Citations

Clear

1892 citation(s) found for "Wu, Kenneth".

Implementation of genomic medicine for rare disease in a tertiary healthcare system: Mayo Clinic Program for Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases (PRaUD)
Kemppainen, Jennifer L., Vitek, Carolyn R. Rohrer , Whalen, Denise A., Kolbert, Kayla J., Sikkink, Kaitlin J. , Kroc, Sarah A., Kruisselbrink, Teresa , Shupe, Gabrielle F., Knudson, Alyssa K., Burke, Elizabeth , Loftus, Elle C., Bandel, Lorelei A. , Prochnow, Carri A., Mulvihill, Lindsay A., Thomas, Brittany C. , Gamble, Dale M., Graddy, Courtney B., Garzon, Giovanna G. Moreno, Ekpoh, Idara U., Porquera, Eva M. Carmona, Hogan, Marie C. , Ters, Mireille El , Davis, III John M., Vella, Adrian, Kumar, Seema , Creo, Ana L. , Lteif, Aida, Pittock, Siobhán T. , Tebben, Peter J. , Abate, Ejigayehu G., Joshi, Avni Y. , Ristagno, Elizabeth H. , Patnaik, Mrinal S., Sabrowsky, Sonia M., Wierenga, Klaas J. , Keddis, Mira T. , Samadder, N. Jewel , Presutti, R. John , Stephens, Michael C., Roberts, Lewis R. , Faubion, William A. , Driscoll, Sherilyn W. , Selcen, Duygu , Jackson, Lauren , Ortega, Victor E. , Anderson, Sarah , Aoudia, Stacy L., Klee, Eric W. , McAllister, Tammy M., Carmona, Eva M. , Carmona, Eva M , Roberts, Lewis R , Presutti, Richard J , Tebben, Peter , Hogan, Marie C , Vairo, Filippo Pinto e , Burke, Elizabeth M., Fervenza, Fernando C. , Warrington, Kenneth J. , Koster, Matthew J. , Orandi, Amir B. , Basiaga, Matthew L. , Patnaik, Mrinal S., Schimmenti, Lisa A. , Dhamija, Radhika , Robinson, Steven I. , Wong‐Kisiel, Lily C. , Flanagan, Eoin P. , Ramanan, Vijay K. , Mauermann, Michelle L. , Lazaridis, Konstantinos N.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | March 7, 2023 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-2617916/v1 Get It

