Citations

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Aarhus University Dagmar Marshalls Fond. Background The assessment of left ventricular (LV) function through transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is essential for guiding diagnosis and treatment in cases of cardiogenic shock (CS). Myocardial global longitudinal strain (GLS) provides an objective and reproducible measure of systolic function, independently predicting outcomes in acute heart failure, regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, whether assessment of GLS can predict mortality in patients with CS remains unknown. Purpose In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of GLS in patients with CS. Methods Data from cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients admitted between 2007 and 2018 with CS who received vasoactive agents and/or mechanical circulatory support were analysed. GLS (as absolute values) and biplane LVEF were measured via TTE performed within 24 hours of CICU admission. Patients with CS were categorised based on the GLS quartile: mild (GLS >9.7%), moderate (7.0% < GLS <9.6%), severe (5.0% < GLS < 6.9%), and very severe (GLS ≤ 4.9%). CICU and in-hospital mortality were compared across GLS categories, and the relationship between GLS and mortality was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Results The study included 626 patients with a median age of 68.6 years, a median LVEF of 31% (IQR 24 to 40%), and a median GLS of 7.0% (IQR 5.0 to 9.7%). In-hospital mortality was 29.1%. As GLS deteriorated, there was an increasing need for vasopressors (P<0.001). Patients with progressively lower GLS exhibited significantly higher CICU and in-hospital mortality across the GLS quartiles (Figure A; P<0.001). Patients in the severe (adjusted OR 2.67; p<0.001) and very severe category (adjusted OR 3.54; P<0.001) had significantly increased risk of in-hospital death compared with mild category. In multivariable analysis, every 1% decrease in GLS corresponded to a 14% higher risk of in-hospital mortality (P<0.001). Finally, GLS outperformed LVEF for discrimination of in-hospital mortality (P=0.002), and when both measurements were included in the same multivariable model, only GLS remained significant. When patients were divided according to whether they had GLS and/or LVEF below the median value, patients with low GLS had higher mortality irrespective of the LVEF (Figure B). Conclusion In patients with CS, GLS assessment surpasses LVEF in its prognostic value and improves risk stratification. Routine evaluation of GLS should be considered for patients with CS.Figure AFigure B

Introduction: Baseline hemodynamic parameters have been shown to predict postoperative outcomes such as right ventricular failure (RVF) in LVAD patients. The pressure adjusted heart rate (PaHR) is a hemodynamic parameter that has not been reported in LVAD recipients. Hypothesis: Patients with an elevated PaHR at baseline will have an increased risk of adverse outcomes following LVAD implantation. Methods: Historical cohort study of 273 patients with preoperative invasive hemodynamic assessment before durable LVAD implantation from January 1 st , 2007 to April 10 th 2017. Baseline patient characteristics and hemodynamic parameters were assessed. The primary endpoint was a composite of 30 day mortality, stage 3 acute kidney injury (AKI), and postoperative RVF. Univariate analysis was used to identify predictors of the composite endpoint, which were entered into stepwise backwards multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors of the composite outcome. Results: The mean age was 59 and 79% of the patients were male. The median INTERMACS profile was 4 and 166 (60%) of LVADs placed were as destination therapy. The primary composite endpoint was reached by 74 (27%) patient, including 30-day mortality in 13 (5%), severe AKI in 48 (18%) and RVF in 53 (19%). Univariate predictors of the composite endpoint (p <0.05) included atrial fibrillation, INTERMACS profile, home inotropes, preoperative IABP, admission creatinine, baseline Vasoactive-Inotropic Score, mean right atrial pressure (mRAP), mRAP/wedge, mean arterial pressure/mRAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure/mRAP, right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWi), pulmonary artery pulsatility index, and the PaHR. Logistic regression identified PaHR (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99, p=.026), RVSWi (OR 1.002, 95% CI 1.001-1.004, p=.002), home inotropes (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.94, p=.034), atrial fibrillation (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26-0.88, p=.019) and admission creatinine (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.77, p=0.002) as predictors of the composite endpoint. Conclusions: The PaHR is a readily available, novel hemodynamic parameter, that when elevated on baseline hemodynamic assessment can predict those patients at increased risk of postoperative adverse outcomes after durable LVAD implantation.

