Citations

Abstract We have conducted systematic small interfering RNA (siRNA) lethality screening of the kinome and “druggable genome” in human myeloma cell lines (HMCL) to functionally generate a comprehensive map of critical genes and vulnerabilities in human myeloma tumors. KMS11 human myeloma cells were screened with both an 1800 oligo (639 gene) siRNA library targeting the kinome and with a 13,984 oligo (6,791 gene) library targeting the druggable genome in duplicate using optimized conditions that resulted in >95% transfection efficiency and <5% background cytotoxicity. siRNA were used at low concentration (13nM) to minimise off-target cellular effects. Each gene was initially screened with at least 2 distinct siRNA. Universally lethal and non-silencing siRNA were tested in parallel as controls. Viability was measured at 96 hours by ATP-dependent luminescence and was normalized to the mean and distribution of controls by the B-score method. Approximately 14% of kinome siRNA and 5.8% of druggable genome siRNA caused important reductions in HMCL viability (greater than three standard deviations from control samples treated with non-silencing siRNA), compared with an anticipated rate due to chance of only 0.135%. Short-listed kinome vulnerabilities were validated by repeat targeting in a second lethality screening experiment in KMS11 using a total of four independent siRNA per gene. Forty-two kinases were confirmed as critical for myeloma cell survival. Unsupervised pathway analysis indicates that approximately half are concentrated within established pathways involved in cytokine (VEGFR, FGFR3, IGFR/IL6R) signaling and regulation of cell cycle, apoptosis or metabolism. The role of other survival kinases in myeloma are novel. The selectivity of kinome vulnerabilities identified in KMS11 for myeloma cells versus other tissues was examined by parallel silencing of these targets in KMS11 and JJN3 myeloma cells and in non-myeloma 293 and A549 epithelial cells. The most lethal kinase targets in myeloma that simultaneously show experimental evidence of tumor selectivity include aurora kinase A (AURKA), G-protein receptor coupled kinase 6 (GRK6) and protein kinase N1 (PKN1). By gene expression analyses, PKN1 and GRK6 are both preferentially expressed in plasma cells, compared with an analysis of >50 somatic tissues in which they are absent or only weakly expressed. The extent to which the kinome vulnerabilities identified in KMS11 occur in other HMCL was assessed by tertiary siRNA screening and by lentiviral shRNA techniques. More than 75% of kinases vulnerable in KMS11 cells are recurrently vulnerable in other myeloma tumor lines. Secondary validation studies of all genomic vulnerabilities identified from the much larger siRNA lethality screen of the druggable genome in myeloma cells is ongoing, however, to date 134 genes have been validated as essential myeloma survival factors during primary screening by concordant lethality of 2/2 independent siRNA (compared with an expected rate due to chance of n<1 genes). Significantly, proteosome subunits and specific ubiquitin ligases number amongst the most potently lethal genomic vulnerabilities in KMS11. Overall, this attempt to systematically and functionally document all genetic vulnerabilities in myeloma provides a strong rational impetus for the development of novel therapies that optimally target susceptibilities inherent within myeloma tumors.

Abstract Table 1. Samples to p53 deletions p 53 deletion FISH aCGH FISH and aCGH MGUS 142 - - SMM 108 - - Newly diagnosed MM - 182 - Relapsed/refractory MM 62 156 19 HMCLs - 48 - Total 312 386 19 Background: Inactivation of p53 by mutation or allelic loss is a rare event in multiple myeloma (MM) at the time of disease diagnosis and believed to be more common in the late stages of the disease. Here we defined the prevalence of p53 deletions in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), newly diagnosed MM, relapsed MM and human myeloma cell lines (HMCLs). Indirect mechanisms of p53 inactivation such as amplification of MDM2, or deletion of CDKN2A (p14ARF) were also investigated. Patients and Methods: A total of 631 MM samples and 48 HMCLs were analyzed for p53 abnormalities (Table 1) and compared with a cohort of plasma cell leukemia (PCL) previously published by us. