Citations

Objectives/Hypothesis: Botulinum neurotoxin type-A (BoNT-A) injection into the true vocal cords is an effective treatment for restoring vocal functionality in adductor spasmodic dysphonia (AdSD). The Glasgow Benefit Inventory was developed to measure quality of life change following any otolaryngologic intervention and was recently revised to a 5-factor subdomain (GBI-5F) questionnaire to improve clinical utility. The study aim was to utilize the GBI-5F to measure patient-reported quality of life change in AdSD patients following BoNT-A injection. Methods: The GBI-5F questionnaire was administered to patients diagnosed with AdSD who received a BoNT-A vocal cord injection between December 2022 and May 2023. All patients had received multiple prior injections. GBI-5F subdomains and demographics were analyzed to identify areas for patient-reported improvement. Results: Sixty-six patients completed the GBI-5F. There were 52 (78.7%) females and average age was 69.4 years. The median total benefit score was +40.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 20.0). Median subdomain scores were +83.3 (IQR, 50.0) for quality of life, +50.0 (IQR, 50.0) for self-confidence, +33.3 (IQR, 33.3) for social involvement, +16.7 (IQR, 50.0) for support, and 0.0 (IQR, 16.7) for general health. Differences in the individual subdomain scores were statistically significant ( P < .0001). No significant differences were found in the total GBI-5F score or any subdomain according to sex or presence of vocal tremor (all P > .05). A moderately positive correlation was noted between median total score and percent functional improvement (r = 0.46, P < .001). Conclusion: Botulinum injection therapy for AdSD provides overall benefit to patients as measured by the GBI-5F, with particular improvement observed for perceived quality of life, self-confidence, and social involvement. Sex, presence/absence of vocal tremor, and age do not appear to modify benefit, though degree of functional improvement is positively correlated with total score.

Introduction: Machine learning (ML) has become increasingly pivotal in health care, particularly in colorectal cancer (CRC) detection and diagnosis with the use of predictive models and artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopies. This study evaluates the efficacy of ML models in predicting the risk for CRC and advanced colorectal polyps (ACP) before colonoscopy. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, focusing on studies using ML for CRC and ACP prediction. Data extraction regarding study type, ML methodology, quality of data, and bias assessment was in line with the CHARMS checklist. Meta-analysis was also performed to assess the performance of models for the prediction of CRC, adenoma, or both. Results: This systematic review included 14 studies with 3618 median patients (333 to 263,879). Our study demonstrated considerable heterogeneity in methodologies and outcomes, with area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) ranging from 0.6 to 1. The derivation+validation cohorts showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.832 (95% CI: 0.755-0.889) and specificity of 0.802 (95% CI: 0.722-0.863), with an overall AUROC of 0.883. Conclusion: The review underscores the significant role of ML in CRC and ACP diagnosis and its routine use could efficiently direct high-risk patients to timely colonoscopies and spare the low-risk ones from unnecessary procedures. Despite the promise shown, the variability in methodologies and outcomes highlights the need for standardized approaches and further investigation in this field.

Abstract Background Primary aldosteronism (PA), a primary adrenal disorder leading to excessive aldosterone production by one or both adrenal glands, is a common cause of hypertension. It is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications compared with primary hypertension. Despite effective methods for diagnosing and treating PA, it remains markedly underdiagnosed and undertreated. Objective To develop an updated guideline that provides a practical, clinical approach to identifying and managing PA to improve diagnosis rates and encourage targeted treatment. Methods The Guideline Development Panel (GDP), composed of a multidisciplinary panel of clinical experts and experts in systemic review methodology, used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to define 10 questions related to the diagnosis and treatment of PA. Systematic reviews were conducted for each question. The GDP used the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework to consider contextual factors, such as stakeholder values and preferences, costs and required resources, cost-effectiveness, acceptability, feasibility, and the potential impact on health equity. Results We suggest that all individuals with hypertension be screened for PA by measuring aldosterone and renin and determining the aldosterone to renin ratio, and that subsequent clinical care be guided by the results. We suggest that individuals with PA receive PA-specific therapy, either medical or surgical. In individuals who screen positive for PA, we suggest (1) commencement of PA-specific medical therapy in individuals who do not desire or are not candidates for surgery and in situations where the probability of lateralizing PA (excess aldosterone produced by one adrenal) is low based on screening results; and (2) aldosterone suppression testing in situations when screening results indicate an intermediate probability for lateralizing PA and individualized decision making confirms a desire to pursue eligibility for surgical therapy. In those who test positive by aldosterone suppression testing, and in those in whom screening results show a high probability of lateralizing PA (obviating the need for aldosterone suppression testing), we suggest adrenal lateralization with computed tomography scanning and adrenal venous sampling prior to deciding the treatment approach (medical vs surgical). In all individuals with PA and an adrenal adenoma, we suggest performing a 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test. We suggest the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) over epithelial sodium-channel (ENaC) inhibitors in the medical treatment of PA. We suggest the use of spironolactone over other MRAs, given its lower cost and greater availability; however, all MRAs, when titrated to equivalent potencies, are anticipated to have similar efficacy in treating PA. Thus, MRAs with greater mineralocorticoid receptor specificity and fewer androgen/progesterone receptor-mediated side effects may be preferred in some situations. In individuals receiving MRA therapy, we suggest monitoring renin and, in those whose hypertension remains uncontrolled and renin is suppressed, titrating the MRA to increase renin. Conclusion These recommendations provide a practical framework for the diagnosis and treatment of PA. They are based on currently available literature and take into consideration outcomes that are important to key stakeholders. The goal is to increase identification of individuals with PA and, by initiating PA-specific medical or surgical therapy, improve blood pressure control and reduce PA-associated adverse cardiovascular events. The guidelines also highlight important knowledge gaps in PA diagnosis and management.

