Citations

CRA1008 The full, final text of this abstract will be available at abstract.asco.org at 7:30 AM (EDT) on Monday, June, 3, 2013, and in the Annual Meeting Proceedings online supplement to the June 20, 2013, issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology. Onsite at the Meeting, this abstract will be printed in the Monday edition of ASCO Daily News.

1033 Background: MA.32 investigates effects of Metformin vs. Placebo, in addition to standard care, on invasive disease free survival and other outcomes. Metformin may improve obesity and metabolic factors [insulin, glucose, leptin, C-reactive protein (CRP)] that have been associated with poor BC outcomes. Maintaining blinding of investigators to outcomes, we conducted a planned, DSMB approved, analysis of the effect of Metformin vs. Placebo on weight and metabolic factors at 6 months, including examination of interactions with baseline body mass index (BMI), in the first 498 subjects with paired fasting plasma samples. Methods: 498 non-diabetic subjects with T1-3, N0-3, M0 BC meeting defined entry criteria who had completed surgery and adjuvant chemo (if given) provided fasting blood samples at randomization and 6 months (while on study drug). Glucose was measured locally; blood was aliquoted, frozen and stored at -80°C then shipped to NCIC CTG (Kingston, Canada). Paired plasma aliquots were shipped to Mount Sinai Hospital (Toronto, Canada) for analysis of Insulin (Dako), hsCRP (Roche Elecsys) and leptin (Luminex). Statistical analysis used the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: Mean age was 52.4 ±9.2 years. Arms were balanced for ER/PgR (63% pos), BMI, prior adjuvant chemo (89%), T and N status, grade, mastectomy/lumpectomy and radiation. Conclusions: Metformin significantly improved weight, insulin, glucose, leptin and CRP at 6 months. Effects did not vary by baseline BMI. Funded by: NIH, CCSRI, CBCF, BCRF, Apotex Canada (drug & placebo - in kind). Clinical trial information: NCT01101438. [Table: see text]

4047 Background: PNET has long had few effective therapies other than chemotherapy. Recent placebo-controlled phase III trials of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and the VEGF/ PDGF receptor inhibitor sunitinib noted improved progression-free survival (PFS). However, objective response rates (RR) with these agents are still <10%. Preclinical studies suggest enhanced anti-tumor effects with combined mTOR and VEGF targeted therapy. Methods: We conducted a phase II trial of the mTOR inhibitor TEM (25 mg IV q week) and the VEGF-A monoclonal antibody BEV (10 mg/kg IV q 2 weeks) in patients (pts) with well or moderately differentiated PNET and progressive disease by RECIST within 7 months of study entry. Co-primary endpoints were RR and 6-month PFS. Planned enrollment is 50 patients, with interim analysis for futility after the first 25 evaluable pts. Pts had no prior mTOR or VEGF targeted agents, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate hematologic and organ function. Continued octreotide was allowed, but not required. Prior interferon, embolization, and ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens were allowed. Results: Confirmed PR was documented in 13 of the first 25 (52%) evaluable patients. 21 of 25 (84%) patients were progression-free at 6 months. Both endpoints exceeded the protocol-defined criteria to continue enrollment. For 36 evaluable patients, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events attributed to therapy were hypertension (14%), leukopenia (11%), lymphopenia (11%), hyperglycemia (11%), mucositis (8%), hypokalemia (8%), and fatigue (8%). Conclusions: The combination of TEM/BEV has substantial activity in a multi-center phase II trial with RR of 52%, well in excess of single targeted agents in PNET. 6-month PFS was a notable 84% in a population of patients with RECIST criteria progression within 7 months of study entry. Accrual is ongoing.

