Citations

There was an error in the original publication [...]

ABSTRACT Rhodococcus equi is an opportunistic pathogen known to cause pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease among immunocompromised patients. Treatment is frequently challenging due to intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotic classes. While non- equi Rhodococcus spp. are prevalent, their clinical significance is poorly defined. There is also limited data on antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of Rhodococcus infection in humans. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluating clinical characteristics, microbiologic profile, and AST of Rhodococcus infections between June 2012 and 2022 at our tertiary academic medical center. Identification of Rhodococcus spp. was performed by Sanger 16S rRNA gene sequencing and/or matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, and AST was performed by agar dilution. Three hundred twenty-two isolates of Rhodococcus spp. were identified from blood (50%), pulmonary (26%), and bone/joint (12%) sources. R. equi/hoagii, R. corynebacterioides , and R. erythropolis were the most frequently isolated species, with 19% of isolates identified only to genus level. One hundred ninety-nine isolates evaluated for AST demonstrated high-level resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanate, cephalosporins, and aminoglycosides. More than 95% susceptibility to imipenem, vancomycin, linezolid, rifampin, and clarithromycin was observed. Non- equi species showed a significantly more favorable AST profile relative to R. equi . Clinically significant Rhodococcus infection was rare with 10 cases diagnosed (majority due to R. equi ) and managed. The majority of patients received 2- or 3-drug combination therapy for 2–6 months, with favorable clinical response. Significant differences in AST were observed between R. equi and non- equi species. Despite high antimicrobial resistance to several antibiotic classes, imipenem and vancomycin remain appropriate empiric treatment options for R. equi . Future research evaluating mechanisms underlying antimicrobial resistance is warranted.

Abstract Background Optimizing antimicrobial regimens for outpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) represents an area of opportunity for ambulatory antimicrobial stewardship programs. A pre-populated, antibiotic order panel for outpatient respiratory syndromes was implemented in the Mayo Clinic Enterprise on 1/4/2021. For CAP, it provides national guideline adherent regimens (i.e., selection, dosing, and durations) by patient comorbidity and beta-lactam allergy status. We aimed to assess impacts of panel use on antibiotic prescribing in outpatients with CAP. Methods This retrospective review included Mayo Clinic outpatient encounters from Minnesota in 2021 and 2022. Eligible encounters used a CAP-related primary ICD-10 code, conveyed intention to treat CAP in encounter notes, and were performed by primary care, emergency department, or urgent care clinicians who managed ≥1 CAP patient with the panel and ≥1 without the panel during the study period. Encounters were excluded if patients were already receiving antibiotics at the time of encounter. The primary outcome was adherence (drug and duration) to guideline recommendations. Secondary outcomes included utilization rate by agent and therapy duration. Outcomes were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis rank sum and Pearson’s chi-squared tests (α level = 0.05). Results 352 encounters (134 panel vs. 218 non-panel) were included. Prescribing was guideline adherent in 61.9% and 29.4% (p< 0.01) of panel and non-panel encounters, respectively. The most common reason for guideline non-adherence during panel use was inappropriate drug selection (n = 45/51, 88.2%). This was predominantly driven by use of the incorrect section of the treatment panel based on patient comorbidity status (n = 30/45, 66.7%). Individual antibiotic utilization rates differed between panel and non-panel cohorts (Table 1), with higher rates of amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanate use and lower rates of azithromycin and doxycycline use in the panel cohort. Durations >5 days were more common in the non-panel as compared to the panel cohort (34.4% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.01). Conclusion Use of a pre-populated antimicrobial order panel in outpatients with CAP resulted in greater adherence to national guideline recommendations. Disclosures Paschalis Vergidis, MD, MSc, AbbVie: Advisor/Consultant|Ansun: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support