Introduction: Patients at increased risk of complications following LVAD placement are admitted to the hospital for hemodynamic optimization prior to LVAD implantation, which can include adjustment of medical therapy and/or placement of an IABP. Hypothesis: Prior to LVAD placement patients treated with an IABP during hemodynamic optimization will have similar outcomes despite worse baseline characteristics compared with patients treated medically. Methods: This single-center study included 199 non-inotrope dependent patients who underwent durable LVAD implantation between January 1 st , 2007 and April 10 th 2017. Hemodynamic data was collected retrospectively. Patients who received an IABP were compared to those who did not. Stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury, right ventricular failure, and 30 day mortality was compared between patients with and without and IABP. Results: The mean age was 62.7 and 82.9% were male; 72 (36.2%) received an IABP. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar. Patients treated with an IABP had worse INTERMACS profiles and worse baseline hemodynamic parameters. The incidence of the primary composite endpoint was similar between patients who had an IABP and those who did not (23.6% vs 19.7%; p=0.517), as were each of the individual endpoints: stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury (18.1% vs 14.2%; p=0.472), right ventricular failure (13.9% vs 13.4%; p=0.796), and 30 day mortality (6.9 % vs 3.2%; p=0.226). Patients treated with an IABP had greater relative reductions in mean right atrial pressure (-24.1% vs -5.9%; p=0.044), pulmonary artery systolic (-11.7% vs +3.3%; p=<0.001), diastolic (-17.0% vs +12.0%; p=0.015), and mean pressures (-15.2% vs 0.5%; p=<0.001). Conclusions: Despite worse hemodynamic parameters and INTERMACS profile at baseline, ambulatory heart failure patients who received an IABP prior to LVAD implantation did not have an increased incident of stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury, right ventricular failure, or 30 day mortality, and had more favorable reductions in right atrial and pulmonary artery pressures. These results suggest that the use of the IABP prior to LVAD implantation in non-inotrope dependent patients with poor baseline hemodynamics may mitigate the risk of postoperative complications.

Introduction: Studies have demonstrated an association between hyperkalemia and increased mortality in patients with myocardial infarction, but limited data exist regarding hyperkalemia and associated death among unselected cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients. Hypothesis: Hyperkalemia is associated with mortality in CICU patients. Methods: Historical cohort of 9,681 CICU patients admitted from January 2007 to December 2015 with serum potassium measured on admission. Hyperkalemia was defined as admission potassium >=5.0 mEq/L, normokalemia as admission potassium 3.5-4.9 mEq/L, and hypokalemia as admission potassium <3.5 mEq/L. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine predictors of hospital mortality. Post-discharge survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Mean age was 67±15 years with 3,629 (36%) females and hospital mortality of 9%. Hyperkalemia occurred in 1,187 (12.3%), and hypokalemia occurred in 719 (7.4%). Compared to normokalemic patients, both hyperkalemic patients (unadjusted OR 2.85, 95% CI 2.40-3.39; P<.001) and hypokalemic patients (unadjusted OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.85-2.88; P<.001) were at increased risk of hospital mortality. After adjustment for illness severity and renal function, only hyperkalemic patients were at increased risk of hospital death (adjusted OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.07-1.69; p = 0.01), while hypokalemic patients were not (P = NS). Among hospital survivors, hyperkalemic patients had lower post-discharge survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P <0.001), while hypokalemic patients had similar survival compared to normokalemic patients (p = NS). After adjustment for illness severity and renal function, hospital survivors with hyperkalemia were at increased risk for post-discharge mortality compared with normokalemic patients (adjusted HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28; p=.003). Conclusions: Hyperkalemia on CICU admission is associated with higher hospital and post-discharge mortality, independent of renal function and illness severity. This emphasizes the importance of potassium abnormalities as a risk predictor in patients admitted to the CICU.

