Citations

Abstract Cellular senescence contributes to tissue homeostasis and age-related pathologies. However, how senescence is initiated in damaged cells remains vague. Here, we discover that irreparable stresses induce transient biogenesis of cilia, which are used by stressed cells to directly communicate with the promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies (PML-NBs), the validated stress signaling hub, to initiate senescence responses. Mechanistically, a ciliary ARL13B-ARL3 GTPase cascade negatively regulates the association of transition fiber protein FBF1 and SUMO-conjugating enzyme UBC9. Irreparable stresses downregulate the ciliary ARLs to release UBC9, which SUMOylates FBF1 at the ciliary base. SUMOylated FBF1 then translocates to PML-NBs to promote PML-NB-dependent senescence initiation. Remarkably, Fbf1 suppression effectively subdues global senescence burden and prevents associated health-span decline in irradiation-treated mice. Collectively, our findings assign primary cilia a central role in inducing senescence program and identify them as promising targets to dampen senescence-associated detrimental damage in future senotherapy strategies.

ABSTRACT Despite advances in early revascularization, percutaneous hemodynamic support platforms, and systems of care, cardiogenic shock (CS) remains associated with a mortality rate higher than 50%. Several risk stratification models have been derived since the 1990 s to identify patients at high risk of adverse outcomes. Still, limited information is available on the differences between scoring systems and their relative applicability to both acute myocardial infarction and advanced decompensated heart failure CS. Thus, we reviewed the similarities, differences, and limitations of published CS risk prediction models and herein discuss their suitability to the contemporary management of CS care.

Background: Cellular redox control is maintained by generation of reactive oxygen/nitrogen species balanced by activation of antioxidative pathways. Disruption of redox balance leads to oxidative stress, a central causative event in numerous diseases including heart failure. Redox control in the heart exposed to hemodynamic stress, however, remains to be fully elucidated. Methods: Pressure overload was triggered by transverse aortic constriction in mice. Transcriptomic and metabolomic regulations were evaluated by RNA-sequencing and metabolomics, respectively. Stable isotope tracer labeling experiments were conducted to determine metabolic flux in vitro. Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes and H9c2 cells were used to examine molecular mechanisms. Results: We show that production of cardiomyocyte NADPH, a key factor in redox regulation, is decreased in pressure overload-induced heart failure. As a consequence, the level of reduced glutathione is downregulated, a change associated with fibrosis and cardiomyopathy. We report that the pentose phosphate pathway and mitochondrial serine/glycine/folate metabolic signaling, 2 NADPH-generating pathways in the cytosol and mitochondria, respectively, are induced by transverse aortic constriction. We identify ATF4 (activating transcription factor 4) as an upstream transcription factor controlling the expression of multiple enzymes in these 2 pathways. Consistently, joint pathway analysis of transcriptomic and metabolomic data reveal that ATF4 preferably controls oxidative stress and redox-related pathways. Overexpression of ATF4 in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes increases NADPH-producing enzymes‚ whereas silencing of ATF4 decreases their expression. Further, stable isotope tracer experiments reveal that ATF4 overexpression augments metabolic flux within these 2 pathways. In vivo, cardiomyocyte-specific deletion of ATF4 exacerbates cardiomyopathy in the setting of transverse aortic constriction and accelerates heart failure development, attributable, at least in part, to an inability to increase the expression of NADPH-generating enzymes. Conclusions: Our findings reveal that ATF4 plays a critical role in the heart under conditions of hemodynamic stress by governing both cytosolic and mitochondrial production of NADPH.

Abstract Context Thyroid nodule risk stratification allows clinicians to standardize the evaluation of thyroid cancer risk according to ultrasound features. Objective To evaluate interrater agreement among clinicians assessing thyroid nodules ultrasound features and thyroid cancer risk categories. Design, setting, and participants We surveyed Endocrine Society and Latin American Thyroid Society members to assess their interpretation of composition, echogenicity, shape, margins, and presence of echogenic foci of 10 thyroid nodule cases. The risk category for thyroid cancer was calculated following the American College of Radiology-Thyroid Imaging Reporting & Data System (ACR-TIRADS) framework from individual responses. Main Outcomes and Measures We used descriptive statistics and Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC1) to assess the primary outcome of interrater agreement for ACR-TIRADS risk category. As secondary outcomes, the interrater agreement for individual features and a subgroup analysis of interrater agreement for the ACR-TIRADS category were performed (ultrasound reporting system, type of practice, and number of monthly appraisals). Results A total of 144 participants were included, mostly endocrinologists. There was moderate level of agreement for the absence of echogenic foci (AC1 0.53, 95% CI 0.24-0.81) and composition (AC1 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.71). The agreement for margins (AC1 0.24, 95% CI 0.15-0.33), echogenicity (AC1 0.34, 95% CI 0.22-0.46), and shape assessment (AC1 0.42, 95% CI 0.13-0.70) was lower. The overall agreement for ACR-TIRADS assessment was AC1 0.29, (95% CI 0.13-0.45). The AC1 of ACR-TIRADS among subgroups was similar. Conclusions This study found high variation of judgments about ACR-TIRADS risk category and individual features, which poses a potential challenge for the widescale implementation of thyroid nodule risk stratification.