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and highresolution array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) were used to detect p53 deletions. MDM2 amplification and p14ARF loss were evaluated by aCGH. Overall survival (OS) was estimated through Kaplan Meier method. Results: The prevalence of p53 deletions was 1.4%, 3.7%, 8.9%, 20% and 87.5% in MGUS, SMM, newly diagnosed MM, relapsed MM and HMCLs respectively (Figure 1). Of interest patients in first relapse showed a p53 deletion prevalence of 18% in comparison with 33% for patients in second relapse or more. We obtained p53 deletion status in 8 patients noted to have deletion at the time of relapse and in whom we had previous samples stored. In 7 of 8 cases deletions had been acquired (absent in the previous samples). The median OS for relapsed MM patients with or without p53 deletion were 4.2 months and 37.8 months respectively (p <0.001). MDM 2 amplification and p14ARF loss was detected in 0.4% and 2% of new diagnosed MM, 0.6% and 5.1% of relapsed MM and 2% and 29% of HMCLs respectively. Discussion: Emergence of p53 deletion/mutations denotes progression genetic events in MM. Importantly we show for the first time the overriding importance of p53 deletions as prognostic markers in relapsed MM. A molecular staging system that is based on the presence of p53 inactivation may be more powerful than classifying patients based on the loss of p53. Other abnormalities involving p53 pathway regulators like MDM2 gain and p14ARF loss are infrequent events in MM, even in advanced disease. Figure 1. Prevalence of p53 deletions Figure 1. Prevalence of p53 deletions

Abstract Melphalan (M), Prednisone (P) and Lenalidomide (R) are active in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). We evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of MPR in a phase I/II trial. Results of phase I part were previously reported (Blood2006, 108(11) abst 3558). M 5 mg/m2 on days (d) 1–4, 60 mg/m2 d 1–4 and R 10 mg d 1–21 of a 28 day cycle was determined as MTD for the phase II study. Methods: Patients with previously untreated MM who were not candidates for stem cell transplantation, age ≥18 yr, ECOG PS 0–3, evaluable or measurable disease, ANC >1500, platelets > 100,000 and creatinine ≤ 3.0 mg/dL were eligible. All patients received aspirin 325 mg/d as DVT prophylaxis. Routine antibacterial prophylaxis was not used. G/GM-CSF was used at the discretion of the treating physician for neutropenia. Response rate (RR), confirmed on two consecutive determinations was the primary end-point. The study had 90% power to detect a RR of at least 45%. Results: Twenty-six patients were accrued between July ’06 and Feb ’08. The median age was 74 y (64 – 87y), 17 (65%) were men. Six, 13, 6, 1 (23%, 50%, 23%, and 4%) patients had ECOG PS 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Three (12%), 11 (42%) and 10 (38%) patients were ISS stage 1, 2 and 3. A total of 106 cycles were administered; median 4.5 (1–13). Seventy-seven % patients experienced at least 1 grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Neutropenia (42%/8%) and thrombocytopenia (20%/8%) were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events followed by anemia (16%/0%), fatigue (8%/4%), rash (11%/0%), and hyperglycemia (4%/0%). There were 20 treatment delays in 9 patients, and 18 dose reductions (9 in R, 11 in M and 1 P) occurred in 7 patients, most commonly because of neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Eleven patients (42%) required G-CSF treatment. Eleven patients are currently receiving treatment; 15 have gone off study (4 completed per protocol, 3 refused, 3 adverse effects, 3 unrelated illnesses, 2 other). Median follow up of survivors is 8 m (0 – 22m). Eighteen (69 %; 95%CI 48–86) patients had a PR or better according to International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria; 3 (12 %) CR, 5 (19 %) VGPR and 10 (38%) PR. Median number of cycles before achieving a response was 2 (1 – 11). Median Progression Free and Overall Survival is 16.7m (95% CI 11.2–23.0), and 23 m (95% CI: 22 – 23), respectively. Conclusions: MPR combination is feasible with a manageable toxicity profile and has significant activity in the treatment of patients with MM who are not candidates for stem cell transplant, with an overall response rate of 69%, and a CR plus VGPR rate of 31%. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was the most common toxicity, seen in up to 50% of patients in this cohort of predominantly elderly patients. Dose reduction in R and/or M was required in 27% patients. No patient developed neuropathy or thromboembolic complications.