e14594 Background: PNETs are uncommon malignancies and little is known about risk their factors and association with other cancers. Our aim was to evaluate smoking, alcohol use, personal history of diabetes and a family history of PNET and other cancers as potential risk factors. Methods: PNET cases seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 2000 to 2011 were evaluated. Insulinoma and high-grade PNETs were excluded. Primary care patients served as controls and were matched (2:1 ratio) to cases on age, sex and region of residence. Cases and controls completed questionnaires at the time of evaluation. Categorical variables were compared with the chi-square test; continuous variables were compared using a two-sample t test. Results: 355 cases were evaluated, mean age was 56.6 years, 52% were males and 96% were White. Personal smoking history was not associated with PNETs (cases 51%, controls 47%, p=0.24). Ever-alcohol use was less common among cases (54% vs. 67%, p=0.001). 19% of cases reported a history of diabetes compared with 11% of controls (p<0.001). Cases were more likely than controls to report a family member with sarcoma (p=0.02), PNET (p=0.024), gall bladder cancer (p=0.024), ovarian cancer (p=0.04) and stomach cancer (p=0.01). Conclusions: Cases with PNETs were more likely than controls to report a history of diabetes and less likely to report alcohol use. There was no association with smoking. Several types of cancer were more commonly reported in family members of cases than controls.

4043 Background: Systemic treatment options for progressive metastatic NET, including islet cell carcinoma (ICC) and carcinoid tumor (CT), are limited. These tumors frequently express the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Gefitinib, a small-molecule inhibitor of the EGFR tyrosine kinase, has been shown to inhibit the growth of NET cell lines. Methods: Eligibility criteria included: radiographic progression by RECIST criteria, ECOG PS ≤ 2, ≤ 1 prior chemotherapy, and good organ function. Prior interferon and prior or concurrent octreotide (if disease progression documented on stable dose) were allowed. Pts received gefitinib 250 mg po daily. We evaluated 6 month (mos) progression-free survival (PFS) in two cohorts (ie, CT and ICC) using separate 2-stage phase II designs. 6 mos PFS rates of 30% (CT) and 10% (ICC) were considered promising. Results: 96 pts were enrolled: (57 CT, 39 ICC). For pts evaluable for the primary endpoint, 23 of 38 (61%) CT pts and 9 of 29 (31%) pts with ICC were progression-free at 6 mos. 1 PR and one minor response (MR = 20–29% decrease in sum of target lesion diameters) were observed in 40 CT pts; 2 PR and 1 MR in 31 ICC pts. In addition, 32% (12/38) of CT and 14% (4/29) of ICC pts had stable disease on study for a duration that exceeded by at least 4 months the time to progression documented prior to study entry. Grade 3–4 toxicity was infrequent with fatigue (6%), diarrhea (5%) and rash (3%) most common. Evaluation of markers of the EGFR pathway on tumor tissue will be presented. Conclusions: Gefitinib is well-tolerated and results in prolonged disease stabilization in pts with prior documented objective progression of CT and ICC, with rare objective responses. Supported by NOI CM17104. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

577 Background: BAY 43–9006 targets the ras/raf signaling pathway and inhibits VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3 and or PDGFR-β growth factors. A study was conducted to assess anti-tumor activity and the toxicity profile in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: A two-stage phase II study was conducted with pts with MBC who had measurable disease and were candidates for 1 st or 2 nd line chemotherapy and had previously received an anthracycline and/or a taxane in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or metastatic setting. Pts started with a dose of 400 mg twice daily on days 1–28 of each 4 week cycle. Based on interval adverse events (AEs), a dose reduction was considered as 400 mg given one time daily. Primary endpoint was tumor response defined as a complete or partial response (PR) according to RESIST. The study required 40 pts, but was to be terminated if 0 or 1 responses occurred among 1 st 20 eligible pts. Results: 23 pts enrolled with a median age of 54 (range 37–70) but 3 were declared ineligible. All 23 pts were included in all analyses except efficacy analysis as stated per protocol. Fifteen (65%) had visceral metastasis; 22 (96%) had prior anthracycline treatment (tx); 16 (70%) had prior taxane tx.; 10 (44%) had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease and 14 (61%) had a prior relapse free interval of 12 months (mos) or more. Pts received tx for a median of 2 cycles (range 1–8) with a median follow-up of 7.2 mos. Dose reductions were due to dermatitis/skin rash (3), hand/foot skin reaction (2), hypertension (1) and cramping hands/feet (1). No grade 4 AEs occurred and grade 3 AEs included acne (2), hand/foot skin reaction (1), neutropenia (1), cough (1), wound infection (1), and prolonged PTT (1). Among the 20 pts eligible for efficacy analysis one pt (5%; 95% CI 0.5–20.5%) achieved a PR with duration of 3.6 mos and one pt achieved stable disease for at least 6 mos. The 6-month overall survival rate was 81% and the progression-free survival rates were 53% at 2 mos, 24% at 4 mos and 6% at 6 mos. Median time to progression was 2 mos. Based on the lack of sufficient response, we did not proceed with the 2nd stage of this study. Conclusion: Treatment with oral BAY 43–9006, while well tolerated, does not have sufficient activity to warrant further testing as a single agent in this disease setting. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Genentech Genentech