Abstract Clinical question In adults with low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels >1.8 mmol/L (>70 mg/dL) who are already taking the maximum dose of statins or are intolerant to statins, should another lipid-lowering drug be added, either a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor or ezetimibe, to reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events? If so, which drug is preferred? Having decided to use one, should we add the other lipid-lowering drug? Current practice Most guidelines emphasise LDL cholesterol targets in their recommendations for prescribing PCSK9 inhibitors and/or ezetimibe in adults at high risk of experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event. However, to achieve these goals in very high risk patients with statins alone is almost impossible, so physicians are increasingly considering other lipid-lowering drugs solely for achieving LDL cholesterol treatment goals rather than for achieving important absolute cardiovascular risk reduction. Most guidelines do not systematically assess the cardiovascular benefits of adding PCSK9 inhibitors and/or ezetimibe for all risk groups across primary and secondary prevention, nor do they report, in accordance with explicit judgments of assumed patients’ values and preferences, absolute benefits and harms and potential treatment burdens. Recommendations The guideline panel provided mostly weak recommendations, which means we rely on shared decision making when applying these recommendations. For adults already using statins, the panel suggests adding a second lipid-lowering drug in people at very high and high cardiovascular risk but recommends against adding it in people at low cardiovascular risk. For adults who are intolerant to statins, the panel recommends using a lipid-lowering drug in people at very high and high cardiovascular risk but against adding it in those at low cardiovascular risk. When choosing to add another lipid-lowering drug, the panel suggests ezetimibe in preference to PCSK9 inhibitors. The panel suggests further adding a PCSK9 inhibitor to ezetimibe for adults already taking statins at very high risk and those at very high and high risk who are intolerant to statins. How this guideline was created An international panel including patients, clinicians, and methodologists produced these recommendations following standards for trustworthy guidelines and using the GRADE approach. The panel identified four risk groups of patients (low, moderate, high, and very high cardiovascular risk) and primarily applied an individual patient perspective in moving from evidence to recommendations, though societal issues were a secondary consideration. The panel considered the balance of benefits and harms and burdens of starting a PCSK9 inhibitor and/or ezetimibe, making assumptions of adults’ average values and preferences. Interactive evidence summaries and decision aids accompany multi-layered recommendations, developed in an online authoring and publication platform ( www.magicapp.org ) that also allows re-use and adaptation. The evidence A linked systematic review and network meta-analysis (14 trials including 83 660 participants) of benefits found that PCSK9 inhibitors or ezetimibe probably reduce myocardial infarctions and stroke in patients with very high and high cardiovascular risk, with no impact on mortality (moderate to high certainty evidence), but not in those with moderate and low cardiovascular risk. PCSK9 inhibitors may have similar effects to ezetimibe on reducing non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke (low certainty evidence). These relative benefits were consistent, but their absolute magnitude varied based on cardiovascular risk in individual patients (for example, for 1000 people treated with PCSK9 inhibitors in addition to statins over five years, benefits ranged from 2 fewer strokes in the lowest risk to 21 fewer in the highest risk). Two systematic reviews on harms found no important adverse events for these drugs (moderate to high certainty evidence). PCSK9 inhibitors require injections that sometimes result in injection site reactions (best estimate 15 more per 1000 in a 5 year timeframe), representing a burden and harm that may matter to patients. The MATCH-IT decision support tool allows you to interact with the evidence and your patients across the alternative options: https://magicevidence.org/match-it/220504dist-lipid-lowering-drugs/ . Understanding the recommendations The stratification into four cardiovascular risk groups means that, to use the recommendations, physicians need to identify their patient’s risk first. We therefore suggest, specific to various geographical regions, using some reliable risk calculators that estimate patients’ cardiovascular risk based on a mix of known risk factors. The largely weak recommendations concerning the addition of ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors reflect what the panel considered to be a close balance between small reductions in stroke and myocardial infarctions weighed against the burdens and limited harms. Because of the anticipated large variability of patients’ values and preferences, well informed choices warrant shared decision making. Interactive evidence summaries and decision aids linked to the recommendations can facilitate such shared decisions. The strong recommendations against adding another drug in people at low cardiovascular risk reflect what the panel considered to be a burden without important benefits. The strong recommendation for adding either ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors in people at high and very high cardiovascular risk reflect a clear benefit. The panel recognised the key uncertainty in the evidence concerning patient values and preferences, namely that what most people consider important reductions in cardiovascular risks, weighed against burdens and harms, remains unclear. Finally, availability and costs will influence decisions when healthcare systems, clinicians, or people consider adding ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors.