Abstract Proteasome inhibitors are used in the treatment of myeloma and are under evaluation for the treatment of other malignancies including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Via high throughput screening for inhibitors of cyclin D2 transactivation, we identified the off-patent antimicrobial, Clioquinol (CQ) that we subsequently determined acted by inhibiting the proteasome. CQ is a copper-binding halogenated 8-hydroxyquinoline that was used in the 1950’s-1970’s as an oral anti-parasitic agent. We determined that CQ decreased expression of cyclin D2, arrested cells in the G1 phase, and increased expression of p21, p27 and the abundance of ubiquitinated proteins. This constellation of changes can be associated with inhibition of the proteasome, so we evaluated the effects of CQ on proteasomal function. AML and myeloma cell lines as well as primary AML and normal hematopoietic cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of CQ. After a 24 hour incubation, cell lysates were prepared and the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome was measured by monitoring the rate of cleavage of the fluorescent substrate Suc-LLVY-AMC. In cell lines and primary AML samples, CQ inhibited chymotrypsin-like activity at low micromolar concentrations and at concentrations associated with reductions in cyclin D2, G1 arrest, and increased p21 and p27 expression. Conversely, CQ did not inhibit the proteasome in normal hematopoietic cells up to 100 μM. As CQ is a copper-binding molecule, we tested the requirement of copper for its effects on the proteasome. Supplementing CQ with copper increased CQ’s potency as a proteasome inhibitor, but also negated its preferential inhibition of the proteasome in malignant cells over normal hematopoietic cells. Of note, copper alone had no effect on proteasomal function when added to intact cells. Since inhibiting the proteasome induces cell death, we tested the effects of CQ on the viability of AML (n=6), myeloma (n=14), and solid tumor (n=5) cell lines as well as primary AML samples (n=6) and primary normal hematopoietic cells (n=3). Forty-eight hours after incubation, CQ induced cell death in 6/6 AML, 12/14 myeloma, 0/5 solid tumor, 6/7 primary AML patient samples and 0/3 normal hematopoietic cells with an IC50 <20 μM. Of note, after oral administration of CQ, trough serum concentrations of 20 μM can be achieved in patients. CQ-mediated reductions in cell viability were associated with its ability to inhibit the proteosome, as no proteasomal inhibition was detected in CQ-resistant cell lines. CQ-induced cell death was copper-dependent as supplementing copper in the medium enhanced the toxicity of CQ, while adding the strong copper chelator, tetrathiomoylbdate, abrogated CQ-induced cell death. Given the effects of CQ on AML cell lines and primary patient samples, we evaluated CQ in a mouse model of leukemia. Twice daily oral gavage with CQ prevented the growth of MDAY-D2 leukemia cells in DBA2 mice without evidence of toxicity. Thus, we have identified the off-patent anti-microbial agent CQ that inhibits the proteasome and induces apoptosis preferentially in malignant cells at clinically achievable concentrations. It acts through a copper-dependent mechanism and leverages the higher copper levels present in malignant cell. As such, CQ could be rapidly advanced into clinical trial as an oral proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of AML and myeloma.

Abstract Background: The combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rev/Dex) has been shown to be a highly effective therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). Over half of the patients with newly diagnosed MM achieve a complete response with prolonged therapy. More recently, a phase III trial demonstrated improved survival with use of lenalidomide and low dose dexamethasone with one year survival in excess of 90%. We report the initial results from a phase II trial combining lenalidomide and low dose dexamethasone with cyclophosphamide (CRd) as initial therapy of newly diagnosed MM. Methods: The trial was initiated in July 2006 and completed the target accrual of 33 patients by July 2007. The treatment protocol consisted of lenalidomide given orally at a dose of 25 mg daily on days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle. Dexamethasone (dex) was given orally at a dose of 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle. Cyclophosphamide at a dose of 300 mg/m2 was given on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Patients also received an aspirin once daily as thromboprophylaxis. Response was defined as a decrease in serum monoclonal (M) protein by 50% or higher and a decrease in urine M protein by at least 90% or to a level less than 200 mg/24 hours, confirmed at least 4 weeks apart. Results: The median age was 63 years (range, 44–79). Eight patients (24%) had ISS stage III disease. At this time, 19 of the 33 patients are evaluable for confirmed responses (i.e., off-study or completed at least 4 cycles of therapy). Of these, 2 achieved VGPR and 13 had a partial response giving an overall response rate of 79%. The response rate was affected by 5 of 19 patients who went off study within three cycles due to toxicities [interstitial nephritis (1 pt), multiple grade 3 toxicities including infection (1 pt) atrial fibrillation and infection (1 pt)] or alternative treatment [no response and possible renal toxicity (1 pt) and progression at 4 cycles (1 pt)]. Overall, hematological toxicity was the most common with grade 4 toxicity seen in 6 patients (20%). Non-hematological grade 3 or higher toxicities included fatigue (4 pts), thrombosis (3 pts) and renal failure (2 pts). One patient with thrombosis came off study for other toxicities, and the other two continued on study with anticoagulation. Thirteen patients (43%) had dose reductions of both cyclophosphamide and lenalidomide, most commonly due to hematological toxicity. So far, 12 patients have gone off study, 6 went to stem cell transplant, 3 due to adverse events, 1 due to disease progression and 2 patients went to alternate treatment. Conclusions: CRd has excellent activity in newly diagnosed myeloma with an estimated overall response rate of 79%. Response evaluation of the entire 33 patients will be presented at the meeting. We believe that the initial use of a 300 mg/m2 dose of cyclophosphamide resulted in 5 of the first 19 pts experiencing early toxicity and withdrawal. As a result, an expansion of the current trial is evaluating lower doses of cyclophosphamide (300 mg fixed dose). Full analysis of this study will be needed to determine if CRd can improve outcome compared to Rd.

