Citations

612 Background: The adoption of new breast surgical techniques has been rapid for early stage breast cancer. The utilization of these techniques in patients with high risk operable breast cancer has not been thoroughly investigated. Methods: Retrospective surgical data was summarized for patients entered into N9831 “Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Weekly Paclitaxel With or Without Trastuzumab as Adjuvant Treatment for Women With HER-2 Over-expressing or Amplified Node Positive or High-Risk Node Negative Breast Cancer.” Results: 3,505 patients were entered into N9831 from 2000–2005 following primary surgery for breast cancer. The median age was 50 and 43% were premenopausal. 93% of patients underwent a diagnostic biopsy prior to their definitive surgical procedure. Whether HER2-neu status was available at time of definitive surgery is unknown. 61% underwent a mastectomy whereas 39% underwent breast conserving surgery (BCS). The rate of BCS was relative stable over the course of the trial. Patients with T1 tumors had a higher rate of BCS (49%) compared to T2 tumors (37%) and T3 tumors (6%). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy was performed in 54% of the cases. The rate of SLN biopsy increased from 40% in 2000 to 66% in 2005. Patients who underwent mastectomy had a lower rate of SLN biopsy than patients who underwent BCS (44% versus 71%, respectively). Tumor size was also associated with the rate of SLN biopsy: T1 (60%), T2 (53%), and T3 (36%). Data on local and regional recurrences are still maturing. Conclusions: Surprisingly, low numbers of patients on this trial underwent BCS whereas the adoption of the SLN biopsy procedure among the same group of surgeons was relatively high. The relatively low rate of BCS in this study population needs further investigation to determine what surgeon and patient factors impacted the surgical decision. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

603 Background: Breast MRI may be useful for detecting mammographically occult ipsilateral carcinoma in newly diagnosed breast cancer. Our initial experience with breast MRI, demonstrated 16% of patients to have additional breast disease detected only by preoperative MRI. We further analyzed our findings to identify an association between patient factors and MRI detected disease. Methods: Preoperative MRI scans of 390 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer were reviewed. Using only patients with pathologic verification, the incidence of mammographically occult ipsilateral cancer was determined. Patient and tumor characteristics were further analyzed to identify factors which may predict pathologically positive MRI findings. Results: Of the 390 women undergoing preoperative MRI, 120 (31%) had ipsilateral findings requiring biopsy. Pathologically verified additional ipsilateral cancer was detected in 62 (16%). Multicentric disease was detected in 32 (52%) and multifocal or more extensive local disease in 30 (48%). The median age of all patients was 62 (27% premenopausal) whereas the median age of those with MRI detected additional carcinoma was 55 (44% premenopausal). Of those with additional disease detected by MRI, 74% had index lesions =1 cm and 63% node negative. The most common histology of the index lesion was infiltrating ductal carcinoma in 64%. In the 62 patients found to have additional disease by MRI the most common histology included infiltrating ductal carcinoma (58%), ductal carcinoma-in-situ (34%) and infiltrating lobular (8%). The histology of the MRI detected additional disease was identical to the index lesion in 71%. Conclusions: In women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, there was a 16% incidence of pathologically proven, mammographically occult ipsilateral disease detected by MRI. Patients found to have additional disease tended to be younger, premenopausal or have index tumors =1cm. The contribution of preoperative MRI in breast cancer management continues to evolve. A lower threshold for obtaining breast MRI may be appropriate in selected subsets of breast cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

579 Background: N9831 and other clinical trials have demonstrated the additive survival benefit of trastuzumab (H) therapy with chemotherapy for patients with resected HER-2 positive breast cancer. Cardiac toxicity (CTox) is increased by this strategy. Prediction of or early detection of CTox is important. Methods: 95 patients provided informed consent. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), troponin T (TnT) and I (TnI), TNF-alpha, IL-1b, and IL-6 were to be drawn at baseline, after initiation of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC), after initiation of paclitaxel (T), and after the initiation of H (may have been given concurrently with T). 67 patients with at least a baseline sample, a post-treatment sample, and a baseline and subsequent evaluation of LVEF were studied. No patient in this group had a grade 3 decline in LVEF. Only 3 of these patients did not receive H. Values above the 99th percentile were considered abnormal for troponin. 40 ng/ml was considered elevated for BNP. Results: Values of CRP, TNF-alpha, IL- 6 and IL1b changed in very few patients and without a discernible pattern. For further evaluation of BNP, TnI, and TnT, 2 definitions of CTox were tested: 1. a >10% drop in LVEF from baseline (n=27) and 2. a drop in LVEF of 10–15% to less than the institutional lower limit of normal (LLN) OR a >15% decline in LVEF (n=14). No pre-treatment marker appeared to predict a > 10% decline in LVEF (definition 1). For patients fulfilling definition 2, pre-treatment BNP > 40 was seen in 21% of patients vs 8% of normals (nls) (p= 0.18) and an abnormal TnI (>0.04) was seen in 21% vs 6% of nls (p=0.10). Only doubling of BNP appeared promising as a serial marker of CTox using definition 2 (27% vs 7% for nls (p = 0.09). Conclusions: Baseline BNP and TnI and serial measures of BNP may be promising for further investigation for the prediction and detection of treatment-related CTox. Due to limitations of the study including the small numbers of patients analyzed, the difficulty in defining CTox, and the variation in the timing of sample procurement and assessment, these data are considered exploratory. Supported by CA-25224, CA-2115, CA 38926, CA31946. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