Background: Troponin-T (TnT) elevation is common in severe sepsis and septic shock, but the impact on mortality and other clinical outcomes remains uncertain. Methods: This was a retrospective review of adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock admitted to all the intensive care units (ICU) at Mayo Clinic, Rochester from January 2012 to December 2014. Patients with congenital heart disease or pre-existing moderate or greater valvular disease were excluded. TnT elevation was defined as initial TnT ≥0.1 ng/mL or rise in 3- and 6-hour TnT ≥0.03 ng/mL. Primary outcomes included ICU, hospital, 28-day and 1-year mortality and secondary outcomes were need for and duration of non-invasive ventilation or invasive mechanical ventilation, ICU readmission, and ICU and hospital length of stay. Two-tailed p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: During this three-year period, TnT was measured in 372/765 patients (49%) with septic shock with TnT elevation noted in 329/372 (88%) patients. In patients with and without TnT elevation, initial TnT was 0.14±0.26 vs. 0.14±0.02 ng/mL, p =0.57 and peak TnT was 0.20±0.36 vs. 0.08±0.11 ng/mL, p <0.001. Severity of illness scores, laboratory values, vasopressor use, clinical parameters and medications were similar between patients with and without TnT elevation, except that patients with TnT elevation were older and had more frequent history of coronary atherosclerosis, chronic kidney disease, heart failure and atrial fibrillation (all p <0.05). There was no significant difference in ICU mortality [43 (13%) vs. 8 (19%), p =0.34] and hospital mortality [75 (23%) vs. 12 (28%), p =0.45] between patients with and without TnT elevation. Long-term follow-up of 220/329 (67%) patients showed no significant difference in 28-day mortality [97/216 (45%) vs. 1/4 (25%); p =0.63] or 1-year mortality [163/216 (75%) vs. 4/4 (100%); p =0.58]. There was no significant difference in any of the secondary outcomes between patients with and without elevated TnT (all p >0.05). There was no difference in mortality with increasing quartiles of peak TnT. Conclusions: Troponin elevation is associated with older age and higher comorbidity burden, but does not predict mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

This cohort study characterizes heterogeneity in cardiac function prior to sepsis and describes associations with hospitalization outcomes and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Associations of early changes in vasoactive support with cardiogenic shock (CS) mortality remain incompletely defined. METHODS: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter registry of cardiac intensive care units. Patients admitted with CS (2018–2023) had vasoactive dosing assessed at 4 and 24 hours from cardiac intensive care unit admission and quantified by the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS). Prognostic associations of VIS at both time points, as well as change in VIS from 4 to 24 hours, were examined. Interaction testing was performed based on mechanical circulatory support status. RESULTS: Among 3665 patients, 82% had a change in VIS <10, with 7% and 11% having a ≥10-point increase and decrease from 4 to 24 hours, respectively. The 4 and 24-hour VIS were each associated with cardiac intensive care unit mortality (13%–45% and 11%–73% for VIS <10 to ≥40, respectively; P trend <0.0001 for each). Stratifying by the 4-hour VIS, changes in VIS from 4 to 24 hours had a graded association with mortality, ranging from a 2- to >4-fold difference in mortality comparing those with a ≥10-point increase to ≥10-point decrease in VIS ( P trend <0.0001). The change in VIS alone provided good discrimination of cardiac intensive care unit mortality (C-statistic, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.70–0.75]) and improved discrimination of the 24-hour Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (0.72 [95% CI, 0.69–0.74] to 0.76 [95% CI, 0.74–0.78]) and the clinician-assessed Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions shock stage (0.72 [95% CI, 0.70–0.74] to 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75–0.79]). Although present in both groups, the mortality risk associated with VIS was attenuated in patients managed with versus without mechanical circulatory support (odds ratio per 10-point higher 24-hour VIS, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.23–1.49] versus 1.84 [95% CI, 1.69–2.01]; P interaction <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Early changes in the magnitude of vasoactive support in CS are associated with a gradient of risk for mortality. These data suggest that early VIS trajectory may improve CS prognostication, with the potential to be leveraged for clinical decision-making and research applications in CS.

