment LGBCL cases. Methods: Tumors from 64 newly diagnosed LGBCL patients from the Molecular Epidemiology Resource of the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence were included in this study (SMZL (n = 48), NMZL (n = 6), LPL (n = 5), B-NOS (n = 3), EMZL (n = 2)). RNA sequencing (RNAseq) data from 61 LGBCL tumors and 5 benign CD19+CD27+ memory B samples was subjected to NMF clustering to define groups. Differential expression and pathway analysis were used to identify biological characteristics of each cluster. CIBERSORT was used to identify immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on 61 tumor-normal pairs. Singscore was used to assign a single score per patient representing gene expression of the survival-associated transcriptomic signature identified in this study. Results: NMF analysis of RNAseq data identified 5 clusters of patients, denoted LGBCL1-5 (Fig 1A). Patients from the same diagnostic subtype did not exclusively cluster together, with all LGBCL clusters comprised of patients from multiple subtypes (Fig 1B). Exploring the association between patient cluster and outcome, we observed significantly inferior event-free survival (EFS) (HR 2.24; 95% CI 1.01-4.98) and overall survival (OS) (HR 5.59; 95% CI 2.00-15.63) in LGBCL5 patients compared to LGBCL1-4 (Fig 1C). In addition, 80% of the transformation cases in our cohort were classified as LGBCL5 (Fig 1D). Differential expression and pathway analysis showed distinct processes significantly upregulated in each cluster (FDR < 0.05), with LGBCL5 demonstrating enrichment of cell cycle and mitosis pathways. CIBERSORT identified increased immune cell content in LGBCL3 and LGBCL5 compared to other clusters, with high frequencies of mast cells in both (p = 0.0002), increased CD8 T cells in LGBCL3 (p < 0.0001), and increased T follicular helper cells in LGBCL5 (p = 0.004). WES identified previously reported alterations in NOTCH, NFkB, and chromatin remodeling pathways and novel variants in LGBCL, including mutations in HNRNPK, CLTC, HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-C. Assessment of alterations by cluster showed significant enrichment of TNFAIP3 (OR 5.54; 95% CI 1.20-28.14) and BCL2 alterations (OR 5.49; 95% CI 1.07-32.02) in LGBCL5 cluster. Finally, we identified a cell cycle-related transcriptomic signature of 108 genes upregulated in LGBCL5 and EFS24 failure cases. Cases with high expression of this signature showed significantly inferior EFS (HR 14.25; 95% CI 4.90-41.38) and OS (HR 7.82; 95% CI 2.40-25.44) compared to cases with low expression in our discovery cohort. This observation was reproduced in an independent validation cohort, where patients with high expression of this signature demonstrated significantly inferior EFS (HR 5.70; 95% CI 1.49-21.79) and OS (HR 10.07; 95% CI 2.00-50.61). Conclusions: In this study, we are the first to define mechanisms of pathogenesis in LGBCL with shared transcriptomic, genomic, and immune profiles present across LGBCL subtypes. We then further defined a gene expression signature associated with inferior patient outcome, with application of this signature to an independent validation cohort demonstrating proof of concept and utility of this signature as a prognostic marker in LGBCL patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Maurer: Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Nanostring: Research Funding. Paludo: Karyopharm: Research Funding. Habermann: Tess Therapeutics: Other: Data Monitoring Committee; Morphosys: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Incyte: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Seagen: Other: Data Monitoring Committee; Loxo Oncology: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Eli Lilly & Co.,: Other: Scientific Advisor. Link: MEI: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis, Jannsen: Research Funding. Rimsza: NanoString Technologies: Other: Fee-for-service contract. Ansell: Bristol Myers Squibb, ADC Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Regeneron, Affimed, AI Therapeutics, Pfizer, Trillium and Takeda: Research Funding. Cerhan: Genentech: Research Funding; Regeneron Genetics Center: Other: Research Collaboration; Celgene/BMS: Other: Connect Lymphoma Scientific Steering Committee, Research Funding; NanoString: Research Funding. Novak: Celgene/BMS: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) exhibits significant clinical, cellular, molecular, and genetic heterogeneity. Our understanding of FL biology and molecular classifications of FL, to date, has largely been driven by pathologic classification (Grade 1-3b), genetic classification (m7-FLIPI), or gene expression profiling (IR-1/2; Huet-23), along with limited studies on small cohorts or targeted panels. In order to further understand the biological underpinnings and complexity of FL, large-scale and integrated whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNAseq) studies are needed. Using a highly-annotated cohort of 93 FL tumors with matched RNAseq, WES, and CyTOF data, we have explored the transcriptomic signature of purified FL B cells and identified unique molecular subsets that are defined by distinct pathway activation, immune content, and genomic signatures. Methods: Frozen cell suspensions from 93 untreated FL (Grade 1-3b) patients' tumor biopsies, enrolled in the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE, were used for the study. DNA was isolated from whole tumor cell suspensions, and RNA was isolated from both whole tumor and B cell-enriched cell suspensions. RNAseq and WES were performed in the Mayo Clinic Genome Analysis Core. RNAseq and WES data were processed using a standard pipeline and novel driver genes were identified using Chasm+ driver analysis. Copy number variants were identified from WES data using GISTIC 2.0. NMF clustering and single sample gene set testing for B cell lineage and tumor microenvironment (TME) signatures were performed in R using the NMF and singscore packages. Results: Unsupervised clustering of RNAseq data identified three distinct expression programs which separated patient B cell samples into 3 groups: Group 1 (G1, n=20), Group 2 (G2, n=24), Group 3 (G3, n=43). While no clinical attributes were defined by any single group, G1 consisted of cases that had less aggressive characteristics (63% Stage I-II, 79% FLIPI 0-1). To identify unique transcriptional pathways driving the three expression programs, we scored gene level contributions to NMF expression programs and employed gene set enrichment analysis. This revealed significant pathway association with type-I IFN signaling (G1), DNA repair and stress response (G2), and epigenetic modulation (G3) as differentiating programs between the 3 groups (FDR q<0.001). VIPER master regulator activity inferencing revealed that these pathways were likely being controlled by differential activity in NF-kB, IRFs, STAT1, BCL6, and FOXO1. Each program significantly enriched for, but were not defined by, portions of specific germinal center programs, such as pre-memory (G1), light-zone-to-dark-zone transition (G2), and a pre-light-zone intermediate (G3). We next assessed the connection between B cell programs and the tumor microenvironment (TME) using available paired CyTOF data on 67 cases, which revealed an active TME in G1, with an abundance of CD8 T cell and NK cell populations, a wide variety of immune content in G2 that consisted mostly of Tfh and myeloid cells, and a poorly populated immune compartment in G3 compared to G1 and G2. Finally, somatic driver mutations and copy number alterations from WES were identified and associated with the three clusters. The three groups distinguished themselves by significant enrichment of copy number alterations (TNFAIP3-loss , 1q23-gain, 1q32-gain) in G2, while 10q-loss and mutations in BCL2 and chromatin modifiers (KMT2D and CREBBP) enriched in G3. G1, overall, had lower alteration burden and had weak associations with any specific alterations, suggesting an alternative mechanism for driving the G1 program. Conclusion: In this study, we have identified three unique FL tumor B cell groups, defined by specific transcriptional programs. Pathways such as inflammation, DNA damage response, and chromatin modification contribute most to the differences between B cell samples and group membership. Additionally, each program associated with specific genetic events as well as TME composition, highlighting potential drivers of these B cell states. This study improves the understanding of the mechanisms driving FL tumors and motivates further investigation into transcriptional consequences of genetic events as well as potential tumor intrinsic factors that may influence the TME. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Maurer: BMS: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Research Funding. Rimsza: NanoString Technologies: Other: Fee-for-service contract. Link: MEI: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis, Jannsen: Research Funding. Habermann: Tess Therapeutics: Other: Data Monitoring Committee; Seagen: Other: Data Monitoring Committee; Incyte: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Morphosys: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Loxo Oncology: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Eli Lilly & Co.,: Other: Scientific Advisor. Ansell: Bristol Myers Squibb, ADC Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Regeneron, Affimed, AI Therapeutics, Pfizer, Trillium and Takeda: Research Funding. King: Celgene/BMS: Research Funding. Cerhan: Genentech: Research Funding; Regeneron Genetics Center: Other: Research Collaboration; Celgene/BMS: Other: Connect Lymphoma Scientific Steering Committee, Research Funding; NanoString: Research Funding. Novak: Celgene/BMS: Research Funding.

