Citations

Clear

1020 citation(s) found for "Perez, EA".

A combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and vinorelbine for first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: An open-label, two-cohort, phase II study (VELVET).
Perez, Edith A. , López-Vega, José Manuel, Petit, Thierry , Mitchell, Lada, Pelizon, C., Andersson, Michael , Mastro, Lucia Del

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: TPS653-TPS653

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.tps653 Get It

TPS653 Background: Pertuzumab (P) is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the dimerization domain of HER2: it prevents HER2 heterodimerization and thus activation of downstream signaling. Since P targets a different epitope than trastuzumab (H), a more comprehensive HER2 blockade is achieved by combining the two agents. Data from CLEOPATRA showed improved efficacy for P and H plus docetaxel. The combination of P and H has not yet been assessed with other chemotherapy partners in the metastatic setting. H plus vinorelbine (V) has shown comparable efficacy to H plus docetaxel but with a superior safety profile. VELVET will assess the overall response rate (ORR) of P with H+V in first-line patients (pts) with HER2-positive MBC. Co-administration of P and H within the same infusion bag will also be investigated as this could increase pt convenience by reducing administration and observation time. Methods: VELVET is a multicenter, open-label, two-cohort, Phase II trial. Pts with HER2-positive LABC or MBC not previously treated in the metastatic setting with non-hormonal anticancer therapy are eligible. Pts must have an LVEF >55% at baseline and an ECOG PS of 0 or 1. Study enrollment started in January 2012. A total of 210 pts will be included. Based on statistical assumptions, 95 pts must be evaluable per cohort, which assumes a withdrawal rate around 10%. Pts in Cohort 1 (the first 105 pts enrolled) will receive P and H sequentially and pts in Cohort 2 (the next 105 pts) will receive P and H in the same infusion bag at Cycle 2 onwards if drug administration in Cycle 1 was well tolerated. V will be given in both cohorts. Treatment duration is until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Study dose: P: 840 mg loading dose, 420 mg q3w (iv); H: 8 mg/kg loading dose, 6 mg/kg q3w (iv), and V: 25 mg/m2 Day 1 and 8 (first cycle) then 30−35 mg/m2 Day 1 and 8 q3w (iv) (dose escalation at investigator’s discretion). The primary endpoint is ORR by independent assessment. Secondary endpoints include investigator assessment of ORR, time to response, duration of response, PFS, time to progression, overall survival, safety and tolerability, and QoL.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting for treatment of HER2+ breast cancer
Garrison, L., Perez, Edith A. , Dueck, A. C. , Lalla, Deepa, Patón, Víctor , Lubeck, Deborah P., Paton, V.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 9, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 6023-6023

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.6023 Get It

6023 Background: The addition of trastuzumab (H) to a standard adjuvant therapy regimen (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel; AC→T) is associated with a 52% reduction in risk (p < 0.0001) of disease recurrence in patients with HER2 positive operable breast cancer (Romond et al, NEJM 2005). A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to assess the lifetime clinical and economic implications of this important clinical finding. Methods: A Markov model with three health states (disease-free survival [DFS], recurrence, and death) was used to estimate the likely cost-effectiveness (CE) for a 50 yr old woman. Efficacy results from both trials (NCCTG N9831/NSABP B-31) were used through 4 years, and projections of time to recurrence and death were based on the literature (EBCTCG, Lancet 2005). After 4 years, annual transition probabilities to recurrence and death are assumed to be the same in both arms. Cardiotoxicity was higher with H (Perez EA, ASCO 2005). Actual total dose of H was used which was lower than scheduled dose. Incremental costs associated with addition of H to adjuvant therapy were estimated using average wholesale prices, Medicare reimbursement rates and other published data. These costs included testing for HER2 status, drug and administration costs for H, cardiac monitoring, treatment of cardiotoxicity, treatment following recurrence, and end-of-life costs for dying patients. Utility estimates were derived from the literature. Results: Over a lifetime, the cost per quality-adjusted life year gained (QALY; discount rate 3%) is $27,800, with a range of $17,900 to $39,100 under multi-way sensitivity analysis. Projected life expectancy from the Markov model is 3 years longer for H patients (19.4 v 16.4 yrs). Over a 20-year horizon, addition of H to AC→T is estimated to cost an additional $46,300 on average, with an expected gain of 1.28 QALYs-a cost/QALY of $36,100. The key drivers of CE are the cost of treatment and the improvement in DFS. Conclusion: The model projects a cost-utility ratio that is below that of many treatments used for oncology patients. The use of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting for HER2+ breast cancer is projected to be cost-effective. [Table: see text]
Should attribution be considered when interpreting adverse event data: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) evaluation of a phase III placebo controlled trial
Hillman, Shauna L., Mandrekar, Sumithra J. , Perez, Edith A. , Kugler, J. W., Adjei, Alex A. , Buckner, Jan C. , Bot, Brian M. , Sargent, Daniel J.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 9, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 6006-6006