576 Background: In node-negative, ER + breast cancer, gene expression profiling can identify level of risk and, in the case of ODX, may also identify pts with a higher chance of benefiting from adjuvant chemotherapy. Because the gene profile in ODX includes an assessment of ER, HER2, and proliferation, we hypothesized that clinicians using standardized criteria could discriminate risk (high versus low/intermediate) as specified by ODX. Methods: We identified Mayo Clinic patients with node-negative, ER + breast cancer, for whom ODX scores were available. Tumor slides were reviewed by an expert breast pathologist to confirm tumor size, histology, and tumor grade. Both ER and PR were quantitated; HER-2 was determined by IHC (FISH, if 2+). These clinical cases were presented to six academic oncologists, blinded to the ODX score, to predict ODX risk (low, intermediate, or high) and give their recommendation for chemotherapy (CTX) (yes/no). Afterwards, they were presented with the same cases with the actual ODX score, to give recommendations regarding CTX. Results: ODX scores in tumors from 31 patients were low in 18 pts, intermediate in 10 pts, and high in 3 pts. Concordance between predicted and actual ODX scores being low/intermediate vs high exceeded 87% for each oncologist. The most frequent discrepancies were actual low scores predicted as intermediate (31/80 discordant) and actual intermediate scores predicted as low (29/80 discordant). Overall agreement of predicted scores (high vs low/intermediate) among the oncologists was substantial (kappa=0.75, p<0.0001). CTX recommendations following provision of the ODX scores changed on average 18.2% (range 12.9%-25.8%) of the time, with slightly fewer changing for, versus against, a CTX recommendation. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the proper evaluation and interpretation of traditional prognostic criteria will identify most node negative, ER + patients at high risk of recurrence (as predicted by ODX) but poorly discriminate low versus intermediate risk. The provision of ODX data changed the recommendation for CTX in approximately 20% of cases. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

512 Background: The joint efficacy analysis of NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31 demonstrated improved outcomes with the addition of trastuzumab (H) to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel (T) in women with surgically removed HER2- positive breast cancer (NEJM 2005). Following this report, patients randomized to AC→T and less than 6 months from completion of chemotherapy were eligible to receive H. We have updated the initial combined results of these two trials. Methods: Primary and secondary efficacy endpoint were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox modeling was performed. Hazard ratios are adjusted for nodal status, tumor size, T schedule, hormone receptor status, and trial (also age for OS). Results: Among the 3,969 women enrolled (ages: 22 to 80yrs), there have been 619 events (H group: 222, non-H: 397). First events were: recurrence (511), contralateral breast disease (18), other second primary cancers (48), and death without recurrence or second primary cancers (42). The median follow-up among the 3,711 women still alive is 2.9 years (range up to 6,4 years). The 4 yr DFS rate and 4 yr OS rate respectively were: 85.9% (95%CI: 84.0–87.8%) and 92.6% (95%CI: 91.2–94.2%) in H group and 73.1% (95%CI: 70.6–75.8%) and 89.4% (95%CI: 87.6–91.2%) in non- H group. Hazard ratio for adjuvant (H/non-H) was 0.49 (P<0.0001; 95%CI: 0.41–0.58) for DFS and 0.63 (P=0.0004; 95%CI: 0.49–0.81) for OS.The rates of a first event per 1,000 women/year during yrs 1–4 were: 26.7, 52.9, 49.6 and 23.2 for H and 42.3, 102.3, 107.6 and 61.5 for non-H. The impact of crossover on clinical outcome will be explored. Conclusions: With an increase in the median follow-up of 11 months and with 225 additional events, the demonstration of substantial improvement in outcomes with the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy persist. This improvement continues in spite of some degree of cross-over occurring after the initial results were reported.Updated data regarding crossover outcomes and H duration (as they relate to disease free survival) will be presented. [Table: see text]