Abstract Introduction: Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma that predominantly occurs in patients with HIV or other causes of immunodeficiency. Frequent infection by the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and MYC translocations have been described as major features contributing to the pathogenesis of PBL. Prior studies examining the genetic landscape of PBL have largely relied on targeted capture-based sequencing approaches. As such, the molecular features of PBL remain to be fully explored. Here, we provide a comprehensive description of the genomic landscape of PBL using whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing to identify commonly perturbed pathways. Method: Archival diagnostic fresh frozen and formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue biopsies from 58 PBL tumours were accrued from Lymphoma/Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project (LLMPP) sites, including 15 tumours from Ramis-Zaldivar et al., Haematolgica 2021. MYC rearrangements were identified by break-apart fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and rearrangement partner was determined in a subset of tumours from capture or genome sequencing data using structural variant callers Manta, GRIDSS, and Delly. High confidence somatic mutations (SNVs/Indels) were identified in data from whole-genome (n=5) or whole-exome (n=53) sequencing through an ensemble voting approach utilizing four variant callers (Strelka2, Lofreq, Mutect2, SAGE). Mutation frequencies in known lymphoma-related genes were compared to activated B-cell (ABC)-DLBCL (Schmitz et al., NEJM 2018), as the closest tumour entity in terms of putative cell-of-origin differentiation stage, to identify differences in genetic aberrations. Candidate somatic copy number alterations (CNAs) were identified from exome and genome sequencing data, using CopywriteR and ControlFREEC, respectively, and high-confidence CNAs were determined using GISTIC2.0. Results: Within the study cohort, 81% of patients were male with a median age of 59 years (range 11-88). HIV and EBV statuses were available for 47% of patients and 95% of tumours, respectively, with 49% (13/27) of the patients being HIV+ and 69% (38/55) of tumours being EBV+. MYC rearrangement was observed in 60% (35/58) of PBLs, with IGH as the partner gene in 88% (21/24) of tumours. The most frequently mutated genes were STAT3 (38%), TP53 (22%), NRAS (21%), and TET2 (16%), consistent with previous studies, however novel mutations were seen in DUSP2 (21%), KLHL6 (16%), and BHLHE41 (16%). Recurrent CNAs included amplifications in 1q, whole gains of 7, 8q24, 11p12 and deletions affecting 4p16, 5p15, 10q11.22. While the mutational landscapes were similar between samples with and without a MYC translocation, the MYC-translocated PBLs showed more frequent amplification of 1q32.1. When stratifying by EBV status, STAT3 and SOCS1 mutations were more frequent in EBV-positive tumours, whereas TP53, TET2, KRAS, and MMRN2 mutations were associated with EBV-negativity. In comparison to ABC-DLBCL, PBLs were significantly enriched in STAT3 and NRAS mutations, and lacked common mutations affecting the NF-κB pathway (eg. MYD88, CD79B, and NFKBIZ 3' UTR mutations). Mutations in genes that are frequently mutated in ABC-DLBCLs, such as those associated with plasma cell differentiation (eg. PRDM1) or a memory B-cell fate (eg. TBL1XR1), were also not mutated in PBLs. Finally, genetic alterations associated with immune evasion, such as deletion of MHC I and II and mutations in B2M, CIITA, and CD58, were rarely observed. Conclusion: These data present a comprehensive overview of the genomic landscape of PBLs in a large cohort. We show frequent mutations involving the JAK-STAT and MAPK pathways, wherein the genetic landscape can be differentially characterized by EBV status and MYC rearrangement status. We show that PBLs are genetically distinct from ABC-DLBCLs, with absence of mutations in genes affecting the NF-κB pathway, immune evasion, and driving a memory B-cell fate. Disclosures Slack: Seagen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Raess: Scopio Labs: Research Funding. Holte: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nordic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanovector: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: lectures honorarias; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Savage: Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Institutional clinical trial funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Institutional clinical trial funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Other: Institutional clinical trial funding; Beigene: Other: Institutional clinical trial funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Steidl: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Curis Inc.: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Epizyme: Research Funding; Trillium Therapeutics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Rimsza: NanoString Technologies: Other: Fee-for-service contract. Morin: Foundation for Burkitt Lymphoma Research: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy; Epizyme: Patents & Royalties. Scott: Abbvie: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Rich/Genentech: Research Funding; BC Cancer: Patents & Royalties: Patent describing assigning DLBCL COO by gene expression profiling--licensed to NanoString Technologies. Patent describing measuring the proliferation signature in MCL using gene expression profiling. ; Incyte: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; NanoString Technologies: Patents & Royalties: Patent describing measuring the proliferation signature in MCL using gene expression profiling..