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.6006 Get It

6006 Background: In March 1998, the Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0 was implemented and introduced the collection and reporting of attribution of adverse events to study treatment. Collection and reporting of attribution adds time and cost to the clinical trial process, and its use while reporting adverse events (AE) in the literature has varied. We investigate whether attribution adds value to the interpretation of AE data. Methods: Patients on the placebo arm of trial 97–24–51 (CAI vs. Placebo) were chosen since the true relationship of the event to the study treatment is known (“unrelated”). Attribution was collected per CTCv2.0 and categorized as “not related” (not related or unlikely) and “related” (possible, probable, or definite). All reported AEs and the maximum severity for a given AE were evaluated. Patterns were evaluated using generalized estimating equations adjusting for multiple events per patient. Changes in attribution over time for the same event were computed. Results: 84 patients on the placebo arm experienced a total of 1013 AEs. 47% of AEs were reported as “related” with 36% reported as possibly related. Known CAI AEs were more likely to be reported as “related” (p = 0.005). Pulmonary AEs were more likely to be reported as “not related” (p = 0.0006). No patterns were observed by gender, age, PS, severity or treatment cycle of AE. When the same event was reported on the same patient in multiple cycles, the attribution category changed at least once 36% of the time with 25% changing from “related” to “unrelated” or vice versa. Conclusion: Almost 50% of events on a placebo arm of a phase III trial were reported as being attributed to study treatment and 25% of the time the same event was not consistently attributed. These data suggest that attribution is difficult to determine, unreliable, and thus its value in large phase III trials is questionable. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Evaluation of platinum-based chemotherapy, glutathione metabolic genes, and survival in advanced non small cell lung cancer: A NCCTG 97–24–51 based study
Mandrekar, Sumithra J. , Hillman, Shauna L., Allen, Katie L., Cunningham, Julie M. , Jett, James R., Adjei, Alex A. , Perez, Edith A. , Yang, Ping , Sun, Zhifu , Wampfler, Jason A.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 9, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 13013-13013

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.13013 Get It

13013 Background: The glutathione metabolic pathway is directly involved in the inactivation of platinum compounds. Our earlier work indicated that genotypes corresponding to varied glutathione-related enzyme activities may predict survival in patients with advanced lung cancer. Herein, we evaluated the role of glutathione-related genotypes on clinical outcomes in stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer patients who were stable or responding from one prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: DNA samples from patients who had tumor regression or stable disease after treatment with one platinum based chemotherapy regimen were analyzed using 6 polymorphic DNA markers that encode 5 important enzymes in the glutathione metabolic pathway. The contrasting genotypes used in the analysis were GCLC (homozygous repeat 77 vs. heterozygous 7*), GPX1 (CC vs. other), GSTP1-I105V (AA vs. other), GSTP1-A114V (CC vs. other), GSTM1 (null vs. present), and GSTT1 (null vs. present). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, treatment arm, ECOG performance status, stage, and prior tumor response, were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of the genotypes at each locus. Results: Data from 112 patients with a median follow-up of 10.6 (range: 0.4–56.3) months was used. No significant difference in time to disease progression was observed for any of the genotypes. Among the 6 genomic DNA markers, the GCLC genotype was an important prognostic factor for overall survival after adjusting for other factors. In particular, patients carrying a 77 repeat genotype (homozygous) had a significantly worse survival (Hazard ratio = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.05–2.63). Conclusions: Genotypes of glutathione-related enzymes, especially GCLC, may be used as host factors in predicting patients’ prognosis after platinum-based chemotherapy. Further investigation to define and measure the effects of these genes in chemotherapeutic regimens is needed. (This work was partly supported by NIH research grants CA77118, CA80127, and CA84354.) No significant financial relationships to disclose.
SWOG 0012, a randomized phase III comparison of standard doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) followed by weekly paclitaxel (T) versus weekly doxorubicin and daily oral cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF (G) followed by weekly paclitaxel as neoadjuvant therap
Ellis, Georgiana K., Barlow, WE, Russell, Christy , Royce, Melanie , Perez, Edith A. , Livingston, R. B.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 9, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: LBA537-LBA537

