Citations

Background Ankle‐brachial indexes ( ABI ) are a noninvasive diagnostic tool for peripheral arterial disease and a marker of increased cardiovascular risk. ABI is calculated using the highest systolic blood pressure of the 4 ankle arteries (bilateral dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial). Accordingly, patients may be assigned a normal ABI when the result would be abnormal if calculated using one of the other blood pressure readings. Cardiovascular outcomes for patients with discordant ABI s are undescribed. Methods and Results We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent ABI measurement for any indication between January 1996 and June 2018. Those with normal ABI s (1.00–1.39) were included. We compared patients with all 4 normal ABI s (calculated using all 4 ankle arteries; n=15 577, median age 64.0 years, 54.4% men) to those with discordant ABI s (at least 1 abnormal ABI ≤0.99; n=2095, median age 66.0 years, 47.8% men). The outcomes assessed were ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all‐cause mortality. Compared with patients with concordant normal ABI s, patients with discordant ABI s were older; women; smoked; and had chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, or prior stroke. Patients with discordant ABI s had a greater risk of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.10–1.56), ischemic stroke ( HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.37–1.72), and all‐cause mortality ( HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.16–1.39), including after adjustment for baseline comorbidities. Conclusions Discordant ABI results were associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all‐cause mortality in the studied population. Clinicians should examine ABI calculations using all 4 ankle arteries to better characterize a patient's cardiovascular risk.

Abstract Background Peripheral arterial disease is a marker of aggressive atherosclerosis. The ankle brachial index (ABI) is a simple and non-invasive tool to diagnose peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Patients with PAD are at increased risk for ischemic strokes and other cardiovascular diseases. Purpose To evaluate the association of abnormal ABI and poorly compressible vessels with ischemic stroke in a large patient cohort. Methods We analyzed lower extremity vascular studies of all patients with ABI measurements at a tertiary care hospital between January 1996 and August 2018. PAD is defined as ABI<1.0, and poorly or non-compressible (PC/NC) arteries as ABI>1.4 while ABI between 1.0–1.4 is normal. Association of these ABIs with new ischemic stroke events post ABI measurement were analyzed after adjusting for high risk confounders such as atrial fibrillation. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using multivariable Cox proportional regression with 95% confidence intervals. Results In total, 38,016 unique patients (mean age 66.1±14.8 years, female 42.3%) were included. Abnormal ABI was found to be more prevalent among elderly male patients compared to patients with normal ABI. In contrast to non-PAD patients, both PAD and PC/NC patients as defined by ABI had a statistically significant risk of ischemic stroke, with PAD conferring the greatest risk compared to PC/NC vessels. The data is summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Unadjusted HR p-value Adjusted HR p-value PAD vs. No PAD 2.77 (2.62, 2.92) <0.001 2.10 (1.98, 2.22) <0.001 PC/NC vs. No PAD 2.11 (1.95, 2.28) <0.001 1.38 (1.26, 1.51) <0.001 PAD vs. PC/NC 1.37 (1.28, 1.46) <0.001 1.37 (1.28, 1.48) <0.001 Adjusted and unadjusted hazard ratios with p-values. HR adjusted for age, sex, atrial fibrillation, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, chronic heart failure, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. PAD = Peripheral artery disease and PC/NC = poorly compressible/non-compressible. Conclusion This study adds to the growing body of evidence that PAD and poorly-compressible vessels are independently associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. Given the associated risk of cerebrovascular disease, clinicians should aggressively treat to minimize risk factors in those with abnormal ABIs.

