Citations

Clear

263 citation(s) found for "Ellis, MJ".

Proposals for revised International Working Group–European LeukemiaNet criteria for anemia response in myelofibrosis
Tefferi, Ayalew , Barosi, Giovanni , Hernández‐Boluda, Juan Carlos , Bose, Prithviraj , Döhner, Konstanze , Gangat, Naseema , Garcia, Jacqueline S. , Gisslinger, Heinz , Gupta, Vikas , Harrison, Claire , Loscocco, Giuseppe Gaetano , Mora, Barbara , Odenike, Olatoyosi, Pardanani, Animesh , Patel, Anand , Pemmaraju, Naveen , Rampal, Raajit K. , Sirhan, Shireen , Vachhani, Pankit , Vannucchi, Alessandro M., Barbui, Tiziano , Hernández-Boluda, Juan Carlos , Bose, Prithviraj , Gangat, Naseema , Garcia, Jacqueline S , Gupta, Vikas , Hexner, Elizabeth , Hobbs, Gabriela S , Koschmieder, Steffen , Kuykendall, Andrew , Loscocco, Giuseppe Gaetano , Mascarenhas, John , Masarova, Lucia , Mesa, Ruben , Oh, Stephen T , Patel, Anand , Pemmaraju, Naveen , Rambaldi, Alessandro , Szuber, Natasha , Vachhani, Pankit , Barbui, Tiziano , Passamonti, Francesco , Ellis, Martin H. , Gotlib, Jason , Guglielmelli, Paola , Hexner, Elizabeth O. , Hobbs, Gabriela , Kiladjian, Jean‐Jacques , Koschmieder, Steffen , Kröger, Nicolaus , Mascarenhas, John , Masárová, Lucia , Mesa, Ruben A. , Odenike, Olatoyosi , Oh, Stephen T. , Rambaldi, Alessandro , Szuber, Natasha , Talpaz, Moshe

Mayo Clinic

Blood | August 8, 2024 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 1813-1820

10.1182/blood.2024025802 | PMID 39116296 Get It

Abstract With emerging new drugs in myelofibrosis (MF), a robust and harmonized framework for defining the severity of anemia and response to treatment will enhance clinical investigation and facilitate interstudy comparisons. Accordingly, the lead authors on the 2013 edition of the International Working Group–European LeukemiaNet (IWG-ELN) response criteria in MF were summoned to revise their document with the intent to (1) account for gender-specific differences in determining hemoglobin levels for eligibility criteria; (2) revise the definition of transfusion-dependent anemia (TDA) based on current restrictive transfusion practices; and (3) provide a structurally simple and easy to apply response criteria that are sensitive enough to detect efficacy signals (minor response) and also account for major responses. The initial draft of the 2024 IWG-ELN proposed criteria was subsequently circulated around a wider group of international experts and their feedback incorporated. The proposed articles include new definitions for TDA (≥3 units in the 12 weeks before study enrollment) and hemoglobin thresholds for eligibility criteria (<10 g/dL for women and <11 g/dL for men). The revised document also provides separate (TDA vs non-TDA) and graded (major vs minor response) response criteria while preserving the requirement for a 12-week period of screening and observation on treatment.
Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee II for the Optimization of Surgical Education and Training in the United States
Johnson, Wali R. , Mainali, Bigyan B. , Chen, Xiaodong, Martin, Rebecca , Dawson-Amoah, Kwesi G, Doyle, Kathleen M., Ellis, Danielle , Fazzone, Brian , Hoefer, Lea , Riner, Andrea N. , Shin, Thomas , Yelorda, Kirbi , Kearse, LaDonna , Chen, Xiaodong, Alobuia, Wilson Mawutor , Anderson, Erik M., Martin, Rebecca, Caldwell, Katharine E. , Dawson-Amoah, Kwesi G., Ghio, Michael , Godfrey, Caroline M. , Gomes, Camilla , Niehaus, Hannah, Phelps, Hannah M. , Sharon, Cimarron E. , Coleman, Julia R.