Cardiogenic shock continues to carry a high mortality rate despite contemporary care, with no breakthrough therapies shown to improve survival over the past few decades. It is a time‐sensitive condition that commonly results in cardiovascular complications and multisystem organ failure, necessitating multidisciplinary expertise. Managing patients with cardiogenic shock remains challenging even in well‐resourced settings, and an important subgroup of patients may require cardiac replacement therapy. As a result, the idea of leveraging the collective cognitive and procedural proficiencies of multiple providers in a collaborative, team‐based approach to care (the “shock team”) has been advocated by professional societies and implemented at select high‐volume clinical centers. A slowly maturing evidence base has suggested that cardiogenic shock teams may improve patient outcomes. Although several registries exist that are beginning to inform care, particularly around therapeutic strategies of pharmacologic and mechanical circulatory support, none of these are currently focused on the shock team approach, multispecialty partnership, education, or process improvement. We propose the creation of a Cardiogenic Shock Team Collaborative—akin to the successful Pulmonary Embolism Response Team Consortium—with a goal to promote sharing of care protocols, education of stakeholders, and discovery of how process and performance may influence patient outcomes, quality, resource consumption, and costs of care.

Background Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides full hemodynamic support for patients with cardiogenic shock, but optimal timing of ECMO initiation remains uncertain. We sought to determine whether earlier initiation of ECMO is associated with improved survival in cardiogenic shock. Methods and Results We analyzed adult patients with cardiogenic shock who received venoarterial ECMO from the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry from 2009 to 2019, excluding those cannulated following an operation. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association between time from admission to ECMO initiation and in‐hospital death. Among 8619 patients (median, 56.7 [range, 44.8–65.6] years; 33.5% women), the median duration from admission to ECMO initiation was 14 (5–32) hours. Patients who had ECMO initiated within 24 hours (n=5882 [68.2%]) differed from those who had ECMO initiated after 24 hours, with younger age, more preceding cardiac arrest, and worse acidosis. After multivariable adjustment, patients with ECMO initiated >24 hours after admission had higher risk of in‐hospital death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.06–1.36]; P =0.004). Each 12‐hour increase in the time from admission to ECMO initiation was incrementally associated with higher adjusted in‐hospital mortality rate (adjusted odds ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03–1.10]; P <0.001). The association between longer time to ECMO and worse outcomes appeared stronger in patients with lower shock severity. Conclusions Longer delays from admission to ECMO initiation were associated with higher a mortality rate in a large‐scale, international registry. Our analysis supports optimization of door‐to‐support time and the avoidance of inappropriately delayed ECMO initiation.

ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of the study is to evaluate whether serial assessment of shock severity can improve prognostication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort of 21,461 ICU patient admissions from 2014 to 2018. We assigned the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Shock Stage in each 4-h block during the first 24 h of ICU admission; shock was defined as SCAI Shock stage C, D, or E. In-hospital mortality was evaluated using logistic regression. Results: The admission SCAI Shock stages were as follows: A, 39.0%; B, 27.0%; C, 28.9%; D, 2.6%; and E, 2.5%. The SCAI Shock stage subsequently increased in 30.6%, and late-onset shock developed in 30.4%. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients who had shock on admission (11.9%) or late-onset shock (7.3%) versus no shock (4.3%). Persistence of shock predicted higher mortality (adjusted OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.06–1.13, for each ICU block with shock). The mean SCAI Shock stage had higher discrimination for in-hospital mortality than the admission or maximum SCAI Shock stage. Dynamic modeling of the SCAI Shock classification improved discrimination for in-hospital mortality (C-statistic = 0.64–0.71). Conclusions: Serial application of the SCAI Shock classification provides improved mortality risk stratification compared with a single assessment on admission, facilitating dynamic prognostication.