Citations

PURPOSE Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have shown progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) without androgen deprivation therapy for oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). Most patients with bone metastatic (BM) omCSPC recur with additional bone disease after MDT. We hypothesized the BM-targeting alpha-emitter radium-223 dichloride (Ra223) could target subclinical bone disease and delay progression. METHODS This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label phase II RCT. Eligible men with recurrent omCSPC with ≥one bone metastasis (≤three on conventional imaging and/or ≤five on molecular imaging) were randomly assigned (1:1) to stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) MDT alone or SABR MDT with Ra223 (six cycles). Primary end point was composite PFS. RESULTS From August 9, 2019, to March 2, 2023, 64 patients were randomly assigned, 33 to SABR MDT and 31 to SABR MDT/Ra223 balancing for key covariates. Most SABR MDT/Ra223 patients (87%) received six cycles of Ra223. The median PFS was 11.8 months with SABR MDT and 10.5 months with SABR MDT/Ra223 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.42 [95% CI, 0.79 to 2.56]; P = .24). Seven patients (11%) experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (no grade 4 or 5), 2 of 33 (6%) with SABR and 5 of 30 (17%) with SABR MDT/Ra223. Patients with high-risk (HiRi) pathogenic mutations in ATM , BRCA1/2 , RB1 , or TP53 had worse PFS (HR, 5.95 [95% CI, 1.83 to 19.3]; P = .003). Greater T-cell receptor (TCR) unique productive rearrangements were prognostic for improved PFS independent of the treatment arm (aHR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.96]; P = .04). CONCLUSION Adding Ra223 to SABR MDT in BM omCSPC does not delay progression of disease. We provide evidence for an HiRi mutational signature and TCR repertoire as prognostic biomarkers in omCSPC treated with SABR MDT, highlighting the importance of collecting biological correlates in RCTs for omCSPC.

AimsPrevious studies have highlighted differences in the risk of periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with either a cemented taper slip (TS) stem or a composite beam (CB) stem. This biomechanical study explored the occurrence of PPF around these stems, and the protective effect of adding a 16-gauge prophylactic calcar or diaphyseal wire to the TS stems to increase the resistance to torque as a potential way to prevent these fractures.MethodsA total of 21 TS stems (eight alone, six with calcar wiring, and seven with diaphyseal wiring placed 2 cm distal to the lesser trochanter) and seven CB stems were cemented into standard sawbones. The peak torque at failure was measured using a servohydraulic test machine, and the fracture location was recorded. An a priori power analysis determined that seven specimens per group were needed to detect a 30 Nm difference with 90% power, assuming a 14.8 Nm SD in peak torque between groups. Comparisons were performed using paired t-tests.ResultsCB stems exhibited a significantly higher mean peak torque at failure (205.3 Nm (SD 26.9)) than TS stems (159.5 Nm (SD 17.4); p = 0.012), calcar-wired TS (148.2 Nm (SD 38.6); p = 0.031), and diaphyseal-wired TS (164.9 Nm (SD 21.5); p = 0.027). This study did not demonstrate that wired-TS stems had a higher peak torque at failure than non-wired TS stems. Additionally, calcar wiring was not found to be stronger than diaphyseal wiring (p = 0.400). Four CB fractures occurred distal to the stem, whereas all TS fractures occurred at the mid-stem, simulating a Vancouver type B fracture. Interestingly, adding the diaphyseal wire shifted the fracture location more distally in four of the seven stems (p = 0.070).ConclusionIn this model, CB stems had greater resistance to torque than TS stems, which may explain the lower risk of PPF. Adding calcar or diaphyseal wires to the TS stems resulted in no significant change in peak torque to fracture. CB cemented stems should be considered in patients at high risk of PPF.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(5 Supple A):32–37.

Background: The perioperative management of chronic aspirin therapy in patients undergoing elective brain surgery is challenging due to the risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events. Although aspirin discontinuation reduces the bleeding risk, it can increase thrombotic complications, particularly in patients at high risk of cardiovascular complications. This Delphi study aimed to develop consensus-based guidelines to address these clinical challenges. Methods: A 2-round Delphi survey was conducted among an international panel of 42 experienced anesthesiologists and neurosurgeons. Participants assessed the risks and benefits of perioperative aspirin management, including bleeding risk, thrombotic risk, timing of cessation and resumption, and the utility of platelet function testing. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement in round 2. Results: Round 1 highlighted significant variability in practice patterns. In round 2, consensus was reached on several key areas. Most experts (84%) agreed that continuing aspirin increases perioperative bleeding risk in high-risk procedures, with 87% recommending discontinuing aspirin 5 to 7 days before surgery. Nearly all experts (97%) supported continuing low-dose aspirin in high-thrombotic-risk patients. Conversely, for low-thrombotic-risk patients, only 65% agreed on aspirin continuation, reflecting an ongoing debate. No consensus was reached regarding routine platelet function testing. Conclusions: This Delphi study provides experience-based recommendations for managing chronic aspirin therapy in neurosurgical patients. The panel strongly supports aspirin continuation in high-thrombotic-risk patients, with cessation 5 to 7 days before high-bleeding-risk surgeries. Individualized management is advised for low-bleeding-risk procedures and low-thrombotic-risk patients. Future research should further clarify aspirin management in these groups and explore the role of platelet function testing in neurosurgical settings.