Abstract Introduction Lower extremity physiologic studies are an important non-invasive diagnostic tool in peripheral arterial disease (PAD). PAD and atrial fibrillation (AF) are associated with increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Purpose To evaluate the association between PAD and new-onset AF and the risk of stroke. Methods We performed a study of all patients without AF undergoing ankle-brachial index (ABI) for any indication between January 1996 to June 2018. The ABI cut-off were as follows: abnormal ABI (0–0.99), normal ABI (1.00–1.39) and poor vessel compressibility (PC) (1.40+). Demographic, comorbidity, and outcome variables were extracted using the electronic medical record. Results Overall, 34,441 patients (mean age 66.8±14.3, 57.3% male, 88.2% white) were included in the study with a median follow-up of 7.2 years (interquartile range, 3.0–12.9 years). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed increased risk of new-onset AF for male sex, older age, hypertension, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease stage III or greater, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer (all p<0.0001). After adjustment, ABI results were significantly associated with new-onset AF, particularly poorly-compressible vessels (adjusted HR: 1.42 (1.30–1.55), p<0.0001) compared to abnormal ABI (adjusted HR: 1.12 (1.05–1.20), p=0.0012). Patients with atrial fibrillation were more likely to experience ischemic stroke (39.2% versus 16.1%, p<0.0001). Conclusion Abnormalities in ABI results, particularly poorly-compressible vessels, are independently associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation in a large ambulatory cohort. While the mechanism cannot be assessed, common inflammatory mechanisms and increased vascular stiffness may play an important role. Identification of AF in these at-risk patients may improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Abstract Background Based on previously published data, routine myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetics is not recommended. Selecting patients with diabetes and high risk cardiovascular features could be important to improve the yield of physiologic assessment of the coronary arteries disease and subsequently patient outcome. Purpose We posed the question whether nuclear stress testing has a better yield by selecting diabetic individuals with known vascular disease. Methods We analyzed records for 15,392 diabetics from 1996 to 2009 with and without vascular disease. Vascular disease is defined as carotid vascular disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, or peripheral arterial disease. There was 2457 myocardial perfusion studies performed within 2 years of the vascular evaluation. We studied the results of these stress testing in each group and evaluated for the presence of myocardial ischemia. Multivariate Cox proportional regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals after adjusting for age, gender. Results Of those who underwent myocardial perfusion studies 1819 were diabetic with vascular disease group A (mean age 67.8, 70.5% female) and 638 were diabetic without vascular disease group B (mean age 64.5 years, 67.1% female). There was at least one reversible defect suggest myocardial ischemia in 225 and 758 studies in group A and B respectively. Comparing outcome based on the presence of myocardial ischemia in group A without vascular disease, those with vascular disease did have an increased risk of myocardial infarction (adjusted HR: 1.630, 95% CI: 1.281–2.074) and death (adjusted HR: 1.646, 95% CI: 1.413–1.918). Conclusion Myocardial perfusion imaging is a reasonable test in patients with diabetes and vascular disease. The presence of myocardial ischemia is more common and is associated with worse cardiovascular outcome. Acknowledgement/Funding None

Millions of patients in the United States use anticoagulation for a variety of indications, such as the prevention of stroke in those with atrial fibrillation (AF) and the treatment and prevention of venous thrombosis. For over six decades warfarin was the only available oral anticoagulant, but now several DOACs are available and their use has become more prevalent in recent years. In spite of this increased use, many physicians remain reluctant to prescribe DOACs due to concerns about bleeding and reversibility.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) refers to partial or complete occlusion of one or more non-coronary arteries that leads to compromised blood flow and ischemia. Numerous processes are involved in arterial stenosis, however, atherosclerosis remains the most common etiology. PAD constitutes a major health economic problem, and it is estimated that over 200 million people around the world suffer from PAD, with at least 20% having some degree of claudication. The purpose of this review is to compare and contrast the guidelines on PAD published in 2005, 2011 and 2016 in terms of new recommendations and level of evidence for practicing clinicians.

BackgroundPatients with heart failure (HF) have increased risk for thromboembolic events. Real‐world incidences of efficacy and safety outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) are of growing clinical interest.HypothesisReal‐world efficacy and safety outcomes of DOACs in patients with LVSD will be similar to those of LVSD or HF subgroups in the RE‐LY, ROCKET‐AF, and ARISTOTLE trials.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of adult patients with LVSD (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) on DOAC therapy between 2010 and 2016. Incidences of safety and efficacy outcomes of anticoagulation with DOACs were extracted from primary and secondary hospital discharge diagnoses.ResultsDOACs were prescribed to 287 patients with LVSD over a mean follow‐up of 313.3 ± 52.3 days. Many patients had moderate and severe chronic kidney disease (28.9% and 10.1%, respectively) and indications for anticoagulation therapy other than atrial fibrillation (19.9%). For efficacy outcomes, the calculated incidence rates of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism were 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25‐3.56) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.10‐2.94) events per 100 person‐years, respectively. For the safety outcomes, incidence rates of GI bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage were 2.4 (95% CI: 0.8‐5.3) and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.1‐2.2) events per 100 patient‐years, respectively.ConclusionsOur findings are largely compatible with the results of LVSD or HF subgroups in RE‐LY, ROCKET‐AF, and ARISTOTLE trials and add to increasing confidence that DOACs can be safely used for stroke and systemic embolism prevention in patients with LVSD.