Citations

3601 Background: Two cfDNA assays are FDA-approved for use in advanced cancer pts across solid tumors. While several NCCN guidelines recommend cfDNA as a valid and useful method for molecular testing, the utility varies by cancer type. Despite the growing number of molecular alterations pertinent to first-line treatment in mCRC, current guidelines offer little guidance on the use of cfDNA in mCRC. Here we assess the ability of cfDNA to detect guideline-relevant actionable biomarkers informative for first-line therapy selection and beyond in patients with mCRC. Methods: We queried consecutive samples from advanced cancer pts with a diagnosis of CRC who underwent testing via a commercially available cfDNA assay (Guardant360) from September 2018 to January 2022. Validation and content of this assay has been previously described. To enrich for less heavily treated pts, we limited analysis to those whose first cfDNA test was done during the study period and only included the pt’s first test. The maximum variant allele fraction (maxVAF) for each test was used as a proxy for tumor shed and was compared between cancers with a Mann-Whitney test. The frequency of suspected germline alterations was assessed only in pts who received testing via a panel version with expanded mismatch repair (MMR) gene coverage. Tissue frequencies for select biomarkers were obtained from the MSK-IMPACT Clinical Sequencing Cohort in cBioPortal. Results: In total, 14,345 pts with mCRC received their first cfDNA test during the study period, with 92% of pts (13,190) having >1 cfDNA alteration detected. Median age was 62 and 44% of pts were female. The frequencies of key biomarkers are listed in Table 1. The median maxVAF was 5.6%, compared to 2.5% and 1.8% for pts with advanced gastric and NSCLC, respectively (p = < 0.0001 for both). The average turnaround time (TAT) for tests was 7 calendar days. Conclusions: cfDNA results from pts with mCRC demonstrated detection of biomarkers essential to first-line treatment decisions at a frequency comparable to what has been reported via tissue genotyping. mCRC pts had significantly higher tumor shed compared to other cancer types with guidelines that recommend cfDNA as an option for molecular testing, suggesting a potential gap in coverage. Tissue availability in mCRC does not guarantee comprehensive testing is completed quickly (compared to the 7-day TAT seen for cfDNA here), making it an attractive alternative strategy for first-line therapy selection in mCRC. [Table: see text]

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) refers to a group of neurodegenerative conditions, affecting the frontal and/or temporal lobes. Ongoing research has provided insight into developing clinical trials for FTLD and key clinical measures such as structural MRI. To inform clinical trial design and optimize participation, it is imperative to explore facilitators and barriers for potential candidates.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to explore facilitators and barriers to participating in future clinical trials for FTLD.MethodsAdvancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL) and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects (LEFFTDS) are observational studies focused on characterizing FTLD syndromes in preparation for clinical trials. The 584 participants enrolled across 18 research sites in the United States and Canada completed a survey assessing interest in clinical trial participation.Results29% of respondents self‐reported as patients (63±10 years), 26% self‐reported as caregivers answering on behalf of patients (65±10 years), and 45% self‐reported as healthy but at risk for FTLD (48±14 years). Travel reimbursement was the most common factor reported to positively influence participation (≧66%), with the healthy but at risk group showing the strongest endorsement (83%). Cost and time involved in travel were possible barriers for about half of the patients (48%) and healthy but at risk respondents (53%). The respondents value receiving feedback on the study findings (≧80%) and being informed of their individual disease progression (≧75%). Particularly, keeping participation confidential was very important for the healthy but at risk group (62%). In regard to research assessments, most participants demonstrated a high interest in physical and neurological exams at a research center (≧87%) whereas only half were interested in doing more invasive procedures such as the lumbar puncture (≧52%). Overall, respondents showed a positive attitude and support for research participation (≧77%) and trusted that their health information would remain confidential in a clinical trial (≧53%).ConclusionsFavorable attitudes and interest towards medical research exist among participants. To optimize participation, clinical trials should allocate funding for travel and involve participants in feedback about study results and their disease progression. Alternatives to invasive assessments may increase participation.