Mayo Clinic

Annals of Surgery | August 7, 2024 | Volume: 281 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 40-45

10.1097/sla.0000000000006483 | PMID 39109446 Get It

Objective: This study aims to appraise recommendations from an expert panel of surgical educators on optimizing surgical education and training in the setting of contemporary challenges. Background: The Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC II), a group of surgical educators, was convened to make recommendations to optimize surgical training, considering the current changes in the landscape of surgical education. Surgical trainees were recruited to assess their impressions of the recommendations. Methods: A mixed-methods study design was employed, with a survey, followed by focus group interviews. Participating residents and fellows were recruited through a purposeful sampling approach. Descriptive statistics were applied to analyze the survey data, and a thematic data analysis on interview transcripts was employed. Results: The majority of trainee respondents (n=16) thought that all of the subcommittee recommendations should be included in the final BRC II recommendations and paper. According to the interviews, overall, the feedback from the trainees was positive, with particular excitement around work-life integration, education support and faculty development, and funding pitfalls. Some themes about concerns included a lack of clarity about the recommendations, concern about some recommendations being in conflict with one another, and a disconnect between the initial BRC II survey and the subsequent recommendations. Conclusions: The residents gathered for this focus group were encouraged by the thought, effort, and intention that gathered the surgical leaders across the country to make the recommendations. While the trainees wanted clarity on some areas, the overall opinion was in agreement with the recommendations.
Pediatric to adult transition care in neurogastroenterology and motility: A position paper from the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Butt, Mohsin F. , Groen, Jip , Jonker, C. , Murray, Helen Burton , Chang, Lin , Lorenzo, Carlo Di, Ellis, Jacob, Escher, Johanna C. , Gorter, Ramon R. , Jewell, Sorcha, Karrento, Katja, Koster, Emma C., Rosen, Rachel , Tilburg, Miranda A.L. van , Zárate-López, Natalia , Benninga, Marc A. , Burton-Murray, Helen , Chang, Lin , Nurko, Samuel , Rosen, Rachel , Corsetti, M , Butt, Mohsin F , Jonker, Charlotte A. L., Carrington, Emma V. , Lorenzo, Carlo Di, Ellis, Jacob, Kovacic, Katja K., Nurko, Samuel , Corsetti, Maura

Mayo Clinic

Neurogastroenterology & Motility | July 22, 2024 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 10 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/nmo.14869 | PMID 39038114 Get It

Abstract Transition services—programs that support adolescents and young adults (AYAs) as they move from a child‐centered to a more autonomous, adult‐orientated healthcare system—have been associated with improved short‐ and long‐term healthcare outcomes. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of evidence exploring transition services within the neurogastroenterology and motility (NGM) field. The overall aim of this article, endorsed by the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, is to promote a discussion about the role of transition services for patients with NGM disorders. The AYAs addressed herein are those who have: (a) a ROME positive disorder of gut–brain interaction (DGBI), (b) a primary or secondary motility disorder (including those with motility disorders that have been surgically managed), or (c) an artificial feeding requirement (parenteral or enteral tube feeding) to manage malnutrition secondary to categories (a) or (b). The issues explored in this position paper include the specific physical and psychological healthcare needs of patients with NGM disorders; key healthcare professionals who should form part of a secondary care NGM transition service; the triadic relationship between healthcare professionals, caregivers, and patients; approaches to selecting patients who may benefit most from transition care; methods to assess transition readiness; and strategies with which to facilitate transfer of care between healthcare professionals. Key areas for future research are also addressed, including the construction of NGM‐specific transition readiness questionnaires, tools to assess post‐transfer healthcare outcomes, and educational programs to train healthcare professionals about transition care in NGM.
Comparison of chemotherapy to chemo-immunotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) of mixed histology: A multi-institutional international retrospective study.
Matteson, Kelsey, Ellis-Caleo, Timothy, Mingo, Emanuele Claudio , Aggarwal, Vanya , Alam, Sumaiya, Ahmed, Murtaza, Grohé, Christian , Berjaga, María Zurera, Watson, Alexander, Chiang, Anne C. , Nassar, Amin H. , Sridhar, Arthi , Crowley, Fionnuala , Nana, Frank Aboubakar , Pinato, David J. , Naqash, Abdul Rafeh