4504 Background: Treatment options for metastatic NET, including islet cell carcinoma (ICC) and carcinoid tumor (CT), are limited. These tumors frequently express vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and platelet derived growth factor receptor receptor-β (PDGFR-β). Sorafenib, a small-molecule inhibitor of the VEGFR-2 and PDGFR-β tyrosine kinase domains, is a rational targeted therapy to evaluate in NET. Methods: Eligibility criteria included: ECOG PS = 2, = 1 prior chemotherapy, good organ function and signed informed consent. Prior interferon and prior or concurrent octreotide at a stable dose were allowed. Pts unable to take oral medications, with uncontrolled hypertension or with symptomatic coronary artery disease were excluded. Pts received sorafenib 400 mg po BID. Primary endpoint was response by RECIST in two cohorts (ie, CT and ICC) using separate 2-stage phase II designs. Results: 93 pts were enrolled: (50 CT, 43 ICC). For pts evaluable for the primary endpoint, 4 of 41 (10%) CT pts and 4 of 41 (10%) ICC pts had a PR. There were 3 minor responses (MR = 20–29% decrease in sum of target lesion diameters) in CT pts and 9 MRs in ICC pts for PR+MR rate of 17% for CT pts and 32% for ICC pts. For pts evaluable, 6-month progression-free survival was observed in 8/20 CT and 14/23 ICC pts. Grade 3–4 toxicity occurred in 43% of pts, with skin (20%), GI (7%) and fatigue (9%) most common. Translational studies from tumor tissue will be presented. Conclusions: Sorafenib at 400 mg po BID has modest activity in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, with frequent grade = 3 toxicity. Supported by NOI CM6225. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

1071 Background: N0234 is a phase II trial of gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle and erlotinib at 150 mg daily in patients with previous therapy with either an anthracycline or a taxane for MBC. A partial response (PR) rate of 17% has been reported (ASCO 2005). Recent information suggests that over-expression of the EGFR pathway is frequent in patients with TNeg MBC. Methods: Tissue and serum were obtained for translational studies of ER, PR, HER2, and proteins related to EGFR pathway on tissue using immunohistochemistry; CK19, mammoglobin, and TTK on circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Markers were evaluated centrally, blinded to patient outcome. Complete data were available in 57 of 59 eligible patients; 20/57 patients (pts) were TNeg. Results: A PR rate of 25% and clinical benefit rate (PR + stable disease > 6 months)of 25% was observed in TNeg pts as compared to a PR rate of 14% (p = 0.30) and clinical benefit rate 22% (p= 0.75) for non-TNeg pts. Median progression free survival 72 days vs 98 days (p=0.13) and overall survival 227 days vs 738 days (p<0.001) were shorter for TNeg pts. Translational results for the EGFR pathway proteins and CTC analysis is forthcoming. Conclusions: The combination of gemcitabine and erlotinib appears to be as active in the non-TNeg and TNeg subset of patients on this trial. TNeg patients had an inferior clinical result, confirming the poor outcome seen in these patients. Data for the remaining biomarkers potentially predictive of activity will be presented. Supported by CA-25224, CA-37404. [Table: see text]