Abstract Background In the United States, rare disease (RD) is defined as a condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals. Collectively, RD affects an estimated 30 million Americans. A significant portion of RD has an underlying genetic cause; however, this may go undiagnosed. To better serve these patients, the Mayo Clinic Program for Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases (PRaUD) was created under the auspices of the Center for Individualized Medicine (CIM) aiming to integrate genomics into subspecialty practice including targeted genetic testing, research, and education. Methods Patients were identified by subspecialty healthcare providers from 11 clinical divisions/departments. Targeted multi-gene panels or custom exome/genome-based panels were utilized. To support the goals of PRaUD, a new clinical service model, the Genetic Testing and Counseling (GTAC) unit, was established to improve access and increase efficiency for genetic test facilitation. The GTAC unit includes genetic counselors, genetic counseling assistants, genetic nurses, and a medical geneticist. Patients receive abbreviated point-of-care genetic counseling and testing through a partnership with subspecialty providers. Results Implementation of PRaUD began in 2018 and GTAC unit launched in 2020 to support program expansion. Currently, 29 RD clinical indications are included in 11 specialty divisions/departments with over 142 referring providers. To date, 1,152 patients have been evaluated with an overall solve rate of 14.1% and as high as 66.7% depending on the phenotype. Noteworthy, 42.7% of the solved or likely solved patients underwent changes in medical management and outcome based on genetic test results. Conclusion Implementation of PRaUD and GTAC have enabled subspecialty practices advance expertise in RD where genetic counselors have not historically been embedded in practice. Democratizing access to genetic testing and counseling can broaden the reach of patients with RD and increase the diagnostic yield of such indications leading to better medical management as well as expanding research opportunities.
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis – 2023
Wise, Sarah K. , Damask, Cecelia, Ebert, Charles S. , Levy, Joshua M. , Lin, Sandra Y. , Luong, Amber , Rodriguez, Kenneth , Sedaghat, Ahmad R. , Toskala, Elina , Akdiş, Cezmi A. , Ansotegui, Ignacio J. , Azar, Antoine , Baroody, Fuad M. , Benninger, Michael S. , Casale, Thomas B. , Chaaban, Mohamad R. , Chew, Fook Tim , Chambliss, Jeffrey , Cianferoni, Antonella , Čustović, Adnan , Davis, Elizabeth Mahoney , DelGaudio, John M. , Flanagan, Carrie E. , Franzese, Christine B., Gill, Amarbir S. , Halderman, Ashleigh A. , Joe, Stephanie, Joshi, Shyam , Kuruvilla, Merin , Kim, Jean , Klein, Adam M. , Krouse, Helene J. , Lang, David M. , Laury, Adrienne M., Lee, Victoria S. , Loftus, Patricia A. , Marzouk, Haidy, Mims, James W., Oppenheimer, John , Orlandi, Richard R. , Phillips, Katie M. , Raymond, Mallory , Ryan, Matthew W., Sastre, J. , Schlosser, Rodney J. , Shaker, Marcus , Smith, Kristine A. , Soyka, Michael , Tang, Monica , Tantilipikorn, Pongsakorn , Taw, Malcolm B., Tversky, Jody , Tyler, Matthew A. , Veling, Maria C., Wallace, Dana , White, Andrew A. , Roland, Lauren T , Levy, Joshua M , Luong, Amber U , Sedaghat, Ahmad R , Villwock, Jennifer , Abdullah, Baharudin , Alt, Jeremiah A , Chaaban, Mohamad R , Gill, Amarbir , Kuruvilla, Merin Elizabeth , Kim, Jean , Kuan, Edward C , Lee, Victoria S , Marcus, Sonya , Mattos, Jose , McCoul, Edward D , Nayak, Jayakar V , Orlandi, Richard , Schuman, Theodore A , Smith, Kristine , Soyka, Michael B , Tantilipikorn, Pongsakorn , Tyler, Matthew A , Zhang, Luo , Schlosser, Rodney J , Chew, Fook Tim , Casale, Thomas , Alt, Jeremiah A. , Bernstein, Jonathan A. , Brook, Christopher D. , Campbell, Raewyn Gay , Ellis, Anne K. , Fokkens, Wytske Johanna , Greenhawt, Matthew , Hohlfeld, Jens Michael , Incorvaia, Cristoforo , Larenas‐Linnemann, Désirée E. , Lechner, Matt , Lee, Stella E. , Mattos, José L. , McCoul, Edward D. , Melén, Erik , Mullol, Joaquim , Nayak, Jayakar V. , Platt, Michael P. , Ramanathan, Murugappan , Raymond, Mallory J , Rhee, Chae‐Seo , Reitsma, Sietze , Sheikh, Aziz , Takashima, Masayoshi , Wang, De Yun , Zhang, Luo

Mayo Clinic

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | March 6, 2023 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 293-859

10.1002/alr.23090 | PMID 36878860 Get It

Abstract Background In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence‐based findings and recommendation from the full document. Methods ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence‐based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work. Results ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost. Conclusion The ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment.
CDK7 controls E2F- and MYC-driven proliferative and metabolic vulnerabilities in multiple myeloma
Yao, Yao , Ng, Jessica Fong, Park, Woojun D. , Morelli, Eugenio , Encinas, Jessica , Xu, Yan , Derebail, Sanika, Epstein, Charles B. , Nabet, Behnam , Chesi, Marta , Gray, Nathanael S. , Young, Richard A., Kwiatkowski, Nicholas , Mitsiades, Constantine S. , Lin, Charles Y. , Munshi, Nikhil C. , Fulciniti, Mariateresa , Park, Woojun Daniel , Morelli, Eugenio , Encinas Mayoral, Jessica , Chyra, Zuzana , Xu, Yan , Epstein, Charles , Nabet, Behnam , Chesi, Marta , Gray, Nathanael S , Young, Richard A , Lin, Charles Y , Fong Ng, Jessica , Samur, Mehmet , Chyra, Zuzana , Anderson, Kenneth C.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | March 6, 2023 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1182/blood.2022018885 | PMID 36877894 Get It