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 26, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 8602-8602

10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.8602 Get It

8602 Background: LCNECs are a rare subtype of lung cancer, with limited clinical trial data and an unclear consensus on first-line treatment. Even less is known about the optimal treatment approach for pts with mixed LCNECs, a pathologic subtype where tumors contain both LCNEC histology as well as features of adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, or small cell lung cancer. Methods: We conducted an international multi-institutional retrospective analysis (n=13 institutions) of pts with advanced or metastatic mixed LCNECs who received 1st-line systemic therapy with either chemotherapy alone (chemo) or chemo-immunotherapy (chemoIO) between 2010-2023. Clinical outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs). Survival comparisons were made via the log-rank test. Results: Seventy-three pts with mixed LCNECs received either chemo (n=42, 57.5%) or chemoIO (n=31, 42.5%). The most common chemo regimens were carboplatin/etoposide (n=27) and cisplatin/etoposide (n=8), while the most common chemoIO was carboplatin/etoposide/atezolizumab (n=19). Median age at 1st-line therapy initiation was 65 (IQR: 60-72). 64% of pts were male (n=47). The majority were former smokers (n=41, 56.2%), with 22 current smokers (30.1%), and 10 non-smokers (13.7%). Mixed histologies included LCNEC/NSCLC (n=45, 56.2%), LCNEC/SCLC (n=17), LCNEC/carcinoid (n=1), and unspecified mixed LCNEC (n=10). Median PFS for chemo was 5 months (95% CI 2.7-9.2) vs. 6 months (95% CI 4.4-8.3) for chemoIO ( p=0.86). Median OS for chemo was 14.2 months (95% CI 10.4-22.5) vs. 17.2 months (95% CI 9.4-27.2) for chemoIO ( p=0.66). The ORR did not differ between chemo (n=18, 45%) and chemoIO (n=15, 48.4%) ( p=0.81). In the chemo group, 60% (n=25) experienced trAEs of any grade, with 23.8% (n=10) experiencing grade 3+ events and four requiring hospitalizations. For chemoIO pts, 61% (n=19) experienced trAEs, with 25.8% (n=8) experiencing grade 3+ events and six requiring hospitalizations. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3+ trAE for both chemo (n=5) and chemoIO (n=4). Overall, there were no significant differences between chemo or chemoIO groups for ORR ( p=0.81), all-grade trAEs ( p=0.88), grade 3+ trAEs ( p=0.84), PFS ( p=0.86), or median OS ( p=0.66). There were no significant differences in median PFS ( p=0.46) or OS ( p=0.99) for pts with mixed LCNEC/NSCLC vs. LCNEC/SCLC. Conclusions: For mixed LCNECs, there was no significant difference in PFS or OS between first-line treatment with chemo vs. chemoIO, suggesting limited benefit from immunotherapy for these pts. Additionally, survival outcomes did not differ between mixed LCNEC/NSCLC and LCNEC/SCLC, suggesting a biology primarily driven by their neuroendocrine component.
Digital droplet RT‐LAMP increases speed of SARS‐CoV‐2 viral RNA detection
Yuan, Yuan , Loveday, Emma K. , Thomas, Mallory M. , Wilking, James N. , Ye, Fangfu , Weitz, David A. , Bikos, Dimitri A , Ellis, Perry W. , Tao, Ye , Bikos, Dimitri A. , Chang, Connie B.

Mayo Clinic

Smart Medicine | June 6, 2024 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/smmd.20240008 | PMID 39188696 Get It

AbstractNucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) remains one of the most reliable methods for pathogen identification. However, conventional bulk NAATs may not be sufficiently fast or sensitive enough for the detection of clinically‐relevant pathogens in point‐of‐care testing. Here, we have developed a digital droplet RT‐LAMP (ddRT‐LAMP) assay that rapidly and quantitatively detects the SARS‐CoV‐2 viral E gene in microfluidic drops. Droplet partitioning using ddRT‐LAMP significantly accelerates detection times across a wide range of template concentrations compared to bulk RT‐LAMP assays. We discover that a reduction in droplet diameter decreases assay times up to a certain size, upon which surface adsorption of the RT‐LAMP polymerase reduces reaction efficiency. Optimization of drop size and polymerase concentration enables rapid, sensitive, and quantitative detection of the SARS‐CoV‐2 E gene in only 8 min. These results highlight the potential of ddRT‐LAMP assays as an excellent platform for quantitative point‐of‐care testing.
Adjunctive Statistical Standardization of Adjuvant Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor in Canadian Cancer Trials Group MA.27 Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Trial of Exemestane Versus Anastrozole
Chapman, Judith‐Anne W. , Bayani, Jane , Sengupta, Sandip , Bartlett, John M.S. , Quintayo, Mary Anne , Virk, Shakeel , Goss, Paul E., Ingle, James N. , Ellis, Matthew J. , Budd, G. Thomas , Ansari, Rafat , Tozer, Richard , D’Souza, David , Chalchal, Haji , Spadafora, Silvana , Stearns, Vered , Perez, Edith A. , Whelan, Timothy J., Elliott, Catherine, Shepherd, Lois E. , Taylor, Karen J. , Whelan, Timothy J. , Ingle, J , Virk, Shakeel , Ellis, Matthew J , Sledge, George W , Budd, G Thomas , Rabaglio-Poretti, Manuela , Stearns, Vered , Perez, Edith A , Gelmon, Karen A , Whelan, Timothy J , Shepherd, LE , Chen, Bingshu E , Taylor, Karen J , Piper, Tammy , Sledge, George W. , Rabaglio, Manuela , Gelmon, Karen A. , Chen, Bingshu E.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 2, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 2887-2898

10.1200/jco.24.00835 | PMID 38824432 Get It

PURPOSE ASCO/College of American Pathologists guidelines recommend reporting estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) as positive with (1%-100%) staining. Statistically standardized quantitated positivity could indicate differential associations of positivity with breast cancer outcomes. METHODS MA.27 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00066573 ) was a phase III adjuvant trial of exemestane versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. Immunochemistry ER and PgR HSCORE and % positivity (%+) were centrally assessed by machine image quantitation and statistically standardized to mean 0 and standard deviation (SD) 1 after Box-Cox variance stabilization transformations of square for ER; for PgR, (1) natural logarithm (0.1 added to 0 HSCOREs and 0%+) and (2) square root. Our primary end point was MA.27 distant disease-free survival (DDFS) at a median 4.1-year follow-up, and secondary end point was event-free survival (EFS). Univariate survival with cut points at SDs about a mean of 0 (≤–1; (–1, 0]; (0, 1]; >1) was described with Kaplan-Meier plots and examined with Wilcoxon (Peto-Prentice) test statistic. Adjusted Cox multivariable regressions had two-sided Wald tests and nominal significance P < .05. RESULTS Of 7,576 women accrued, 3,048 women's tumors had machine-quantitated image analysis results: 2,900 (95%) for ER, 2,726 (89%) for PgR, and 2,582 (85% of 3,048) with both ER and PgR. Higher statistically standardized ER and PgR HSCORE and %+ were associated with better univariate DDFS and EFS ( P < .001). In multivariable assessments, ER HSCORE and %+ were not significantly associated ( P = .52-.88) with DDFS in models with PgR, whereas higher PgR HSCORE and %+ were significantly associated with better DDFS ( P = .001) in models with ER. CONCLUSION Adjunctive statistical standardization differentiated quantitated levels of ER and PgR. Patients with higher ER- and PgR-standardized units had superior DDFS compared with those with HSCOREs and %+ ≤–1.
Long term impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mammographic breast cancer screening.
Prasad, Dhauna Karam, McGary, Alyssa , Ellis, Richard , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Haddad, Tufia C. , Yousufuddin, Mohammed , Kosiorek, Heidi , Pritchett, Joshua C.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 29, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 1597-1597

