Citations

OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers excellent tumor control for pituitary adenoma (PA); however, treatment failure occasionally necessitates salvage surgery. Comprehensive studies on salvage surgical outcomes for recurrent PA after SRS remain scarce. This study aimed to elucidate the outcomes of salvage endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (sETS) for progressive PA failing SRS. METHODS This retrospective, two institution–based cohort study analyzed data from patients who underwent sETS for progressive PA failing SRS. Progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and neurological and endocrinological outcomes in the sETS group were analyzed and compared with those in the primary ETS (pETS) group after propensity score matching using the following variables: age at surgery, maximum tumor diameter, highest Knosp–Steiner classification, and tumor type. RESULTS Thirteen sETS patients (8 males [62%], median age at surgery of 56 years) with 5 nonfunctioning (39%), 6 corticotropic (46%), and 2 other functioning (15%) PAs who received median (range) follow-up of 125 ( 23–169) months were included. None of the patients experienced new neurological deficits or death after sETS. The median (range) tumor resection rate was 90% (80%–100%). The 5-year PFS and DSS rates were 55% and 77%, respectively. All 4 patients (31%) who experienced recurrence after sETS had corticotropic tumors. In the matched cohort analysis between the sETS group with 12 patients and the pETS group with 12 patients, no significant differences were observed in surgical outcomes. PFS rates were marginally higher in the sETS group than in the pETS group (80% vs 49% at 3 years, p = 0.216, log-rank test), and DSS was similar between the two groups (p = 0.543, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS The authors’ results indicate that ETS can be safely performed as a salvage treatment after failed SRS with low complication rates and satisfactory tumor control in treatment-resistant PA.

AbstractObjectiveLimited evidence guides the optimal timing of treatment after the detection of tumor growth during the observation of sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS). The current work aimed to inform the timing of radiosurgical intervention based on an analysis of patient outcomes among those who ultimately failed stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and underwent salvage microsurgery.Study DesignA historical cohort study.SettingSeven centers across the United States and Norway.MethodsAdults with sporadic VS who underwent salvage microsurgery following failed primary SRS were included. The primary outcome of interest was the association between tumor size at the time of primary SRS and the ability to achieve gross total resection (GTR) and maintain postoperative House–Brackmann (HB) facial nerve grade I at the last follow‐up after salvage microsurgery.ResultsAmong 96 patients, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor size at primary SRS was 14.5 mm (10.0‐19.0). Each 1‐mm increase in CPA tumor size at the time of primary SRS was associated with a 13% increased likelihood of near‐total/subtotal resection or most recent postoperative HB grade >I (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05‐1.21, P = .001), with an optimal tumor size threshold to distinguish this outcome of 12 mm of CPA extension (c‐index 0.73). Similarly, for each 1‐mm increase in CPA tumor size at the time of primary SRS, a 9% increase in any postoperative complication with salvage microsurgery was observed (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02‐1.15, P = .009).ConclusionCorroborated by size threshold surveillance data informing the timing of primary microsurgical resection, the current study suggests that VS outcomes are optimized when primary radiosurgical intervention is undertaken on growing tumors when they harbor 10–15 mm of cerebellopontine angle extension or less.