Abstract Objectives: We identified a case of follicular lymphoma (FL) that transformed into a morphologic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), which by gene expression profiling showed a primary mediastinal (PMBL)-like gene expression profile (GEP) (Lymph3Cx; Blood 2018;132:2401-5). A search identified 4 additional transformed FL (tFL) cases with a PMBL-like GEP, which we further studied to determine how similar these tFLs were to classic cases of PMBL. Methods: The morphology and previously reported immunophenotype were reviewed, and CD30, CD23, MAL, CD273/PDL2, and CD200 immunohistochemical stains (IHC) were performed. Whole exome sequencing (WES) and copy number analysis (CNA) to evaluate genes typically altered in FL and PMBL were performed. Results: None of the tFLs arose in the mediastinum or had a previous history of mediastinal disease. All cases showed typical centroblastic DLBCL cytology, with fine sclerosis typical of PMBL. 3/3 were GCB by the Hans IHC algorithm, 1/3 were MYC+, 3/3 BCL2+, 1/5 CD30+, 3/5 CD23+, 4/5 MAL+, 0/5 CD273/PDL2+, 1/5 CD200+, and 0/2 EBER+. Rearrangements of MYC, BCL2, or BCL6 were identified by FISH in 0/3, 1/3, and 2/3 cases, respectively. WES demonstrated sequence variants in genes associated with both FL (CREBBP [60%], KMT2D [40%], and TNFRSF14 [40%]) and PMBL (JAK-STAT pathway genes [80%], B2M [20%], and CD58 [20%]). 2 of the mutations identified in the tFLs have previously been shown to result in JAK-STAT activation (STAT6 p.E372K [PNAS 2016;113:13015-20] and SOCS1 p.F101L [Oncogene 2002;21:4351-62] identified in 1/5 cases each). CNA showed gains/amplification of REL in 3/5 cases, gains/amplification of STAT6 in 2/5, gains of large sections of chromosome 16, including IL4R, in 2/5, and both deletions and gains of 11q in 1/5. See Figure demonstrating the 5 cases on the Y-axis and the chromosomes on the X-axis. Conclusions: The tFLs in this small series seem to represent PMBL-like DLBCLs, rather than classic PMBLs, and have a blended pattern of immunophenotypic and genomic features between FL/DLBCL and PMBL. Although the cases express some PMBL-associated markers (CD23 and MAL), there is less frequent staining for others (CD30, CD273/PDL2, and CD200). The cases harbor both FL-associated and PMBL-associated sequence variants, including 40% with mutations known to activate the JAK-STAT pathway. This frequency of mutations in JAK-STAT pathway genes is higher than that seen in typical FL/DLBCL, but perhaps lower than in classic PMBL (Blood 2019;134:802-13). PMBL also frequently has gains/amplifications of 9p24.1, which was not seen in our cohort. However, gains/amplification of REL/2p, which is seen in approximately 50% of PMBL, was identified in 60% of the tFLs. The 11q aberration identified in 1 case would be unusual for PMBL, and is instead more commonly associated with a subset of aggressive lymphomas with Burkitt-like features (Haematologica 2019;104:1822-9). Recently, lymphomas with similar blended features between DLBCL and PMBL, which were not arising in the setting of tFL, have been reported (Duns G, et al. Blood 2021). Our study extends the types of biological transformations, in addition to more classic DLBCL, that can be seen in FL. These tFLs with blended PMBL-DLBCL biology may have implications for therapeutic decision making including targeted therapies used in PMBL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rimsza: NanoString Technologies: Other: Fee-for-service contract. Steidl: Curis Inc.: Consultancy; Trillium Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Epizyme: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.