Citations

Abstract Background: Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy (eET) beyond the first 5 years of ET improves long-term outcomes in breast cancer survivors. For women who remain premenopausal, evidence for benefit has only been demonstrated to date for 5 years of additional tamoxifen, after an initial 5 years of tamoxifen (from ATLAS, aTTom). There are no data available for eET among premenopausal women treated with initial adjuvant aromatase inhibition (AI) and ovarian functions suppression (OFS). Thus, there is uncertainty regarding the optimal eET regimen for young breast cancer survivors. Methods: The Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study (YWS) is a multicenter prospective cohort of women age ≤40 years newly diagnosed with breast cancer between 2006-2016. Women with stage I-III hormone receptor positive breast cancer, ≥6 years post-diagnosis without breast cancer recurrence were considered candidates for eET. Use of eET was elicited on surveys completed at 6, 7 and/or 8 years post-diagnosis, censoring for recurrence or death. Those completing ≥1 survey were eligible for analysis. Patient characteristics were compared by Chi-square test between eET users and non-users, and logistic regression applied to identify factors associated with eET use. Results: Of 667 potential eET candidates, 73.9% (493/667) returned ≥1 survey between year 6-8 and were eligible for analysis. Compared to those without a year 6-8 survey, the analytic cohort tended to be more non-Hispanic white (86.0% v. 77.6%), more financially comfortable (53.9% v. 39.5%) and more likely to have children pre-diagnosis (59.6% v. 41.4%); age and disease characteristics were similar. Overall, 59.6% (294/493) reported any eET use, with use declining over time from 56.9% (265/466) to 51.4% (219/426) to 46.8% (162/346) at years 6, 7 and 8 post-diagnosis, respectively. Among eET users (n=294), tamoxifen monotherapy was the most common approach (76.9%, 226/294), followed by AI monotherapy (22.1%, 65/294, presumably women who transitioned into menopause), AI-OFS (7.1%, 21/294) and tamoxifen-OFS (3.1%, 9/294). Women diagnosed after 2012 were as likely to receive eET as those diagnosed 2006-2011 (59.4%, 117/197 v. 59.8%, 177/296 p=0.928), however eET more often included AI, with or without OFS (41.0% v. 18.6%, p<0.001), or OFS (17.9% v. 7.3%, p=0.005) in later years. In multivariable analysis, increasing age (per year odds ratio [OR]: 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.15, p<0.001), higher stage (II v. I: OR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.81-4.48, p<0.001; III v. I: OR: 3.73, 95% CI: 1.87-7.42, p<0.001) and receipt of chemotherapy (OR: 3.50, 95% CI: 2.08-5.91, p<0.001) were independently significantly associated with any eET use, while women not of white non-Hispanic race/ethnicity were less likely to report eET use (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28-0.87, p=0.014). Rates of pregnancy in years 1-5 did not differ between eET users and non-users (10.0%, 29/291 v. 8.7%, 17/195, p=0.645) Conclusion: The majority of eligible young breast cancer survivors in the YWS have received eET despite limited data regarding its utility in this population. Heterogeneity exists regarding strategies utilized, and while some factors associated with eET use appear to reflect appropriate risk-based care, such as stage and receipt of chemotherapy, others, including age and race, suggest disparate uptake. Clinical studies are needed in order to determine the optimal approach to eET for young women with a history of early stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who remain premenopausal following 5 years of ET. Ensuring risk and preference-based uptake of eET should be a priority. Citation Format: Tal Sella, Yue Zheng, Shoshana M Rosenberg, Kathryn J Ruddy, Shari I Gelber, Rulla M Tamimi, Jeffrey M Peppercorn, Lidia Schapira, Virgina F Borges, Steven E Come, Lisa A Carey, Eric P Winer, Ann H Partridge. Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in a longitudinal cohort of young breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-10.

