Citations

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate the association between standard pure tone and speech audiometry with neuroimaging characteristics reflective of aging and dementia in older adults.Study DesignProspective population‐based study.SettingSingle tertiary care referral center.MethodsParticipants from the Mayo Clinic Study of aging 60 years old or older with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment, baseline neuroimaging, and a behavioral audiogram associated with neuroimaging were eligible for study. Imaging modalities included structural MRI (sMRI) and fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery MRI (FLAIR‐MRI; N = 605), diffusion tensor imaging MRI (DTI‐MRI; N = 444), and fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET; N = 413). Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to evaluate associations with neuroimaging outcomes.ResultsMean (SD) pure tone average (PTA) was 33 (15) dB HL and mean (SD) word recognition score (WRS) was 91% (14). There were no significant associations between audiometric performance and cortical thinning assessed by sMRI. Each 10‐dB increase in PTA was associated with increased likelihood of abnormal white‐matter hyperintensity (WMH) from FLAIR‐MRI (odds ratio 1.26, P = .02). From DTI‐MRI, participants with <100% WRSs had significantly lower fractional anisotropy in the genu of the corpus callosum (parameter estimate [PE] −0.012, P = .008) compared to those with perfect WRSs. From FDG‐PET, each 10% decrease in WRSs was associated with decreased uptake in the anterior cingulate cortex (PE −0.013, P = .001).ConclusionPoorer audiometric performance was not significantly associated with cortical thinning but was associated with white matter damage relevant to cerebrovascular disease (increased abnormal WMH, decreased corpus callosum diffusion). These neuroimaging results suggest a pathophysiologic link between hearing loss and cerebrovascular disease.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONCost‐effective screening tools for vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) has significant implications. We evaluated non‐imaging indicators of VCID using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐measured white matter (WM) damage and hypothesized that these indicators differ based on age.METHODSIn 745 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (≥50 years of age) with serial WM assessments from diffusion MRI and fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)‐MRI, we examined associations between baseline non‐imaging indicators (demographics, vascular risk factors [VRFs], gait, behavioral, plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], and plasma neurofilament light chain [NfL]) and WM damage across three age tertiles.RESULTSVRFs and gait were associated with diffusion changes even in low age strata. All measures (VRFs, gait, behavioral, plasma GFAP, plasma NfL) were associated with white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) but mainly in intermediate and high age strata.DISCUSSIONNon‐imaging indicators of VCID were related to WM damage and may aid in screening participants and assessing outcomes for VCID.Highlights Non‐imaging indicators of VCID can aid in prediction of MRI‐measured WM damage but their importance differed by age. Vascular risk and gait measures were associated with early VCID changes measured using diffusion MRI. Plasma markers explained variability in WMH across age strata. Most non‐imaging measures explained variability in WMH and vascular WM scores in intermediate and older age groups. The framework developed here can be used to evaluate new non‐imaging VCID indicators proposed in the future.