Abstract Background Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is an important complication of long-term central venous catheters (CVCs) and is associated with high morbidity and cost. While line removal is optimal, it is not always feasible and is not without complications. Antibiotic lock therapy (ALT) may be an alternative strategy for line salvage, but the efficacy of this approach particularly among immunocompromised hosts is unknown. Methods We retrospectively reviewed adult patients with CRBSI managed with ALT between 2018 and 2022 at our tertiary medical center. We reviewed patient comorbidities, type and indications for CVC use, microbiology of CRBSI, ALT, and use of systemic antibiotics. Outcomes included 30-day mortality, 90-day microbiologic relapse (with same bacteria as index case), 90-day recurrent BSI (with different bacteria from index case), and adverse events. Results 86 patients were reviewed, a majority of whom were immunocompromised (91%) due to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (85%) and thrombocytopenic (platelet count 36; IQR 17-112). 78% had tunneled CVC for indications including peri-transplant therapy (72%), chemotherapy (15%), and TPN (6%) (Table 1). The median time to CRBSI following CVC insertion was 45 days (IQR 19-86). Infections were frequently monomicrobial (80%) due to Gram-positive organisms (n=75) including coagulase-negative staphylococci and Enterococcus spp. The minority of Gram-negative (n=17) infections were due to E coli and Enterobacter spp. 94% of patients received systemic antibiotics and all patients received ALT for a median of 11 days [IQR 6-15] and 11.5 days [IQR 6-14], respectively (Table 2). The 30-day attributable mortality rate was low at 1%. Rates of 90-day microbiologic relapse (20%) and recurrent BSI (16%) were high, occurring at a median of 42 days (IQR 12-55) and 35 days (IQR 25-50) following completion of ALT, respectively (Table 3). Conclusion Despite high rates of microbiologic relapse and recurrent BSI, ALT may be an effective line salvage strategy extending the use of CVC by up to 30 days with minimal impact on mortality even among immunocompromised patients. Disclosures John C. O'Horo, Sr., MD, MPH, Janssen Pharmaceuticals.: Grant/Research Support|nference: Grant/Research Support

Abstract Background Rhodococcus spp. are a zoonotic, Gram-positive coccobacilli that cause pulmonary and disseminated disease in immunocompromised patients. Rhodococcus infection is associated with high morbidity and mortality and treatment can be challenging due to intrinsic resistance to several antibiotics. There is limited data on antibiotic susceptibility patterns and clinical characteristics of infection in humans. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the microbiology and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of Rhodococcus isolates submitted to our medical reference laboratory between June 2012 and 2022. Identification (ID) was performed by Sanger 16S rRNA gene sequencing or MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. AST was performed by microbroth dilution. We also reviewed the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients managed at our local academic medical center. Results Over a 10-year period, 322 isolates of Rhodococcus spp. were identified from blood (50%), pulmonary (26%), and bone/joint (12%) sources. R equi/hoagii and R corynebacteriodes were the most frequently isolated species, with 19% of isolates only identified to genus level (Figure 1). 199 isolates were evaluated for AST, with high rates of resistance to cephalosporins and aminoglycosides. Optimal antibiotics based on AST included imipenem, vancomycin, linezolid, clarithromycin, and TMP-SMX. Discordance in susceptibility was noted between ciprofloxacin (62%) and moxifloxacin (94%) (Table 1). Ten clinical cases of Rhodococcus infection were identified. Eight patients were immunocompromised with 6 having pulmonary and 3 with extra-pulmonary disease. Significant variability in choice and duration of therapy was noted, but all patients had positive treatment response with minimal complications (Table 2). Conclusion This study demonstrates high rates of resistance among Rhodococcus isolates with need for accurate ID and AST to guide effective treatment of infection among immunocompromised patients. Disclosures Nancy Wengenack, PhD, Mayo Clinic Laboratories: Employee