Abstract Introduction. The NCIC CTG is conducting phase II testing to establish the tolerability and estimate the efficacy of combining lenalidomide (L) + melphalan (M) over multiple cycles for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation. We report the data from the preliminary safety phase of this trial. Methods. The MY.11 trial was initially designed as a randomized phase II test of M 9 mg/m2 given on days 1–4 (M9) plus either L 10 mg (L10) or 20 mg given on days 1–21 of a 28 day cycle. Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF was not included, but use of G-CSF for established neutropenia was permitted; our intent was to determine dose levels that could be given independently of G-CSF. A dose attenuation schedule was developed for neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia that was severe and occurred during the administration of L or was persistent and caused a delay in the next treatment cycle. A hematologic dose limiting toxicity (H-DLT) was defined as the need for 2 dose attenuations of L or 1 dose attenuation of M. Prior to the randomized phase of the trial, a safety run-in phase testing M9+L10 in 6 patients was planned; closure of this arm was to occur if, during the first 3 treatment cycles, there were ≥ 3 H-DLTs or any non-hematologic serious adverse event (SAE) judged to be treatment related. Four of the planned 6 patients were entered; during their first 3 treatment cycles, each experienced a H-DLT and one died from sepsis. The study was therefore amended with the intent to conduct a randomized phase II test of M 4 mg/m2 days 1–4 plus L 15 mg days 1–21 (M4L15) and M 6 mg/m2 days 1–4 plus L 10 mg days 1–21 (M6L10). Prior to the randomized phase of testing, each regimen was tested in non-randomized safety run-ins that included 6 patients per arm. The same parameters as above for study arm closure were applied. If the M6L10 arm was closed, the trial would proceed to test M 5 mg/m2 days 1–4 and L 10 mg days 1–21 (M5L10). Results. Six patients were enrolled to M4L15: during their first 3 treatment cycles, 4 patients experienced H-DLTs related to severe or persistent grade 3–4 neutropenia and one other patient experienced an SAE related to hallucinations and multiple constitutional complaints. This arm was therefore closed to accrual. Six patients were enrolled to M6L10: during their first 3 treatment cycles, 3 patients experienced H-DLTs related to severe or persistent grade 3–4 neutropenia. One of these patients was hospitalized with pulmonary edema and another with febrile neutropenia. This arm was therefore closed and the MY.11 trial amended to proceed as a single-arm phase II testing M5L10. Conclusion. Although M + L holds promise as an effective combination for previously untreated myeloma patients, the regimen is associated with considerable myelosuppression. The efficacy of the combination when given at tolerable doses remains to be established.