696 Background: A number of treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been FDA approved since December, 2005. Trials evaluating these agents excluded non-clear cell histologies and therefore the efficacy of these treatments remains unclear in patients (pts) with metastatic non-clear cell RCC (mncRCC). Methods: This is a single arm Phase II study designed to determine the efficacy of pazopanib in mncRCC. Treatment was pazopanib 800 mg by mouth daily until progression or intolerability of treatment. Dose reductions were allowed for toxicity with dose level -1 being 600 mg daily and dose level -2, 400 mg daily. Cycles were every 28 days. Main eligibility criteria included: (1) age ³ 18 years old; (2) histologic confirmation of ncRCC; (3) ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0, 1, or 2; (4) up to one prior treatment for mncRCC (5) measurable or non-measurable metastatic disease per RECIST criteria. The primary endpoint was overall survival rate at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were best tumor response rates after two cycles, PFS, OS and toxicity. Results: 38 pts were enrolled between May 16, 2013 and February 1, 2018. 35 pts were evaluable for primary endpoint. Median age 63 years old and 22/35 (62.9%) were male. Most common histology was papillary RCC, 14/35 (40%), and most common number of metastatic sites was 1. 29/35 (82.9%) had prior nephrectomy and 30/35 (85.7%) had no prior systemic therapy. Median number of cycles was 5. 12-month OS was 65.7% (90% CI, 50.5-78.9%). Best response in first 2 cycles: PR 11%, SD 60%, PD 9%, not evaluated 20%. Median PFS was 7.5 months (90% CI, 5.0-11.0); median OS 18.9 months (90% CI, 13.0-NE). Grade 3 / 4 AEs seen in 25 pts with hypertension, transaminitis and abdominal pain being most common (seen in >10%). Conclusions: There are limited data about the efficacy of available therapies for mncRCC. This study shows that pazopanib has similar efficacy compared to historical data in clinical trials using other TKIs in mncRCC. The safety profile of pazopanib in pts with mncRCC was found to be similar to that found in prior clinical trials studying pazopanib. Our findings warrant further investigation into the utility of pazopanib in metastatic ncRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01767636.

Abstract Remediation of struggling learners is a challenge faced by all educators. In recognition of this reality, and in light of contemporary challenges facing infectious diseases (ID) fellowship program directors, the Infectious Diseases Society of America Training Program Directors’ Committee focused the 2018 National Fellowship Program Directors’ Meeting at IDWeek on “Remediation of the Struggling Fellow.” Small group discussions addressed 7 core topics, including feedback and evaluations, performance management and remediation, knowledge deficits, fellow well-being, efficiency and time management, teaching skills, and career development. This manuscript synthesizes those discussions around a competency-based framework to provide program directors and other educators with a roadmap for addressing common contemporary remediation challenges.