Abstract Background Non-diphtheriae Corynebacterium spp. are important human pathogens responsible for a broad spectrum of clinical syndromes. Data on species-specific susceptibility patterns is limited. In this study we aim to study these susceptibility patterns over time and summarize the species-specific resistance profile that could be used by clinicians to guide therapeutic decisions. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all the Non-diphtheriae Corynebacterium isolates that were submitted for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) between January-2012 and February of 2023 to our reference lab. Results A total of 1925 Corynebacterium isolates were submitted for susceptibility testing over the study period. The most commonly identified species was C. striatum (35.6%) followed by C. amycolatum (24.4%). Figure-1 outlines the species distribution. Temporal analysis showed decreasing susceptibility rates over the study period from 47.5% to 20.6% for penicillin & from 50% to 7.6% for clindamycin. Linezolid and vancomycin were universally active against all species (Table-1). Daptomycin non-susceptibility was reported in 25% of C. jeikeium isolates (MIC=2). High level resistance to daptomycin with MIC >256 were noted in seven C. striatum and single C. amycolatum isolate. Doxycycline has the highest susceptibility rates among the tested oral agents after linezolid for the non-striatum species. Significant variation in species-specific susceptibility pattern was noted and summarized in Table 1. C. striatum was associated with concerning resistance rates to beta-lactams, tetracyclines, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole & fluoroquinolones with limited reliable oral treatment options beside linezolid. C. kroppenstedtii (associated with granulomatous mastitis) showed high susceptibility rate to tetracyclines and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole despite prevalent penicillin resistance. Conclusion Non-diphtheriae Corynebacterium spp are commonly isolated from clinical specimens and are associated with various clinical syndromes. Significant variation in resistance profile exists between different species. Prevalent resistance among the most common species such as C. Striatum is associated with therapeutic challenges. Disclosures Christina G. Rivera (O'Connor), Pharm.D, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Board Member|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Honoraria Audrey N. Schuetz, MD, Merck: Advisor/Consultant

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for Tier 3 upper respiratory infection (URI) syndromes across the Mayo Clinic Enterprise before and after a multifaceted antimicrobial stewardship intervention, and to determine ongoing factors associated with antibiotic prescribing and repeat respiratory healthcare contact in the postintervention period. Methods This was a quasi-experimental, pre/post, retrospective cohort study from 1 January 2019 through 31 December 2022, with 12-month washout during implementation from 1 July 2020 through 30 June 2021. All outpatient encounters, adult and pediatric, from primary care, urgent care, and emergency medicine specialties with a Tier 3 URI diagnosis were included. The intervention was a multifaceted outpatient antibiotic stewardship bundle. The primary outcome was the rate of antibiotic prescribing in Tier 3 encounters. Secondary outcomes included 14-day repeat healthcare contact for respiratory indications and factors associated with persistent unnecessary prescribing. Results A total of 165 658 Tier 3 encounters, 96 125 in the preintervention and 69 533 in the postintervention period, were included. Following intervention, the prescribing rate for Tier 3 encounters decreased from 21.7% to 11.2% (P < .001). Repeat 14-day respiratory healthcare contact in the no antibiotic group was lower postintervention (9.9.% vs 9.4%; P = .004). Multivariable models indicated that increasing patient age, Charlson comorbidity index, and primary diagnosis selected were the most important factors associated with persistent unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. Conclusions Outpatient antibiotic stewardship initiatives can reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for Tier 3 URIs without increasing repeat respiratory healthcare contact. Advancing age and number of comorbidities remain risk factors for persistent unnecessary antibiotic prescribing.