Abstract Background: We previously reported an 85% response rate with 54% CR/nCR using a combination of cyclophosphamide (Cy), prednisone, and bortezomib (BZ) in relapsed myeloma (MM). We now report a Phase II clinical trial using a combination of Cy, BZ, and dexamethasone (Dex) [Cybor-D] in newly-diagnosed MM. We then compare the activity of this combination with historical controls treated with our current induction standard of Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (L-Dex). Methods: 30 patients have been enrolled on Cybor-D. Treatment consists of Cy 300mg/m2 p.o. days 1, 8, 15, and 22; BZ 1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, and 11, and Dex 40mg p.o. days 1–4, 9–12, 17–20. Prophylactic use of acyclovir, a quinolone and antifungal prophylaxis was highly recommended for all patients on study. Growth factors were allowed. As a relevant contemporaneous control for speed and depth of response, we used 33 patients treated on a recent Mayo Clinic trial of L-Dex (Rajkumar. Blood: 2005 106;4050–3). Response was defined according to IMWG criteria although in the current trial, bone marrows for confirmation of CR are not yet available on all patients. Results: At time of current analysis, 17 patients on Cybor-D were evaluable through at least one cycle for response and toxicity. Baseline characteristics included mean age of 57, 29% female, 41/24% ISS stage II/III. There were statistically more early stage patients on L-Dex; otherwise, baseline patient characteristics were similar. The mean % decline in monoclonal (M) protein from baseline following cycles 1–4 of Cybor-D were 71%, 90%, 93%, 96%. This compares favorably with L-Dex where equivalent % decline in M proteins were 66%, 77%, 80%, and 79%. Thus, in preliminary results, Cybor-D produces a more rapid initial decline and mean % reduction in M protein than L-Dex. Overall response rate (≥ PR) after one cycle of Cybor-D was 77% with 36% obtaining ≥VGPR (L-Dex 73% and 18% respectively). The % of patients obtaining ≥VGPR after each cycle was 36%, 64%, 77%, and 100% for Cybor-D as compared to 18%, 36%, 42%, and 33% for L-Dex. The overall ≥VGPR at the end of four cycles of Cybor-D is currently100% (≥ 66%nCR using older nomeclature). Major toxicities ≥ grade 3 for Cybor-D included hematologic (37%), hyperglycemia (15%) and neuropathy (11%). Conclusions: In summary, for newly-diagnosed MM patients, four cycles of Cybor-D produces more frequent, rapid and deep responses when contrasted with historical L-Dex controls. Further confirmation of response rates and effect on TTP will be required.

Abstract From a high throughput RNAi screen of the human druggable genome targeting the KMS11 cell line, we identified the suppression of the vacuolar H+- ATPase (V-ATPase) family as cytotoxic to myeloma cells. In the screen, two oligos against each gene for the V-ATPase subunits ATP6V1A and ATP6V1B1 resulted in suppression of cell growth (50% and 60% inhibition of cell viability respectively). We further confirmed this result using both lentiviral shRNA knockdown and two small molecule inhibitors specific for V-ATPase. Silencing of ATP6V1A by lentiviral shRNA knock-down in KMS11 and in OPM1 myeloma cell lines caused 75–80% reduction of cell viability at 5 days post infection (measured by MTT assay). Consistent with this result, the V-ATPase specific inhibitors, bafilomycin A1 and REATA 203, both inhibited the growth of a genetically heterogeneous and standardized panel of 14 human myeloma cell lines in vitro with an IC50 ranging from 2.2 – 8.9 nM (mean 5.25 nM) for bafilomycin A1 and 46–1594 nM (mean 542.5 nM)) for REATA 203. We further demonstrated that patient samples (n=10) were sensitive to 20nM bafilomycin A1 which induced a mean of 58% of MM cells to undergo apoptosis (range 10% to 93%) after 24 hours of treatment. Similar to bafilomycin A1, treatment of primary patient-derived MM cells with 500 nM REATA 203 for 72 hours resulted in a mean 69% apoptosis (range 24% to 97%). In contrast, non-myeloma cells (the CD138- fractions of the bone marrow samples) were less sensitive - mean 9% apoptosis (range from 0% to 34%) under the same treatment conditions. Of high interest, however, unlike most drugs we have studied in pre-clinical myeloma models, the cytotoxicity induced by bafilomycin A1 in MM cell lines is abrogated by co-culture with patient bone marrow stromal cells but is not affected by IL-6 or IGF-1 treatment. Dexamethasone- or melphalan-resistant MM cell lines were also highly sensitive to both bafilomycin A1 and REATA 203. In a xenographic JJN3 mouse model, bafilomycin A1 suppresses and delays growth of tumor in a dose-dependent fashion. Gene expression analysis of normal-donor bone marrow plasma cells (n=19), primary tumor samples from MM patients (n=107) and normal somatic tissues demonstrates ubiquitous expression of most subunits of V-ATPase, however, some subunits are preferentially expressed in myeloma cells compared with normal plasma cells, including ATP6V1F (84% vs. 11%), ATP6V1E1 (29% vs. 5%), ATP6V1G2 (17% vs. 0%) and ATP6V0E 2 (36% vs. 16%). In conclusion, our data indicate that vacuolar H+-ATPase inhibitors are of interest as potential therapeutics for MM.

