Citations

Background and Purpose: The diagnosis of spontaneous spinal cord infarction (SCI) is limited by the lack of diagnostic biomarkers and MRI features that often overlap with those of other myelopathies, especially acute myelitis. We investigated whether the ratio between serum neurofilament light chain levels and MRI T2-lesion area (neurofilament light chain/area ratio—NAR) differentiates SCI from acute myelitis of similar severity. Methods: We retrospectively identified Mayo Clinic patients (January 1, 2000–December 31, 2019) with (1) SCI, (2) AQP4 (aquaporin 4)-IgG or MOG (myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein)-IgG-associated myelitis at disease clinical presentation, or (3) idiopathic transverse myelitis from a previously identified population-based cohort of patients seronegative for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG. Serum neurofilament light chain levels (pg/mL) were assessed at the Verona University (SIMOA, Quanterix) in a blinded fashion on available stored samples obtained ≤3 months from myelopathy presentation. For each patient, the largest spinal cord lesion area (mm 2 ) was manually outlined by 2 independent raters on sagittal T2-weighted MRI images, and the mean value was used to determine NAR (pg/[mL·mm 2 ]). Results: Forty-eight patients were included SCI, 20 (definite, 11; probable, 6; possible, 3); acute myelitis, 28 (AQP4-IgG-associated, 17; MOG-IgG-associated, 5; idiopathic transverse myelitis, 6). The median expanded disability status scale score (range) at myelopathy nadir were 7.75 (2–8.5) and 5.5 (2–8), respectively. Serum neurofilament light chain levels (median [range] pg/mL) in patients with SCI (188 [14.3–2793.4]) were significantly higher compared with patients with AQP4-IgG-associated myelitis (37 [0.8–6942.9]), MOG-IgG-associated myelitis (45.8 [4–283.8]), and idiopathic transverse myelitis (15.6 [0.9–217.8]); P =0.01. NAR showed the highest accuracy for identification of SCI versus acute myelitis with values ≥0.35 pg/(mL·mm 2 ) yielding 86% specificity and 95% sensitivity (area under the curve=0.93). The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 6.67 and 0.06, respectively. NAR remained independently associated with SCI after adjusting for age, gender, immunotherapy before sampling, and days from myelopathy symptoms onset to sampling ( P =0.0007). Conclusions: NAR is a novel and promising clinical biomarker for differentiation of SCI from acute myelitis.

Abstract Background Autoimmunity is an increasingly recognized cause of encephalitis with a similar prevalence to that of infectious etiologies. Over the past decade there has been a rapidly expanding list of antibody biomarker discoveries that have aided in the identification and characterization of autoimmune encephalitis. As the number of antibody biomarkers transitioning from the research setting into clinical laboratories has accelerated, so has the demand and complexity of panel-based testing. Clinical laboratories are increasingly involved in discussions related to test utilization and providing guidance on which testing methodologies provide the best clinical performance. Content To ensure optimal clinical sensitivity and specificity, comprehensive panel-based reflexive testing based on the predominant neurological phenotypic presentation (e.g., encephalopathy) is ideal in the workup of cases of suspected autoimmune neurological disease. Predictive scores based on the clinical workup can aid in deciding when to order a test. Testing of both CSF and serum is recommended with few exceptions. Appropriate test ordering and interpretation requires an understanding of both testing methodologies and performance of antibody testing in different specimen types. Summary This review discusses important considerations in the design and selection of neural antibody testing methodologies and panels. Increased collaboration between pathologists, laboratorians, and neurologists will lead to improved utilization of complex autoimmune neurology antibody testing panels.

Background: New inflammatory activity is of unclear frequency and clinical significance in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS); it is uncertain in patient cohorts with motor progression due to critical demyelinating lesions. Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the likelihood of central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory activity, assessed by new clinical relapses or active magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions, following onset of motor progression due to critical demyelinating lesions. Methods: Patients with progressive upper motor neuron impairment for ⩾1 year attributable to critical demyelinating lesions with single CNS lesion (progressive solitary sclerosis (PSS)), 2 to 5 total CNS demyelinating lesions (progressive “pauci-sclerosis” (PPS)), or >5 CNS demyelinating lesions and progressive exclusively unilateral monoparesis or hemiparesis (PUHMS) were identified. Clinical data were reviewed for acute MS relapses, and subsequent MRI was reviewed for active T1-gadolinium-enhancing or T2-demyelinating lesions. Results: None of the 91 patients (22 PSS, 40 PPS, 29 PUHMS) identified experienced clinical relapses over a median clinical follow-up of 93 months (range: 12–518 months). Nine patients (10%) developed active lesions over median 84 months radiologic follow-up (range: 12–518 months). Active lesions occurred in 24% PUHMS, 5% PSS, and 3% PPS cohorts. Conclusion: New inflammatory activity, defined by active lesions and clinical relapses following motor progression in patients with critical demyelinating lesions, is low. Disease-modifying therapies that reduce demyelinating relapses and active MRI lesions are of uncertain benefit in these cohorts.