10 Background: In colon cancer, tumor deposits (TD) have been associated with worse prognosis, but they are included in the TNM staging system only in the absence of lymph node metastasis (i.e., stage III pN1c tumors). Here we aimed at evaluating the prognostic value of TD and the impact of the addition of TD in the count of lymph node metastases in patients with stage III colon cancer from the CALGB/SWOG 80702 phase III trial (NCT01150045). Methods: Pathological reports of all patients were reviewed for the presence and the count of TD, primary tumor sidedness, lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion. Cases without available pathological report or without specific information of TD were excluded. Prognostic associations were evaluated by multi-variable Cox models adjusting for treatment arm, T-stage, N-stage, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and lymph node ratio. Results: Overall, 2028 patients were included, with 524 (26%) TD-positive and 1504 (74%) TD-negative stage III tumors. Of the TD-positive patients, 80 (15.4%) were node negative (i.e., pN1c), 239 (46.1%) were pN1a/b and 200 (38.55%) were pN2. 17.2% and 37.0% of all pN1a/b and pN2 tumors had TD. Overall median follow-up was 69.3 months. The presence of TD was associated with poorer DFS (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.59, 95%CI 1.28-1.91) and OS (aHR = 1.52, 95%CI 1.18-1.95) in the overall population. The negative effect of TD on DFS and OS was observed for both pN1a/b and pN2 groups and confirmed in multivariate Cox model. Among TD-positive patients, the number of TD had a linear negative effect on DFS and OS. Adding TD to the count of lymph node metastases, 104 of 1570 (6.6%) patients initially considered as pN1 were re-staged as pN2. Re-staged pN2 patients experienced worse DFS (3-year DFS rate: 65.5% versus 80.3%, P = .0003) and OS (5-year OS rate: 69.1 versus 87.8%, P = .0005) than patients confirmed as pN1. Re-staged pN2 patients had similar DFS than patients initially staged as pN2 (3-year DFS rate: 65.5% versus 63.1%, P = .1992). OS curves of these 2 groups crossed, with better outcomes during the first 3 years of follow-up but poorer 5-year estimates for re-staged pN2 patients (5-year OS rate: 69.1% versus 74.8%, P = .0436). Conclusions: TD are found in more than one fourth of stage III colon cancer specimens. The number of TD has a linear deleterious effect on patients’ prognosis. Adding the number of TD to the count of lymph node metastases improves the prognostication accuracy of the TNM staging. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT01150045.

Abstract Background: Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is consistently hyperactivated in multiple tumor types including PDAC. Our preclinical work showed that FAK and PD-1 inhibitors elicit significant tumor regression, and that combining FAK and PD-1 inhibitors with gemcitabine achieves a maximal response. This suggests the need for a cytotoxic agent to bolster antigen presentation. Defactinib is an orally available, well-tolerated, potent FAK inhibitor. Methods: This study included a dose escalation phase (all solid tumors) and dose expansion phase (metastatic PDAC). A 3+3 design with five dose levels was used in the dose escalation phase. For the expansion phase, 10 PDAC patients with stable disease on front-line gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel were enrolled in the Maintenance cohort (A), while 10 patients who progressed on at least one line of therapy were enrolled in the Refractory cohort (B). Pre and on-treatment biopsied were collected from all PDAC patients. The primary endpoint was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included safety, toxicity, objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The exploratory endpoints included developing a molecular and immune profile for treatment response. Results: In dose escalation, the common low grade (G1/2) treatment-emergent adverse events included fatigue, anorexia, nausea and vomiting. No DLTs were seen. The RP2D was defactinib 400mg twice daily, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and pembrolizumab 200mg day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Safety and toxicity results in the escalation cohort were reported at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting. Among 8 evaluable PDAC patients enrolled on the dose escalation phase, we observed 1 (13%) partial response (PR), 3 (38%) stable disease (SD), 4 (50%) progressive disease (PD). In the Maintenance cohort, 1 (10%) PR, 6 (60%) SD, and 3 (30%) PD were observed. Two patients in the Maintenance cohort remain on study, and the median time on treatment was 4.6 months. In the Refractory cohort, 5 (50%) had SD, 4 (40%) PD, 1 not evaluable; median PFS was 2.9 months and median OS was 7.6 months. Interestingly, two confirmed PR patients both have MSS disease. Paired biopsies in PDAC patients show increased proliferating CD8+ T cells, while Tregs, macrophages, and stromal density decrease with treatment. Conclusions: The combination regimen was well tolerated. Encouraging efficacy signals were observed in both Maintenance and Refractory cohorts. Updated outcomes and correlative analyses are forthcoming. Citation Format: Andrea Wang-Gillam, Robert McWilliams, A. Craig Lockhart, Benjamin R Tan, Rama Suresh, Kian-Huat Lim, Katrina S. Pedersen, Nikolaos Trikalinos, Olivia Aranha, Haeseong Park, Lee Ratner, Nicholas Boice, David G. Denardo. Phase I study of defactinib combined with pembrolizumab and gemcitabine in patients with advanced cancer: Experiences of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT118.