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.lba537 Get It

LBA537 Background: Between 10-1-02 and 12-01-05, SWOG 0012 accrued patients to a two-arm randomized trial, with formal participation from NCCTG and CTSU participation by other cooperative groups. Arm 1 gave A at 60 mg/m2 and C at 600 mg/m2 q 3 wk IV for 5 cycles, arm 2 A at 24 mg/m2/wk × 15 IV and C at 60 mg/m2/day PO for 15 wk with G at 5 mcg/kg/day × 6/7 weekly. Both groups then received T at 80 mg/m2/wk × 12, and proceeded to surgery with pCR by NSABP criteria at the primary site as the endpoint. A total of 372 were randomized, and we report here on 265 patients (pts) evaluable for outcome, including those who did not proceed to surgery. In arm 1, pCR was seen in 17% vs 27% in arm 2 (p = .06); when adjusted for hormone receptor status (ER-PR- in 49% on arm 1, 41% on arm 2) and disease type (locally advanced vs inflammatory), the odds ratio in favor of arm 2 is 1.98 (95% CI 1.05–3.74, p = .034). For ER- PR- pts, pCR rates for Arm 1 vs 2 were 26 vs 43%, while for those with ER or PR+, pCR rates were 9 vs 14%. Inflammatory pts showed a striking difference in pCR rates for arm 1 vs arm 2 (12 vs 33%, p = .033). HER 2 status (+ in 29%) did not predict response or interact with treatment. Grade 3/4 toxicities (arm 1 vs 2, %) were as follows: hand-foot syndrome (0 vs 13), neutropenia (47 vs 16), neutropenic infection (1.8 vs 0.6), stomatitis (2 vs 11), and nausea/vomiting (11 vs 5). Toxicity from T was grade 3 neuropathy in 10%, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 12%. There were no treatment-related deaths. Continuous or “metronomic” chemotherapy with AC is superior to standard intermittent AC, and the pCR rate reported for the continuous arm is the highest reported in a cooperative group experience for this patient population. [Table: see text]
Phase II trial of ixabepilone in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who are resistant to an anthracycline, a taxane and capecitabine
Thomas, E. Donnall , Perez, Edith A. , Lerzo, Guillermo, Mullaney, Brian P., Thomas, E., Mukhopadhyay, P. , Pivot, Xavier B. , Bosserman, Linda D. , Vahdat, Linda T. , Hortobágyi, Gabriel N.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 9, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 660-660

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.660 Get It

660 Background: Patients (pts) with MBC previously treated with an anthracycline, a taxane and capecitabine have very limited treatment options. Ixabepilone is the first semi-synthetic analog in a new class of cytotoxic agents, the epothilones. It has shown activity in breast and other tumors. Methods: This single-arm Phase II trial was designed to assess the objective response rate (ORR) of ixabepilone in MBC pts resistant to an anthracycline, a taxane and capecitabine. Pts had to be resistant to each regimen as defined by progression within 8 wks in the metastatic setting or recurrence within 6 months (mo) of adjuvant anthracycline/taxane. Capecitabine must have been given in the metastatic setting. Response was assessed by an independent radiology review committee (IRRC; primary analysis) and by each investigator per RECIST. Ixabepilone was administered IV at 40 mg/m2 over 3 h every 3 wks. Results: A total of 126 pts were treated: median age 51 yrs (range 30–78), Karnofsky PS range 70–100% and 70% pts had baseline liver metastases. 88% pts had received ≥2 prior metastatic regimens. 113 pts were response evaluable (had target disease by IRRC and met eligibility criteria for prior therapy). Median duration of response was 5.3 mo. Stable disease (SD) was the best response in 50% pts and 14% pts had SD ≥6 mo duration. Median PFS was 3.1 mo. Pts received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–16). The most common Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were sensory peripheral neuropathy (14%), fatigue (10%), myalgia (7%), and stomatitis (6%). The neuropathy was cumulative and reversible. Time to resolution (to Grade 1 or baseline) for Grade 3/4 neuropathy was 5.4 wks by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 54% and 7% of pts, respectively. Febrile neutropenia was reported in 3% pts. Conclusions: Ixabepilone demonstrates promising clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in patients highly resistant to standard chemotherapy. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
Pre-operative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) influences patient selection for partial breast irradiation
Vallow, Laura A., Packianathan, S., DePeri, Elizabeth R., McDonough, Michelle, Earle, John D., Perez, Edith A.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 9, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 604-604