Therapeutic targeting of CDK7 has proven beneficial in pre-clinical studies, yet the off-target effects of currently available CDK7 inhibitors make it difficult to pinpoint the exact mechanisms behind MM cell death mediated by CDK7 inhibition. Here, we show that CDK7 expression positively correlates with E2F and MYC transcriptional programs in multiple myeloma (MM) patient cells; and its selective targeting counteracts E2F activity via perturbation of the CDKs/Rb axis and impairs MYC-regulated metabolic gene signatures translating into defects in glycolysis and reduced levels of lactate production in MM cells. CDK7 inhibition using the covalent small molecule inhibitor YKL-5-124 elicits a strong therapeutic response with minimal effects on normal cells, and causes in vivo tumor regression increasing survival in several MM mouse models including a genetically engineered mouse model of MYC-dependent MM. Through its role as a critical cofactor and regulator of MYC and E2F activity, CDK7 is therefore a master regulator of oncogenic cellular programs supporting MM growth and survival, and a valuable therapeutic target providing rationale for development of YKL-5-124 for clinical use.
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with gastroparesis using enteral and/or exclusive parenteral nutrition
Parkman, Henry P. , Murray, Helen Burton , Yates, Katherine P. , Grover, Madhusudan , Malik, Zubair , Schey, Ron , Bulat, Robert, Koch, Kenneth L. , Sarosiek, Irene , Shulman, Robert J. , Farrugia, Gianrico , Miriel, Laura , Tonascia, James , Hamilton, Frank A., Pasricha, Pankaj J. , McCallum, Richard W. , Abell, T L , Parkman, H P , Burton-Murray, Helen , Blackford, Amanda , Kuo, Braden , Chumpitazi, Bruno P. , Abell, Thomas L.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition | March 4, 2023 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 541-549

10.1002/jpen.2493 | PMID 36871132 Get It

AbstractBackgroundPatients with gastroparesis (Gp) may need enteral nutrition (EN) or exclusive parenteral nutrition (PN). Among patients with Gp, we aimed to (1) identify the frequency of EN and exclusive PN use and (2) explore characteristics of patients using EN and/or exclusive PN compared with those using oral nutrition (ON), including changes over 48 weeks.MethodsPatients with Gp underwent history and physical examination, gastric emptying scintigraphy, water load satiety testing (WLST), and questionnaires assessing gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life (QOL). Patients were observed 48 weeks.ResultsOf 971 patients with Gp (idiopathic, 579; diabetic, 336; post–Nissen fundoplication, 51), 939 (96.7%) were using ON only, 14 (1.4%) using exclusive PN, and 18 (1.9%) using EN. Compared with patients receiving ON, patients receiving exclusive PN and/or EN were younger, had lower body mass index, and had greater symptom severity. Patients receiving exclusive PN and/or EN had lower physical QOL but not mental QOL or Gp‐related QOL scores. Patients receiving exclusive PN and/or EN ingested less water during WLST but did not have worse gastric emptying. Of those who had been receiving exclusive PN and/or EN, 50% and 25%, respectively, resumed ON at 48‐week follow‐up.ConclusionsThis study describes patients with Gp requiring exclusive PN and/or EN for nutrition support, who represent a small (3.3%) but important subset of patients with Gp. Unique clinical and physiological parameters are associated with this subset and provide insight into the use of nutrition support in Gp.
Abstract PD14-05: PD14-05 Prospective longitudinal validation of a breast cancer risk prediction model in a cohort of 130,058 women
Mabey, Brent, Hughes, Elisha , Probst, Braden , Simmons, Timothy , Hullinger, Brooke, Gary, Monique, Klemp, Jennifer R. , Offit, Kenneth , Pruthi, Sandhya , Whitworth, Pat, Wagner, Susanne , Slavin, Thomas P. , Gutin, Alexander , Pederson, Holly J. , Morris, Brian, Domchek, Susan M. , Eng, Charis , Mukherjee, Semanti , Vijai, Joseph , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Kurian, Allison W. , Robson, Mark E. , Lanchbury, Jerry S.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | March 2, 2023 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 5_Supplement | Pages: PD14-05-PD14-05