ABSTRACT Infections due to nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) continue to increase in prevalence, leading to problematic clinical outcomes. Omadacycline (OMC) is an aminomethylcycline antibiotic with FDA orphan drug and fast-track designations for pulmonary NTM infections, including Mycobacteroides abscessus (MAB). This multicenter retrospective study across 16 U.S. medical institutions from January 2020 to March 2023 examined the long-term clinical success, safety, and tolerability of OMC for NTM infections. The cohort included patients aged ≥18 yr, who were clinically evaluable, and` had been treated with OMC for ≥3 mo without a previous diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. The primary outcome was 3 mo clinical success, with secondary outcomes including clinical improvement and mortality at 6- and 12 mo, persistence or reemergence of infection, adverse effects, and reasons for OMC utilization. Seventy-five patients were included in this analysis. Most patients were female (48/75, 64.0%) or Caucasian (58/75, 77.3%), with a median (IQR) age of 59 yr (49–67). Most had NTM pulmonary disease (33/75, 44.0%), skin and soft tissue disease (19/75, 25.3%), or osteomyelitis (10/75, 13.3%), and Mycobacterium abscessus (60/75, 80%) was the most commonly isolated NTM pathogen. The median (IQR) treatment duration was 6 mo ( 4 – 14 ), and the most commonly co-administered antibiotic was azithromycin (33/70, 47.1%). Three-month clinical success was observed in 80.0% (60/75) of patients, and AEs attributable to OMC occurred in 32.0% (24/75) of patients, leading to drug discontinuation in 9.3% (7/75).

Abstract Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have an associated infection rate of 13%–80% postimplant. An optimal strategy for surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) at the time of implantation has not been well defined. We aimed to evaluate the different LVAD implantation antibiotic prophylaxis regimens as well as the incidence of LVAD infection at our institution. Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective study of patients who underwent LVAD implantation between February 2007 and June 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of LVAD infection (LVADI), within 3 months and 1 year of placement, between patients who received expanded or narrow-spectrum regimens for SIP. We assessed outcomes using Kaplan-Meier, time-to-first event. We used a noninferiority analysis, which was established if the narrow-spectrum event rate was no more than 5% greater than the expanded-spectrum event rate. Results We included 399 patients, 305 (76.4%) patients received narrow-spectrum SIP, whereas the remaining 94 (23.6%) patients received the expanded-spectrum regimen. Statistical noninferiority of the narrow spectrum to the multiple drug regimen was demonstrated at both time points, and statistical superiority of the narrow-spectrum group across 12-month follow up was further evident (P = .037). Conclusions We report evidence supporting noninferiority, or even superiority, of the narrow-spectrum over expanded-spectrum antimicrobial prophylaxis strategy with respect to LVADI. These findings support data-driven antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies.

Abstract Purpose Mayer's theory of multimedia learning proposes that personalisation and embodiment (P/E) can improve outcomes in e‐Learning. The authors hypothesised that an e‐Learning module enhanced by P/E principles would lead to higher knowledge, perceived P/E and motivation among health care professionals, compared with an unenhanced module. Methods The authors conducted a randomised trial comparing two versions of a 30‐minute multimedia e‐Learning module addressing the antibiotic management of pneumonia. The unenhanced format used slides with voiceover (human voice but no visible speaker), formal language and no specific P/E strategies. The enhanced format additionally implemented P/E strategies including conversational style, polite language, visible author, social congruence, human‐like presence and professional presence by subtly changing the script and substituting several short videos of subject matter experts. Participants included pharmacists, physicians and advanced practice providers from three academic and several community hospitals. Outcomes included knowledge, perceived P/E (assessed by the Congruence Personalisation Questionnaire, CPQ), motivation (assessed via the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey [IMMS] and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire [MSLQ]) and course satisfaction. Results There were 406 participants including 225 pharmacists, 109 physicians and 72 advanced practice providers. Post‐module knowledge was slightly higher for the enhanced versus the unenhanced format, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (adjusted mean difference, 0.04 of 10 possible, [95% CI −0.26, 0.34], p = 0.78; Cohen d 0.02). Participant perceptions of P/E (measured via CPQ) were significantly greater for the enhanced format (difference 0.46 of 5 possible [0.35, 0.56], p < 0.001; Cohen d 0.85), as were motivational features of the e‐Learning course (measured via IMMS) (difference 0.14 of 5 possible [0.02, 0.26], p = 0.02; Cohen d 0.24). Participants' overall motivational orientation (measured via MSLQ) and course satisfaction were not significantly different between the two formats ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Application of P/E principles to an e‐Learning module led to greater perceived P/E and motivational features but did not influence knowledge.