10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.1597 Get It

1597 Background: The impact of COVID19 pandemic on patient health beliefs and healthcare systems has adversely affected mammographic breast cancer screening (MBCS) during the initial stages of the pandemic. The aims of our study were to determine whether the initial decrease in MBCS rates persisted or if there was a rebound in later stages and to quantify the impact on urban and rural populations. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed data from March 2017 to March 2023 to assess whether eligible women received annual MBCS during this timeframe. We included women aged 40-75 years, drawn from the integrated Mayo Clinic system, encompassing nearly 60 primary care practices in Arizona, Florida, Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, representing a broad cross-section of the United States (US) population. US census data was utilized to classify a county as urban or rural. We divided the study period into 4 categories:1) pre-COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2017-March 10, 2020), 2) early pandemic (March 11, 2020-March 10, 2021; pre-vaccination period), 3) mid- pandemic (March 11, 2021-March 10, 2022; delta and omicron variant dominant period), and 4) late pandemic (March 11, 2022-March 1, 2023; recovery period). Utilizing the Poisson regression model, we compared the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for rates of MBCS across the 4 predefined time periods. Multivariable modeling was performed to assess the significance of MBCS rates with urbanicity while controlling for the year (2017-2022) and age. Results: By race and ethnicity, the women in this cohort were White (92%), Black (3.1%), Asian (3%) and other (1.9%). The median age was 57 years and the cohort included 239, 804 women aged 40-75 years. MBCS rates was 49.2% in 2017, 47.1% in 2018, 46.4% in 2019, and decreased to 42.1% in 2020 and improved to 44.7% in 2021 and 43.8% in 2022. Compared with the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period, there was a significant decrease in MBCS rate in the early pandemic (IRR= 0.886, 95% CI 0.879, 0.892, p<0.001). Though the MBCS rate improved in the mid-pandemic period, it remained below the pre-pandemic level (IRR=0.941, 95% CI 0.934, 0.948, p<0.001). Similarly, during the late stage of the pandemic, the MBCS rate remained lower than the pre-pandemic level (IRR=0.922, 95% CI 0.915, 0.928, p<0.001). Rural counties had a lower MBCS rate compared with urban counties (IRR = 0.936, 95% CI 0.931, 0.941, p<0.001). Conclusions: This study confirms the negative impact of the early COVID-19 pandemic on MBCS, and it revealed its persistent effect, as the current MBCS rate remains below the pre-pandemic rate. These findings were more evident in rural counties. Factors contributing to the long-lasting impact are being analyzed with the intent to develop and implement targeted solutions to improve the MBCS rate.
Adjunctive statistical standardization of quantitated adjuvant ER and PgR in CCTG MA.27.
Chapman, Judy‐Anne W., Bayani, Jane , Sengupta, Sandip , Battlett, John MS, Quintayo, Mary Anne , Virk, Shakeel , Goss, Paul E., Budd, G. Thomas , Perez, Edith A. , Whelan, Timothy J. , Shepherd, L. E., Piper, Tammy , Ingle, James N. , Ellis, Matthew J. , Sledge, George W. , Rabaglio, Manuela , Stearns, Vered , Gelmon, Karen A. , Chen, Bingshu E. , Taylor, Karen J.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 29, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 567-567