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd14-05 Get It

Abstract Background: Personalized breast cancer (BC) risk assessment depends on known traditional risk factors, specific germline mutations, and genome-wide polygenic risk scores (PRS). PRS explains a substantial proportion of genetic BC susceptibility. Accuracy of BC risk prediction may be improved by combining a PRS with traditional risk factors. We recently developed and validated a 149-SNP PRS for women of diverse ancestries using ancestry-informative genetic markers and combined this with version 7 of the Tyrer-Cuzick (TC) model to generate a Combined Risk Score (CRS). Here, we describe a pre-specified prospective longitudinal clinical validation of CRS as a predictor of BC risk. Methods: Women in the U.S. who were referred for clinical genetic testing between January 2017 and February 2019 were matched to medical and hospital claims in an anonymized dataset. Women with a pathogenic mutation in a BC-related gene were excluded from analysis. Follow-up began 4 months after testing and extended to the earliest date of BC diagnosis, censoring at the time of BC preventive treatment, or November 1, 2019. Incident BC events were determined by an ICD10 code of C50.* and confirmed by relevant treatment codes. CRS calibration was evaluated by the ratio of observed (O) to expected (E) incident BCs for the full cohort, and for women split into event-based 5-year CRS risk deciles. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate discriminatory accuracy in terms of hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values from likelihood ratio chi-squared statistics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to examine risk for women split into high- or low-risk groups according to a 3% 5-year CRS risk threshold. Results: 130,058 women with 148,349 total patient years met study eligibility criteria and were matched to claims data. Over a median (range) follow-up of 12.1 (4.0-29.5) months, 340 incident BC events were observed. The CRS was well calibrated in the overall cohort with an O/E ratio of 1.11 (95% CI=0.99-1.23) and within deciles of predicted risk (Table). Importantly, in the highest risk decile, the O/E was 0.91 (95% CI=0.63-1.27) with CRS, but 0.67 (95% CI=0.46-0.94) with TC alone, illustrating the superior calibration of CRS. In a Cox model adjusted for age at testing, PRS had an HR per standard deviation (SD) of 1.48 (95% CI=1.33-1.64, p=2.55×10-13); the HR/SD was 1.43 (95% CI=1.29-1.59, p=1.61×10-11) after adjusting for family history. In a bivariate analysis using both CRS and TC to predict time to BC, CRS added significantly to the model after accounting for TC (HR/SD=2.89, 95% CI=2.12-3.94, p=1.20×10-11), whereas TC did not add significant information after accounting for CRS. 15,986 (12.3%) women were above the CRS high-risk threshold, including 123 with events. A total of 10,248 (7.9%) women were reclassified by the CRS model compared to the TC model. Among women who were classified as high-risk by TC, 32.6% were reclassified as low-risk by CRS; among those classified as low-risk by TC, 4.3% were reclassified as high-risk by CRS. The CRS high-risk group experienced events at over three times the rate of the low-risk group (HR=3.75, 95% CI=3.00-4.68, p=6.39×10-27). Conclusion: The CRS was well-calibrated in predicting BC and significantly improved upon a traditional risk factor model. Clinical use of the CRS may lead to improved BC prevention and screening strategies. Table: Absolute risk calibration by 5-year risk decile Incidence is reported per 1,000 women-years. 34 breast cancers were observed per decile. Citation Format: Brent Mabey, Elisha Hughes, Braden Probst, Holly J. Pederson, Timothy Simmons, Brian Morris, Brooke Hullinger, Susan Domchek, Charis Eng, Monique Gary, Jennifer Klemp, Semanti Mukherjee, Vijai Joseph, Kenneth Offit, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Sandhya Pruthi, Allison W. Kurian, Mark E. Robson, Pat Whitworth, Susanne Wagner, Jerry Lanchbury, Thomas Slavin, Alexander Gutin. PD14-05 Prospective longitudinal validation of a breast cancer risk prediction model in a cohort of 130,058 women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD14-05.
Abstract GS4-05: Phase II randomized trial of conventional versus hypofractionated post-mastectomy proton radiotherapy
Mutter, Robert W. , Giri, Sharmila, Fruth, Briant, Remmes, Nicholas B. , Ruddy, Kathryn, Villarraga, Hector R. , Yan, Elizabeth , Merrell, Kenneth W. , McGee, L.A. , Vern-Gross, T.Z., Stish, Bradley J. , Corbin, Kimberly S. , Vargas, Carlos , Anand, Aman Raj , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Santos-Patarroyo, Sebastián , Gao, Robert, Boughey, Judy C. , Park, Sean S.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | March 2, 2023 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 5_Supplement | Pages: GS4-05-GS4-05