Objective: To compare progressive motor impairment onset attributable to a “critical” central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating lesion in patients with highly restricted versus unlimited magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion burden. Methods: We identified 135 patients with progressive motor impairment for ⩾1 year attributable to a “critical” demyelinating lesion with: MRI burden of 1 lesion (“progressive solitary sclerosis”), 2–5 lesions (“progressive paucisclerosis”), or unrestricted (>5) lesions and “progressive unilateral hemiparesis.” Neuroradiology review of brain and spinal cord MRI documented unequivocally demyelinating lesions. Results: A total of 33 (24.4%) patients had progressive solitary sclerosis; 56 (41.5%) patients had progressive paucisclerosis; and 46 (34.1%) patients had progressive unilateral hemiparesis. Median age at onset of progressive motor impairment was younger in progressive solitary sclerosis (49 years; range 24–73) and progressive paucisclerosis (50 years; range 30–64) than in progressive unilateral hemiparesis (54 years; range 39–77; p = 0.02 and p = 0.003, respectively). Within progressive unilateral hemiparesis, motor-progression onset was similar between those with 4–10, 11–20, or >20 brain lesions (55, 54, 53 years of age, respectively; p = 0.44). Conclusion: Motor-progression age is similar, but paradoxically earlier, in cohorts with highly restricted CNS lesion burden than in those with unrestricted lesion burden with progressive unilateral hemiparetic MS. The “critical” demyelinating lesion rather than total brain MRI lesion burden is the major contributor to motor-progression onset in these cohorts.

Background: Progressive motor impairment anatomically attributable to prominent, focally atrophic lateral column spinal cord lesions (“critical lesions”) can be seen in multiple sclerosis (MS), for example, progressive hemiparetic MS. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether similar spinal cord lesions are more frequent in long-standing MS patients with secondary progressive motor impairment (secondary progressive MS (SPMS)) versus those maintaining a relapsing-remitting course (relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS)). Methods: We retrospectively identified Olmsted County (MN, USA) residents on 31 December 2011 with (1) RRMS or SPMS for ⩾25 years, and (2) available brain and spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A blinded neuroradiologist determined demyelinating lesion burden and presence of potential critical lesions (prominent focally atrophic spinal cord lateral column lesions). Results: In total, 32 patients were included: RRMS, 18; SPMS, 14. Median (range) disease duration (34 (27–53) vs. 39 (29–47) years) and relapse number (4 (1–10) vs. 3 (1–15)) were similar. In comparison to RRMS, SPMS patients more commonly showed potential critical spinal cord lesions (8/18 (44%) vs. 14/14 (100%)), higher spinal cord (median (range) 4 (1–7) vs. 7.5 (3–12)), and brain infratentorial (median (range) 1 (0–12) vs. 2.5 (1–13)) lesion number; p < 0.05. By multivariate analysis, only the presence of potential critical lesions independently associated with motor progression ( p = 0.02). Conclusion: Critical spinal cord lesions may be important contributors to motor progression in MS.

Background: Myelitis accompanied by a negative spinal cord MRI may lead to diagnostic uncertainty. Objective and Methods: We retrospectively investigated the frequency of negative spinal cord MRI (performed <6 weeks from onset) in Mayo Clinic patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG-associated myelitis (2000–2019). Results: The initial spinal cord MRI was negative in 7/73 (10%) patients, despite severe acute disability (median EDSS, 7 (range, 4.5–8)); myelitis symptoms/signs were frequent (paraparesis, neurogenic bladder, sensory level, Lhermitte’s phenomenon). Myelitis lesions became overt at follow-up MRI in three patients. Conclusions: A negative spinal cord MRI should not dissuade from MOG-IgG testing in patients with acute/subacute myelitis.