10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.567 Get It

567 Background: We proposed adjunctive statistical standardization of quantitated ER and PgR to improve inter-laboratory comparability of biomarker results and therapeutic management of breast cancer. Methods: We utilized CCTG MA.27 (NCT00066573), an adjuvant phase III trial of exemestane versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with ER+ and/or PgR+ tumours. IHC ER and PgR HSCORE and % positivity (%+) were centrally assessed by machine image quantitation, and each statistically standardized to mean of 0, standard deviation of 1 following Box-Cox variance stabilization transformations of square for ER; for PgR, 1.) natural logarithm (0.1 added to 0 HSCOREs and 0 %+), 2.) square root. The primary endpoint was STEEP distant disease-free survival (DDFS) at the longest trial follow-up of median 4.1 years; a secondary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Survival was described with Kaplan-Meier plots and tested with the univariate Wilcoxon (Peto-Prentice) test statistic. We examined cut-points at standard deviations about mean of 0 (<-1; (-1,0]; (0,1]; >1) and explored single cut-points. Cox multivariate regressions were adjusted for age, T and N stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion, treatment, and baseline patient demographics; 2-sided Wald tests had nominal significance if p<0.05. Results: Of the 7576 women accrued, 3048 women had machine-quantitated image analysis results: 2900 (95%) for ER; 2726 (89%) for PgR. Statistically standardized HSCORE and %+ units differentiated both univariate DDFS and EFS; DDFS was significantly different by ER levels (p<0.001) and PgR levels (p<0.001). In multivariable assessments, ER HSCORE and %+ were not significantly associated (p=0.52-0.88) with the DDFS primary endpoint in models with PgR, while higher PgR HSCORE and %+ had significantly better DDFS (p=.001, in all instances) in models with ER. Conclusions: DDFS was superior for patients with higher ER and PgR standardized units compared with those with HSCOREs and %+ <-1. The adjunctive statistical standardization of ER and PgR performed here is similar to that mandated for clinical practice by the World Health Organization for BMD. [Table: see text]
PKMYT1 Is a Marker of Treatment Response and a Therapeutic Target for CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Resistance in ER+ Breast Cancer
Chen, Anran , Kim, Beom-Jun , Mitra, Aparna , Vollert, Craig T. , Fandino, Diana , Anurag, Meenakshi , Holt, Matthew V. , Gou, Xuxu , Pilcher, Jacob B. , Northfelt, Donald W. , Marshall, C. Gary , Hyer, Marc L. , Papp, Robert , Yin, Shou-Yun , Angelis, Carmine De , Cynthia, X. , Lei, Jonathan T , Fandino, Diana , Anurag, Meenakshi , Holt, Matthew V , Gou, Xuxu , Pilcher, Jacob B , Goetz, Matthew P , Northfelt, Donald , Hilsenbeck, Susan Galloway , Marshall, C Gary , Hyer, Marc L , Papp, Robert , Yin, Shou-Yun , De Angelis, Carmine , Schiff, Rachel , Fuqua, Suzanne A W , Ma, Cynthia , Foulds, Charles E , Ellis, Matthew J , Lei, Jonathan T. , Goetz, Matthew P. , Schiff, Rachel , Ellis, Matthew J.

Mayo Clinic

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | May 23, 2024 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1494-1510

10.1158/1535-7163.mct-23-0564 | PMID 38781103 Get It

Abstract Endocrine therapies (ET) with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibition are the standard treatment for estrogen receptor-α-positive (ER+) breast cancer, however drug resistance is common. In this study, proteogenomic analyses of patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) from patients with 22 ER+ breast cancer demonstrated that protein kinase, membrane-associated tyrosine/threonine one (PKMYT1), a WEE1 homolog, is estradiol (E2) regulated in E2-dependent PDXs and constitutively expressed when growth is E2-independent. In clinical samples, high PKMYT1 mRNA levels associated with resistance to both ET and CDK4/6 inhibition. The PKMYT1 inhibitor lunresertib (RP-6306) with gemcitabine selectively and synergistically reduced the viability of ET and palbociclib-resistant ER+ breast cancer cells without functional p53. In vitro the combination increased DNA damage and apoptosis. In palbociclib-resistant, TP53 mutant PDX-derived organoids and PDXs, RP-6306 with low-dose gemcitabine induced greater tumor volume reduction compared to treatment with either single agent. Our study demonstrates the clinical potential of RP-6306 in combination with gemcitabine for ET and CDK4/6 inhibitor resistant TP53 mutant ER+ breast cancer.
Abstract PO1-27-10: Adjunctive statistical standardization of quantitated machine image analysis of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors: CCTG MA.27 trial
Chapman, Judy-Anne, Bayani, Jane , Sengupta, Sandip , Bartlett, John M.S. , Quintayo, Mary Anne , Virk, Shakeel , Goss, Paul E. , Budd, G. Thomas , Ansari, Rafat , Tozer, Richard , D’Souza, David , Chalchal, Haji , Spadafora, Silvana , Perez, Edith A. , Gelmon, Karen, Whelan, Timothy J. , Elliott, Catherine, Shepherd, L. E., Chapman, Judy‐Anne W., Piper, Tammy , Ingle, James N. , Ellis, Matthew J. , Sledge, George W. , Rabaglio, Manuela , Stearns, Vered , Chen, Bingshu E. , Taylor, Karen J.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | May 2, 2024 | Volume: 84 | Issue: 9_Supplement | Pages: PO1-27-10-PO1-27-10