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-gs4-05 Get It

Abstract Purpose/Objectives: Proton therapy is under investigation in breast cancer as a strategy to reduce heart and lung exposure, which is associated with late cardiopulmonary adverse events and secondary malignancy. To date, studies investigating postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) with protons have used conventional fractionation. We hypothesized that condensing treatment to 15 fractions would be safe based on evidence that breast cancer is more sensitive to higher dose fractions than surrounding normal tissues. Materials/Methods: We conducted a randomized non-inferiority phase II trial comparing conventional and hypofractionated proton PMRT with primary endpoint of 24-month complication rate (defined as grade 3 or higher late adverse events using CTCAE, v 4.0 and/or unplanned surgical intervention in patients undergoing mastectomy with reconstruction). With a 10% non-inferiority margin the study ensured 80% power and had a one sided-type I error rate of 0.05. Cardiotoxicity was assessed with serial transthoracic conventional and 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). Eligibility included age ≥ 18 years with non-inflammatory breast cancer resected by mastectomy with indications for PMRT. Assignment of treatments was balanced with respect to immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Conventional fractionation group received 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2 Gy, and hypofractionation group received 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions of 2.67 Gy (RBE 1.1). Target volume included the chest wall and axillary, supraclavicular, and internal mammary lymph nodes. All patients were treated with multi-field optimized pencil beam scanning (intensity modulated proton therapy). Results: Between 2016 and 2018, 82 patients were enrolled and randomized (41 conventional, 41 hypofractionation). Median patient age was 52 years. 32.9% were staged T3-T4 and 79.3% node positive at diagnosis. 57 of 82 patients (69.5%) elected IBR. The median mean heart dose was 0.49 Gy and the median ipsilateral lung volume receiving 40% of prescription or greater (V40%) was 13.6%. No significant changes on conventional or 2D-STE at end-of-treatment or 3-month follow-up compared to baseline were observed. The rate of ≥ grade 2 acute dermatitis was lower with hypofractionation (44% vs 15%, p = 0.006). Other ≥ grade 2 acute adverse events including esophagitis (0 vs 5%), infection (5% vs 2.4%) and skin hyperpigmentation (7.3% vs 4.8%) were not significantly different between the two arms. With a median follow-up of 38.3 months, the 24-month complication rate was conventional 14.6% vs hypofractionation 17.1% (absolute difference 2.4%, p=0.17, 95% CI [-, 15.7%]). In patients with IBR, 6 of 28 (21.4%) conventional and 7 of 29 (24.1%) hypofractionated patients developed complications (p =0.80). There was no significant difference in 3-year disease-free survival between the conventional (89.4%; 95% CI 80.0 – 99.8%) and hypofractionated (92.4%, 95% CI 84.5 – 100.0%) arms (p = 0.91). One local recurrence occurred in the hypofractionated arm simultaneous with regional and distant relapse. The remaining 6 recurrences were isolated distant events. Conclusions: Proton PMRT provided excellent locoregional control and normal tissue sparing. There were no subclinical echocardiographic changes indicative of radiation-induced cardiac dysfunction. Hypofractionation resulted in comparable disease control, tolerability and reconstruction outcomes as conventional fractionation. Although non-inferiority of hypofractionation could not be established based on the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for complication rate being greater than 10%, both conventional and hypofractionation may be considered appropriate regimens for ongoing phase 3 randomized trials comparing photon and proton radiotherapy. Citation Format: Robert Mutter, Sharmila Giri, Briant Fruth, Nicholas Remmes, Aman Anand, Kathryn Ruddy, Hector Villarraga, Sebastian Santos Patarroyo, Elizabeth Yan, Kenneth Merrell, Lisa McGee, Tamara Vern-Gross, Bradley Stish, Robert Gao, Judy C. Boughey, Sean Park, Kimberly Corbin, Carlos Vargas. Phase II randomized trial of conventional versus hypofractionated post-mastectomy proton radiotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-05.
Anatomic and Functional Imaging of Immunoglobulin G4–related Disease and Its Mimics
Huynh, Kenneth N. , Kong, Min J., Nguyen, Ba D. , Nguyen, B D , Kong, Min J.