579 Background: N9831 and other clinical trials have demonstrated the additive survival benefit of trastuzumab (H) therapy with chemotherapy for patients with resected HER-2 positive breast cancer. Cardiac toxicity (CTox) is increased by this strategy. Prediction of or early detection of CTox is important. Methods: 95 patients provided informed consent. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), troponin T (TnT) and I (TnI), TNF-alpha, IL-1b, and IL-6 were to be drawn at baseline, after initiation of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC), after initiation of paclitaxel (T), and after the initiation of H (may have been given concurrently with T). 67 patients with at least a baseline sample, a post-treatment sample, and a baseline and subsequent evaluation of LVEF were studied. No patient in this group had a grade 3 decline in LVEF. Only 3 of these patients did not receive H. Values above the 99th percentile were considered abnormal for troponin. 40 ng/ml was considered elevated for BNP. Results: Values of CRP, TNF-alpha, IL- 6 and IL1b changed in very few patients and without a discernible pattern. For further evaluation of BNP, TnI, and TnT, 2 definitions of CTox were tested: 1. a >10% drop in LVEF from baseline (n=27) and 2. a drop in LVEF of 10–15% to less than the institutional lower limit of normal (LLN) OR a >15% decline in LVEF (n=14). No pre-treatment marker appeared to predict a > 10% decline in LVEF (definition 1). For patients fulfilling definition 2, pre-treatment BNP > 40 was seen in 21% of patients vs 8% of normals (nls) (p= 0.18) and an abnormal TnI (>0.04) was seen in 21% vs 6% of nls (p=0.10). Only doubling of BNP appeared promising as a serial marker of CTox using definition 2 (27% vs 7% for nls (p = 0.09). Conclusions: Baseline BNP and TnI and serial measures of BNP may be promising for further investigation for the prediction and detection of treatment-related CTox. Due to limitations of the study including the small numbers of patients analyzed, the difficulty in defining CTox, and the variation in the timing of sample procurement and assessment, these data are considered exploratory. Supported by CA-25224, CA-2115, CA 38926, CA31946. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

576 Background: In node-negative, ER + breast cancer, gene expression profiling can identify level of risk and, in the case of ODX, may also identify pts with a higher chance of benefiting from adjuvant chemotherapy. Because the gene profile in ODX includes an assessment of ER, HER2, and proliferation, we hypothesized that clinicians using standardized criteria could discriminate risk (high versus low/intermediate) as specified by ODX. Methods: We identified Mayo Clinic patients with node-negative, ER + breast cancer, for whom ODX scores were available. Tumor slides were reviewed by an expert breast pathologist to confirm tumor size, histology, and tumor grade. Both ER and PR were quantitated; HER-2 was determined by IHC (FISH, if 2+). These clinical cases were presented to six academic oncologists, blinded to the ODX score, to predict ODX risk (low, intermediate, or high) and give their recommendation for chemotherapy (CTX) (yes/no). Afterwards, they were presented with the same cases with the actual ODX score, to give recommendations regarding CTX. Results: ODX scores in tumors from 31 patients were low in 18 pts, intermediate in 10 pts, and high in 3 pts. Concordance between predicted and actual ODX scores being low/intermediate vs high exceeded 87% for each oncologist. The most frequent discrepancies were actual low scores predicted as intermediate (31/80 discordant) and actual intermediate scores predicted as low (29/80 discordant). Overall agreement of predicted scores (high vs low/intermediate) among the oncologists was substantial (kappa=0.75, p<0.0001). CTX recommendations following provision of the ODX scores changed on average 18.2% (range 12.9%-25.8%) of the time, with slightly fewer changing for, versus against, a CTX recommendation. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the proper evaluation and interpretation of traditional prognostic criteria will identify most node negative, ER + patients at high risk of recurrence (as predicted by ODX) but poorly discriminate low versus intermediate risk. The provision of ODX data changed the recommendation for CTX in approximately 20% of cases. No significant financial relationships to disclose.