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-27-10 Get It

Abstract Background: Adjuvant breast cancer therapy is informed by whether a tumour is positive or negative for the biomarkers ER, PgR, and HER2, often without regard to level of positivity. Quantitation has been proposed to improve therapeutic management. Adjunctive statistical standardization has been proposed to improve inter-laboratory comparability of biomarkers results. Methods: This primary report utilized adjunctive statistical standardization of machine-quantitated image analysis biomarker assessments. CCTG MA.27 (NCT00066573) is an adjuvant phase III trial of exemestane versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with ER+ and/or PgR+ tumours. IHC ER, PgR, and HER2 were centrally assessed, with FISH (HER2;HER2/CEP17) determinations for equivocal IHC HER2. HSCOREs were statistically standardized to a mean of 0, standard deviation of 1 following Box-Cox variance stabilization transformations of square for ER and natural logarithm for PgR (0.1 was added to 0 HSCOREs). The primary endpoint was STEEP distant disease-free survival (DDFS) at the longest trial follow-up of median 4.1 years. Survival was described with Kaplan-Meier plots. The univariate Wilcoxon (Peto-Prentice) test statistic was used with usual designation of negative/positive (0; &gt;0), and standardized cut-points at standard deviations about mean of 0(&lt;-1; (-1,0]; (0,1]; &gt;1). Cox multivariate regressions adjusted for age, T and N stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion, treatment, and baseline patient demographics, utilized likelihood ratio tests. Nominal significance was p=0.05. Results: Of the 7576 women accrued, 3048 had machine-quantitated image analysis results: 2900 (95%) for ER; 2726 (89%) for PgR. Only 8 women were ASCO/CAP ER- (HSCORE 0); PgR HSCORE was 0 for 533. Statistically standardized units differentiated DDFS ER levels (p&lt; 0.001) and PgR levels (p&lt; 0.001). In adjusted multivariate analyses, higher ER HSCORE was associated with better DDFS (p=0.05) with weak evidence of an association (p=0.11) for standardized HSCORE, and no significant association (respectively, p=0.28, p=0.54) in models with PgR. Higher PgR was associated with better DDFS (p=0.001) in all multivariate assessments, including those with ER. Conclusions: DDFS was superior for patients with higher ER and PgR standardized units compared with those with HSCOREs &lt;-1. Adjunctive statistical standardization, similar to that mandated for clinical practice by the World Health Organization for BMD, should improve inter-laboratory comparability of biomarker results for similar patient populations. Biomarker N DDFS DDFS 5-year (%) 95% CI ER total 2900 ER &lt;-1 506 86 (82, 91) ER (-1, 0] 934 94 (92, 96) ER ( 0, 1] 919 94 (92, 96) ER &gt;1 541 96 (93, 98) PgR total 2726 PgR &lt;-1 734 89 (86, 92) PgR (-1, 0] 439 92 (89, 95) PgR ( 0, 1] 967 95 (93, 96) PgR &gt;1.0 586 98 (97,100) Citation Format: Judy-Anne Chapman, Jane Bayani, Sandip SenGupta, John MS Bartlett, Tammy Piper, Mary Anne Quintayo, Shakeel Virk, Paul Goss, James Ingle, Matthew Ellis, George Sledge Jr, George Budd, Manuela Rabaglio, Rafat Ansari, Richard Tozer, David D'Souza, Haji Chalchal, Silvana Spadafora, Vered Stearns, Edith A. Perez, Karen Gelmon, Timothy Whelan, Catherine Elliott, Lois Shepherd, Bingshu Chen, Karen Taylor. Adjunctive statistical standardization of quantitated machine image analysis of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors: CCTG MA.27 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-27-10.