Mayo Clinic

RadioGraphics | February 23, 2023 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/rg.220097 | PMID 36821510 Get It

Comparing Oncological and Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic versus Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Multinational, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Grossmann, Nico C. , Juvet, Tristan , Potretzke, Aaron M. , Djaladat, Hooman , Ghoreifi, Alireza , Mari, Andrea , Fujita, Kazutoshi , Fontana, Matteo , Sfakianos, John P. , Pfail, John , Laukhtina, Ekaterina , Rajwa, Paweł , Pallauf, Maximillian, Poyet, Cédric , Cacciamani, Giovanni , Doeveren, Thomas van , Boormans, Joost L., Antonelli, Alessandro , Jamil, Marcus , Abdollah, Firas , Ploussard, Guillaume , Heidenreich, Axel , Storz, Enno , Boorjian, Stephen A. , Rink, Michael , Shariat, Shahrokh F. , Pradère, Benjamin , Ghoreifi, Alireza , Mari, Andrea , Fujita, Kazutoshi , Fontana, Matteo , Laukhtina, Ekaterina , Cacciamani, Giovanni E , Boormans, Joost L , Antonelli, Alessandro , Abdollah, Firas , Ploussard, Guillaume , Shariat, Shahrokh F , Pradere, Benjamin , Grossman, Nico C , Rajwa, Pawel , Soria, Francesco , Kikuchi, Eiji , Khene, Z. , Raman, Jay D. , Breda, Alberto , Daneshmand, Siamak , Rouprêt, Morgan

Mayo Clinic

Cancers | February 23, 2023 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1409

10.3390/cancers15051409 | PMID 36900201 Get It

Objectives: To identify correlates of survival and perioperative outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients undergoing open (ORNU), laparoscopic (LRNU), and robotic (RRNU) radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study that included non-metastatic UTUC patients who underwent RNU between 1990–2020. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to impute missing data. Patients were divided into three groups based on their surgical treatment and were adjusted by 1:1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Survival outcomes per group were estimated for recurrence-free survival (RFS), bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Perioperative outcomes: Intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay (LOS), and overall (OPC) and major postoperative complications (MPCs; defined as Clavien–Dindo > 3) were assessed between groups. Results: Of the 2434 patients included, 756 remained after PSM with 252 in each group. The three groups had similar baseline clinicopathological characteristics. The median follow-up was 32 months. Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests demonstrated similar RFS, CSS, and OS between groups. BRFS was found to be superior with ORNU. Using multivariable regression analyses, LRNU and RRNU were independently associated with worse BRFS (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.22–2.28, p = 0.001 and HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.22–2.47, p = 0.002, respectively). LRNU and RRNU were associated with a significantly shorter LOS (beta −1.1, 95% CI −2.2–0.02, p = 0.047 and beta −6.1, 95% CI −7.2–5.0, p < 0.001, respectively) and fewer MPCs (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.31–0.79, p = 0.003 and OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.16–0.46, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: In this large international cohort, we demonstrated similar RFS, CSS, and OS among ORNU, LRNU, and RRNU. However, LRNU and RRNU were associated with significantly worse BRFS, but a shorter LOS and fewer MPCs.
Two‐Year Outcomes With a Next‐Generation Left Atrial Appendage Device: Final Results of the PINNACLE FLX Trial
Doshi, Shephal K. , Kar, Saibal , Sadhu, Ashish, Horton, Rodney , Osorio, José , Ellis, Christopher R. , Stone, James, Shah, Manish H. , Dukkipati, Srinivas R. , Adler, Stuart W., Kim, Jamie , Wazni, Oussama M. , Holmes, David R. , Shipley, Robert D., Christen, Thomas, Allocco, Dominic J. , Buchbinder, Maurice , Chinitz, Larry A. , Desai, Amish J., Dukkipatti, Srinivas R., Ellis, Christopher, Gibson, Douglas , Huber, Kenneth, Khairallah, Farhat, Koneru, Jayanthi N. , Mahoney, Paul G. , Mansour, Moussa , Mark, George E., Nicholson, William , REISS, J. A., Shehata, Michael , Swarup, Vijendra, Huber, Kurt , Téllez-Plaza, María , Ellis, Christopher , Shah, Manish , Nair, Devi G , Wazni, Oussama , Price, Matthew J , Holmes, David R , Reddy, Vivek Y , Kar, Saibal , Huber, Kurt , Price, Matthew J. , Reddy, Vivek Y. , DeLurgio, David B. , Ellis, Christopher, Huber, Kenneth, Mahoney, Paul, O’Neill, William W. , Reiss, James, Saliba, Walid I.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the American Heart Association | February 21, 2023 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.122.026295 | PMID 36789852 Get It

