Citations

Clear

54 citation(s) found for "Moore, M Lane".

A Comprehensive Analysis of Medicare Reimbursement to Physicians for Common Arthroscopic Procedures: Adjusted Reimbursement Has Fallen Nearly 30% From 2000 to 2019
Pollock, Jordan R. , Haglin, Jack M. , LeBlanc, Matthew P., Arthur, Jaymeson R. , Deckey, David G. , Chhabra, Anikar , Bingham, Joshua S. , Pollock, Jordan Riley , Chhabra, Anikar , Moore, M. Lane

Mayo Clinic

Arthroscopy | December 2, 2020 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1632-1638

10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.049 | PMID 33278531 Get It

Purpose To analyze and objectively measure the trends in inflation‐adjusted Medicare reimbursement rates for the 20 most commonly performed orthopaedic arthroscopic surgical procedures from 2000 to 2019. Methods The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services website was used to find the top 20 most commonly performed arthroscopic procedures using the Public Use File data file for calendar year 2017. By use of the Physician Fee Schedule Look‐Up Tool, national reimbursement averages were calculated from 2000‐2019 and data were analyzed. Averages were adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index. Current Procedural Terminology codes that did not exist in 2000 were unable to be analyzed in this study. Results When adjusted for inflation, Medicare reimbursement for the 20 most commonly performed arthroscopic procedures from 2000‐2019 has decreased substantially (–29.81%). The mean Medicare reimbursement to physicians was $906 in 2000 and $632 in 2019. During this same period, the annual change in the adjusted mean reimbursement rate for all included arthroscopic procedures was –1.8% whereas the average compound annual growth rate was –1.9%. Conclusions This study shows that when adjusted for inflation, Medicare reimbursement to physicians has decreased by nearly 30% during the past 20 years for the most common arthroscopic procedures. Clinical Relevance This analysis will give orthopaedic surgeons and hospital administrators a better understanding of the financial trends surrounding one of the fastest‐growing techniques in surgery. Additionally, these financial‐trend data will be increasingly important as the population in the United States continues to age and new payment models are introduced.
Declining Orthopaedic Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Medicare Reimbursement Rates from 2000 to 2019
Haglin, Jack M. , Pollock, Jordan Riley , Bingham, Joshua S. , Moore, M. Lane

Mayo Clinic

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine | July 31, 2020 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 7_suppl6 | Pages: No page available

10.1177/2325967120s00410 Get It

Objectives: In the field of orthopaedics, it has been evident that Medicare reimbursement rates have been relatively stagnant. Although, objective measures of how these financial trends have changed over the past couple of decades has been limited. If orthopaedic practitioners and hospital administrators wish to make progress and advance the degree of satisfactory reimbursement they can expect, a more thorough understanding of these trends is warranted. In this study, the field of orthopaedic shoulder, elbow, and upper arm surgery is being analyzed specifically. The objective of this analysis was to assess the monetary trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for the 10 most commonly utilized shoulder surgical procedures and the 10 most commonly utilized elbow and upper arm surgical procedures from 2000 to 2019. Methods: For this analysis, the current procedural terminology (CPT) code ranges that corresponded to “Surgical Procedures of the Shoulder” and “Surgical Procedures of the Humerus (Upper Arm) and Elbow” were determined. The Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Suppliers PUF CY 2017 document was then utilized to objectively determine the 10 most common CPT codes fororthopaedic shoulder surgical procedures and orthopaedic elbow and upper arm surgical procedures. The reimbursement data for each of these procedures was then compiled from The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. All monetary data points were adjusted for inflation to 2019 US dollars utilizing changes to the United States consumer price index. The average annual and the total percentage change in reimbursement were based on the adjusted trends for the 10 included shoulder procedures and the 10 included elbow and upper arm procedures. Results: After adjustment for inflation, the average reimbursement for the top 10 orthopaedic shoulder surgery procedures decreased by 25.8% from 2000 to 2019. The greatest mean decrease was observed in the “Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (e.g. rotator cuff) open; chronic (23412)” CPT code (-40.1%). No adjusted reimbursement rates were noted to be positive throughout the study period for surgical shoulder procedures. The procedure with the smallest mean decrease was the “Closed treatment of proximal humeral (surgical or anatomical neck) fracture; without manipulation (23600)” CPT code (-5.4%). From 2000 to 2019, the adjusted reimbursement rate for all included shoulder procedures decreased by an average of 1.6% per year. For the top 10 orthopaedic elbow and upper arm surgical procedures, the average reimbursement decreased by 19.5% from 2000 to 2019. The greatest mean decrease was observed in the “Osteoplasty,humerus (e.g., shortening or lengthening) (24420)” CPT code (-32.1%). The procedure with the only positive mean difference was “Closed treatment of humeral shaft fracture; without manipulation (24500)” CPT code (0.34%). From 2000 to 2019, the adjusted reimbursement rate for all included elbow and upper arm procedures decreased by an average of 1.2% per year. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the orthopaedic shoulder and elbow subspecialtyand its trends in Medicare reimbursement rates. When monetary data is corrected for inflation, Medicare reimbursement rates have shown a steady decline from 2000 to 2019. The 10 most common procedures of or relating to the shoulder have decreased by an average of 25.8% while the 10 most common procedures of or relating to the elbow or upper arm have decreased by an average of 19.5%. Additionally, only one procedure showed a positive increase in reimbursement rate (Closed treatment of humeral shaft fracture; without manipulation (24500)). If access to high quality and sustainable surgicalorthopaedic care is to persist in the United States, increased awareness of these trends is important for stakeholders to take note of.
Explaining Segmental Lean Soft Tissue Discrepancies Between Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis And Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
Griffiths, Nelson , Dellinger, Jacob R., Benavides, Marqui L. , Adamson, Brian T., Stratton, Matthew T. , Harty, Patrick S. , Moore, M. Lane , Tinsley, Grant M

Mayo Clinic

Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise | July 9, 2020 | Volume: 52 | Issue: 7S | Pages: 877-877

10.1249/01.mss.0000685060.59897.5e Get It

Physiological And Anthropometric Predictors Of Discrepancies Between Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis And Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry
Griffiths, Nelson , Benavides, Marqui L. , Dellinger, Jacob R., Adamson, Brian T., Harty, Patrick S. , Stratton, Matthew T. , Moore, M. Lane , Tinsley, Grant M

Mayo Clinic

Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise | July 9, 2020 | Volume: 52 | Issue: 7S | Pages: 877-877

10.1249/01.mss.0000685056.74015.fc Get It