Abstract HACS1 is a SH3 (Src homology 3) and SAM (sterile alpha motif) domain containing adaptor protein that is expressed in activated B and dendritic cells, is up-regulated by Interleukin 4 in the process of B cell activation and likely serves to dampen the immune response. To elucidate the function of HACS1, we generated HACS1 gene knockout mice by deletion of the SH3 and SAM domains. HACS1−/− mice were viable and fertile and had normal bone marrow B cell development and normal splenic T and B cell populations. However, adult HACS1−/− mice had increased numbers of peritoneal B1 cells (IgM+CD5+). Upon LPS plus BCR or TCR stimulations, splenic cells from HACS1−/− mice demonstrated an upregulation of activation markers with increased intensity of CD23 expression or increased population of CD69 positive cells. Purified B220+ splenic B cells from HACS1−/− mice showed increased cell proliferation upon BCR stimulation. Both T helper type 1 (Th1) and T helper type 2 (Th2) humoral responses were enhanced in HACS1−/− mice upon immunization with T cell-dependent antigen NP-KLH, which resulted in increased production of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), anti-NP IgG2a and IL-4, as well as anti-NP IgG1 and IgE. Upon immunization with T cell-independent antigens such as TNP-LPS and TNP-Ficoll, HACS1−/− mice had increased production of anti-TNP IgM and IgG3 as compared to normal controls. The in vitro maturation of bone marrow-derived dentritic cells from HACS1−/− mice was similar to wild-type mice but HACS1−/− dentritic cells showed increased IL-12 production upon stimulation with anti-CD40 or LPS. There was no significant difference in antigen uptake by cultured dentritic cells from non-immunized wild-type or knockout mice. However, in immunized mice, an increase in antigen uptake in HACS1−/− dentritic cells was observed. We further demonstrate that the HACS1−/− B cells had increased tyrosine phosphorylation in the resting state. As deletion of the SH3 & SAM domains of HACS1 appears to generate a hypersensitive immune response, our results collectively support that HACS1 negatively regulates adaptive immunity.

Abstract Bortezomib and related proteasome inhibitors have profound pre-clinical and clinical activity in Multiple Myeloma (MM). However, the critical molecular target(s) modulated by proteosome inhibition remains unknown. The overall response rate to bortezomib in relapsed and refractory MM patients is consistently 35%–50%, suggesting specific molecular targets or resistance mechanisms are inherent in patients. None of the known effects of bortezomib has been shown to correlate with clinical responses in patients or to explain the unique sensitivity of MM (as opposed to other malignancies) to these reagents. Therefore, in this study, we have conducted a small interfering RNA (siRNA) screen of the druggable genome in human myeloma cells to identify genes that modulate sensitivity to bortezomib. KMS11 human myeloma cells were reverse transfected with 13,984 synthetic short interfering RNAs (siRNA) against each of 6992 druggable targets (2 siRNA/gene with a single-siRNA per well/384 well format). At 24 hours post transfection, bortezomib was added at IC10, 30, 60 and 90. Cell viability was measured by ATP-dependent luminescence assay 72 hours post drug treatment. The resulting data from primary screening was evaluated for multiple quality control metrics and found to exceed all expected performance parameters with >99% global transfection efficiency, <0.25 CV values across the dataset with minimal plate-to-plate and set-to-set variation observed. From analysis of the primary screening data, a core panel of 320 (4.6% of druggable targets in library) bortezomib sensitizers were identified. 187 (58%) of these were further confirmed in a secondary screening experiment by multiple (2 to 4) independent siRNA. Among these 187 genes (2.6% of the genes investigated), some known targets, such as proteasome subunits are evident. Other genes belonging to the same functional gene families (e.g. TNF receptor family, Ras family, kinases, oncogenes and transporter proteins) or functioning within the same network of signal transduction (e.g. NF-kB, Wnt and estrogen receptor pathways) are evident. Our primary screen also identified genes that attenuate bortezomib-induced cytotoxicity. Members in this group include genes implicated in the negative regulation of cell proliferation and survival, such as NF-kB inhibitors, JNK pathway activators, tumor suppressors, apoptosis inducers and phosphatases. These studies enable dissection of the molecular mechanism of bortezomib in myeloma cells and may serve to point to biomarkers for response prediction and novel chemotherapeutic combination therapies.