Context: There is need for an up-to-date comprehensive review of baseball interval throwing programs in the literature. Objective: To (1) understand the origin and basis of interval throwing programs; (2) evaluate the content of programs in the peer-reviewed literature including target audience, initiation criteria, throwing specifics, arm care, and performance evaluation metrics; (3) classify these variables as well defined, ambiguous, or missing; and (4) analyze variability in key aspects including starting criteria, length, progression, and completion criteria. Data Sources: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Reviews, Web of Science, and Scopus Study Selection: The full text of studies, in English, had to be available. Included studies had to contain a complete interval throwing program designed for baseball players. Study Design: Systematic review. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Data Extraction: Initial screening was conducted based on article title and abstract. Full text of the remaining articles was evaluated for fulfillment of inclusion criteria. Results: Nine studies initially met inclusion criteria. The programs’ comprehensiveness was poor, with a mean Interval Throwing Program Checklist score of 20 (range 14-23) on a scale of 0 to 30. There were a variety of components, including progressive long toss, weighted ball, and throwing mechanics exercises. The programs identified had significant heterogeneity in duration, intensity, progression, and focus. Overall, there was a significant lack of attempts at validation or formal study of efficacy for published throwing programs. Conclusion: Current published interval throwing programs are mostly variations of an original program published many years ago and were based on principles of progressive loading with pain as sign of injury that should be monitored carefully. However, these programs have minimal clinical validation and objective measures to quantify their effectiveness. This work identifies several limitations in the current literature and can serve as a foundation for future development of evidence-based interval throwing programs.

Abstract Background: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is a type II integral membrane glycoprotein, highly expressed on the cell surface of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) present in the tumor microenvironment of most epithelial cancers and showing limited expression in normal tissues. Given this expression profile, FAP appears to be a promising target for radioligand therapy that has pan-cancer potential. [177Lu]Lu-NNS309 is a FAP-targeted radiopharmaceutical that shows improved tumor retention and demonstrates promising anti-tumor activity in translationally relevant preclinical models (e.g., PDAC, NSCLC) where FAP is expressed on CAFs. Methods: CFXX489A12101 (NCT06562192) is a first-in-human phase I, open-label, multi-center study of [177Lu]Lu-NNS309 in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer (BC), and colorectal cancer (CRC). The study includes a dose escalation part followed by a dose expansion part. Key eligibility criteria include prior treatment for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic disease and having all measurable lesions (per RECIST 1.1) showing [68Ga]Ga-NNS309 uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Patients who are eligible for treatment receive one dose of [177Lu]Lu-NNS309 on day 1 of each cycle. A 6-week and a 4-week dosing schedule will be explored. Dosimetry data will be obtained from patients in the dose escalation part after the first dose and will be used to calculate the cumulative radiation exposure. Dose escalation will be guided by a Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model with overdose control (EWOC) principle, and assessment of all relevant data available from all dose levels including safety, tolerability, clinical dosimetry, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy. Once the recommended dose(s) (RD) and schedule(s) of [177Lu]Lu-NNS309 are determined, the expansion part may open and will include patients with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC (n∼20), locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC (n∼20), HR+/HER2- ductal BC (n∼15), HR+/HER2- lobular BC (n∼15), and triple negative BC (; n∼24).The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of [177Lu]Lu-NNS309 and to identify the RD(s) and regimen(s) of [177Lu]Lu-NNS309 for further clinical evaluation. Secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the preliminary anti-tumor activity of [177Lu]Lu-NNS309, characterize the pharmacokinetics of [177Lu]Lu-NNS309 in blood and urine, the radiation dosimetry for organs and tumor lesions, and to evaluate the safety and imaging properties of [68Ga]Ga-NNS309. Conclusion: The study is currently enrolling in the dose escalation part. Citation Format: Ravit Geva, Daniel Juneau, Shadi Abdar Esfahani, Cristiano Ferrario, Farshad Moradi, Amir Iravani, Jordi Ahnert, Ivan Manuel Victoria Ruiz, Thibaud Koessler, Aitana Calvo Ferrandiz, Bernard Doger de Speville, Patrick Flamen, Albiruni Razak, Desiree Deandreis, Laure Al-Mansour, Niklaus Schaefer, James Nagarajah, Hilde Nienhuis, Marco Maccauro, Angelina Filice, Jonathan Goldman, Ken Herrmann, Matthias Eiber, Alexander Drzezga, Martin Heuschkel, Jonathan McConathy, Johnson Geoffrey, Ephraim Parent, Yasutoshi Kuboki, Shizuka Origuchi, Xuan Mai Couillebault, Elisa Garcia Garayoa, Jayarama Naidu Roopa, Christopher Straub, Dominik Hainzl, Xinyu Chen, Fang Yang, Eirini Pectasides, Brandon Mancini. Phase I open-label, multi-center study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, dosimetry, and preliminary activity of FXX489 ([177Lu]Lu-NNS309) in patients with pancreatic, lung, breast and colorectal cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT112.