4003 Background: Aspirin and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors have been associated with a reduced risk of colorectal polyps and cancer in observational and randomized studies. CALGB/SWOG 80702 tested the effect of celecoxib, a COX-2 inhibitor, on reducing the risk of recurrence in stage III CC. Methods: CALGB/SWOG 80702 is a 2x2 randomized controlled phase III trial of 3 v 6 months of adjuvant FOLFOX (data previously reported as part of the IDEA collaboration) with concurrent celecoxib (400 mg daily) v placebo x 3 yrs for patients (pts) with resected stage III CC. The primary endpoint of the trial is disease-free survival (DFS), defined as time from randomization to recurrence or death from any cause. The trial was designed to provide 91% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.79 in favor of celecoxib with 2-sided alpha = 0.05 (775 events required); due to slowing accumulation of events 4 years after complete accrual, power was lowered to 85% with same HR and alpha assumptions (696 events required). The DSMB released data on February 24, 2020 at median f/u of 5.6 yrs with 689 DFS events. Results: Between June 2010 and November 2015, 2,526 pts were consented and randomized to the trial. Treatment arms were well balanced by patient and tumor prognostic features, as well as low-dose aspirin use. Baseline characteristics included 45% female, 18% non-White, 8% Hispanic, 15% T4, 26% N2. 3-yr DFS for celecoxib was 76.3% v 73.3% for placebo (HR 0.89 [95% CI 0.77-1.04]; P = 0.14). 5-yr overall survival (OS) was 83.9% for celecoxib v 81.7% for placebo (HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.72-1.05]; P = 0.14). When considering the 4 treatment arms separately, 3-yr DFS was 77.0% for 12 months FOLFOX + celecoxib, 74.9% for 12 months FOLFOX + placebo, 75.5% for 6 months FOLFOX + celecoxib, and 71.9% for 6 months FOLFOX + placebo (log rank P = 0.22; P interaction = 0.64). There were no significant differences in grade 3-4 toxicity with celecoxib v placebo. Compliance with protocol celecoxib treatment, defined as 3 yrs of therapy completion or recurrence/death while on treatment, was 58.1% pts on celecoxib and 60.2% pts on placebo. Conclusions: The addition of celecoxib to standard chemotherapy did not significantly improve DFS or OS. Clinical trial information: NCT01150045 .

Abstract Purpose: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to chemotherapy have limited treatment options. Ensituximab (NEO-102) is a novel chimeric mAb targeting a variant of MUC5AC with specificity to colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Single-arm, phase II trial assessed the efficacy and safety of ensituximab in patients with advanced, refractory cancer who expressed MUC5AC antigen in tumor tissue. Ensituximab was administered intravenously every 2 weeks with 3 mg/kg as recommended phase II dose (RP2D). A minimum sample size of 43 patients was required on the basis of the assumption that ensituximab would improve median overall survival (OS) by 7 months using a one-sided significance level of 10% and 80% power. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Results: Sixty-three patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer were enrolled and 53 subjects were treated in phase II arm. Median age was 58 years and 46% of the patients were female. Among 57 evaluable patients, median OS was 6.8 months. No responses were observed, and stable disease was achieved in 21% of the patients. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AE) at RP2D included fatigue (38%), anemia (30%), nausea (15%), vomiting (11%), increased bilirubin (9%), constipation (8%), decreased appetite (6%), and diarrhea (6%). Serious AEs at least possibly related to ensituximab occurred in 4 patients and included anemia, nausea, increased bilirubin, and hypoxia. No patients discontinued treatment due to drug-related AEs. Conclusions: Ensituximab was well tolerated and demonstrated modest antitumor activity in patients with heavily pretreated refractory colorectal cancer.