Background: Heterozygous somatic mutations in the genes encoding RNA splicing factors SF3B1, U2AF1, SRSF2 or ZRSR2 induce aberrant splicing in cancer cells and are among the most common mutations in patients with MDS, AML or CMML. H3B-8800 is an orally available small molecule that binds to the SF3b complex and induces alternative splicing changes in cells. Because splicing factor mutant cells depend on residual wild-type function of splicing factors for survival, we hypothesized that H3B-8800 would induce preferential cell killing of mutant cells by further perturbing splicing to synthetic lethality. In pre-clinical models, H3B-8800 preferentially kills spliceosome mutant cells and induces antitumor activity in xenograft leukemia models with core spliceosome mutations (Seiler M et al Nature Medicine 2018). Therefore, we conducted a phase I clinical trial (NCT02841540) of H3B-8800 in patients with MDS, AML or CMML. Here we describe the safety profile and clinical outcomes of the dose escalation cohorts in this phase I trial. Methods: This phase I trial explored the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of H3B-8800 in patients with myeloid cancers. Dose escalation cohorts, employing a standard 3+3 design, examined 2 different once daily dosing regimens (schedule I: 5 days on/9 days off; schedule II: 21 days on/7 days off) in a 28-day cycle, with stratification based on lower-risk (LR) versus higher-risk (HR) myeloid neoplasms. Results: As of June 16th, 2019, 84 patients were enrolled at 24 centers in the US and Europe. Dose ranged from 1-40 mg among 65 patients on schedule I, while 19 patients were enrolled with dose ranging from 7-20 mg on schedule II. The patient population included AML (n=38), CMML (n=4), HR-MDS (n=20), LR-MDS (n=21) and 1 MDS with unknown risk level. Most patients (88%) had spliceosome mutations of interest. The most common mutations were in SRSF2 (p.P95H in 17, p.P95L in 9, p.P95_R102Del in 4), SF3B1 (p.K700E in 11, p.R625C in 4), and U2AF1 (p.Q157P in 6, p.S34F in 4). Patients remained on treatment from 7 to 819 days; 25 patients (30%) had time on treatment greater than 180 days, 20% more than 1 year and 2% over 2 years. The median therapy duration for LR-CMML/MDS, HR-CMML/MDS, and AML patients were 216, 62, and 47 days respectively. Most observed treatment related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were Grade 1 or 2. The most common treatment-related (as judged by the investigator, &gt;10% frequency) TEAEs in the patients treated on schedule I were diarrhea (75%), nausea (37%), fatigue (28%) and vomiting (27%). The most common treatment-related TEAEs in the patients treated on schedule II were diarrhea (68%), vomiting (42%), QTc prolongation (21%), nausea (16%), and fatigue (16%). The most common dose limiting toxicity was prolongation of the QTcF interval &gt;500 msec (n=2, 40 mg on schedule I and n=1, 20 mg on schedule II, all ≥Grade 3) and bradycardia without other arrhythmias (n=1, 14 mg on schedule II, ≥Grade 3). No ophthalmic AEs were observed; 1 patient (LR-MDS) experienced durable marrow aplasia. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has not been confirmed for either Schedule I or Schedule II. PK analysis indicates that H3B-8800 is rapidly absorbed and exhibits dose-proportional increase in plasma exposure. Consistent dose-dependent target engagement (i.e., alteration in mature mRNA transcripts) was observed in blood mononuclear cells from patients enrolled in the 2 mg up to 40 mg dose cohorts on both schedules. Despite this splicing modulation, no objective complete responses (CR) or partial responses (PR) meeting International Working Group criteria were observed. One patient with CMML had a durable platelet response that began in Cycle 1 and persisted through Cycle 13. Nine red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent patients with MDS or CMML and 2 patients with AML did not require RBC transfusions for ≥8 weeks (up to 28 weeks) while on study. One platelet transfusion-dependent patient with LR-MDS did not require platelet transfusions for ≥8 weeks. Conclusion: Results from this first-in-human multicenter prospective clinical trial of a splicing modulator in myeloid neoplasms demonstrate dose-dependent target engagement and predictable PK profile of H3B-8800, and safety even with prolonged dosing. Although no objective CR or PR were achieved, decreased RBC or platelet transfusion requirements were observed in 12 (14%) of enrolled patients. Disclosures Steensma: H3 Biosciences: Other: Research funding to institution, not investigator.; Pfizer: Consultancy; Aprea: Research Funding; Stemline: Consultancy; Arrowhead: Equity Ownership; Summer Road: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy. Wermke:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Greenberg:Notable Labs: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; H3 Biotech: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Font:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Komrokji:Agios: Consultancy; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau; DSI: Consultancy; JAZZ: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; celgene: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy. Yang:Agios: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Brunner:Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding. Ades:Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Silence Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Helsinn Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Al-Kali:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Coombs:H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding. Foran:Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Helsinn: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amphivena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Micol:AbbVie: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Perez De Oteyza:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Wang:Abbvie: Other: Advisory role; Kite: Other: Advisory role; Jazz: Other: Advisory role; Astellas: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; celyad: Other: Advisory role; Pfizer: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi: Other: Advisory role; Amgen: Other: Advisory role; Agios: Other: Advisory role. Watts:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Buonamici:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Kim:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Gourineni:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Marino:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Rioux:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Schindler:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Smith:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Yao:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Yuan:Eisai: Employment. Yu:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Platzbecker:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: H3B-8800 (experimental, unapproved)

78 Background: Previous study demonstrated that activation of RAS/MAPK pathway is associated with reduced tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Further study showed that inhibition of MAPK pathway with a MEK inhibitor is synergistic with anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapies. Methods: Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic TNBC with ≤ 3 prior lines of therapy without prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2 therapies were enrolled. Treatment was started with a 2-week run in period with single agent binimetinib. Dose level 0 was binimetinib at 45 mg oral twice daily continuously and dose level -1 was 30 mg twice daily. Pembrolizumab was given at a fixed dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks at both dose levels. Phase I study was based on the standard 3+3 design. Results: A total of 12 patients were enrolled and treated in the phase 1. Five patients were enrolled at dose level 0, 1 patient withdrew prior to treatment and 1 patient was not evaluable for dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Among 3 evaluable patients, 2 patients experienced DLT with grade 3 flank pain and ALT abnormality. Additional 8 patients were enrolled at dose level -1. Out of 6 evaluable patients for DLT, there was 1 DLT observed with grade 3 AST and ALT abnormality. However, this particular patient had liver metastasis with grade 1 AST and ALT abnormality at baseline and her liver function test (LFT) normalized in 3 weeks after treatment discontinuation and oral prednisone. Other grade 1-2 common AEs included rash, LFT increase, abdominal pain, mucositis, nausea, cardiac troponin T increase without EKG change. The efficacy data will be presented at the meeting after the phase II interim analysis. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab in combination with binimetinib at 30 mg twice daily appears to be safe based on the initial cohort. Phase II part is currently ongoing with binimetinib 30 mg twice daily and pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks with a total of 23 patients planned where the safety and efficacy of this combination will be further evaluated. Clinical trial information: NCT03106415.