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.604 Get It

604 Background: Many patients with localized breast cancer undergo breast conservation therapy. Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is a technique that reduces irradiated tissue volume and decreases treatment time. Appropriate patient selection for this technique is critical. We studied the influence of pre-operative breast MRI on patient selection for PBI. Methods: Between 05/04 and 05/05, 231 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer underwent pre-operative bilateral breast MRI (median age = 64, range 34 to 89). Following initial clinico-pathologic review, patients were deemed to be eligible for PBI based on the NSABP B39 protocol if they satisfied its inclusion criteria (tumor size ≤3 cm, ≤3 positive nodes, negative surgical margins, lack of multicentric disease), derived through physical examination, mammography and/or ultrasonography. Breast MRI scans of all patients deemed eligible for PBI by these criteria were then reviewed to determine the impact of the MRI findings on their eligibility for PBI. Only patients who had pathological assessment to correlate with the MRI findings were included in the analysis. Results: Based on the NSABP B39 inclusion criteria, 186 patients (81%) were considered to be appropriate candidates for PBI without influence from MRI findings. Of these 186 women, MRI findings led to pathologically proven additional disease that altered the recommendations for PBI in 26 patients (14%). Mammographically occult, biopsy proven multicentic disease was detected in the ipsilateral breast in 13 patients (7%), whereas 5 women (2.7%) had mammographically occult, biopsy proven multicentric disease in the contralateral breast. In 8 patients (4.3%), pathological assessment confirmed more extensive local disease than was detected by breast MRI. Conclusions: Up to 14% of patients initially deemed eligible for PBI were later found to be ineligible because of breast MRI findings. Ipsilateral multicentric disease was identified in 7%, contralateral disease was discovered in 2.7%, and more extensive local disease was noted in 4.3%. Bilateral breast MRI complements other imaging modalities in determining eligibility for PBI by identifying mammographically occult disease in patients for whom PBI may be inappropriate. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Results of an analysis of cardiac function in 2,812 patients treated with lapatinib
Perez, EA, Byrne, Julie, Hammond, Isaac W., Rafi, R., Martín, Adrián, Berger, Marvin, Zaks, Tal, Roychowdhury, D., Stein, Steven H., Rafi, R., Berger, M. S., Oliva, Cristina

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 9, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 583-583

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.583 Get It

583 Background: Lapatinib is an orally bioavailable reversible, dual tyrosine kinase ErbB1 and ErbB2 inhibitor. Trastuzumab, an ErbB2 inhibitor, has been associated with cardiotoxicity. Methods: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was monitored every 8 weeks using MUGA or echocardiogram. Cardiac risk factors including age, underlying cardiovascular disease, previous exposure to AC, trastuzumab, or mediastinal/left sided radiation (XRT) were also collected. LVEF data were evaluated for ≥ NCI CTC grade 3, or ≥ 20% decline relative to baseline (& below institutional LLN). Results: 1.3%, 37 of the 2812 subjects who have received lapatinib in all trials to date have experienced decreased LVEF. 22 of 37 patients received lapatinib monotherapy, the remaining 15 received lapatinib in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. 68% (25/37) of patients were female, median age was 59 years. Decreased LVEF occurred within 9 weeks of treatment onset in 68% of cases. The event resolved/improved in 57% of cases: in 50% of these, lapatinib treatment was continued. Average event duration was 5 weeks. Four of 37 patients were symptomatic (0.1% incidence). Most symptomatic events responded promptly to standard CHF therapy. The majority of patients (92%, 34/37) had confounding factors that may have contributed to the event, including previous exposure to AC, trastuzumab or XRT, and/or medical history. 8 of 34 patients had a positive lapatinib dechallenge (LVEF recovered): 3 were symptomatic (signs of CHF) and 5 asymptomatic. 3 patients had no contributing factors: 1 experienced symptomatic decreased LVEF, the remaining 2 died due to disease progression whilst LVEF decrease was ongoing. 16 of 1307 patients participating in placebo controlled studies experienced decreased LVEF. Of these 8 are known to have received lapatinib, giving an incidence of 1.2% (8/654). Conclusions: Lapatinib-associated LVEF decrease is rarely symptomatic and generally reversible/non-progressive. Incidence was 1.3% in our population, less than the 3–6% incidence of asymptomatic LVEF decreases observed in the general population. Pharmacogenetic studies are ongoing to determine whether there is a link between ErbB2 polymorphisms and lapatinib cardiotoxicity. [Table: see text]
BAY 43–9006 as single oral agent in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously exposed to anthracycline and/or taxane
Moreno‐Aspitia, Alvaro , Wiesenfeld, Martin, Hobday, Timothy J. , Rowland, Kendrith M. , Northfelt, Donald W. , Tenner, Kathleen , Palmieri, Frances M., Perez, Edith A. , Hillman, David W.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 9, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 577-577