Background: The risk for cardiovascular disease is multifold higher in patients with the autoimmune disease rheumatoid arthritis, but underlying mechanisms remain poorly defined. We have explored whether patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) share pro-inflammatory effector cells that sustain tissue inflammation, thus maintaining synovial inflammation and atherosclerotic plaque formation. Methods: Tissue cytokines expressed in RA synovial lesions were analyzed by cytokine array technology. Cytokine production in macrophages was verified with RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Mitochondrial function was evaluated by Seahorse analyzer. Results: In highly inflamed synovial tissues, 21 of 60 cytokines tested were significantly elevated, with the small cytokine CCL18 being strongly associated with tissue inflammation. Immunohistochemical examination assigned CCL18 to CD68 + tissue macrophages in both the atherosclerotic plaque and in rheumatoid synovitis. In monocyte-derived macrophages (MΦ), CCL18 enhanced production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α and stimulated production of the tissue-injurious enzyme cathepsin K. Pro-inflammatory effector functions were linked to CCL18 induced activation of mitochondrial metabolism, quantified by oxygen consumption rates and generation of ATP. Macrophage stimulation with recombinant CCL18 resulted in the inactivating phosphorylation of the metabolic sensor GSK-3β. Immunoprecipitation experiments localized GSK-3β to the mitochondrial surface and imaging studies revealed excessive formation of mitochondria-endoplasmic reticulum connections in patient-derived CCL18 hi macrophages. Conclusions: Pro-inflammatory MΦ in CAD and RA patients share a metabolic profile of increased mitochondrial oxygen consumption and ATP production. Mitochondrial activation depends on inactivation of the metabolic sensor GSK-3β and promote pro-inflammatory effector functions, such as production of cytokines and proteases. Inhibiting GSK-3β activation provides a novel therapeutic strategy to suppress pro-inflammatory macrophages in CAD and RA.

Background Recombinant human immunoglobulin M22 (rHIgM22) has promoted remyelination in animal models and was well tolerated in people with clinically stable multiple sclerosis. Objective Safety/tolerability of a single rHIgM22 dose was investigated following an acute relapse and to determine whether this enhanced CNS/CSF concentrations. Methods Adults (N = 27) with acute relapse were assigned to rHIgM22 (0.5 or 2.0 mg/kg) or placebo. Study included screening/steroid administration periods and 10 study visits over 6 months. rHIgM22 CSF concentrations were assessed on days 2 and 29. Pharmacokinetic and safety samples were taken for up to 60 days. Assessments included adverse events and other clinical measures. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed with/without gadolinium. Results rHIgM22 CSF levels were consistent with dose-dependent concentration on both days 2 and 29. Infusion was generally well tolerated during an acute relapse. Immunogenicity was mild. Most adverse events did not appear to be dose dependent, were mild/moderate, and were events often associated with multiple sclerosis. Conclusion Although limited by high variability and small sample size, the data suggest enhanced CNS uptake associated with a drop in CSF levels. This study demonstrated safety of an antibody directed to myelin and oligodendrocytes in the course of active demyelinating disease. Further research into rHIgM22 is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02398461 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02398461

Human genetic studies support an inverse causal relationship between leukocyte telomere length (LTL) and coronary artery disease (CAD), but directionally mixed effects for LTL and diverse malignancies. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), characterized by expansion of hematopoietic cells bearing leukemogenic mutations, predisposes both hematologic malignancy and CAD. TERT (which encodes telomerase reverse transcriptase) is the most significantly associated germline locus for CHIP in genome-wide association studies. Here, we investigated the relationship between CHIP, LTL, and CAD in the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program ( n = 63,302) and UK Biobank ( n = 47,080). Bidirectional Mendelian randomization studies were consistent with longer genetically imputed LTL increasing propensity to develop CHIP, but CHIP then, in turn, hastens to shorten measured LTL (mLTL). We also demonstrated evidence of modest mediation between CHIP and CAD by mLTL. Our data promote an understanding of potential causal relationships across CHIP and LTL toward prevention of CAD.