Purpose The time to complete oncology pharmacist tasks is needed to determine workload and productivity. The Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA) and the Hematology/Oncology Practice and Research Network (PRN) of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) partnered with the aim of establishing consensus on the time required to complete oncology pharmacy tasks. Methods Fifteen patient care tasks and 9 non-patient care tasks, commonly completed by oncology pharmacists were each assigned an average amount of time to be completed. This list was then converted into 24 statements and the Delphi survey method was utilized with an expert panel to arrive at consensus between December 2023 and February 2024. Consensus was defined as at least 75% agreement. The complete manuscript was endorsed by HOPA and ACCP Hematology/Oncology PRN. Results Thirty-three pharmacist-experts agreed to participate in this survey with all participating in round 1, and 29 (87.9%) participating in round 2. In round 1, 9 tasks achieved consensus, with 7 of these being classified as patient care associated. Seven statements reaching 65% but less than 75% agreement were deemed to reach borderline consensus. Eight statements failed to achieve at least 65% agreement and were modified based on respondent feedback. In round 2, 15 statements were included with all achieving consensus. At the completion of round 2, all 24 statements reached consensus, and the survey was deemed complete. Conclusion This project produced the first comprehensive consensus statements for the average time for a US-based oncology pharmacist to complete common patient and non-patient care-related tasks.

Background Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are frequent in Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, but a higher NPS burden is found in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Lewy body (LB) pathology frequently co-occurs with AD pathology and may not meet neuropathological criteria for DLB (ADLB). NPS trajectories over disease course in these subgroups is not well understood. Objective We investigated changes in NPS severity over time, at two time points, comparing clinicopathologically defined cohorts of AD (without LB), ADLB, DLB, and controls. Methods Cases with two available Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPIQ), at the time of enrollment and within 2.5 years of death, were selected from the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Differences and rate of change in NPIQ scores were compared between AD (n = 75), ADLB (n = 48) DLB (n = 65), and controls (n = 32) with covariates for age, sex, and cognition. Results First NPIQ scores were highest in ADLB when compared to AD (p = 0.04) and controls (p = 0.01) but not different from DLB. A significant increase in NPS severity was observed in DLB and AD (p < 0.001) over a mean follow up time of 4.9 ± 3.0 years, and the rate of change was significantly greater in DLB when compared to other groups. Final NPIQ scores were highest in DLB when compared to AD (p = 0.03) but not ADLB, and in DLB, ADLB, and AD than controls ( all p < 0.001). Conclusions Early NPS burden as well as NPS severity progression rate, independently of cognitive status, might be useful clinical metrics and may help predict underlying pathological diagnoses.

The Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) Network indexes over 600 reporting guidelines designed to improve the reproducibility of manuscripts across medical fields and study designs. Although several such reporting guidelines touch on adverse events that may occur in the context of a study, there is a large body of research whose primary focus is on adverse events, near-misses and medical errors that do not currently have a dedicated reporting guideline to help set reporting standards and facilitate comparisons across studies. As part of the process prescribed by EQUATOR for developing such a reporting guideline, we performed a needs assessment, evaluating whether existing standards address key features of a proposed reporting guideline in development, entitled Standard Elements in Studies of Adverse Events and Medical Error (SESAME). We evaluated 12 EQUATOR reporting guidelines for the presence of eight key features of SESAME. Five of the 12 failed to include any of these key features. None of the remaining seven incorporated more than four of the eight SESAME key components, confirming the need for a dedicated reporting guideline for studies of adverse events and medical errors.