Abstract Purpose: Young age at breast cancer diagnosis correlates with unfavorable clinicopathologic features and worse outcomes compared with older women. Understanding biological differences between breast tumors in young versus older women may lead to better therapeutic approaches for younger patients. Experimental Design: We identified 100 patients ≤35 years old at nonmetastatic breast cancer diagnosis who participated in the prospective Young Women's Breast Cancer Study cohort. Tumors were assigned a surrogate intrinsic subtype based on receptor status and grade. Whole-exome sequencing of tumor and germline samples was performed. Genomic alterations were compared with older women (≥45 years old) in The Cancer Genome Atlas, according to intrinsic subtype. Results: Ninety-three tumors from 92 patients were successfully sequenced. Median age was 32.5 years; 52.7% of tumors were hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative, 28.0% HER2-positive, and 16.1% triple-negative. Comparison of young to older women (median age 61 years) with luminal A tumors (N = 28 young women) revealed three significant differences: PIK3CA alterations were more common in older patients, whereas GATA3 and ARID1A alterations were more common in young patients. No significant genomic differences were found comparing age groups in other intrinsic subtypes. Twenty-two patients (23.9%) in the Young Women's Study cohort carried a pathogenic germline variant, most commonly (13 patients, 14.1%) in BRCA1/2. Conclusions: Somatic alterations in three genes (PIK3CA, GATA3, and ARID1A) occur at different frequencies in young versus older women with luminal A breast cancer. Additional investigation of these genes and associated pathways could delineate biological susceptibilities and improve treatment options for young patients with breast cancer. See related commentary by Yehia and Eng, p. 2209

Background Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is more intense in younger women. Because FCR is a powerful determinant of quality of life, identifying those at risk for persistently elevated FCR can inform timing of interventions. Methods A total of 965 women with stage 0 to stage III breast cancer enrolled in the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a prospective cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≤40 years, completed the 3‐item Lasry Fear of Recurrence Index. Group‐based trajectory modeling was used to classify distinct FCR patterns from baseline through 5 years post‐diagnosis. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify patient, disease, and treatment characteristics associated with each trajectory. Results Five FCR trajectories were identified with the majority of participants having moderate (33.1%) or high FCR (27.6%) that improved over time. A total of 6.9% participants had moderate FCR that worsened, whereas 21.7% had high FCR at baseline that remained high throughout. In the fully adjusted multinomial model, stages II and III (vs stage I) were associated with higher odds of being in the high/stable trajectory, whereas stage 0 (vs I), being financially comfortable (vs not comfortable), was associated with lower odds of being in the high/stable trajectory. White (vs non‐White) was associated with higher odds of being in a trajectory that improved over time. Conclusions Although FCR improves over time for many young women with breast cancer, approximately one‐third had FCR that was severe and did not improve or worsened over 5 years after diagnosis. Ongoing monitoring is warranted, with early referral to mental health professionals indicated for those at highest risk for unresolved FCR. Lay Summary Fear of recurrence is common among young women with breast cancer. The authors followed a large cohort of young women diagnosed with breast cancer when they were 40 years of age and younger, and found 5 distinct trajectories that show moderate and severe fears do not always improve over time and may require targeted mental health intervention.

PURPOSE This guideline updates recommendations of the ASCO guideline on chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) that is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor (HR)–negative. METHODS An Expert Panel conducted a targeted systematic literature review guided by a signals approach to identify new, potentially practice-changing data that might translate into revised guideline recommendations. RESULTS The Expert Panel reviewed abstracts from the literature review and retained 14 articles. RECOMMENDATIONS Patients with triple-negative, programmed cell death ligand-1–positive MBC may be offered the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitor to chemotherapy as first-line therapy. Patients with triple-negative, programmed cell death ligand-1–negative MBC should be offered single-agent chemotherapy rather than combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment, although combination regimens may be offered for life-threatening disease. Patients with triple-negative MBC who have received at least two prior therapies for MBC should be offered treatment with sacituzumab govitecan. Patients with triple-negative MBC with germline BRCA mutations previously treated with chemotherapy may be offered a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rather than chemotherapy. Patients with HR-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative MBC for whom chemotherapy is being considered should be offered single–agent chemotherapy rather than combination chemotherapy, although combination regimens may be offered for highly symptomatic or life-threatening disease. Patients with HR-positive MBC with disease progression on an endocrine agent may be offered treatment with either endocrine therapy with or without targeted therapy or single-agent chemotherapy. Patients with HR-positive MBC with germline BRCA mutations no longer benefiting from endocrine therapy may be offered a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rather than chemotherapy. No recommendation regarding when a patient's care should be transitioned to hospice or best supportive care alone is possible. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines .

12081 Background: Young women with breast cancer may be at increased risk for premature development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in part due to their cancer treatment. Limited data are available on CVD risk among young breast cancer survivors. Methods: Women aged 30-40 years at diagnosis with stage 0-III breast cancer enrolled in a prospective cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤40 were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. Data were obtained from serial surveys and electronic medical records at breast cancer diagnosis and 5-year follow-up. We calculated “excess heart age,” which incorporates a CVD risk-based score (calculated using age, systolic blood pressure, blood pressure medication, diabetes, smoking, body mass index) to estimate the difference in years between an individual’s chronological age and their CVD-risk adjusted age. Multivariable logistic regression models (adjusting for age at diagnosis, stage, and race) were fitted to evaluate associations between treatment (radiation, endocrine therapy, anthracyclines, and trastuzumab) and having a change in excess heart age ≥2 years from baseline to 5 years. Results: Among 372 young breast cancer survivors, mean age at diagnosis was 36.6 (SD 2.89), 93% were white, and 79% were diagnosed with stage I or II breast cancer. Mean excess heart age was.32 (SD: 6.16) years at baseline, which declined to -.07 (SD 6.64) at 5-year follow-up (p=.17). At 5 years, 31% (n=114) of women experienced an increase of at least 2 years in their excess heart age since diagnosis, and their mean excess heart age was 4.34 years (range -9 to 30). In multivariable analyses, receipt of trastuzumab was associated with higher odds (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.02-2.77) of experiencing an increase of ≥2 years in excess heart age between diagnosis and 5 years of follow-up. Endocrine therapy, anthracyclines, and radiation were not significantly associated with a change in excess heart age of ≥2 years at 5 years post-diagnosis. Conclusions: At 5 years post-diagnosis, approximately 1/3 of young breast cancer survivors experienced a change from baseline in their excess heart age of ≥2 years. Further research is warranted to confirm findings regarding trastuzumab and excess heart age, and potential effects on longer-term cardiac outcomes in this population. Extended follow-up of this cohort may further quantify CVD risk over time.[Table: see text]

e24108 Background: Clonal hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential (CHIP) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes including increased risk of hematologic malignancies and heart disease. Limited data suggest an increased prevalence of CHIP in patients treated for solid tumors, particularly after exposure to radiation and chemotherapy. CHIP testing may inform risk-reduction strategies for cancer survivors. Little is known about patient knowledge, attitudes, and preferences regarding CHIP testing. Methods: We surveyed survivors without history of recurrence participating in an ongoing prospective cohort study of young women with breast cancer (BC). The survey was sent by email and included an introduction to CHIP including risk factors and clinical associations. Respondents then reviewed a vignette and were asked about CHIP testing preferences (definitely/probably test vs. definitely/probably not test) considering sequentially: 1) population-based 10-year risk of BC recurrence, hematological malignancy and heart disease; 2) estimated increase in these risks with CHIP; 3) current CHIP management; 4) a dedicated CHIP clinic; and 5) a theoretical CHIP treatment. Changes in preferences from the prior scenario were evaluated with the McNemar's test using a type I error rate of 5%. Results: 528/642 (82.2%) eligible women responded to the survey, at a median age of 46 (range: 31-54) years (median time from diagnosis: 108 months (range: 60-168)), and 88% were white. Most had stage 1/2 BC (78.8%) and had received chemotherapy (73.1%) and/or radiation (61.9%). 93.6% had never heard of CHIP prior to survey. After initial patient vignette presentation, most women (87.1%,) recommended CHIP testing if offered. Preferences for testing decreased (p<0.05) when considering population-based risks, with 11.1% shifting their preference from CHIP testing to not testing. After considering increased risks associated with CHIP, interest in testing increased (p<0.05), with 10.1% shifting their preference to testing. Interest significantly (p<0.05) increased with the possibility of managing CHIP through a clinic or a hypothetical CHIP treatment, with 7.2% and 14.1% switching their preferences towards testing, respectively. Finally, 75.8% responded that they themselves, after learning about CHIP and reviewing the vignette, would want to have CHIP testing; 28.2% reported that learning about CHIP and the associated risks caused them at least moderate anxiety. Conclusion: Few young BC survivors were aware of CHIP yet most indicated an interest in testing after learning about it. Testing preferences were influenced by risks presented and potential management strategies. Findings highlight the importance of effective risk communication and the need for adequate psychosocial support when considering testing for CHIP and other potential clinical biomarkers predictive of cancer and other medical risks in cancer survivors.