Background The PINNACLE FLX (Protection Against Embolism for Non‐valvular AF [Atrial Fibrillation] Patients: Investigational Device Evaluation of the Watchman FLX LAA [Left Atrial Appendage] Closure Technology) trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of a next‐generation left atrial appendage closure device (WATCHMAN FLX; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA). At 1 year, the study met the primary end points of safety and anatomical efficacy/appendage closure. This final report of the PINNACLE FLX trial includes the prespecified secondary end point of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism at 2 years, also making it the first report of 2‐year outcomes with this next‐generation left atrial appendage closure device. Methods and Results Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score ≥2 (men) or ≥3 (women), with an appropriate rationale for left atrial appendage closure, were enrolled to receive the left atrial appendage closure device at 29 US centers. Adverse events were assessed by an independent clinical events committee, and imaging was assessed by independent core laboratories. Among 395 implanted patients (36% women; mean age, 74 years; CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc, 4.2±1.5), the secondary efficacy end point of 2‐year ischemic stroke or systemic embolism was met, with an absolute rate of 3.4% (annualized rate, 1.7%) and an upper 1‐sided 95% confidence bound of 5.3%, which was superior to the 8.7% performance goal. Two‐year rates of adverse events were as follows: 9.3% all‐cause mortality, 5.5% cardiovascular death, 3.4% all stroke, and 10.1% major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5). There were no additional systemic embolisms, device embolizations, pericardial effusions, or symptomatic device‐related thrombi after 1 year. Conclusions The secondary end point of 2‐year stroke or systemic embolism was met at 3.4%. In these final results of the PINNACLE FLX trial, the next‐generation WATCHMAN FLX device demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy outcomes.
Multi-Omic Architecture of Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Garmany, Ramin , Bos, J. Martijn , Tester, David J. , Giudicessi, John R. , Remedios, Cristobal G. dos , Dasari, Surendra , Nagaraj, Nagaswaroop Kengunte , Nair, Asha, Johnson, Kenneth L. , Ryan, Zachary C. , Maleszewski, Joseph J. , Ommen, Steve R. , Ackerman, Michael J. , Dos Remedios, Cristobal G , Nagaraj, Nagaswaroop K , Nair, Asha A, Dearani, Joseph A. , Ackerman, Michael J , Bos, Johan M , Johnson, Kenneth , Dearani, Joseph A.

Mayo Clinic

Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine | February 20, 2023 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circgen.122.003756 | PMID 36802768 Get It

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by asymmetric left ventricular hypertrophy. Currently, hypertrophy pathways responsible for HCM have not been fully elucidated. Their identification could serve as a nidus for the generation of novel therapeutics aimed at halting disease development or progression. Herein, we performed a comprehensive multi-omic characterization of hypertrophy pathways in HCM. Methods: Flash-frozen cardiac tissues were collected from genotyped HCM patients (n=97) undergoing surgical myectomy and tissue from 23 controls. RNA sequencing and mass spectrometry–enabled deep proteome and phosphoproteomic assessment were performed. Rigorous differential expression, gene set enrichment, and pathway analyses were performed to characterize HCM-mediated alterations with emphasis on hypertrophy pathways. Results: We identified transcriptional dysregulation with 1246 (8%) differentially expressed genes and elucidated downregulation of 10 hypertrophy pathways. Deep proteomic analysis identified 411 proteins (9%) that differed between HCM and controls with strong dysregulation of metabolic pathways. Seven hypertrophy pathways were upregulated with antagonistic upregulation of 5 of 10 hypertrophy pathways shown to be downregulated in the transcriptome. Most upregulated hypertrophy pathways encompassed the rat sarcoma-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascade. Phosphoproteomic analysis demonstrated hyperphosphorylation of the rat sarcoma-mitogen-activated protein kinase system suggesting activation of this signaling cascade. There was a common transcriptomic and proteomic profile regardless of genotype. Conclusions: At time of surgical myectomy, the ventricular proteome, independent of genotype, reveals widespread upregulation and activation of hypertrophy pathways, mainly involving the rat sarcoma-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascade. In addition, there is a counterregulatory transcriptional downregulation of the same pathways. Rat sarcoma-mitogen-activated protein kinase activation may serve a crucial role in hypertrophy observed in HCM.