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.577 Get It

577 Background: BAY 43–9006 targets the ras/raf signaling pathway and inhibits VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3 and or PDGFR-β growth factors. A study was conducted to assess anti-tumor activity and the toxicity profile in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: A two-stage phase II study was conducted with pts with MBC who had measurable disease and were candidates for 1 st or 2 nd line chemotherapy and had previously received an anthracycline and/or a taxane in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or metastatic setting. Pts started with a dose of 400 mg twice daily on days 1–28 of each 4 week cycle. Based on interval adverse events (AEs), a dose reduction was considered as 400 mg given one time daily. Primary endpoint was tumor response defined as a complete or partial response (PR) according to RESIST. The study required 40 pts, but was to be terminated if 0 or 1 responses occurred among 1 st 20 eligible pts. Results: 23 pts enrolled with a median age of 54 (range 37–70) but 3 were declared ineligible. All 23 pts were included in all analyses except efficacy analysis as stated per protocol. Fifteen (65%) had visceral metastasis; 22 (96%) had prior anthracycline treatment (tx); 16 (70%) had prior taxane tx.; 10 (44%) had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease and 14 (61%) had a prior relapse free interval of 12 months (mos) or more. Pts received tx for a median of 2 cycles (range 1–8) with a median follow-up of 7.2 mos. Dose reductions were due to dermatitis/skin rash (3), hand/foot skin reaction (2), hypertension (1) and cramping hands/feet (1). No grade 4 AEs occurred and grade 3 AEs included acne (2), hand/foot skin reaction (1), neutropenia (1), cough (1), wound infection (1), and prolonged PTT (1). Among the 20 pts eligible for efficacy analysis one pt (5%; 95% CI 0.5–20.5%) achieved a PR with duration of 3.6 mos and one pt achieved stable disease for at least 6 mos. The 6-month overall survival rate was 81% and the progression-free survival rates were 53% at 2 mos, 24% at 4 mos and 6% at 6 mos. Median time to progression was 2 mos. Based on the lack of sufficient response, we did not proceed with the 2nd stage of this study. Conclusion: Treatment with oral BAY 43–9006, while well tolerated, does not have sufficient activity to warrant further testing as a single agent in this disease setting. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Genentech Genentech
Phase III adjuvant trial of concurrent epirubicin/taxane vs. sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by taxane for node positive breast cancer
Lambert-Falls, R., Deutsch, M., Desch, Christopher E., Zhou, Kaiyu , Perez, Edith A. , Zhou, K.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 9, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 573-573

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.573 Get It

573 Background: This study evaluates whether concurrent epirubicin/taxane (ET) improves disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 yrs compared to the sequential combination of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by a taxane (EC>T) in pts with operable node (+) breast cancer. Methods: Eligible pts were randomized to receive either ET (E 75 mg/m 2) for 8 cycles q21 days or EC>T (E 90 mg/m 2, C 600 mg/m2) for 4 cycles, followed by 4 cycles of a taxane q21 days. Choice of T (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m 2) was at the physician’s discretion. The primary endpoint is DFS. A 0.10 increase in the probability of DFS at 3 yrs for the ET arm would be considered clinically relevant. To detect 82 events, 300 subjects per arm are required to provide 90% power at 5% significance level. Results: 617 pts were enrolled from Nov 2000 to June 2003; 308 pts received ET and 309 pts received EC>T. Both treatment arms were well balanced with respect to age, nodal+, ER status, Her-2+ and PS; median age 52.5 (42%<50 years old); 70% ER+; 61% LN (1–3); 16% Her-2+; 87% PS 0. Total of 2206 cycles of treatment were given to ET compared 2314 cycles of treatment to EC>T. At 30 months of median follow-up there were DFS 102 events occurred; 47 events in ET arm (16%) and 55 events in EC>T arm (18%); 63 total deaths; 29 deaths in ET arm and 34 deaths in EC>T arm. The most common toxicities include alopecia (50%), fatigue (31%), nausea and vomiting (30%), dyspepsia (27%), febrile neutropenia (15%), constipation (12%), diarrhea (10%), arthralgia (11%), stomatitis (10%). In cardiac safety f/u, only one pt in ET arm remained LVEF drop >15. Conclusions: Epirubicin can be combined with taxanes in both sequential and concurrent therapies and both regimens are effective and well tolerated. The study is sponsored by Pfizer Inc. No significant financial relationships to disclose.